The State Department has opened a formal inquiry into whether former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her aides mishandled classified information while she was the nation’s top diplomat, Fox News has learned. Despite being under investigation, Clinton and her staffers still have security clearances to access sensitive government information.
The department’s investigation aims to determine whether Clinton and her closest aides violated government protocols by using her private server to receive, hold and transmit classified and top-secret government documents. The department declined to say when its inquiry began, but it follows the conclusion of the FBI’s probe into the matter, which did not result in any actions being taken against Clinton or any of her aides.
Depending on the outcome of the current State Department inquiry, Clinton and her aides could have their access to sensitive government documents terminated.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, confirmed to Fox News the department’s formal inquiry.
Meanwhile, Grassley’s committee launched its own inquiry into Clinton’s handling of emails, an inquiry that began in March. Grassley cited among his concerns the July 5 statement of former FBI Director James Comey that the agency found Clinton and her staff members were “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.” Grassley also contended there is “evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information...”
During the FBI’s investigation of Clinton’s use of top-secret and classified information on her private server, Comey said there were seven email chains on Clinton’s computer that were classified at the “Top Secret/Special Access Program level.” Another 2,000 emails on her private server were found to have contained information deemed classified now, though not marked classified when sent. In addition, the server also contained 22 top-secret emails deemed too damaging to national security to be released.
Clinton’s spokesperson, Nick Merrill, told Fox News that the investigation into Clinton’s mishandling of classified information is done.
“Nothing's been more thoroughly dissected. It's over. Case closed. Literally,” said Merrill.
That's not a universally held view.
Chris Farrell, of Judicial Watch, a conservative Washington-based government watchdog that has filed a number of lawsuits related to the Clinton email scandal, said he believes Clinton and her “circle of national security criminals” should not have access to any classified information for any reason.
“Their conduct has cost them that privileged position of special trust and confidence,” Farrell said.
Any other government employee would have been prosecuted under 18 USC Sec. 793(f) (“Mishandling National Defense Information”) and be subject to a long prison sentence and large fines, Farrell added.
“This flagrant double standard for the gang that exposed Top Secret Codeword material to the Russians, Chinese and others is both offensive and deeply corrosive to the intelligence community,” Farrell said. “There is no better evidence that when it comes to Hillary Clinton and her côtèrie — laws are for the little people.”
Malia Zimmerman is an award-winning investigative reporter.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
She is no longer employed in any way by the government, right?
Shouldn't revoking her clearance been the first thing done?
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Well hold on. Security clearances are renewed every 10 years, Top Secret every 5 years I believe. If she were under a true investigation, her clearance would be revoked, but as we all know they are looking the other way on her misdeeds. But even though she has a security clearance that doesn't mean she has access to classified materials.
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
It was my understanding that security clearances are different for each agency and expire when the employee resigns or changes agencies. And they don't automatically ensure full access to classified materials. It's on a "need to know" basis, and there are levels of security clearances. TS is not the highest.
Interesting, IKWTDS. Is that new? I was told that they were not transferable, even if I was transferring to another agency under DOJ. (It's been 10 years since I was with DOJ).
Interesting, IKWTDS. Is that new? I was told that they were not transferable, even if I was transferring to another agency under DOJ. (It's been 10 years since I was with DOJ).
I don't know if it's new. I do know that your employer does not "own" your clearance. When I changed jobs 2 years ago, my clearance came with me.
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
