This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to colleagues, clients or customers, use the Reprints tool at the top of any article or order a reprint of this article now.
Dr. Oz tells critics: No conflict of interest on my TV show
April 17, 2015 by THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Dr. Mehmet Oz is defending himself against 10 doctors who've accused him of promoting "quack treatments" on his TV show.
Oz said in a statement Friday that his show provides "multiple points of view" including his own.
He added that his own views are offered "without conflict of interest."
A group of 10 doctors sent a letter to Columbia University this week urging the university to remove Oz from its faculty. They accused Oz of an "egregious lack of integrity."
The lead author was Dr. Henry Miller, a senior research fellow at Stanford's Hoover Institution.
A Columbia spokesman said the school is "committed to the principle of academic freedom."
Oz is vice chairman of Columbia's surgery department and still occasionally teaches. He also performs heart surgery at Columbia's affiliated hospital.
This was only a matter of time IMO. I'm surprised that someone hasn't sued him yet. He promotes unsafe and totally unproven methods. He's a quack. I don't care if people like him and think he has a great personality or whatever. 99.9 percent of what he says is crap.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
This was only a matter of time IMO. I'm surprised that someone hasn't sued him yet. He promotes unsafe and totally unproven methods. He's a quack. I don't care if people like him and think he has a great personality or whatever. 99.9 percent of what he says is crap.
This was only a matter of time IMO. I'm surprised that someone hasn't sued him yet. He promotes unsafe and totally unproven methods. He's a quack. I don't care if people like him and think he has a great personality or whatever. 99.9 percent of what he says is crap.
Cuz good looking "doctors" must be smart, right?
flan
Exactly. And he's not even that good looking to me.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
There have been COUNTLESS studies done showing that good-looking people get preferential treatment.
flan
What does that have to do with people following quack medicine? If people are choosing to follow his advice just because they think he is attractive ( I do not ), then why isn't that their own fault?
You are blaming his looks for other people's gullibility.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
There have been COUNTLESS studies done showing that good-looking people get preferential treatment.
flan
What does that have to do with people following quack medicine? If people are choosing to follow his advice just because they think he is attractive ( I do not ), then why isn't that their own fault?
You are blaming his looks for other people's gullibility.
If he was ugly he wouldn't be a TV personality & wouldn't be spreading his quackery. I agree people are gullible.
There have been COUNTLESS studies done showing that good-looking people get preferential treatment.
flan
What does that have to do with people following quack medicine? If people are choosing to follow his advice just because they think he is attractive ( I do not ), then why isn't that their own fault?
You are blaming his looks for other people's gullibility.
If he was ugly he wouldn't be a TV personality & wouldn't be spreading his quackery. I agree people are gullible.
There have been COUNTLESS studies done showing that good-looking people get preferential treatment.
flan
What does that have to do with people following quack medicine? If people are choosing to follow his advice just because they think he is attractive ( I do not ), then why isn't that their own fault?
You are blaming his looks for other people's gullibility.
If he was ugly he wouldn't be a TV personality & wouldn't be spreading his quackery. I agree people are gullible.
I don't trust doctors that spend more time on TV than in a hospital, just like I don't trust rich pastors.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.