According to the New Mexico lottery, John Wines didn’t actually win the $500,000 he scratched off from his purchased ticket. He was told that it was a “misprint” and he wasn’t entitled to the money.
Wines purchased the scratch-off ticket from a Shell gas station in Roswell, New Mexico. After scratching off the ticket he realized he had multiple winning numbers adding up to over $500,000, more than double the max payout of $250,000 for the ticket.
When Wines brought his ticket in to claim his winnings, he was told his ticket wasn’t actually a winner. Hetold the local NBC affiliate:
“I took it back in, and she told me that is not a winner. They told me that it was a misprint, and they don’t pay off for misprints.”
Hold the phone, so this man paid good money for a ticket that just happened to be a “misprint” of colossal winnings and they conveniently say they won’t pay it out?
Well, yes. That’s exactly what happened.
Wines then decided to contact the New Mexico Lottery and they responded:
“We did find a flaw in that particular pack of tickets, and it’s been reported to our printer. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I did complete a reconstruction of your ticket, and it was not a winner.”
Um, “thanks for bringing this to our attention”??
Wines told NBC:
“If it was $50 or $75, I would not think a thing about it, but this was $500,000. That’s a half million.”
As a consolation prize, the New Mexico Lottery supposedly offered Wines $100 worth of new tickets.
“I mean, if you thought you won $500,000 and somebody tells you that you didn’t, and you can prove to them you did, it’s pretty stressful for somebody to say, ‘no you’re not getting your money’. It’s like I told them, I didn’t misprint it. I bought the ticket in good faith thinking if I won I was going to get my money. And they told me no, they absolutely, positively, told me no.”
What do you think — should Wines receive the winnings or settle for the excuse that it was a “misprint”?
__________________
I'm the Ginger Rogers of spelling...that means I'm smat.
Lesson learned in February: I don't have to keep up, I just have to keep moving!
But there is probably some clause in 3 point type in their rules saying that they don't have to pay for printer errors, or any other cr@p reason, or if they just don't feel like it.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
Man Buys Winning Lotto Ticket Then Told He Didn’t Win – Do You Think He Deserves The Cash?
________________________________________________________________________
no--and he wasn't told he won--the state isn't obligated to pay any " winnings " claimed with a defective ticket
__________________
" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke
If you look at the ticket, it is clearly a misprint. Beside the number ones, there are the beginning of other numbers, they are just no complete. Yes, at first glance it looks like he won, but he didn't...
And to keep people from cheating, they have a code for each number. The codes do not say ONE. One reads ET(last letter not printed), but it is clearly and 18.
-- Edited by Ohfour on Tuesday 6th of January 2015 11:36:33 AM
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
"If you look at the ticket, it is clearly a misprint. Beside the number ones, there are the beginning of other numbers, they are just no complete. Yes, at first glance it looks like he won, but he didn't...
And to keep people from cheating, they have a code for each number. The codes do not say ONE. One reads ET(last letter not printed), but it is clearly and 18." - Ohfour
There was no ticket to look at in the OP, so I was unaware of the actual printed evidence on the ticket. Upon further research and actually seeing an image of the ticket, his ticket doesn't meet my criteria (If, when scratched, the uncovered area matches the criteria of a win, that shouldn't be called a misprint), it's clearly a "18" with half of the 8 missing. It's not a "1". And the second one looks like a "13" with a little more than half of the "3" missing.
I rescind my previous statement of "he definitely deserves his winnings".
"If you look at the ticket, it is clearly a misprint. Beside the number ones, there are the beginning of other numbers, they are just no complete. Yes, at first glance it looks like he won, but he didn't...
And to keep people from cheating, they have a code for each number. The codes do not say ONE. One reads ET(last letter not printed), but it is clearly and 18." - Ohfour
There was no ticket to look at in the OP, so I was unaware of the actual printed evidence on the ticket. Upon further research and actually seeing an image of the ticket, his ticket doesn't meet my criteria (If, when scratched, the uncovered area matches the criteria of a win, that shouldn't be called a misprint), it's clearly a "18" with half of the 8 missing. It's not a "1". And the second one looks like a "13" with a little more than half of the "3" missing.
I rescind my previous statement of "he definitely deserves his winnings".
Ah well, if that's the case. I hate stupid articles that don't give the real information.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
No, he didn't fake the ticket. It was printed badly, but (looking at the picture) it's obvious that where he's seeing a "1 " the ticket actually has a "13" or a "18" that was printed badly.
So he gets his 15 minutes of fame, and maybe they will refund the price he paid for the ticket.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.