London (AFP) - Prime Minister David Cameron was urged to intervene Wednesday after a British Muslim family was prevented from flying to the United States for a visit to Disneyland.
The family of 11 was stopped from boarding their flight to Los Angeles at London's Gatwick airport on Tuesday last week by immigration officials.
Mohammad Tariq Mahmood, who was travelling with his brother and nine of their children, said the officials gave no reason for blocking their travel plans.
But he told the Guardian newspaper he believed it was because US officials "think every Muslim poses a threat".
"Because I have a beard and sometimes wear Islamic dress, I get stopped and asked questions," Mahmood added in comments to the BBC. "I feel that is part of the deal of flying."
The family has also been unable to secure a refund for the cost of the flights -- around £9,000 (12,000 euros, $13,400).
Mahmood's local lawmaker in London, Stella Creasy of the main opposition Labour party, has asked Cameron to look into what happened.
Cameron's Downing Street office confirmed that the prime minister would respond to Creasy's request.
"Online and offline discussions reverberate with the growing fear that UK Muslims are being 'trumped' -- that widespread condemnation of Donald Trump's call for no Muslim to be allowed into America contrasts with what is going on in practice," Creasy wrote in Wednesday's Guardian.
"We should do more than shrug our shoulders at secretive American security policies that leave our constituents in such limbo."
The US embassy in London and Britain's Home Office did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
OK - now perhaps the media should pay attention to the laws that get passed in this country by Congress. The Visa waiver program was changed people. What they should do is look at the guy's passport and see if he has been in any of those flagged countries in the last five years.
Donald Trump is a candidate - he doesn't have the power to control U.S. immigration.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
We don't know there isn't a perfectly legitimate reason that they were denied. Just because they say there's not doesn't make it so. We don't have to let ANYONE in if we don't want to.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
My question is, there is a list of places that raise the red flags, and if we limit the time period to 4-5 years since any of those have been visited, that means they have 6 years to prepare and plan an attack.
Plus, now we have refugees everywhere and what's stopping them from using that excuse to get in and set shop?
There are a whole lot of possibilities when it comes to circumventing the limits and laws.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
