TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Jeep vs. Subaru: Which Should Cherie Keep?


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Jeep vs. Subaru: Which Should Cherie Keep?
Permalink  
 


Jeep vs. Subaru: Which Should Cherie Keep?

  RSS
used cars, Jeep
Dear Car Talk:

I love, love, love your show and column. I just inherited a 2006 Jeep Commander with 60,000 miles on it. It's in almost mint condition. But I have been driving a 2003 Subaru Forester since buying it new in 2002. It has 150,000 miles. It's had expensive repairs in the past couple of years, but it seems OK now.

Would you sell the Subaru and keep the Jeep, or keep the Subaru and sell the Jeep? Someone told me that after 1995, Jeep finally got its act together and made good cars. Is that true? The gas mileage on the Jeep is pretty disgusting, but I don't drive more than 5,000 miles per year. I would so appreciate your advice. Thanks.

-- Cherie

Keep the Jeep, Cherie.

Jeeps are better than they were, even though they're still not great in terms of reliability. However, that Subaru with 150,000 miles is almost certain to become unreliable in the near future; 150,000 is a lot of miles. And the fact that it "seems OK now" means it's the perfect time to sell it!

At 150,000 or perhaps a bit earlier, most Subarus have engine seals that are leaking oil, leaking head gaskets, a water pump that needs replacing, and certainly a timing belt that has to be changed. If you haven't done all of that stuff yet, you're looking at $2,500 in the near future.

Plus, at that age, lots of stuff can go wrong, unpredictably. Your transmission may develop issues. Your suspension, exhaust and brake components will be rusting out or failing. And this is the age at which a car tries to send its owner little SOS messages. Like when the rearview mirror falls off, or the glove box stops closing.

While the Jeep is not the most reliable car built, it has only 60,000 miles on it. So it's far more likely to last you many years.

And you're right that the Jeep's mileage is awful. But since you're driving only 5,000 miles a year, it's less of an issue, and an expense, than if you drove 20,000 miles a year.

If you want another opinion (and after writing to Car Talk, I don't blame you), take both cars to a mechanic you trust, and ask him to check them out as if they were used cars that you were thinking of purchasing. He'll check everything and give you a full report on what he finds. Then you can use that information to make an informed decision.

I can tell you're emotionally attached to your old Subaru. But based on mileage alone, I'm guessing judges would pick the Jeep in a unanimous decision.

But whatever you decide, put aside the proceeds from the sale of one car to pay for future repairs on the other. Then you'll be covered no matter what you do.


__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

    My experience w/ inherited vehicles is the new owner often knows very little about how the car's been serviced and how often it's been driven. A car that hasn't been properly serviced combined with sitting parked for months on end can present special problems, especially in the fuel system. Good idea to take it to a shop, explain the situation, and ask for the equivalent of a pre-purchase inspection.

    What the heck was the Commander? Was it bigger or smaller or the same as the Cherokee? And why do people think Subarus are the best thing since sliced bread when the manufacturer refuses to modify known design defects that lead to leaking seals and head gaskets?

    I would sell both cars, and use the money to buy the best Subaru you can with that money. I am not unbiased, I do not like Jeeps.

    Or sell BOTH cars and use the proceeds to buy an even more reliable (and efficient) car....



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1586
Date:
Permalink  
 

lord--have been jeep owners for over tweny years--the commander is a heavy, under-powered, thirsty vehicle designed to compete with land rover--though somewhat luxurious ( for a jeep ), their fuel economy / reliability / handling is abysmal--the subaru's flat four boxer engine is nearly bulletproof--easily 300k or better service life--solid, tank-like body construction--very safe and capable--if the subaru's running well now would spend a few hundred on any deferred maintenance and drive it for another five years--definitely sell the commander

__________________

" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

burns07 wrote:

lord--have been jeep owners for over tweny years--the commander is a heavy, under-powered, thirsty vehicle designed to compete with land rover--though somewhat luxurious ( for a jeep ), their fuel economy / reliability / handling is abysmal--the subaru's flat four boxer engine is nearly bulletproof--easily 300k or better service life--solid, tank-like body construction--very safe and capable--if the subaru's running well now would spend a few hundred on any deferred maintenance and drive it for another five years--definitely sell the commander


We applaud the Voice of Experience 

clap.gif

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard