TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Liberalism in One Photo


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Liberalism in One Photo
Permalink  
 


GunShots-B.jpg



-- Edited by Lady Gaga Snerd on Saturday 18th of July 2015 08:45:33 AM

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Why are we not allowing our own trained soldiers to carry guns and be sitting ducks? Disgusting.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

"Gun Free Zone". How ironic that the bad guys know exactly where to go. Duh.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1849
Date:
Permalink  
 

I read that this guy fired from his vehicle. How would having armed guys inside a building prevent what was more or less a drive by shooting?
Just asking.

__________________


Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Why are we not allowing our own trained soldiers to carry guns and be sitting ducks? Disgusting.


I have NO idea...but of course, it's the LIBERALS who caused this tragedy. 

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Give Me Grand's!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13802
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Why are we not allowing our own trained soldiers to carry guns and be sitting ducks? Disgusting.


I have NO idea...but of course, it's the LIBERALS who caused this tragedy. 

flan


Flan, you know I love you, but it is the liberal perspective that allows for these incidents to occur.

Soft targets are prime targets for all nut jobs.

IF they had been armed, one of them could have fired back at the guy as he was driving by and shooting. 



__________________

I drink coffee so I don't kill you.

I quilt so I don't kill you.

Do you see a theme?

Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

just Czech wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Why are we not allowing our own trained soldiers to carry guns and be sitting ducks? Disgusting.


I have NO idea...but of course, it's the LIBERALS who caused this tragedy. 

flan


Flan, you know I love you, but it is the liberal perspective that allows for these incidents to occur.

Soft targets are prime targets for all nut jobs.

IF they had been armed, one of them could have fired back at the guy as he was driving by and shooting. 


Right, and I think they SHOULD have been armed. I had no idea that a military facility prohibited firearms.

flan 



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1586
Date:
Permalink  
 


can remember when the bases around here ( SA and Austin-Bergstrom ) were patrolled and guarded by MPs--they were armed--sort of expected on a military base

looking at that photo, appears to be rounds from a shotgun--in any case, had the base been guarded or the staff been armed ( or both ) the perpetrator likely would have died on the spot--there may have been casualties true but would be willing to venture that there would have been fewer hurt/killed if the staff had been armed

in the ft hood incident, but for the valor and cool-headedness of a female police officer ( with the chutzpah to draw her weapon, under fire, and drop the bastard ), that particular sob would have shot quite a few more people--how ridiculous that local police have to defend and protect a US military base

__________________

" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tangerine wrote:

I read that this guy fired from his vehicle. How would having armed guys inside a building prevent what was more or less a drive by shooting?
Just asking.


 Wrong.  He did so at the first place where NO ONE was even killed or injured.  At the place where he killed the marines, he drove through an empty checkpoin, got out of the car, walked in, and shot 4 people.

 

besides that, you don't know.  Had the guys at the first place been able to return Fire, they might have got him, disabled his vehicle, or made him give up on the project.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
just Czech wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Why are we not allowing our own trained soldiers to carry guns and be sitting ducks? Disgusting.


I have NO idea...but of course, it's the LIBERALS who caused this tragedy. 

flan


Flan, you know I love you, but it is the liberal perspective that allows for these incidents to occur.

Soft targets are prime targets for all nut jobs.

IF they had been armed, one of them could have fired back at the guy as he was driving by and shooting. 


Right, and I think they SHOULD have been armed. I had no idea that a military facility prohibited firearms.

flan 


 Thank your beloved bill Clinton.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

The scum was shot and killed by a police officer with an assault riffle.

That area was locked down like a prison yard within minutes.

In this area, the Tristan area I live in, when some thing this happens, a mass notification goes out to ever public building and they lock them down.

Malls, school, stores, government buildings. Anything.

And all law enforcement goes into attack.

Our interstate, the off ramps, we're closed. That scum wasn't getting away.

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1849
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't think it is something new that not all soldiers are armed at all times though. A recruitment office is very office like with lots of brochures and paperwork, often they are located in strip malls.
I grew up on military bases and i only recall seeing the MPs with sidearms and a few times during Desert Storm they had troops in BDU's with M-16s patrolling the base and standing on top of the PX and other buildings on post.
Most military people are not armed most of the time unless they are deployed or something.

I feel really badly for those men's families.

__________________


Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tangerine wrote:

I don't think it is something new that not all soldiers are armed at all times though. A recruitment office is very office like with lots of brochures and paperwork, often they are located in strip malls.
I grew up on military bases and i only recall seeing the MPs with sidearms and a few times during Desert Storm they had troops in BDU's with M-16s patrolling the base and standing on top of the PX and other buildings on post.
Most military people are not armed most of the time unless they are deployed or something.

I feel really badly for those men's families.


 That's a good point, Tang.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Who said it was something new? Times have changed. Make new policies.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

The only soldiers who carry firearms are the ones in active combat or the military police on any base. On regular old every day bases no soldiers anywhere are armed.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tangerine wrote:

I don't think it is something new that not all soldiers are armed at all times though. A recruitment office is very office like with lots of brochures and paperwork, often they are located in strip malls.
I grew up on military bases and i only recall seeing the MPs with sidearms and a few times during Desert Storm they had troops in BDU's with M-16s patrolling the base and standing on top of the PX and other buildings on post.
Most military people are not armed most of the time unless they are deployed or something.

I feel really badly for those men's families.


So what?  Before blowjob Bill changed it--they could be armed.   



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

They are soft and wanted targets. To post a no firearms sign on the door was liberal stupidity at it finest. Of course these terrorists are going to target people that can't fight back.

__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard