TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: School attempting to shut down high school off campus religious group lunches


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
School attempting to shut down high school off campus religious group lunches
Permalink  
 


There’s a religious liberty standoff underway in Middleton, Wisconsin.

 

On one side is a group of Christian moms armed with Chick-fil-A sandwiches and 400 homemade brownies. On the other side are public school administrators who believe that Jesus and plump juicy chicken breasts are “divisive.”

 

The controversy surrounds an off-campus lunch event involving students at Middleton High School known as “Jesus Lunch.”  


 

The high school allows students to eat lunch off-campus. In 2014 a small group of parents began meeting with their children in a nearby park — providing home cooked meals along with a Christian-themed, inspirational message.

 

The small weekly gatherings in the fall and spring eventually morphed into a popular gathering spot for hungry kids — with nearly 500 turning out for all sorts of goodies — ranging from Chick-fil-A sandwiches and fresh fruit to hundreds of homemade brownies.

 

“We show up every week just to show the love of Jesus,” parent Beth Williams told me. “Our mission statement for Jesus Lunch is ‘food for the body, nutrition for the soul.’”

 

Superintendent Donald Johnson and Principal Stephen Plank called the off-campus religious gatherings “divisive” and they want the weekly non-denominational meetings shut down.

 

“We believe that religious or political events do not have a place in our school or on our campus, except when sponsored by a student group in accordance with our rules, which require prior approval,” the pair wrote in an email sent to parents on April 12.

 

The district accused the moms of violating all sorts of rules — especially in the area of food preparation. They implied the parents are putting their children in danger by hosting the weekly picnics.

 

“The policies in question include food handling, visitors to campus, and expectations around student organized events,” the administrators wrote. “We are in no way interested in opposing religious practice in otherwise legal circumstances.”

 

The district said parents are ignoring “food handling standards.”

 

“Food of any kind that is served to students must be approved by the school/district to ensure food safety, cleanliness and health,” they wrote. “In addition, many students are subject to food allergies, so additional protocols must be followed to safeguard students with these conditions.”

 

I grew up in the Deep South. Had a school administrator slandered the great homemakers in my town like they did in Middleton -- they would’ve been facing a mob armed with cast iron skillets.

 

“These are mothers,” attorney Phillip Stamman told me. “they are spending all their time and effort to show love for these kids and now they are being attacked by a superintendent and principal — trying to intimidate them.”

 

Stamman is representing the moms as they figure out how to respond to the school district’s hostility towards home-cooking and Jesus.

 

“The [school district] is going after them because they are spreading a religious message,” Stamman tells me. “They are upset because they are sharing Christianity.”

 

The attorney has a valid point. What if it had been a gathering of students protected under “non-discrimination laws”? I suspect the district would not only have approved the gathering -- but also endorsed it. 

 

And their argument over the safety of the food is a bit of a stretch. The district doesn’t seem to have a problem with kids going to McDonalds or Taco Bell. So why are they so bothered by youngsters gathering off campus in a public park?

 

Well, the district is arguing that the public park is technically off campus. They have a lease agreement with the city that allows them to use the park during school hours. So the district contends the moms and their offspring are technically on school property.

 

“The parents contend that it is their First Amendment Right to provide free food and hold a religiously oriented event on this property during school hours,” the administrators wrote. “The District believes that we have jurisdiction of this leased property, which is part of our campus.”

 

The moms believe that even though there is a lease agreement — that doesn’t make the public space off-limits. 

 

“Fireman's Park -- a public park owned by the City of Middleton -- remains accessible to everyone in the public for the purposes of assembly and free speech,” they wrote in a statement. “By law, the lease agreement between the city and the School District of Middleton does not privatize the park. The City of Middleton has sent us a letter this week and acknowledged our rental agreement of the pavilion at Fireman's Park.”

 

So hence, the standoff — between the goodhearted moms and a bunch of public school administrative bullies who don’t under the concept of free speech or religious liberty. 

 

I suspect the principal and superintendent are about to discover a valuable life lesson. You don’t tug on Superman’s cape and you don’t mess with a bunch of moms armed with homemade brownies.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Let's see - students are allowed to leave campus to eat lunch.

Students are allowed to have religious student groups.

Students are going voluntarily.

Moms can provide lunch for kids.



Now religion is "divisive"? And people call those concerned about freedom of religion paranoid.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

I got stuck on this:

"Jesus and plump juicy chicken breasts"

I need more caffeine.

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

It's off campus.

Therefore, out of the school's reach.

Period.

But, I will not be surprised to see this squashed.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

The disturbing part is that they are even trying to squash it. What business is it of theirs? Why does it matter to them?

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

It's divisive? Telling a bunch of moms that they can't feed kids at a park is inclusive? It is getting so out of hand yet some will still deny that Christians rights are being trampled.

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

I knew he was a reporter for Fox News.

I hate Googling before 8:00...

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:

I knew he was a reporter for Fox News.

I hate Googling before 8:00...

flan


 What does that have to do with it?

What do you have to say about the content of it?

Is it ok the the school is trying to shut down something being done off campus, with private funds, on a voluntary basis?

Don't even think about the religious aspect.

Should the school have this right or ability?



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

The disturbing part is that they are even trying to squash it. What business is it of theirs? Why does it matter to them?


 I agree.

The school shouldn't have anything to do with it.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:
flan327 wrote:

I knew he was a reporter for Fox News.

I hate Googling before 8:00...

flan


 What does that have to do with it?

What do you have to say about the content of it?

Is it ok the the school is trying to shut down something being done off campus, with private funds, on a voluntary basis?

Don't even think about the religious aspect.

Should the school have this right or ability?


 It's a great way to deflect. Then she doesn't have to say whether she actually thinks this is good or bad. Or maybe she's waiting for someone to tell her what her opinion should be...



__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Vette's SS!!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2297
Date:
Permalink  
 

500 kids is a LOT. It changes how I feel about it some.
If it was 15 or even 50, sure. But, 500? It sounds like a headache to have that many kids congregating in one place for lunch on a regular basis.
But, it seems like the sprt of thing that could use an open and respectful conversation before the knee jerk reaction of shut it down.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

It doesn't matter how many kids. This is NONE of the schools business.

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

"I grew up in the Deep South. Had a school administrator slandered the great homemakers in my town like they did in Middleton -- they would’ve been facing a mob armed with cast iron skillets."

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Is the park school property?

That seems to be in contention here.

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:
flan327 wrote:

I knew he was a reporter for Fox News.

I hate Googling before 8:00...

flan


 What does that have to do with it?

What do you have to say about the content of it?

Is it ok the the school is trying to shut down something being done off campus, with private funds, on a voluntary basis?

Don't even think about the religious aspect.

Should the school have this right or ability?


 1. Because LIBERALS are told "cite your source." The article is so obviously slanted, it makes it hard for me to take it seriously.

2. I need more FACTS.

Don't tell me not to think about the religious aspect. Of course THAT is at the heart of the issue.

“We believe that religious or political events do not have a place in our school or on our campus, except when sponsored by a student group in accordance with our rules, which require prior approval,” the pair wrote in an email sent to parents on April 12."

flan

 



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Vette's SS!!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2297
Date:
Permalink  
 

The school doesn't hve much of a leg to stand on here. They are grasping at straws.
Bottom line is: could the school get into trouble for anything that happens at the lunch? Ie, if a kid has an allergy attack, or gets food poisoning, is there any way for the school to be held liable?
If not. . They should probably just butt out. I would not be impressed if my kid was going, but by that age they should be mature enough to explore religions on their own.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:

Is the park school property?

That seems to be in contention here.

flan


 It's a freaking public park. The school can claim it's their campus all they want but if my tax dollars are paying for that park then they can go pound sand. You'll latch on to anything that makes Christians the ones in the wrong every time.



__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lord, they would lose their minds 'round here. Just about every school has an FCA club. They meet regularly. And it's a school sponsored club.

Plus, most schools lend out the building to churches on the weekends.

__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:

Is the park school property?

That seems to be in contention here.

flan


 You will defend anything against religion, won't you?

 

This is a public park - the mothers LEASED the pavilion.  The school thinks because they also use the park, they get to call it school property.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:
flan327 wrote:

I knew he was a reporter for Fox News.

I hate Googling before 8:00...

flan


 What does that have to do with it?

What do you have to say about the content of it?

Is it ok the the school is trying to shut down something being done off campus, with private funds, on a voluntary basis?

Don't even think about the religious aspect.

Should the school have this right or ability?


 1. Because LIBERALS are told "cite your source." The article is so obviously slanted, it makes it hard for me to take it seriously.

2. I need more FACTS.

Don't tell me not to think about the religious aspect. Of course THAT is at the heart of the issue.

“We believe that religious or political events do not have a place in our school or on our campus, except when sponsored by a student group in accordance with our rules, which require prior approval,” the pair wrote in an email sent to parents on April 12."

flan

 


 Then go look them up instead of demanding others do it for you.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1758
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't really see what the scho an do. Whatever takes place in a public park is none of their business. They are bullies. And whether it were Christians or satanists it's still not their business.

__________________
That's Mrs. Face to you!


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Dona Worry Be Happy wrote:

500 kids is a LOT. It changes how I feel about it some.
If it was 15 or even 50, sure. But, 500? It sounds like a headache to have that many kids congregating in one place for lunch on a regular basis.
But, it seems like the sprt of thing that could use an open and respectful conversation before the knee jerk reaction of shut it down.


 Yep, 500 students is a lot.  And freedom of religion doesn't end because the event is popular.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1758
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:

"I grew up in the Deep South. Had a school administrator slandered the great homemakers in my town like they did in Middleton -- they would’ve been facing a mob armed with cast iron skillets."

flan


 Damn strait. My Mama was from Kentucky. Don't mess with little southern women in their pearls with cast iron skillets!

Makes me proud.  Now I want to fry up some chicken with biscuits and milk gravy 😜



__________________
That's Mrs. Face to you!


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

You know what is scaring people? That the kids WANT to go to the Jesus lunch.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

Mary Zombie wrote:
flan327 wrote:

"I grew up in the Deep South. Had a school administrator slandered the great homemakers in my town like they did in Middleton -- they would’ve been facing a mob armed with cast iron skillets."

flan


 Damn strait. My Mama was from Kentucky. Don't mess with little southern women in their pearls with cast iron skillets!

Makes me proud.  Now I want to fry up some chicken with biscuits and milk gravy 😜


Don't forget the sweet tea!!!!! 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1758
Date:
Permalink  
 

Oh yes. The house wine of the south!

__________________
That's Mrs. Face to you!


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

An article with more information - and the principal's comments are SCARY. The are in red.

 

MIDDLETON, Wis. -

Middleton-Cross Plains School District officials would like a gathering known as the "Jesus Lunch" held near the high school to stop.

"In one year what started out with less than 40 kids has grown into a lunch that serves almost 400 kids or a fourth of Middleton High School," a video posted online about the event says. "What makes this even more amazing is that while we provide the lunches, it’s the students who bring their friends and discuss a different biblical topic each week among themselves. It is entirely voluntary."

“What it’s all about is some mothers, they bring a lot of food to the park by the school and then people eat it and they also have bible stuff there as well,” Middleton senior Logan Kossel said.

In a letter sent to parents Tuesday, high school Principal Steve Plank and District Administrator Don Johnson said that the city leases the park, making it part of school property and subject to school rules about both parent- and student-organized activities.

Plank said the event violates school and district policy because parents are not following food safety standards, are not checking in as visitors to the school, and the event seems to be adult-organized and not initiated by students.

“At some level we want to be very direct and say, ‘This is not approved by the school district,’ and I think right now they are saying, ‘We don’t care and we believe we have the right to come in because it’s a park even though you’ve leased it,” Johnson said.

"The parents contend that it is their First Amendment right to provide free food and hold a religiously oriented event on this property during school hours," the letter to parents says. "The district believes that we have jurisdiction of this leased property, which is part of our campus.

“They have a First Amendment right and a right to access facilities after hours. All those are accurate, but we don’t necessarily allow the Hindu community and the Buddhist community and Islamic community and Wiccans and others to come in and proselytize and bring their message to our students” Johnson said.

"We believe that religious or political events do not have a place in our school or on our campus, except when sponsored by a student group in accordance with our rules, which require prior approval. In addition, many students have conveyed to us their concern about a group offering free food to incentivize participation in a religious event on campus. The result of which has a divisive impact on our learning community. As such, we will continue to work with the parent group to find an amicable resolution."

“There are some students that when they know this day is coming, they will leave school early. (We) have some students that staff will find sitting in the hallway crying,” Plank said.

“A lot of students feel that it’s not OK to have religious affiliation on school grounds, and other students also think not everyone has to participate in it. They’re not being forced to, so it’s not an issue so there’s kind of a clash there,” Kossel said.

The organizers of the lunch issued a statement to News 3.

"We would like to thank you for this opportunity to hear our story, as the Middleton School District has not yet approached us to discuss what we do or how the Jesus Lunch began. We have invited them to attend, but as of date they have declined.

"The question here is not us being in opposition to the school, but rather that we have a right to be in Fireman's Park. Although the school district contends that it is school grounds because they have a lease, the public still has a right to use the park during school hours."

Organizers said the park can be used by the public.

"By law, the lease agreement between the city and the School District of Middleton does not privatize the park," the statement said.

Organizers said the City of Middleton acknowledges their rental agreement for the Fireman's Park pavilion.

"Our mission statement for Jesus Lunch is 'food for the body, nutrition for the soul.' Our goal each week is to share a biblical truth. Students who come to lunch are not required to listen to or participate in the 3-5 minute message," the statement said.

Organizers said the Jesus Lunch began in the fall of 2014 with a small group of our children and their friends.

"Students that attend Jesus Lunch have expressed their desire for Jesus Lunch to continue," the statement said. "The Jesus Lunch has become the highlight of the week for students and those involved!

Middleton City Administrator Mike Davis told News 3 Wednesday afternoon that the lease agreement the city has with the district allows “contemporaneous use” by members of the general public “from time to time.”

Davis said the district has the right to enforce its rules in the park, “as long as they don’t conflict with the interests of the general public.”

The group has legal representation, and plans to hold the lunch again next week.

District officials said they are looking for an amicable solution.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

The school doesn't ALLOW religious freedom? WTH? That school needs a smack down. It is not up to the school to APPROVE student's religious activities.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

You know what is scaring people? That the kids WANT to go to the Jesus lunch.


 Kids will come to ANYTHING if you feed them.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

They can try to say it the school campus all they want, but it's a public park, and even their own lease says the public can use it contemporaneously. Perhaps the city should revoke the school's lease.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

You know what is scaring people? That the kids WANT to go to the Jesus lunch.


 Kids will come to ANYTHING if you feed them.

flan


 Really?  Well, good thing that staying for the message part is voluntary.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:
flan327 wrote:

I knew he was a reporter for Fox News.

I hate Googling before 8:00...

flan


 What does that have to do with it?

What do you have to say about the content of it?

Is it ok the the school is trying to shut down something being done off campus, with private funds, on a voluntary basis?

Don't even think about the religious aspect.

Should the school have this right or ability?


 1. Because LIBERALS are told "cite your source." The article is so obviously slanted, it makes it hard for me to take it seriously.

2. I need more FACTS.

Don't tell me not to think about the religious aspect. Of course THAT is at the heart of the issue.

“We believe that religious or political events do not have a place in our school or on our campus, except when sponsored by a student group in accordance with our rules, which require prior approval,” the pair wrote in an email sent to parents on April 12."

flan

 


 Then go look them up instead of demanding others do it for you.


 I did look it up this morning. There were 2 articles, one of which you had posted.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

They can try to say it the school campus all they want, but it's a public park, and even their own lease says the public can use it contemporaneously. Perhaps the city should revoke the school's lease.


Yep.  I wonder what the school is actually going to try to do about this.  If kids are allowed to leave campus at lunch, there's not a damn thing they can do.  Are they going to tell them where they can and cannot go? 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

You know what is scaring people? That the kids WANT to go to the Jesus lunch.


 Kids will come to ANYTHING if you feed them.

flan


 Really?  Well, good thing that staying for the message part is voluntary.


 Actually, I should amend that to "people."

Libraries capitalize on that regularly.

flan

 



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

You know what is scaring people? That the kids WANT to go to the Jesus lunch.


 Kids will come to ANYTHING if you feed them.

flan


 Really?  Well, good thing that staying for the message part is voluntary.


 Actually, I should amend that to "people."

Libraries capitalize on that regularly.

flan

 


 So does everyone else.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

However, the important thing to remember is that this started as a group of moms meeting their own kids for lunch. And then more came, and more came. The growth is because the kids WANT to come.

If you have a problem with your own kid going, forbid them from doing so, but don't interfere with others.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

I do hope they can come to a compromise.

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Dona Worry Be Happy wrote:

500 kids is a LOT. It changes how I feel about it some.
If it was 15 or even 50, sure. But, 500? It sounds like a headache to have that many kids congregating in one place for lunch on a regular basis.
But, it seems like the sprt of thing that could use an open and respectful conversation before the knee jerk reaction of shut it down.


 A headache for who?  Not the school.  They are not responsible for the food (which, if you give food away, food preparation laws in most states don't apply), the venue, discipline, or anything. 



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:

I do hope they can come to a compromise.

flan


 Why should the moms have to compromise?  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
flan327 wrote:

I do hope they can come to a compromise.

flan


 Why should the moms have to compromise?  


Because the libs say so. no 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
flan327 wrote:

I do hope they can come to a compromise.

flan


 Why should the moms have to compromise?  


 Exactly.   They are on their own time, in a park pavilion they leased out, and are meeting with kids who voluntarily come. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

If the school wants to control what kids do during lunch hour, then close the campus.

Since they have open campus, they can't say "well, you can go to McDonald's, but not Burger King.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1758
Date:
Permalink  
 

The moms don't have to do anything differently. Except maybe tell the school suc.k it. But they pro ably want to be all Christian ya know. How horrible!

__________________
That's Mrs. Face to you!


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1758
Date:
Permalink  
 

Sometimes you have to stand up to bullies by refusing to acknowledge them.

__________________
That's Mrs. Face to you!


My dog name is Sasha, too!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6679
Date:
Permalink  
 

This is ridiculous. If the kids are allowed to leave campus for lunch then they can eat lunch anywhere they choose. If it is the public park on Jesus Lunch day then so be it.

As for the food handling I doubt they prohibit mom packed lunches so that is just moot. And these are HS students. I'm sure they know what they are allergic to at this point.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1758
Date:
Permalink  
 

If anyone from the school tries to physically stop them I hope they sue the school for harassment. Make it expensive for them to keep stepping out of place. I'm not even a super devout Christian but this school getting involved in things outside of school angers me.

__________________
That's Mrs. Face to you!


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lexxy wrote:

This is ridiculous. If the kids are allowed to leave campus for lunch then they can eat lunch anywhere they choose. If it is the public park on Jesus Lunch day then so be it.

As for the food handling I doubt they prohibit mom packed lunches so that is just moot. And these are HS students. I'm sure they know what they are allergic to at this point.


 Yep.  

 

If they open the campus and allow kids to leave - the kids get to go where they want.

If they allow sack lunches - the kids can eat what moms prepare.

 

 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

If this was Muslims serving Mohammed Lunch, or Satanists serving Satan Lunch, with a hefty dose of proselytizing with the free food, these same Christians would be screaming bloody murder.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

No. We might not like it but we wouldn't try to stop it. That's what libs do.

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

weltschmerz wrote:

If this was Muslims serving Mohammed Lunch, or Satanists serving Satan Lunch, with a hefty dose of proselytizing with the free food, these same Christians would be screaming bloody murder.


 Students have the right to join any group they want.  No one has the right to tell them otherwise.  And if Muslim parents want to have lunch with their Muslim students and pray - more power to them.  If Satanists want to do  whatever they do that's legal - have at it.  

I would personally tell my child not to go to either of those events, but I wouldn't be shutting it down - that's what FREEDOM means.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 

1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard