TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Stupidest thing I've seen in forever.


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Stupidest thing I've seen in forever.
Permalink  
 


[video=https://video-atl1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hvideo-xpa1/v/t42.1790-2/11191742_10102745139305648_310818069_n.mp4?rl=324&vabr=180&oh=b0e11661bc9298ddc424e6ab0c213323&oe=55B8FF4E]

 

 

 

 

When I read the constitution, I often ask myself - WHAT were the founding fathers thinking? HOW could they not include a right for women to have employers and taxpayers pay for their personal sexual choices? I mean, why....just WHY should they not have been more concerned with that than giving the citizens the rights to defend themselves against a tyrannical government? Where were their priorities?  evileye



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Vette's SS!!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2297
Date:
Permalink  
 

Is there a transcript?

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

Does CVS now sell pistols? Do I have to be a Boyscout to buy one?



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

Exactly. It's nothing but propaganda. But this take it to a whole nother level of stupid...

__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

ed11563 wrote:

Does CVS now sell pistols? Do I have to be a Boyscout to buy one?


 No, they don't sell them.  According to this, they hand them out free to children who ask for one. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Dona Worry Be Happy wrote:

Is there a transcript?


 Not that I know of.  However, this is the gist -

It starts out as a normal birth control commercial and then has the standard "Ask your doctor if birth control is right for you".  Normal enough.  But then it goes on to about 8 different scenes  - ask your boss if BC is right for you, ask your boss' priest if BC is right for you, ask the black guy and asian guy playing chess in the park if BC is right for you (and ask how they came to be friends, that has to be interesting - inferring racism), and on and on.  Then she goes to the pharmacist to get her BC, and she has no refills and says "I have to go through all of this again next month?" and the pharmacist says yes.  Then she asks herself if she should really be having sex for fun.  Then a little boy walks up to the pharmacist and asks for a gun and the pharmacist says "sure" and throws one across the counter at him. 

 

Last time I checked, a grown woman can BC anytime she wants.  She just MIGHT have to pay for it.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

Oh, yeah, I saw that on FB I think. Stupid. I deleted the post.

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Dona Worry Be Happy wrote:

Is there a transcript?


 Not that I know of.  However, this is the gist -

It starts out as a normal birth control commercial and then has the standard "Ask your doctor if birth control is right for you".  Normal enough.  But then it goes on to about 8 different scenes  - ask your boss if BC is right for you, ask your boss' priest if BC is right for you, ask the black guy and asian guy playing chess in the park if BC is right for you (and ask how they came to be friends, that has to be interesting - inferring racism), and on and on.  Then she goes to the pharmacist to get her BC, and she has no refills and says "I have to go through all of this again next month?" and the pharmacist says yes.  Then she asks herself if she should really be having sex for fun.  Then a little boy walks up to the pharmacist and asks for a gun and the pharmacist says "sure" and throws one across the counter at him. 

 

Last time I checked, a grown woman can BC anytime she wants.  She just MIGHT have to pay for it.


 Implying, not inferring.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3029
Date:
Permalink  
 

I was hoping you'd post a summation of it. All I got was a broken FB video page.

Now that I've read the synopsis, I agree with you, it's pretty stupid.

__________________


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

weltschmerz wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
Dona Worry Be Happy wrote:

Is there a transcript?


 Not that I know of.  However, this is the gist -

It starts out as a normal birth control commercial and then has the standard "Ask your doctor if birth control is right for you".  Normal enough.  But then it goes on to about 8 different scenes  - ask your boss if BC is right for you, ask your boss' priest if BC is right for you, ask the black guy and asian guy playing chess in the park if BC is right for you (and ask how they came to be friends, that has to be interesting - inferring racism), and on and on.  Then she goes to the pharmacist to get her BC, and she has no refills and says "I have to go through all of this again next month?" and the pharmacist says yes.  Then she asks herself if she should really be having sex for fun.  Then a little boy walks up to the pharmacist and asks for a gun and the pharmacist says "sure" and throws one across the counter at him. 

 

Last time I checked, a grown woman can BC anytime she wants.  She just MIGHT have to pay for it.


 Implying, not inferring.


 Yes.  You are correct.  Which is much more important than the rest.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

The rest of what? If I can't read the article, I can't comment. Link doesn't work.

__________________


Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

weltschmerz wrote:

The rest of what? If I can't read the article, I can't comment. Link doesn't work.


And yet, you did... 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:

The rest of what? If I can't read the article, I can't comment. Link doesn't work.


And yet, you did... 


I'm pretty sure I didn't comment on the article. Show me where. 



__________________


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:

The rest of what? If I can't read the article, I can't comment. Link doesn't work.


And yet, you did... 


I'm pretty sure I didn't comment on the article. Show me where. 


 I gave a summary of the video and your only comment was on my word usage.  It reminds me of ..... "When you have nothing meaningful to say, just correct their grammar."



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:

The rest of what? If I can't read the article, I can't comment. Link doesn't work.


And yet, you did... 


I'm pretty sure I didn't comment on the article. Show me where. 


 I gave a summary of the video and your only comment was on my word usage.  It reminds me of ..... "When you have nothing meaningful to say, just correct their grammar."


 I would really prefer to see the video for myself, rather than rely on your summary.



__________________


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

weltschmerz wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:

The rest of what? If I can't read the article, I can't comment. Link doesn't work.


And yet, you did... 


I'm pretty sure I didn't comment on the article. Show me where. 


 I gave a summary of the video and your only comment was on my word usage.  It reminds me of ..... "When you have nothing meaningful to say, just correct their grammar."


 I would really prefer to see the video for myself, rather than rely on your summary.


 I'm sure if you google, you can find it.  It is all over facebook, being shared by LIVs.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

And I just clicked the link - it worked fine, it is not broken. Your browser obviously has issue with it.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

I can't open it either.

But it does sound stupid.

I think it ridiculous how you hear all about "it's a woman's body and she should be in control of it, can't tell her what to do".

But then the same people seem to turn around wonder why BC isn't provided and how it is someone else's responsibility.

Who is responsible for your body? You or someone else?



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:

The rest of what? If I can't read the article, I can't comment. Link doesn't work.


And yet, you did... 


I'm pretty sure I didn't comment on the article. Show me where. 


 I gave a summary of the video and your only comment was on my word usage.  It reminds me of ..... "When you have nothing meaningful to say, just correct their grammar."


I didn't correct your grammar. I corrected your vocabulary.  Consider it a Public Service Announcement.

The person giving the information does the implying. The person receiving the information does the inferring.  You're welcome.



__________________


Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:

I can't open it either.

But it does sound stupid.

I think it ridiculous how you hear all about "it's a woman's body and she should be in control of it, can't tell her what to do".

But then the same people seem to turn around wonder why BC isn't provided and how it is someone else's responsibility.

Who is responsible for your body? You or someone else?


 Liberal logic 101. 

 

Macht nichts aus....



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

I watched the whole entire video. It was stupid. It was all intended to make fun of those of us who feel like if your work doesn't pay for your BC maybe you should just um be RESPONSIBLE for it yourself? There was a time in my life where my DH (ex DH) and I didn't have insurance. I managed to both have sex AND not get pregnant. I know that seems like a miracle.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

weltschmerz wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:

The rest of what? If I can't read the article, I can't comment. Link doesn't work.


And yet, you did... 


I'm pretty sure I didn't comment on the article. Show me where. 


 I gave a summary of the video and your only comment was on my word usage.  It reminds me of ..... "When you have nothing meaningful to say, just correct their grammar."


I didn't correct your grammar. I corrected your vocabulary.  Consider it a Public Service Announcement.

The person giving the information does the implying. The person receiving the information does the inferring.  You're welcome.


 The video implied - I inferred from the implication. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Do some liberals ever get tired of being so stereotypical?

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't think they actually realize they are.

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3029
Date:
Permalink  
 

Do some liberals ever get tired of being so stereotypical?
- Lawyerlady

_________________________

Probably not. But the same question with likely the same answer could apply to any demographic someone would care to replace "liberals" with.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:

The rest of what? If I can't read the article, I can't comment. Link doesn't work.


And yet, you did... 


I'm pretty sure I didn't comment on the article. Show me where. 


 I gave a summary of the video and your only comment was on my word usage.  It reminds me of ..... "When you have nothing meaningful to say, just correct their grammar."


I didn't correct your grammar. I corrected your vocabulary.  Consider it a Public Service Announcement.

The person giving the information does the implying. The person receiving the information does the inferring.  You're welcome.


 The video implied - I inferred from the implication. 


 So your mind immediately went to racism because a black guy and Asian guy were playing chess in the park? Interesting.

First you admitted I was right, and now you're saying the opposite. Speaking of minds...how about making your's up?



__________________


Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

I saw the commercial. They make it extremely clear that something is wrong that an Asian kid and black man could be friends. It's what the commercial SAYS not what LL says.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

Weltz, you said yourself you haven't seen it. So really, you're just talking out of your.....anyway.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

Do some liberals ever get tired of being so stereotypical?


No, they don't.   



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Vette's SS!!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2297
Date:
Permalink  
 

When I jit the link, all I get is "Sorry, something went wrong! We are working to fix it."

__________________


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

weltschmerz wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:

The rest of what? If I can't read the article, I can't comment. Link doesn't work.


And yet, you did... 


I'm pretty sure I didn't comment on the article. Show me where. 


 I gave a summary of the video and your only comment was on my word usage.  It reminds me of ..... "When you have nothing meaningful to say, just correct their grammar."


I didn't correct your grammar. I corrected your vocabulary.  Consider it a Public Service Announcement.

The person giving the information does the implying. The person receiving the information does the inferring.  You're welcome.


 The video implied - I inferred from the implication. 


 So your mind immediately went to racism because a black guy and Asian guy were playing chess in the park? Interesting.

First you admitted I was right, and now you're saying the opposite. Speaking of minds...how about making your's up?


 My mind immediately went to racism because the video actually said - "and then ask how these two became friends because that has to be an interesting story".  WHY else would that be said?  Why can't a black guy and an asian guy be friends, and why does their ethnicity matter when they are just playing chess?  If it didn't mean anything, you would just be asking 2 men playing chess in the park.

But since you can't watch the video, maybe you should just stop before you make more foolish comments.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard