A rookie Cleveland cop shot and killed Tamir Rice literally seconds after arriving at a park where the 12-year-old was carrying a BB gun. In disturbing new security video, released on Wednesday by police, the unnamed police officer is seen exiting his police vehicle and almost immediately deciding to shoot the child.
A rookie officer pulled the trigger, said Jeffrey Follmer, president of the Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Association.
Police were sent to the Cudell Recreation Center at Detroit Avenue and West Boulevard about 3:30 p.m. when someone called 9-1-1 to report a "guy with a gun pointing it at people."
The caller told dispatchers twice that the gun was "probably fake," but that detail was not relayed to the responding officers, Follmer said.
Advertisement
The video was made public one day after the parents of Rice had sent out a letter asking the city’s Mayor Frank Jackson and the Cleveland Police Department to release the footage, NBC affiliate WKYC reported.
From the letter:
While we request the release of the complete video, we also ask for the media to give our family privacy as we continue to grieve and learn about what happened. We feel the actions of the patrol officer who took our son's life must be made public.
It is our prayer and request for citizens in the City of Cleveland and throughout Northeast Ohio to remain calm at this time. We ask for the public to demonstrate peacefully.
Though the hurt our family feels is too painful for words to describe, we still have faith in the justice system. We thank the community for their prayers, encouragement and support. It has helped us during this difficult time.
Officials have said that the boy was shot when he pulled the pellet gun from his pants after he was told by cops to raise his hands, although he didn’t point the gun at the officers. The video appears to show that he was shot before he would have had time to point the gun, or raise his hands, anywhere.
Well that is the thing with Ferguson. The Media and Jesse Jackson try to make a case fit facts of police brutality or overreach when it doesn't. And, instead ignore very real cases where the Police actions are questionable. Why?
Well that is the thing with Ferguson. The Media and Jesse Jackson try to make a case fit facts of police brutality or overreach when it doesn't. And, instead ignore very real cases where the Police actions are questionable. Why?
It makes no sense.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
I think that police departments need better training and procedures.
This kid was alone. He was presenting no immediate threat to anyone.
Why the immediate confrontation? Why not observe for a minute or two from the relative safety of the car?
I can't really fault the police for having to make a split second determination on whether the gun was real or not--but I do think that police resort to deadly force FAR too often when it is not required. You can't take that back.
This rookie cop probably won't be charged--but it will be a stain on his career, and even if he stays on the force, he'll have to live with it for the rest of his life.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
I think that police departments need better training and procedures.
This kid was alone. He was presenting no immediate threat to anyone.
Why the immediate confrontation? Why not observe for a minute or two from the relative safety of the car?
I can't really fault the police for having to make a split second determination on whether the gun was real or not--but I do think that police resort to deadly force FAR too often when it is not required. You can't take that back.
This rookie cop probably won't be charged--but it will be a stain on his career, and even if he stays on the force, he'll have to live with it for the rest of his life.
It was a playground with kids there, you and I were not there. Perhaps the cops were thinking of all the other kids' safety?
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
I have NO PROBLEM with BB guns. I have no problem with a 12 year old having a real gun.
Time and place seems to be the issue here.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
No he didn't deserve to die, but he did because it looked as though he had a real gun on a play ground where other children were. I don't understand why people don't or won't get that. I live in an area where guns are not scary, very much every day life. Bit I would not allow my child to take a real looking gun off our property, certainly not to a playground. People have to understand the scenario, This kid was in a playground with little kids.
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
I think that police departments need better training and procedures.
This kid was alone. He was presenting no immediate threat to anyone.
Why the immediate confrontation? Why not observe for a minute or two from the relative safety of the car?
I can't really fault the police for having to make a split second determination on whether the gun was real or not--but I do think that police resort to deadly force FAR too often when it is not required. You can't take that back.
This rookie cop probably won't be charged--but it will be a stain on his career, and even if he stays on the force, he'll have to live with it for the rest of his life.
It was a playground with kids there, you and I were not there. Perhaps the cops were thinking of all the other kids' safety?
Then firing a weapon is not really thinking of that.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
the officers responded correctly--you aren't required to let yourself be shot in the line of duty--the weapon doesn't know if it's being held by a twelve-year old, a woman, a grown man, etc.--and the officer would be just as dead
__________________
" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke
No he didn't deserve to die, but he did because it looked as though he had a real gun on a play ground where other children were. I don't understand why people don't or won't get that. I live in an area where guns are not scary, very much every day life. Bit I would not allow my child to take a real looking gun off our property, certainly not to a playground. People have to understand the scenario, This kid was in a playground with little kids.
