TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: No recorded scientific data on mass shootings?


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1944
Date:
No recorded scientific data on mass shootings?
Permalink  
 


Part of the reason your nation has been unable to respond to the terrifying epidemic of mass shootings and gun violence in general is that very little is known about the phenomenon, whether it’s the warning signs, the motivations of killers or the methodology of murder. Unsurprisingly, the blame for that rests with your Republican politicians and the National Rifle Association. There is almost no recorded scientific data on mass shootings because research on gun violence has been illegal for the past twenty years.

Physicians, scientists, and Democratic lawmakers have all joined together to push for the end to the ban on gun violence research. 2,000 doctors have signed a petition demanding the repeal of this bill that actively contributes to the gun deaths of 89 Americans a day, joined by furious Democratic congressmen who have had enough of turning a blind eye to the daily slaughter of our citizens by their own countrymen.

The Dickey Amendment is one of the worst products of the unholy union between the gun lobby and conservative politicians, a marriage consecrated in the blood of the innocent. When the Center for Disease Control and other scientific institutes began publishing studies in the early 1990s which proved fairly obvious conclusions like “gun ownership drastically heightens the risk of homicide in the home,” the NRA called upon their Republican servants to smother the scientific endeavors.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1944
Date:
Permalink  
 

Do you think there is any truth to this?

__________________
FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18704
Date:
Permalink  
 

No, I don't believe so. More contraband to disarm the public.

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

I ask two questions when reading something like this.

1. What is the end goal of the article?

2. Is it an attempt to strip the 2nd amendment right from law abiding American citizens?



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1944
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think there just might be a bit of truth to it, the thing is, just because you don't like it, doesn't mean you should ignore it.

__________________
FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18704
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think there is no "scientific data", if there in fact is none, has more to do with a failure to address radical islam, or an unwillingness to bring back the asylums for the crazies.

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

apple wrote:

I think there just might be a bit of truth to it, the thing is, just because you don't like it, doesn't mean you should ignore it.


 What truth?



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1944
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:
apple wrote:

I think there just might be a bit of truth to it, the thing is, just because you don't like it, doesn't mean you should ignore it.


 What truth?


 nevermind.confuse



__________________


My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

Exactly.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:

Exactly.


 Yes, we DO get tired of trying to open petty minds.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1944
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

Exactly.


 Yes, we DO get tired of trying to open petty minds.

flan


 Its just not worth the effort. 



__________________


My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

I want to know what truth was in that.


__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:

I want to know what truth was in that.


 Ask your kids for help.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

apple wrote:
flan327 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

Exactly.


 Yes, we DO get tired of trying to open petty minds.

flan


 Its just not worth the effort. 


 It truly isn't.

Yet the same topics can actually be DEBATED elsewhere.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

I want to know what truth was in that.


 Ask your kids for help.

flan


 What do my kids have to do with anything?

This is the second time you've brought my kids up today.

Why is that? 

 



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

ANALYSIS: In One Year, Gun Owners Stopped Hundreds Of Criminals, Saved Countless Lives [INFOGRAPHIC]

Casey Harper, Ethan Barton and Luke Rosiak
 
 

Gun carrying, private citizens who used firearms to stop criminal attacks saved at least 283 potential victims in a period between July 2014 and July 2015, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation analysis.

TheDCNF concluded its analysis as President Barack Obama announced Tuesday another push by his administration to tighten federal gun control laws in an attempt to curb gun violence.

Does Gun Control Save Lives Or Kill Lives?

  Save Lives         Kill Lives       

Completing this poll entitles you to Daily Caller news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

While Obama quotes the more than 30,000 gun deaths in a year — omitting that 60 percent are suicides, 6 percent are gang related3 percent are accidents, and the vast majority of the rest occur in urban areas — TheDCNF found that a noteworthy number of kids, the elderly, and women successfully defended themselves against criminals by use of gun fire.

TheDCNF analyzed 195 random incidents where gun owners used firearms to save their lives, and often the lives of others. We wanted to know, not just how many perpetrators were killed, but how many potential victims were saved.

 

In the interactive graphic below, clicking demographics boxes will narrow your results to see specific data points. For example, see handgun incidents in Texas by clicking “TX” in the State category and “handgun” in the Gun category. Click on individual pins on the map for more details.


Of the nearly 200 cases we analyzed, people carrying guns saved at least 283 potential victims, whether it was a man protecting his family from thugs or a 9mm-toting grandma warding off a burglar in her living room.

In 60 of those cases, the single gun carrier was the only potential victim. In 43 cases, there were 2 potential victims. In nine cases there were three victims and in nine more cases there were four or more victims.

In 74 cases, it was unknown how many potential victims were present but it can be assumed there was at least one.  If the 74 potential victims followed the same distribution as the other cases, then the number of potential victims would actually be at least 335.

 

In one case, four Florida men put on masks and grabbed weapons in a planned burglary attempt of a Melbourne home in June of 2015. When one of the men came inside, he held a woman and her child at gunpoint. As the woman protected her child with her own body, the homeowner pulled out his handgun and opened fire on the robbers. The criminals fled, one injured, and the three victims were left unharmed.

The data shows that little less than a third of the people defending themselves with guns were women. Of the 173 cases where gender is known, 133 were male and 40 were female.

The most common age of a defender was middle aged, in their 40’s or 50’s. It’s also worth noting that of the 72 cases where the age of the defender is known, 15 defenders were elderly people over 60 years old and nine were minors under 18 years old. They were most often defending themselves against adult males under 30 years old.

Phyllis Law, a 63-year-old Alabama grandmother, was a victim of multiple robberies to her home and had even boarded up her windows to keep thieves out. But in July of 2014, a male robber broke into her home, and Law hid with her 9mm pistol while her granddaughter hid in the closet.

Law told Fox 10 News that when the man came into her home, “I jumped up and just started shooting and he hollered and turned around and ran A lot of them come in people’s house, kill them, take what they want and leave. Like I said, not here.”

Young people used guns for self defense as well. In September of 2014, an 11-year-old Oklahoma girl awoke around 4 a.m. to find that a man had broken into her home and stabbed her mother. The girl grabbed a handgun and shot the man twice, saving her mother’s life. The mother said she had just taught the daughter how to use the gun for self defense the week before.

Gun carriers were able to defend themselves usually without killing the suspect. Of 217 suspects in our analysis, 148 survived their encounter with a gun carrier, whether they survived a gunshot wound or simply fled. The remaining 69 were killed, so more than half the suspects involved survived.

Most often, when people used guns to defend themselves, it was in the home. Of the 194 cases where location is known, gun owners used firearms to defend the home 114 times. They pulled the trigger in a place of business or in public about 40 times each.

In many cases, it’s unclear how many potential victims would be saved. For example, if a man robbed a convenience store at gunpoint but was stopped by a man with a gun, it may not be documented how many people were in the store who could have been harmed.

Handguns were by far the most popular firearm of choice for self defense, with more than half of defenders using them. The DCNF obtained the stories from gunssavelives.net and independently verified the data.

Neal Earley contributed to this report.



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1586
Date:
Permalink  
 


Part of the reason your nation has been unable to respond to the terrifying epidemic of mass shootings and gun violence in general is that very little is known about the phenomenon, whether it’s the warning signs, the motivations of killers or the methodology of murder. Unsurprisingly, the blame for that rests with your Republican politicians and the National Rifle Association. There is almost no recorded scientific data on mass shootings because research on gun violence has been illegal for the past twenty years.
_____________________________________________________

pure bs


__________________

" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke

 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Where do people come up with such nonsense? Gun violence research illegal? That's ridiculous.



Guns save more lives than they take. And my right to own guns should never be affected by the acts of a criminal.


Tell the government to enforce the laws they have - and when a gun shop owner calls the damn FBI to warn about someone, they should take it seriously.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard