One of three men who kidnapped 26 schoolchildren and their bus driver, then buried them alive in an underground bunker, was granted parole after nearly 40 years in prison.
James Schoenfeld, 63, applied for parole 20 times before he finally received initial approval on Wednesday, the Los Angeles Times reports.
In 1976, Schoenfeld, his brother Richard and their friend Frederick Woods kidnapped a bus full of children from Chowchilla, California, and buried them, as well as their driver, inside a moving van beneath a rock quarry near Livermore, California.
They planned to ransom the children, who were ages 5 to 14, for $5 million after suffering losses on a real estate project, according to the Times.
But the victims managed to escape, clawing their way to freedom after 16 hours underground while the three took a nap, the Associated Press reports.
The men were arrested a week later and were convicted in the kidnapping. They were originally given life sentences with no chance of parole, but an appeal three years later overturned that ruling, allowing them to be eligible for parole, according to KFSN.
Schoenfeld is the second of the three men to be granted parole. His brother Richard was released in 2012. Woods, however, remains in jail.
The decision is just the first step in the process for release, the Times reports. The board's legal staff must review the decision and then the governor must make his own ruling before Schoenfeld can be released.
His victims hope it doesn't go that far.
Jennifer Brown Hyde, who was 9 years old at the time of the kidnapping, wrote a "brutal" letter to the board, urging them to keep Schoenfeld in prison.
"I wrote that they buried me alive, they stole my childhood and caused me immense emotional pain over the years. It affected my life, my parents' lives and my children's lives," she told the Fresno Bee.
"Until recently I slept with a night-light," she added. "I have anxiety attacks when I'm in a confined space ... They took away my ability to be free."
Madera County District Attorney David Linn opposes Schoenfeld's release as well, though he says he's not surprised by the decision, particularly in light of California's movement toward reducing prison overcrowding.
"I did everything I could to resist it," he told the Bee. "What I want to do now is reach out to the victims, let them know we're here for them."
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
I remember reading about this when it happened. Then there was a Lifetime movie.
I wonder about the long-term effects of the trauma involved.
No one was injured, and for at least some of the kids, it had to be the adventure of a lifetime. Or not.
I think living through a big flood, or a major earthquake, or a tornado, would be much worse.
Still, I'm not inside their heads, cannot walk a mile in their moccasins.
Should this guy get out after 40 years? I'm glad it's not my call to make.
No, no, no, no! None of those 3 should ever be let out. They could have killed them all but luckily they escaped. Floods, earthquakes, and tornados are all weather related and not directed at anyone in particular but these men made this trauma personal to these kids. I would think that is way more traumatic.
-- Edited by Tinydancer on Friday 15th of May 2015 11:30:08 AM
__________________
“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.” ― Julia Child ―
But rationale says the served the allotted punishment and it should be over.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
But rationale says the served the allotted punishment and it should be over.
They are giving him parole so he hasn't served his allotted punishment. He got life and was ELIGIBLE for parole. That doesn't mean they have to let him out.
__________________
“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.” ― Julia Child ―
My question is, after a person is released, do continue to be punished?
I think what they done should get them life in prison. Don't get what I am saying confused with sympathy for them. I think they should never get out.
My question is in general.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Once they are released it would be wrong to continue punishing them but I don't think these guys should ever be released.
I agree. They are very, very lucky that those kids escaped and they didn't become murderers.. When I opened this thread I was surprised and relieved it wasn't about 26 dead children.
Once they are released it would be wrong to continue punishing them but I don't think these guys should ever be released.
I agree. They are very, very lucky that those kids escaped and they didn't become murderers.. When I opened this thread I was surprised and relieved it wasn't about 26 dead children.
Oh me too. I didn't remember the story and thought it had a bad ending. I'm very glad they all survived. It must have been so scary!!!!
__________________
“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.” ― Julia Child ―
I say put them on an island. Anybody that hurts a kid should be dropped off on a horrible island to fend for themselves with all the other rapists and murderers.
I say put them on an island. Anybody that hurts a kid should be dropped off on a horrible island to fend for themselves with all the other rapists and murderers.
I wish I had an island to donate for this purpose.
Is this the first parole hearing? The first is usually a no go.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I read a book about it, the men did it because "they were bored" Bored my foot, they had no intentions of letting those children go or letting them live.
I remember reading about this when it happened. Then there was a Lifetime movie.
I wonder about the long-term effects of the trauma involved.
No one was injured, and for at least some of the kids, it had to be the adventure of a lifetime. Or not.
I think living through a big flood, or a major earthquake, or a tornado, would be much worse.
Still, I'm not inside their heads, cannot walk a mile in their moccasins.
Should this guy get out after 40 years? I'm glad it's not my call to make.
No, no, no, no! None of those 3 should ever be let out. They could have killed them all but luckily they escaped. Floods, earthquakes, and tornados are all weather related and not directed at anyone in particular but these men made this trauma personal to these kids. I would think that is way more traumatic.
-- Edited by Tinydancer on Friday 15th of May 2015 11:30:08 AM
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
Once they are released it would be wrong to continue punishing them but I don't think these guys should ever be released.
Why? I don't think there is enough punishment for what they did. And if they let them out early, they did NOT serve their time.
If they served their sentence and were released it would be wrong to keep punishing them and I said they should never be released. I think they should have got the death penalty. Evil like this should be removed from society permanently.
__________________
“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.” ― Julia Child ―