And that's ridiculous. Kids should be able to play with their toys outside without fear of getting shot.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
So we should immediately shoot everyone carrying a gun? I grew up in rural Pa. Men walked thru town carrying hunting rifles. And what about 2nd amendment rights? Anyone simply carrying a gun is a threat? This is why the media doesn't pickup this story. Then the cops can simply shoot eeveryone with a visible weapon.
the officers responded correctly--you aren't required to let yourself be shot in the line of duty--the weapon doesn't know if it's being held by a twelve-year old, a woman, a grown man, etc.--and the officer would be just as dead
So they can mow down anyone and claim fear? What danger were they in? There was no gun other than a BB gun.
the officers responded correctly--you aren't required to let yourself be shot in the line of duty--the weapon doesn't know if it's being held by a twelve-year old, a woman, a grown man, etc.--and the officer would be just as dead
How would the officer be "dead"??? It was not a real gun.
There was no immediate threat to anyone and no reason for an immediate confrontation.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
we weren't there--they had been informed via a 911 dispatch that the kid was armed--if you've seen photos of the weapon, it's a pretty genuine replica of the real thing--minus the red tip, of course--were they quick to react ? yes but if it had indeed been a real weapon, pretty decent chance ( given the range ) that one or both of them would have / could have been shot--a close call either way
__________________
" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke
2 kids were shot today by a 12 year old on their neighborhood playground. Officers responding to a 9-1-1 call arrived and watched from their car for a few minutes to assess the situation. The officers said they saw a man on the playground with what looked like a hand gun but wanted to wait a minute to see what he would do. That is when the shooter fired his weapon hitting one. The officers then made their out of the car and attempted to get close enough to use the stun gun but before they could the shooter fired again. That is when the officers decided to take drastic action and shoot the shooter.
So there is a scenario. What about that report?
The very first thing any of you saying "they could have waited" would want to know why they waited.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
we weren't there--they had been informed via a 911 dispatch that the kid was armed--if you've seen photos of the weapon, it's a pretty genuine replica of the real thing--minus the red tip, of course--were they quick to react ? yes but if it had indeed been a real weapon, pretty decent chance ( given the range ) that one or both of them would have / could have been shot--a close call either way
So what if someone is " armed"? Is it illegal to carry a gun?
I don't care what the Police " thought". He was breaking no law. They could have parked a distance and talked to him with a bull horn. They gave him no chance at all.
But I am pointing out that you nor I have ever been in that situation and we have no right to say what they should or shouldn't do in them. You want them there unless you don't. Then you don't want them to do anything until you want them to.
They are there to serve and protect the greater good.
Why is this 12 year old out with a bb gun in a park. Any parent would know that is not the place to have one.
I am sorry this child died. I am not going to say the police at the bad guys.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
we weren't there--they had been informed via a 911 dispatch that the kid was armed--if you've seen photos of the weapon, it's a pretty genuine replica of the real thing--minus the red tip, of course--were they quick to react ? yes but if it had indeed been a real weapon, pretty decent chance ( given the range ) that one or both of them would have / could have been shot--a close call either way
So it's illegal to carry a gun? Is that the new standard? Everyone who has a weapon should be shot?
Maybe a 12 year old shouldn't have a real gun--and he DIDN'T--but it's a RIDICULOUS standard to say that everyone who carries a gun should be shot.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
You know what? I would not want to be a police officer. That kid was waving the gun around and pointing it at people before the police were called. They had no clue what they were dealing with. Unfortunately a kid is dead. An out of control, dumb kid. I hate to say it, but his actions had consequences and in this case it was death. I can't fault the officer.
I had guns too at 12. I have no problem with guns.
But there is a difference in having one on the way to the woods or in your yard or something like that and being in a park with kids around pointing it at people.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I have to tell you that I live in a very nice community 30 miles north of Cleveland and 9 guns have been stolen by high school kids in my city. 7 of them have been recovered with the serial numbers sawed off. 2 are still missing. Many homes and cars have been broken into. Yeah, I take this seriously and so do the police. 2 guns are still out there in the hands of kids. This is close to home for me. My youngest son is currently sitting in the juvenile detention center and he needs to be there. It breaks my heart to say that but it is what it is. Happy Thanksgiving!
the officers responded correctly--you aren't required to let yourself be shot in the line of duty--the weapon doesn't know if it's being held by a twelve-year old, a woman, a grown man, etc.--and the officer would be just as dead
So they can mow down anyone and claim fear? What danger were they in? There was no gun other than a BB gun.
Explain to me how the officers could have known it was a bb gun, not a 9mm automatic?
It did NOT have the orange tip at the end of the barrel. It LOOKED exactly like the 9mm automatic.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
Being a threat. Waving a gun around and pointing it people. They asked him to put it down and he didn't. He got shot. He could have just put it down and he would be alive. That's on him.
They shot him within 2 SECONDS of pulling in. A 12 yr old kid who was confused when the cop pulled up screaming and did not react quickly enough in less than 2 sec deserved to be executed for what exactly?