Dear Prudence, My husband is much older than me and is very close to his daughters from his first marriage; they are lovely and smart girls (his youngest will be graduating high school at 16). We have a 2-year-old son together. I get along fine with the girls, but according to the divorce decree, my husband is responsible for all college expenses. One wants to go to medical school and the other got accepted to an Ivy League school!
We could buy a new house in cash for what this will cost us. There are in-state schools just as good, and we could sell our two-bedroom condo and get a place with a backyard for our son to run around in. My husband shuts me down every time I bring it up: The condo is paid for, he promised his daughters, our lives are fine, his girls are going to be the first in the family to get their degrees and they deserve the best, etc. I am made to feel like a wicked stepmother for wanting my son to grow up with a treehouse and a dog. In-state tuition would allow us to do both (or the girls could get student loans like the rest of us). Is there any way I can convince him?
—Out of Our Price Range
No. I understand you’re not threatening to lock his daughters in a golden tower so your son can grow up with free rein of the kingdom, but ... no. They’re not your children. It’s not your call. You live in a perfectly nice condo, and there are public parks for your son to run around in. Lots of people grow up without dogs and lead perfectly normal lives. You have everything you need, and then some. Don’t ask a couple of teenagers to take on student loan debt so you can have more.
Foul! For half of every dollar that goes toward those girls' college he should be putting money into their babies college fund. Plus not one dime of her earnings and only half of his discretionary income should go towards the college. Those divorce decrees do not say "harvard" it can be a state school.
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
He's a decent dad who wants the best for his kids, and that's admirable.
It's the price you pay for marrying someone who already has kids.
Maybe it would make you really happy if he stopped all child support so YOUR child could have more.
Suck it up, buttercup.
When he agreed to it he probably hadn't thought of having another family. And, if you marry someone with kids, you are going to be married to someone who has those responsibilities. He should also be thinking of his other child as well.
He's a decent dad who wants the best for his kids, and that's admirable. It's the price you pay for marrying someone who already has kids. Maybe it would make you really happy if he stopped all child support so YOUR child could have more. Suck it up, buttercup.
How about ALL HIS kids are treated equally? Unless he is putting aside the same for his baby as for his daughter's education then he is being completely unfair and if marital income is going toward those kids' education then yeah, she has a say.
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
He's a decent dad who wants the best for his kids, and that's admirable. It's the price you pay for marrying someone who already has kids. Maybe it would make you really happy if he stopped all child support so YOUR child could have more. Suck it up, buttercup.
How about ALL HIS kids are treated equally? Unless he is putting aside the same for his baby as for his daughter's education then he is being completely unfair and if marital income is going toward those kids' education then yeah, she has a say.
How do you know he won't pay for the youngest child to go to a good school?
Well, he shouldn't be bankrupting them and not thinking about his other child. Fine, help them and then go start a 529 plan and fund the youngest one too.
"No. I understand you’re not threatening to lock his daughters in a golden tower so your son can grow up with free rein of the kingdom, but ... no. They’re not your children. It’s not your call. You live in a perfectly nice condo, and there are public parks for your son to run around in. Lots of people grow up without dogs and lead perfectly normal lives. You have everything you need, and then some. Don’t ask a couple of teenagers to take on student loan debt so you can have more."
"No. I understand you’re not threatening to lock his daughters in a golden tower so your son can grow up with free rein of the kingdom, but ... no. They’re not your children. It’s not your call. You live in a perfectly nice condo, and there are public parks for your son to run around in. Lots of people grow up without dogs and lead perfectly normal lives. You have everything you need, and then some. Don’t ask a couple of teenagers to take on student loan debt so you can have more."
I agree.
What??? It is her business. He's HER husband. He should be disproportionately spending his income on his other two kids and not his current wife and child.
He's a decent dad who wants the best for his kids, and that's admirable. It's the price you pay for marrying someone who already has kids. Maybe it would make you really happy if he stopped all child support so YOUR child could have more. Suck it up, buttercup.
How about ALL HIS kids are treated equally? Unless he is putting aside the same for his baby as for his daughter's education then he is being completely unfair and if marital income is going toward those kids' education then yeah, she has a say.
There is NOTHING to suggest that he won't pay for his youngest child's college, too.
Where do you get your nonsense? The LW doesn't even bring that up. She's just worried about not getting the house she wants.
-- Edited by huskerbb on Thursday 7th of April 2016 07:48:10 PM
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
"I am made to feel like a wicked stepmother for wanting my son to grow up with a treehouse and a dog. In-state tuition would allow us to do both (or the girls could get student loans like the rest of us). Is there any way I can convince him?"
Well, if she feels the kids should take on student loans, how about HER kid taking on a student loan? Not good enough for her own child?
We don't know anything. Maybe he's got enough money for all three.
She's whining that her kid doesn't have a tree house. Maybe that's because he's putting money away for the youngest kid.
How do you know that?
The letter doesn't say.
The fact that the letter doesn't bring up the youngest child's college makes it easy to infer that the LW isn't worried about it and from that one can assume that it will be covered.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
She's whining that her kid doesn't have a tree house. Maybe that's because he's putting money away for the youngest kid.
How do you know that?
The letter doesn't say.
The fact that the letter doesn't bring up the youngest child's college makes it easy to infer that the LW isn't worried about it and from that one can assume that it will be covered.
Yes.
Meanwhile, his daughters' education is more important than a tree house for a two year old.
One would also have to assume that given the daughter's abilities that medical school and Ivy League were not out of the question when the divorce was settled. I think he should pay if he can afford to do so, either way, but especially if those were the plans to begin with.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
First of all he should NOT ask his kids to take out loans. No way no how. But I really have to side with IKWTDS here. In DH's divorce decree it says he has to pay for HALF of SS's degree. He may not even have to pay for that much. His ex works for a college and she earns free tuition for her kids by working there. But yes, where is the mom? She should help out too. And no, the girls don't have to go to Ivy League schools. And IKWTDS is right. Their baby deserves consideration too!
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
Why shouldn't the kids take out some loans? I am making my own kids take out the Stafford loans. They need to have some ownership in their own education. That only pays a portion, not even one semester a year but they can own that.
-- Edited by Lady Gaga Snerd on Thursday 7th of April 2016 08:02:37 PM
Why shouldn't the kids take out loans? I am making my own kids take out loans. They need to have some ownership in their own education.
Because he can't. The divorce decree spells out that he pays for college--not them. It's irrelevant as to whether or not they should have "ownership".
He MIGHT have some ability to influence where they go to college--but I think that would be unwise to say, sorry, Harvard is out. Again, contingent on the fact that they can afford it--but even according to the letter it seems they can.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
First of all he should NOT ask his kids to take out loans. No way no how. But I really have to side with IKWTDS here. In DH's divorce decree it says he has to pay for HALF of SS's degree. He may not even have to pay for that much. His ex works for a college and she earns free tuition for her kids by working there. But yes, where is the mom? She should help out too. And no, the girls don't have to go to Ivy League schools. And IKWTDS is right. Their baby deserves consideration too!
NONE of that matters. The divorce decree lets mom off the hook. He signed off on that. He had a lawyer--and he probably got some trade-offs such as keeping his retirement accounts or whatever.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
First of all he should NOT ask his kids to take out loans. No way no how. But I really have to side with IKWTDS here. In DH's divorce decree it says he has to pay for HALF of SS's degree. He may not even have to pay for that much. His ex works for a college and she earns free tuition for her kids by working there. But yes, where is the mom? She should help out too. And no, the girls don't have to go to Ivy League schools. And IKWTDS is right. Their baby deserves consideration too!
I hate that some states force divorced parents to pay for college. That is so not right. So if your parent's are married, no soup for you!
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
First of all he should NOT ask his kids to take out loans. No way no how. But I really have to side with IKWTDS here. In DH's divorce decree it says he has to pay for HALF of SS's degree. He may not even have to pay for that much. His ex works for a college and she earns free tuition for her kids by working there. But yes, where is the mom? She should help out too. And no, the girls don't have to go to Ivy League schools. And IKWTDS is right. Their baby deserves consideration too!
NONE of that matters. The divorce decree lets mom off the hook. He signed off on that. He had a lawyer--and he probably got some trade-offs such as keeping his retirement accounts or whatever.
Oh you are so naive Husker in the ways of the divorce court.
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
Also, the LW CANNOT make the girls take on student loans if the divorce decree states that dad will pay for college.
Divorce decrees do not stipulate private college. Most are for state colleges. But he WANTs them to go to the more expensive schools.
We don't know if this decree spelled out a specific school--but if it didn't specify private college, it undoubtedly did not spell out state schools, either, or the LW would have brought that up.
Why shouldn't he want them to go to the expensive schools if he can afford it? Don't you think the LW will want her precious to go to Princeton if he gets the chance?
At any rate--it does spell out that he is to pay for it--not the daughters.
-- Edited by huskerbb on Thursday 7th of April 2016 08:09:17 PM
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
First of all he should NOT ask his kids to take out loans. No way no how. But I really have to side with IKWTDS here. In DH's divorce decree it says he has to pay for HALF of SS's degree. He may not even have to pay for that much. His ex works for a college and she earns free tuition for her kids by working there. But yes, where is the mom? She should help out too. And no, the girls don't have to go to Ivy League schools. And IKWTDS is right. Their baby deserves consideration too!
NONE of that matters. The divorce decree lets mom off the hook. He signed off on that. He had a lawyer--and he probably got some trade-offs such as keeping his retirement accounts or whatever.
Oh you are so naive Husker in the ways of the divorce court.
So he didn't sign off on it?
Maybe he didn't get a trade-off, in which case he lost, but that is IRRELEVANT as to what he has to do now.
-- Edited by huskerbb on Thursday 7th of April 2016 08:10:56 PM
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Also, the LW CANNOT make the girls take on student loans if the divorce decree states that dad will pay for college.
Divorce decrees do not stipulate private college. Most are for state colleges. But he WANTs them to go to the more expensive schools.
Correct. I'm totally on your side on this one.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
First of all he should NOT ask his kids to take out loans. No way no how. But I really have to side with IKWTDS here. In DH's divorce decree it says he has to pay for HALF of SS's degree. He may not even have to pay for that much. His ex works for a college and she earns free tuition for her kids by working there. But yes, where is the mom? She should help out too. And no, the girls don't have to go to Ivy League schools. And IKWTDS is right. Their baby deserves consideration too!
I hate that some states force divorced parents to pay for college. That is so not right. So if your parent's are married, no soup for you!
No kidding. If your parents are divorced you are promised a free ride through college. If they are still married good luck, start applying for loans!
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
First of all he should NOT ask his kids to take out loans. No way no how. But I really have to side with IKWTDS here. In DH's divorce decree it says he has to pay for HALF of SS's degree. He may not even have to pay for that much. His ex works for a college and she earns free tuition for her kids by working there. But yes, where is the mom? She should help out too. And no, the girls don't have to go to Ivy League schools. And IKWTDS is right. Their baby deserves consideration too!
NONE of that matters. The divorce decree lets mom off the hook. He signed off on that. He had a lawyer--and he probably got some trade-offs such as keeping his retirement accounts or whatever.
Oh you are so naive Husker in the ways of the divorce court.
Amen!
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
I think I'm going to have to agree with weltz on this one.
I don't think people realize what they are getting into when they marry someone who has children. And it never ends. Parents don't stop being parents when the child turns 18. Then there's the grandchildren, and it starts all over.
Its more common in divorces than you think. G didnt have to pay for college, but he DID have to maintain a college account for them in the amount of x dollars per paycheck on top of child support. It was enough to pay for their college.
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
It's not spelled out in my divorce but it is in DH's divorce. Both parents split college equally. However, SS's mom works for a college here. For each five years each of her kids get 1/4 of their tuition off. So if she stays ten years it will be half. If she stays 20 years there SS's college will be paid for.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
I just can't believe that someone who has that kind of money to pay for an Ivy school and med school also couldn't afford to buy a house.
I wondered that too!
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
A college degree is not medical school. You get a bachelor's degree first - then go to medical school. His obligation ends with college.
Not necessarily. He may feel compelled to pay the whole thing.
As for having the money, not everyone has an endless supply of money to pay for 2 kids to go to college simulataneously without taking any loans. He may be able to afford that , but that doesn't mean he can afford that AND a house.
I don't understand how some Judge can just order college to be paid for. That is an unknown cost. And, there are a lot of variables. Should your kid then just decide they can go to whatever college they please and major in whatever they want? I suppose Judges can pretty much order anything but that isn't right.
I don't understand how some Judge can just order college to be paid for. That is an unknown cost. And, there are a lot of variables. Should your kid then just decide they can go to whatever college they please and major in whatever they want? I suppose Judges can pretty much order anything but that isn't right.
That should have been taken into consideration when crafting the settlement agreement. Now, whatever he has agreed to is what he agreed to, and Courts have and will enforce it.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
A college degree is not medical school. You get a bachelor's degree first - then go to medical school. His obligation ends with college.
Not necessarily. He may feel compelled to pay the whole thing.
As for having the money, not everyone has an endless supply of money to pay for 2 kids to go to college simulataneously without taking any loans. He may be able to afford that , but that doesn't mean he can afford that AND a house.
Well, then, that's on him, and his wife may very well have a good grievance at that point.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
These are all the things that should have been considered when agreeing to pay for college in the divorce agreement -
Voluntary college support agreements are contracts that spell out each parent’s responsibility for a child’s college costs. Even if you live in a state that won’t order parents to pay college expenses, a court will honor parents’ college support agreements. Agreements need to explain and define the following elements in order to be enforceable:
definition of what type of college will be covered—public university, private school, technical school, or trade school
definition of covered expenses, such as tuition, housing, food, travel costs, books, and other living expenses
how payments will be made
the child’s responsibility for certain expenses
where the child will reside while attending school, and
conditions the child must meet for payments to continue, like good behavior or a certain grade point average.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.