A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
The Republican Party has its own c0ckroach to deal with: the short-fingered Trumpus Americanus, an indestructible pest who happens to be its presidential nominee.
flan
-- Edited by flan327 on Sunday 12th of June 2016 09:33:35 PM
Trump maybe a womanizer. I'm fine with that. I don't feel the least bit threatened by it.
It doesn't subtract what he has to offer, what he can offer this country.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
But here's the thing: Trump's former wife Ivana said Trump raped her in a sworn deposition. Given how central a role rape accusations have played in Trump's campaign - against Mexicans, political opponents, etc. it is clearly a highly germane question, as frankly it would be for any presidential candidate.
The details surrounding the alleged rape are bizarrely novelistic even by Trumpian standards. According to Ivana, Trump was driven to freakish rage by a failed anti-baldness surgery - a so-called 'scalp reduction'. But the actions are very clear cut. According to her deposition, Trump flew into a rage, attacked her, held her down and began pulling hair out of her head to mimic his pain and then forcibly penetrated her.
There is also a lawsuit in California claiming that he raped a teenage girl when he was married to Marla Maples.
The woman, identified by RadarOnline as Katie Johnson, accused Trump and fellow billionaire Jeffrey Epstein of “making her their sex slave” for a four-month stretch of 1994.
The graphic lawsuit says the sexual abuse began when she was just 13 years old. Epstein is a convicted sex offender who pleaded guilty in 2008 for hiring an underage hooker — and then spent 13 months in prison.
Trump was accused of raping the teen after tying her to a bed during one of their perverse sessions.
You know how someone on the FBI watch list can buy a gun?
The same way a person under FBI investigation can run for president.
And idiots will still vote for her. Even as she lies about it.
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
Its unfortunate that you can't get behind a candidate that you really, really believe in.
Are there any on the horizon? The process is so expensive and LENGTHY!
My theory is our system makes it so expensive and lengthy so the really good ones will give up and go home and the bad ones stay.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
Its unfortunate that you can't get behind a candidate that you really, really believe in.
Are there any on the horizon? The process is so expensive and LENGTHY!
My theory is our system makes it so expensive and lengthy so the really good ones will give up and go home and the bad ones stay.
I don't believe the system does it on purpose SO the good ones give up & go home but ultimately that is the outcome. Only the underhanded, dirty ones taking campaign bribes (or filthy rich personally) can afford to stay in the race.
Its unfortunate that you can't get behind a candidate that you really, really believe in.
Are there any on the horizon? The process is so expensive and LENGTHY!
My theory is our system makes it so expensive and lengthy so the really good ones will give up and go home and the bad ones stay.
I don't believe the system does it on purpose SO the good ones give up & go home but ultimately that is the outcome. Only the underhanded, dirty ones taking campaign bribes (or filthy rich personally) can afford to stay in the race.
I do. I believe the whole system is dirty. From top to bottom. I don't believe our founding fathers would have wanted our system to look like this. I believe elections are so corrupt that it weeds out who will play the game with them and who won't.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
Its unfortunate that you can't get behind a candidate that you really, really believe in.
Are there any on the horizon? The process is so expensive and LENGTHY!
My theory is our system makes it so expensive and lengthy so the really good ones will give up and go home and the bad ones stay.
I don't believe the system does it on purpose SO the good ones give up & go home but ultimately that is the outcome. Only the underhanded, dirty ones taking campaign bribes (or filthy rich personally) can afford to stay in the race.
I do. I believe the whole system is dirty. From top to bottom. I don't believe our founding fathers would have wanted our system to look like this. I believe elections are so corrupt that it weeds out who will play the game with them and who won't.
I'm not quite a cynical as you (yet) but you do have some very valid points. Our founding fathers would be appalled & the system is dirty.
Trump maybe a womanizer. I'm fine with that. I don't feel the least bit threatened by it.
- lilyofcourse.
_________________________________________
Exactly. No one is nominating him for "Most loyal man to his wife". Trump's issues about fidelity have the same amount of bearing on his ability to be President as Bill Clinton's issues with fidelity had to do with his ability to be President. Exactly nothing.
There has been so much "sexual impropriety" in the White House, that they ought to institute a new House Staff position: Presidential Mistress (or Presidential Stud, if the President at the time is female). Then maybe the country wouldn't need to worry about it anymore.
Trump maybe a womanizer. I'm fine with that. I don't feel the least bit threatened by it. - lilyofcourse.
_________________________________________
Exactly. No one is nominating him for "Most loyal man to his wife". Trump's issues about fidelity have the same amount of bearing on his ability to be President as Bill Clinton's issues with fidelity had to do with his ability to be President. Exactly nothing.
There has been so much "sexual impropriety" in the White House, that they ought to institute a new House Staff position: Presidential Mistress (or Presidential Stud, if the President at the time is female). Then maybe the country wouldn't need to worry about it anymore.
Not if Hillary Clinton takes office. I'm sure that there's a person of masculine genetics out there that could tolerate having sex with her though. He could volunteer.
Not if Hillary Clinton takes office. I'm sure that there's a person of masculine genetics out there that could tolerate having sex with her though. He could volunteer.