TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Dear Prudie: Should I Take Mistress's Money?


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Dear Prudie: Should I Take Mistress's Money?
Permalink  
 


Dear Prudence,
My former best friend slept with my husband. To save our marriage, we cut off all ties with her and her family. Reconciliation with my husband has been painful but rewarding. Recently, my husband and I received legal notifications that she had established two very generous college funds for our young daughters. We (especially I) want nothing to do with her or her guilt money; her behavior feels so manipulative. But by refusing the college funds, I’m worried I’m being a bad mother, making my girls’ college careers less certain. Would it be petty to turn down her money?

—Tuition Turmoil

Dear Turmoil,
It’s all of a piece that a woman who would sleep with her best friend’s husband would also think it appropriate to set up college funds for the betrayed friend’s daughters, presumably to launder away her guilt. (Let me throw in a condemnation of your husband here, too. His violation was the greater, and he is lucky you were willing to give him another chance.) I understand your wanting to tell her to take her foul funds back, and if that’s what you decide, communicate this through a lawyer so you don’t get drawn into having actual discussions with her. But I am going to suggest you keep the dough. Our civil court system uses money as a form of compensation for injury or loss. Sure, there was no legal finding here, but your friend shattered your world and destroyed your trust. The money won’t undo that, but it will make your life easier when the tuition bills come due. If you’re able to think to yourself, “Damn right, you owe me!” then take the money and don’t dwell on its origin. Of course, if she tries to use it as an opening to re-establish contact, your lawyer should be in touch with hers to clarify that there are no conditions on the money, and there will be no reconciliation. Because even if she funds an academic study of friendship and betrayal in your name, you will never speak to her again.

—Prudie



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Give Me Grand's!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13802
Date:
Permalink  
 

Wow! Now that takes some balls to set up a college fund to erase your guilt. I bet she really believes it will work in her favor.
What a freakin' loser.
I'm not sure I could accept tainted money. It just seems like it would degrade me all over again. Since it is going to the kids, that might make it easier though.
And the biotch does need to pay for her infidelity with her former friends DH, more in the form of roasting her over a bed of hot coals type of thing though.
After thinking about it, take the money. LW does not have to actually touch the money and it will lessen financial burdens for the kids.

__________________

I drink coffee so I don't kill you.

I quilt so I don't kill you.

Do you see a theme?

Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Money ALWAYS comes with strings attached. Either physically, mentally, emotionally or spiritually. Just say no and Hell no.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Owl drink to that!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4799
Date:
Permalink  
 

I wouldn't take it. I personally wouldn't need the money bad enough to even consider the emotional implications.

__________________

Was it a bad day?

Or was it a bad five minutes that you milked all day?



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

I would never tell the kids where the money came from.

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

I wouldn't have too because I wouldn't take it. I pay my own way through life. I don't need handouts.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Give Me Grand's!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13802
Date:
Permalink  
 

I wouldn't think of the money as a handout, but more a restitution. The kids never need to know and the lawyer can handle all contact.
Why burden yourself financially if some idiot gives you money that you may need?
Not everyone is financially well off and I can see Prudies point.

__________________

I drink coffee so I don't kill you.

I quilt so I don't kill you.

Do you see a theme?

Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well, I see so many people who let other people fund their lives and then complain because they are beholden to them. I seriously doubt this is going to be freely given with no strings. Most money is not.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Give Me Grand's!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13802
Date:
Permalink  
 

If there are strings attached, then she can easily refuse. That would be the lawyers job.
I really don't see a problem with accepting the money if no strings are attached.
Think of it as winning the lottery. Woo Hoo, now get out of my face.

__________________

I drink coffee so I don't kill you.

I quilt so I don't kill you.

Do you see a theme?

Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4189
Date:
Permalink  
 

just Czech wrote:

I wouldn't think of the money as a handout, but more a restitution. The kids never need to know and the lawyer can handle all contact.
Why burden yourself financially if some idiot gives you money that you may need?
Not everyone is financially well off and I can see Prudies point.


 I'm with Czech. Take the money. But, make sure there are no stipulations spelled out. If there are not, any "strings" would be of your own doing. If some idiot wants to give me money, I'll take it. If they have some feeling towards it, that's their issue, not mine. 



__________________

Faith makes things possible, not easy



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Do you really want to take money from a former best friend who slept with your husband to pay for your kids? I mean really? I know that it's all about the Money nowadays but seems we would still have some standards. Maybe not.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Like watching "It's a Wonderful Life'. The point when George Bailey is offered to sell out to Mr Potter and Mr. Potter offers him a job as his manager and opportunity to make bank and travel the world. But, George refuses on principal. But if you made that movie today, that would be the end of the movie and we would see George in a designer suit traveling first class with his wife in furs.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Money ALWAYS comes with strings attached. Either physically, mentally, emotionally or spiritually. Just say no and Hell no.


 Yeah.  Prudie is being completely ridiculous on that point.  Its obvious the "friend" wants to use this money to start some type of reconciliation.  Its not just a random gift.  The LW needs go decline or accept it based on that.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Thanks dad for having an affair so I can get my college paid for!  biggrin



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Divine Geek wrote:
just Czech wrote:

I wouldn't think of the money as a handout, but more a restitution. The kids never need to know and the lawyer can handle all contact.
Why burden yourself financially if some idiot gives you money that you may need?
Not everyone is financially well off and I can see Prudies point.


 I'm with Czech. Take the money. But, make sure there are no stipulations spelled out. If there are not, any "strings" would be of your own doing. If some idiot wants to give me money, I'll take it. If they have some feeling towards it, that's their issue, not mine. 


 That's exactly what the loser boyfriends on Judge Judy say about taking money from their single mom girlfriends who are barely getting by, themselves.  "Well, if someone is going to give me money, I'm not going to turn it down."  

 

BS.  Either decline it, or realize the conditions it comes with.  Forgiveness is an option--although whether a bribed one is sincere, or not is a fair point.  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Divine Geek wrote:
just Czech wrote:

I wouldn't think of the money as a handout, but more a restitution. The kids never need to know and the lawyer can handle all contact.
Why burden yourself financially if some idiot gives you money that you may need?
Not everyone is financially well off and I can see Prudies point.


 I'm with Czech. Take the money. But, make sure there are no stipulations spelled out. If there are not, any "strings" would be of your own doing. If some idiot wants to give me money, I'll take it. If they have some feeling towards it, that's their issue, not mine. 


 That's exactly what the loser boyfriends on Judge Judy say about taking money from their single mom girlfriends who are barely getting by, themselves.  "Well, if someone is going to give me money, I'm not going to turn it down."  

 

BS.  Either decline it, or realize the conditions it comes with.  Forgiveness is an option--although whether a bribed one is sincere, or not is a fair point.  


Yes, and it makes those men less than who they should be. 



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

I want to know what kind of account? Is this the kind of account that will keep her active in thier lives? Or did she really just set it up and you never have to talk to her again.

This may be her way of holding on to this family.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 198
Date:
Permalink  
 

My first thought in no way in hell!

But I would get a lawyer and get him to ask "what are the conditions/strings attached?" Cause you there will be.

Then I would submit a list of conditions a mile long with the ability to add more as I see fit. First and foremost. You/your family will have no contact my family.



-- Edited by Whenitrains on Friday 24th of April 2015 03:24:16 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

I want to know what kind of account? Is this the kind of account that will keep her active in thier lives? Or did she really just set it up and you never have to talk to her again.

This may be her way of holding on to this family.


 Of course it is.  She is trying to buy forgiveness.  Accepting the money implies it is given.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

I want to know what kind of account? Is this the kind of account that will keep her active in thier lives? Or did she really just set it up and you never have to talk to her again.

This may be her way of holding on to this family.


 Of course it is.  She is trying to buy forgiveness.  Accepting the money implies it is given.


 Implications can be assertively denied. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

I could take the money, forgive her, and still not have her in my life. At least in a perfect world.

__________________


Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

just Czech wrote:

I wouldn't think of the money as a handout, but more a restitution. The kids never need to know and the lawyer can handle all contact.
Why burden yourself financially if some idiot gives you money that you may need?
Not everyone is financially well off and I can see Prudies point.


 All of this.  I would take the money in a heartbeat.



__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

I want to know what kind of account? Is this the kind of account that will keep her active in thier lives? Or did she really just set it up and you never have to talk to her again.

This may be her way of holding on to this family.


 Ok I amend my response.  I would only take the money if no strings attached.



__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

I know what to do_sometimes wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

I want to know what kind of account? Is this the kind of account that will keep her active in thier lives? Or did she really just set it up and you never have to talk to her again.

This may be her way of holding on to this family.


 Ok I amend my response.  I would only take the money if no strings attached.


 I mean, do they have to contact her to take the money out?  That kind of thing.  Or, will they be able to walk into the bank at 18 and say, "please give me my money."?



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

I want to know what kind of account? Is this the kind of account that will keep her active in thier lives? Or did she really just set it up and you never have to talk to her again.

This may be her way of holding on to this family.


 Of course it is.  She is trying to buy forgiveness.  Accepting the money implies it is given.


 Implications can be assertively denied. 


 Then I'm betting the money offer will be withdrawn.  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

I want to know what kind of account? Is this the kind of account that will keep her active in thier lives? Or did she really just set it up and you never have to talk to her again.

This may be her way of holding on to this family.


 Of course it is.  She is trying to buy forgiveness.  Accepting the money implies it is given.


 Implications can be assertively denied. 


 Then I'm betting the money offer will be withdrawn.  


 She actually does need to forgive her.  Not for the mistress' sake but for her own.  But forgiveness does not mean letting her back in her life.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think one thing I would be weary of is the mistress contacting the girls when they are in college to let them know that Auntie Skank paid for their schools.

__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

I want to know what kind of account? Is this the kind of account that will keep her active in thier lives? Or did she really just set it up and you never have to talk to her again.

This may be her way of holding on to this family.


 Of course it is.  She is trying to buy forgiveness.  Accepting the money implies it is given.


 Implications can be assertively denied. 


 Then I'm betting the money offer will be withdrawn.  


 She actually does need to forgive her.  Not for the mistress' sake but for her own.  But forgiveness does not mean letting her back in her life.


 But that is the string that is attached.  It couldn't be more obvious.  Prudie and others are naive beyond belief to think that isn't the case.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

The mistress is not the problem child. Her husband is the one who made the vows. Hello.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

The mistress is not the problem child. Her husband is the one who made the vows. Hello.


 So, if your best friend sleeps with your husband, that's ALL his fault?  She is not to blame?  Bull. 

 

Of course, he is a problem - but so is she.  Pretending otherwise is ridiculous.  She betrayed her friend and slept with a married man.  Either of those are terrible on their own - both of them together are heinous.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

The husband has the greater responsibility to you.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

The husband has the greater responsibility to you.


So?  That doesn't mean anything in context to what SHE did. 

And she has a bigger investment in her husband also - a marriage, children, etc. which give her more incentive to forgive him. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

The husband has the greater responsibility to you.


So?  That doesn't mean anything in context to what SHE did. 

And she has a bigger investment in her husband also - a marriage, children, etc. which give her more incentive to forgive him. 


 But he still committed the greater wrong--yet she can forgive him.  It's illogical.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

The husband has the greater responsibility to you.


So?  That doesn't mean anything in context to what SHE did. 

And she has a bigger investment in her husband also - a marriage, children, etc. which give her more incentive to forgive him. 


HE transgressed THEIR vows.  I find it bizarre that women get soooo angry at the mistress instead of their own husbands.  Ridiculous. 



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

The husband has the greater responsibility to you.


So?  That doesn't mean anything in context to what SHE did. 

And she has a bigger investment in her husband also - a marriage, children, etc. which give her more incentive to forgive him. 


HE transgressed THEIR vows.  I find it bizarre that women get soooo angry at the mistress instead of their own husbands.  Ridiculous. 


 Yeah, mainly--although in this case she was also the LW's friend so the betrayal is pretty big there, also.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yes but the biggest betrayer is him.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3029
Date:
Permalink  
 

Since forgiveness does not require forgetfulness, I say take the money, but transfer it to an account the former Mistress has no access to.

__________________


Nothing's Impossible

Status: Offline
Posts: 16913
Date:
Permalink  
 

Take the money. Donate it to someone else.

__________________

A person's a person no matter how small.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Yes but the biggest betrayer is him.


 Again, So??????  Why does that matter?  This is not about comparing blame - this is about what SHE did. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

The husband has the greater responsibility to you.


So?  That doesn't mean anything in context to what SHE did. 

And she has a bigger investment in her husband also - a marriage, children, etc. which give her more incentive to forgive him. 


 But he still committed the greater wrong--yet she can forgive him.  It's illogical.


 I don't think so.  In the scheme of things, your spouse is supposed to be THE most important person in your life - if you are going to forgive anyone, it should be them.  Plus, if you have kids, keeping the family together is incentive for forgiveness.  But, forgiveness usually comes long before trust returns. 

This woman is an outsider to the family - there is no incentive to keep her in their lives.  Plus, reconciliation with the husband would be impossible with the constant reminder of his mistress around, I would think. And trust would absolutely impossible. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Yes but the biggest betrayer is him.


 Again, So??????  Why does that matter?  This is not about comparing blame - this is about what SHE did. 


The Blame fall squarely on him. 



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Like women who shoot the mistress in a rage of jealousy. Shoot him, he is the one that cheated, not her.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Yes but the biggest betrayer is him.


 Again, So??????  Why does that matter?  This is not about comparing blame - this is about what SHE did. 


The Blame fall squarely on him. 


 It takes TWO.  This was her BEST FRIEND - are you kidding me?????



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Like women who shoot the mistress in a rage of jealousy. Shoot him, he is the one that cheated, not her.


 Women who sleep with men when they know they are married are horrid.  Absolutely horrid. 

 

That does NOT mean the men are not equally or greater douchebags. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Like women who shoot the mistress in a rage of jealousy. Shoot him, he is the one that cheated, not her.


 Women who sleep with men when they know they are married are horrid.  Absolutely horrid. 

 

That does NOT mean the men are not equally or greater douchebags. 


Friends come and go.  The friend did not make a life long commitment to her.  He did.



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well, Gaga - if your husband ever sleeps with your best friend, you are more than welcome to continue staying friends with her. You would be nuts - but it's your call.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Like women who shoot the mistress in a rage of jealousy. Shoot him, he is the one that cheated, not her.


 Women who sleep with men when they know they are married are horrid.  Absolutely horrid. 

 

That does NOT mean the men are not equally or greater douchebags. 


Friends come and go.  The friend did not make a life long commitment to her.  He did.


 Ah well, here is the disconnect.  My friends rarely come and go - they are like family.  I keep them and I love them.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

Well, Gaga - if your husband ever sleeps with your best friend, you are more than welcome to continue staying friends with her. You would be nuts - but it's your call.


Where did I say that?  Now you are being ridiculous.  Yes, I would tell her to Go to Hell.  But, I would feel more anger and betrayal at him. 



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Yes but the biggest betrayer is him.


 Again, So??????  Why does that matter?  This is not about comparing blame - this is about what SHE did. 


The Blame fall squarely on him. 


 It takes TWO.  This was her BEST FRIEND - are you kidding me?????


 It doesn't take Two.   The lifelong commitment was from him and him alone.  It only takes one.  HE transgressed.  Who cares about the friend?  She can go pound salt.  Obviously she wasn't a friend. 



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

I know what to do_sometimes wrote:

I think one thing I would be weary of is the mistress contacting the girls when they are in college to let them know that Auntie Skank paid for their schools.


 Can I just say that I love the name "Auntie Skank?"

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.

1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard