TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: New Ontario Law Enables Gov’t to Seize Children from Parents Opposing Gender Transition


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
New Ontario Law Enables Gov’t to Seize Children from Parents Opposing Gender Transition
Permalink  
 


New Ontario Law Enables Gov’t to Seize Children from Parents Opposing Gender Transition

 
 
 
 

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

 

The Canadian government may legally remove children from families that refuse to accept their child’s chosen “gender identity” thanks to new legislation passed by the Ontario province.

Bill 89, “Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act, 2017,” was approved on June 1 by a vote of 63 to 23.

 
 
 
 

The Minister of Children and Youth Services, Michael Coteau, who introduced the bill, said earlier this year that a parent’s failure to recognize and support a child’s gender self-identification is a form of child abuse, and a child in these circumstances should be removed from the situation and placed into protection.

“I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently,” Coteau said. “If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.”

The new bill replaces the Child and Family Services Act, or Bill 28, which governed child protection, foster care and adoption services.

While “gender identity” and “gender expression” are included in the new legislation as important factors to be considered in determining “the best interests of the child,” the religious faith in which the parents are raising the child—present in former laws—has been removed from consideration for assessing the child’s best interests.

Child protection agents, adoption service providers and judges are now required to take into account and respect a child’s “race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.”

The former law stated that the parent of a child in care has the right “to direct the child’s education and religious upbringing.” The new law has removed that consideration, saying parents can direct the child’s education and upbringing “in accordance with the child’s or young person’s creed, community identity and cultural identity.”

Some Christians have reacted strongly to the new bill, calling it a violation of parents’ primordial rights to educate their children and a direct assault on Christian beliefs.

“With the passage of Bill 89, we’ve entered an era of totalitarian power by the state, such as never witnessed before in Canada’s history,” said Jack Fonseca, senior political strategist for Campaign Life Coalition. “Make no mistake, Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and all people of faith who have children, or who hope to grow their family through adoption.”

Canadian child protection services are no stranger to invasive micromanagement of child-rearing according to a predetermined worldview.

In April of this year, a Christian couple filed a lawsuit against Hamilton Children’s Aid Society after two foster children were removed from their care because they refused tell the children that the Easter bunny is real.

“We have a no-lying policy,” said Derek Baars, one of the foster parents, as the motivation for disobeying a child support worker who ordered him and his wife to tell the two girls in their care, aged 3 and 4, that the Easter bunny is real.

“We explained to the agency that we are not prepared to tell the children a lie. If the children asked, we would not lie to them, but we wouldn’t bring it up ourselves,” Baars said.

Follow Thomas D. Williams



-- Edited by Lady Gaga Snerd on Tuesday 6th of June 2017 04:05:08 PM

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2279
Date:
Permalink  
 

JEEZ!!!!

__________________


My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

Coming to a state near you.

I really do not understand how anyone can not see this for mental illness.

Anytime you think you are some thing you are not, that is a mental illness.

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nationalist state. Needs to be stopped. But that is Canada so not our place. However we need to make this very public in the U.S. letting people know what their liberal laws lead to. What is next? You feed your kid some food that the gov't doesn't approve of so they take your kid away?

__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

So, ok I get there are various opinions on that. But, they are opinions. So what? That should'n't be an opportunity for a govt to come intervene in your life.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

People.

This isn't about gender identity or abuse.

Read it again.

This law is about taking away religious freedom.

That's is the difference between bill 88 and bill 89.

The only difference.

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't necessarily agree that Jazz should be undergoing surgery, hormone treatments, etc. However, I will defer to the parents that they are truly trying to do what is in the best interest of their child. However, I do think that medical ethics should address these life altering treatments though and the risks of cancers and so forth.
On the other hand, there are parents who do not wish to do that and wish to proceed in a different manner, and they should also be given that liberty.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

That is insane.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard