TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: What would you think?


Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
What would you think?
Permalink  
 


I'll start out by saying I am just asking out of curiosity and being nosy.

I found out a friend of a friend's ex boyfriend (and father of her children) is on the sex offender registry for child porn. He claims (and she believes him) that he accidentally clicked a spam link, realized what it was a closed out of it... he went to jail. I checked the registry for him and it says 'convicted of possessing, manufacturing, and distributing child pornography of a 14 year old girl'. Since it is only one girl would you be inclined to believe him- that it was an accident and that is just a blanket conviction, or would you believe that he did all three (possess, manufacture and distribute)? 

About a year ago, a guy who used to work with DH was arrested for the same thing, and he also claimed it was just an accidental click. So, bad excuse or are people being arrested for clicking spam links?

 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

Just about everyone who goes to jail claims they're innocent. Evidently, the prisons are plumb full to bursting with "innocent" people.

__________________


Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yea. I mean, I think they are both lying liars who lie, but I thought maybe I was being too harsh. But then again, all the spam I've ever seen has never included child pornography- so again, I think they are full of BS.



-- Edited by NAOW on Wednesday 23rd of December 2015 11:28:45 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

Don't believe either of them.

They get caught for sending, not receiving from a click and then deleting.

"manufacturing, and distributing child pornography of a 14 year old girl'" means he had a camera and a live (probably willing) 14 y.o. girl. Then he sent out or sold the pictures / videos.

 

My vote is ...

bad excuse, but the only one they could come up with.

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

NAOW wrote:

Yea. I mean, I think they are both lying liars who lie, but I thought maybe I was being too harsh. But then again, all the spam I've ever seen has never included child pornography- so again, I think they are full of BS.



-- Edited by NAOW on Wednesday 23rd of December 2015 11:28:45 PM


Of course it's BS. 



__________________


Regular

Status: Offline
Posts: 332
Date:
Permalink  
 

One cannot manufacturer and distribute pronography by clicking one link and then closing out of the site.

Even an overworked public defender can get a computer guru to disprove those two charges.

So no, I do not believe him.



__________________
“One day, you will be old enough to start reading fairytales again.” C.S.Lewis


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

Does he access to the children?
That's what I'd be concerned about.

__________________


Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

weltschmerz wrote:

Does he access to the children?
That's what I'd be concerned about.


 He is not allowed to be alone with them. All his visits have to be supervised. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3029
Date:
Permalink  
 

One accidental click to a link does not "manufacture and distribute" make. I call shenanigans. I think that any lawyer worth their Bar Card should have been able to get those two parts tossed if they weren't true.

I'm not a Lawyer and I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, so I could be wrong though.

__________________


Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

WYSIWYG wrote:

One accidental click to a link does not "manufacture and distribute" make. I call shenanigans. I think that any lawyer worth their Bar Card should have been able to get those two parts tossed if they weren't true.

I'm not a Lawyer and I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, so I could be wrong though.


 

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

WYSIWYG wrote:

One accidental click to a link does not "manufacture and distribute" make. I call shenanigans. I think that any lawyer worth their Bar Card should have been able to get those two parts tossed if they weren't true.

I'm not a Lawyer and I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, so I could be wrong though.


 I agree, but I didn't know if it's like a blanket conviction, if you are guilty of one you are charged with all three.. or something..



__________________


Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

WYSIWYG wrote:

One accidental click to a link does not "manufacture and distribute" make. I call shenanigans. I think that any lawyer worth their Bar Card should have been able to get those two parts tossed if they weren't true.

I'm not a Lawyer and I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, so I could be wrong though.


 Yeah this.  One accidental click could easily be explained away.  Shoot, no jury in the world would convict on ONE link.  How many of us have accidentally clicked on something.  Most of us.  Granted, not child porn but most of us have clicked on stuff accidentally.  I agree that any lawyer worth weight could get a person off on just one link.  I call BS on this one.



__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

NAOW, the guy is lying. Your friend's friend is in denial.

__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think there is a higher bar than accidently clicking a link.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Nothing's Impossible

Status: Offline
Posts: 16913
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lying. They probably tracked him for a while. One click and closing it out wouldn't even alert anyone.

__________________

A person's a person no matter how small.



Regular

Status: Offline
Posts: 332
Date:
Permalink  
 

NAOW wrote:
WYSIWYG wrote:

One accidental click to a link does not "manufacture and distribute" make. I call shenanigans. I think that any lawyer worth their Bar Card should have been able to get those two parts tossed if they weren't true.

I'm not a Lawyer and I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, so I could be wrong though.


 I agree, but I didn't know if it's like a blanket conviction, if you are guilty of one you are charged with all three.. or something..


 Not a lawyer And it is different in each state, but usually NO, this is not a ONE SIZE FITS ALL charge. Becuase each charge is different. One can make and / or possess porn without distributing it. One can distribute porn without "possessing" it, ie watching it for gratification Or making it.  

 



__________________
“One day, you will be old enough to start reading fairytales again.” C.S.Lewis


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well, I am a lawyer and he's full of ****. He would not have been charged, let alone convicted for accidently clicking on a spam link. Police and prosecutors have much bigger fish to fry than pursuing "accidental spam" guppies.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

He is lying.

But I do think the "sex offender" blanket it too big.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1586
Date:
Permalink  
 


one click constitutes " distribution? "--no, not even close

__________________

" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke

 

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lying.

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



My dog name is Sasha, too!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6679
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lying perv!


__________________


My dog name is, Sasha!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5883
Date:
Permalink  
 

Can you even accidentally click on child porn? Isnt' that something that you don't really come across on mainstream internet?

__________________

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not today, Satan.  Not today.



Nothing's Impossible

Status: Offline
Posts: 16913
Date:
Permalink  
 

Usually the pop up spam is related to the things you search. Look up a scarf and you will get lots of pop ups for scarves. So..... if he was getting porn pop ups, guess what?

__________________

A person's a person no matter how small.



My dog name is Sasha, too!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6679
Date:
Permalink  
 

Southern_Belle wrote:

Usually the pop up spam is related to the things you search. Look up a scarf and you will get lots of pop ups for scarves. So..... if he was getting porn pop ups, guess what?


 Good point SB!



__________________


Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lexxy wrote:
Southern_Belle wrote:

Usually the pop up spam is related to the things you search. Look up a scarf and you will get lots of pop ups for scarves. So..... if he was getting porn pop ups, guess what?


 Good point SB!


 Too true.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard