A commuter train struck an SUV that was stuck on the tracks in a suburban New York community during the afternoon rush hour Tuesday, killing the car's driver and six passengers on board the train.
The crash, which was the deadliest incident in the history of the Metro-North rail system, sent hundreds of passengers scrambling for safety. Authorities said the impact was so forceful the electrified third rail came up and pierced the train.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
"You have seven people who started out today to go about their business and aren't going to be making it home tonight," New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo told a press conference late Tuesday.
Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino said that 12 people were injured, 10 of them seriously, and described the train as "completely charred and burned."
"I am amazed anyone got off that train alive," Astorino added. "It must have been pure panic, with the flames, the third rail and the smoke."
Authorities said the railroad crossing gates had come down on top of the Jeep Cherokee, which had stopped on the train tracks. The female driver got out to inspect the vehicle and got back into it to drive away when it was struck at around 6:30 p.m. local time, approximately 45 minutes after departing New York's Grand Central Station.
Rick Hope told WNYW that he was in his car directly behind the Jeep when it was struck by the train. He said he had started to back up his car to give the woman room to also back up but when she got back into the Jeep she moved forward into the path of the oncoming train.
"It looks like where she stopped she did not want to go on the tracks but the proximity of the gate to her car, you know, it was dark -- maybe she didn't know she was in front of the gate," Hope said.
"I am amazed anyone got off that train alive."
- Rob Astorino, Westchester County Executive
The train shoved the SUV about 10 train car lengths as smoke poured out of the scorched front rail car, its windows blackened. It was unclear how fast the train was going, but the maximum would be 60 mph, a railroad official said.
Passengers on the train said they felt a jolt, then heard a huge explosion.
"I was horrified — the crash and the flames," passenger Devon Champagne told the New York Post. "I thought I was going to die for a minute. It was the scariest moment of my life."
The paper reported that some tried to reach passengers in the first car of the train, which sustained the heaviest damage.
"They were basically trapped in there with the fire," said passenger Jamie Wallace. "A few of us in my car tried to break the glass so we could get through, but to no avail."
More than 750 passengers were likely aboard the train. About 400 passengers got off from the rear of the train and taken to a nearby rock climbing gym for shelter. Buses were headed there to pick them up and take them to their destinations.
All railroad grade crossings have gate arms that are designed to lift automatically if they strike a vehicle no the way down, railroad safety consultant Grady Cothen said. The arms are made of wood and are designed to be easily broken if a car trapped between them moves forward or backward, he said.
Metro-North is the nation's second-busiest railroad, after the Long Island Rail Road. It was formed in 1983 and serves about 280,000 riders a day in New York and Connecticut. Service on its Harlem Line was suspended between Pleasantville and North White Plains after the crash.
Metro-North has had many recent accidents. Late last year, the National Transportation Safety Board issued rulings on five accidents that occurred in New York and Connecticut in 2013 and 2014, repeatedly finding fault with the railroad while also noting that conditions have improved.
Among the accidents was a Dec. 1, 2013, derailment that killed four people, the railroad's first passenger fatalities, in the Bronx. The NTSB said the engineer had fallen asleep at the controls because he had a severe, undiagnosed case of sleep apnea.
It is horrible. I still worry about rail crossings. There are some around here that don't even have the drop rails but just an X. Most people don't slow down, look or anything but just barrel across the tracks. I have also seen people driving around them or ignoring red flashing lights.
That is horrible. Many years ago I crossed a railroad track but because of a red light ahead up the road my rear bumper was still in the path of the track. Then a train came. I had only two options. Floor it & hit the vehicle in front of me & hope I pushed them forward enough to get off the track or get hit by the train. Luckily the guy in front of me realized what was about to happen & he drove his truck sideways into the ditch so I could move forward. It was terrifying. Now I don't cross the tracks if I don't think there is enough clearance.
If the lights are flashing red, I stop and sit there. And, if people want to drive around me, have it. You cannot estimate the speed of a train as easily as you think you can. So if it is flashing and the gates haven't dropped, I still stop and wait. Why take any chances to save 5 minutes?
If the lights are flashing red, I stop and sit there. And, if people want to drive around me, have it. You cannot estimate the speed of a train as easily as you think you can. So if it is flashing and the gates haven't dropped, I still stop and wait. Why take any chances to save 5 minutes?
If the stop light is red even if the train lights aren't flashing I don't cross the track until the light turns green & I know I have room to clear the track. There is always some impatient jerk honking at me to cross. I am not going to move up just because they are honking & really where do they think they are going if the light is red?
Unprotected crossing. Wayne was in the lead car, we had company.
And I was following, in my Jeep.
He went through, and so did I, without looking first.
I'm glad I didn't see the train, until after I was over the tracks. My Jeep was a 5-speed. I might have had a panic attack, and stalled the darn thing.
I just saw the news report on this. The evidence is pointing to her starting over the tracks and the cross bar came down on top of her car, just about where the lift gate on the SUV is.
Said she couldn't go on.
I don't know why she couldn't.
What a tragic and stupid decision that driver made.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I just saw the news report on this. The evidence is pointing to her starting over the tracks and the cross bar came down on top of her car, just about where the lift gate on the SUV is.
Said she couldn't go on.
I don't know why she couldn't.
What a tragic and stupid decision that driver made.
It' s hard to say. Maybe something prevented her car from moving. Or, she just thought she could quickly jump out of the car, lift off the gate and then proceed. Obviously, she was wrong.
Steam locomotives (remember them from the movies?) had a wedge-shaped structure (called a "cow catcher") on the front that would pick up any large object on the tracks (usually a "cow" ) so it wouldn't get under the wheels and derail the train.
Maybe all commuter trains should have the same thing, but call it a "SUV catcher"?
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
I just saw the news report on this. The evidence is pointing to her starting over the tracks and the cross bar came down on top of her car, just about where the lift gate on the SUV is.
Said she couldn't go on.
I don't know why she couldn't.
What a tragic and stupid decision that driver made.
It' s hard to say. Maybe something prevented her car from moving. Or, she just thought she could quickly jump out of the car, lift off the gate and then proceed. Obviously, she was wrong.
I think this is what happened and she panicked. Why she got back in her car we will never know.
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
I just saw the news report on this. The evidence is pointing to her starting over the tracks and the cross bar came down on top of her car, just about where the lift gate on the SUV is.
Said she couldn't go on.
I don't know why she couldn't.
What a tragic and stupid decision that driver made.
It' s hard to say. Maybe something prevented her car from moving. Or, she just thought she could quickly jump out of the car, lift off the gate and then proceed. Obviously, she was wrong.
Today on the news they are saying the arm was probably broken because it's built to immediately raise up if it touches anything at all. Also, there was not enough time from when the arm went down to when the train came by. There is a certain number of seconds they are supposed to have so that cars can get out of the way. This crossing was only 20 seconds. Her family may have quite a case on their hands. The expert I heard talking said this was the most poorly designed crossing he has seen in years.
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
at times difficult to judge distance at a locomotive crossing ( especially at night ) and the speed of an oncoming train--why risk it ?
she probably got caught inside the crossbar and panicked--regardless, will probably end-up being driver error not conductor error
Roger that.
Sadly, from what I read, she got out of the Jeep, to look for damage.
And, instead of walking away, she got back in. And tried to drive it off the tracks.
If she had just kept walking, she'd still be alive.
One less life could have been lost.
The only smart thing to do if the crossing arm is trapping your car on the tracks, is, HIT THE GAS .
I disagree. The only smart thing to do is abandon ship.
I used to think this and wondered why people stayed in the car, until this article. Would you leave the car if you thought it could killed a number of people?
-- Edited by cadiver on Thursday 5th of February 2015 03:34:11 PM
at times difficult to judge distance at a locomotive crossing ( especially at night ) and the speed of an oncoming train--why risk it ?
she probably got caught inside the crossbar and panicked--regardless, will probably end-up being driver error not conductor error
Roger that.
Sadly, from what I read, she got out of the Jeep, to look for damage.
And, instead of walking away, she got back in. And tried to drive it off the tracks.
If she had just kept walking, she'd still be alive.
One less life could have been lost.
The only smart thing to do if the crossing arm is trapping your car on the tracks, is, HIT THE GAS .
I disagree. The only smart thing to do is abandon ship.
I used to think this and wondered why people stayed in the car, until this article. Would you leave the car if you thought it could killed a number of people?
-- Edited by cadiver on Thursday 5th of February 2015 03:34:11 PM
Its what we were taught to do in driver's training.
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
at times difficult to judge distance at a locomotive crossing ( especially at night ) and the speed of an oncoming train--why risk it ?
she probably got caught inside the crossbar and panicked--regardless, will probably end-up being driver error not conductor error
Roger that.
Sadly, from what I read, she got out of the Jeep, to look for damage.
And, instead of walking away, she got back in. And tried to drive it off the tracks.
If she had just kept walking, she'd still be alive.
One less life could have been lost.
The only smart thing to do if the crossing arm is trapping your car on the tracks, is, HIT THE GAS .
I disagree. The only smart thing to do is abandon ship.
I used to think this and wondered why people stayed in the car, until this article. Would you leave the car if you thought it could killed a number of people?
-- Edited by cadiver on Thursday 5th of February 2015 03:34:11 PM
Its what we were taught to do in driver's training.
Yes, but if the engine is running, and the only thing keeping the car on the tracks is that wooden gate, just break the gate with the front of the car. Or break the one behind the car. They're not very strong.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
I agree, but that is a tough thing to do for some people . They dont' want to break the law or break something so they think they might have time to correct the situation without doing that. It is hard to educate people to even save themselves if they are stickler for the rules.