•  
•  
•  
•  
• e-mail 

589

View comments

 

+7

 

Lisa Bloom tried to arrange payments of up to $750,000 for women who said they had been accused by Donald Trump to have them come forward before the election 

Celebrity attorney Lisa Bloom tried to bag 'donations' of up to $750,000 for women accusing President Trump of sexual harassment during the 2016 election, it has been revealed.   

Bloom, who prides herself on representing sexual assault accusers pro-bono, also tried to land commissions for herself by having them sell their stories to television and media outlets for a fee which she would take a cut out of. 

She worked with four separate women, including two who have never come forward, who alleged sexual misconduct against the president.

Her attempts to secure payment for them were revealed by The Hill on Friday and confirmed by the 56-year-old later in a lengthy statement in which she called the journalist who revealed them biased and insisted she had done nothing wrong. 

Later, she shared the phone number, email address and IP address of someone who sent her an abusive email.  

None of the women say that Bloom encouraged them to be dishonest but they say they were surprised by her eagerness for them to go public with their claims before election day.

One, who never went public with her story but demanded escalating amounts from donors at the time, said she was disgusted by Bloom's recent and brief representation of Harvey Weinstein and that this was why she had now chosen to speak out. 

'I couldn’t understand how she could say she was for people like me and then represent someone like him.  And then all the money stuff I knew about. I just became frustrated,' she said. 

 

Bloom responded to the news on Friday by describing it as an attempt by the 'right wing' to undermine the accusers 

The attempts include requests to  Clinton Super Pacs which refused to pay. 

The donors who were willing to pay have not been named. Bloom claims they 'approached' her 'out of the blue' after another accuser backed out of a November 2 press conference because she was afraid. 

The donors, Bloom said, did not want another woman to fear the same rebuke and so offered the cash to give them peace of mind about speaking out. 

She insisted she had no contact with Clinton or anyone from her campaign. 

In one case, the lawyer and her husband set up a GoFundMe page for one accuser, Jill Harth, to 'get her back on her feet'. 

It only raised $2,300 but the same woman had her mortgage paid off by an unnamed donor. 

The most tenacious attempts were to secure money for a woman who never ended up going public with her story against Trump. 

At one stage, Bloom claims she asked for as much as $2million to be able to 'relocate' with her daughter after announcing her accusations.  She cooperated with The Hill to share how Bloom tried to get her money.

In her claims to the newspaper, the woman claimed Bloom was in a hurry to have her share her story before the November 8 election. 

They exchanged numerous text messages where they discussed what Bloom could 'get' for her. 

One week before election day and after 'weeks of back and forth', Bloom sent her a text message which read: 'Give us a clear sense of what you need and we will see if it we can get it.' 

 

+7

 

Harth (pictured with the president) said he assaulted her in 1993. She took licensing fees for photos from media outlets but stood by Bloom's representation of her on Friday 

 

+7

 

Alongside donations from mysterious donors who gave Jill Harth a sum, described as being under $30,000 to pay off her mortgage, Bloom and her husband Braden Pollock set up a GoFundMe page to raise money for her. It only raised $2,300 

 

+7

 

Harth defended Bloom and said her representation of her and all the accusers was above board. She insisted that her claims against Trump were just as credible as ever and that the money she received did nothing to change that 

The woman replied that she was scared, 'couldn't relocate' as she believed she would have to and 'didn't like taking other people's money'. 

Bloom replied: 'Ok let’s not do this then. We are just about out of time anyway.' 

The woman was a friend of Jill Harth, a make-up artist who claims she was assaulted by Trump in 1993. She filed a lawsuit against him in 1997 and it was unearthed during the campaign.

Harth went public with her accusation and was represented by Bloom. Her unnamed friend said she initially considered coming forward to support her but not to sink Trump's campaign. 

She supported the president politically, told Bloom as much and even had a photograph on her Facebook account of the pair which Bloom told her to remove when they were considering publicizing her claims. 

She says Bloom first offered her a $10,000 donation to her church but asked her to keep it confidential. The Hill did not specify in its report whether that initial offer was sponsored by a donor. 

By November, the offers grown to $50,000 then to $100,000 which had been offered by a mysterious donor to help 'any Trump accuser' relocate and pay for any additional security they might need after sharing their claims. 

The woman refused the $100,000 offer and asked for more, replying to Bloom that she wanted enough money to send her daughter to college. 

 

+7

 

Bloom said the donors contacted her 'out of the blue' after a November 2 press conference (above) where a separate accuser who was meant to appear suddenly backed out. The donors, she said, offered the other women money to ensure their safety should they wish to speak out against Trump who was, at the time, still a candidate 

She became bold in her requests and once asked the lawyer if any Clinton Super Pacs would be willing to stump up the money. 

In a reply to one text message in October, Bloom admitted to 'reaching out to them' but said they turned her down.

It is not clear if she ever asked them directly for money.  

'I have already reached out to Clinton Super PACs and they are not paying. I can get you paid for some interviews however,' she said.  

As the demands grew, the donors backed out and the woman eventually refused. 

Bloom claimed that she asked for $2million at one stage, a ludicrous amount which she said she told her would be a 'non-starter'. The offers of around $100,000 remained but the woman refused.

On November 5, after the woman lost contact with Bloom because she was hospitalized for an unknown medical condition, the attorney sent her a text message which read: 'I am confused because you sent me so many nice texts Wednesday night after my other client wasted so much of my time and canceled the press conference. 

 

+7

 

One of the accusers said she was prompted to speak out about Bloom's attempts to secure money after learning she represented alleged serial sex abuser Harvey Weinstein (pictured above together in October a day before the first accusations about him emerged) 

'That meant a lot to me. Thursday you said you wanted to do this if you could be protected/relocated. I begged you not to jerk me around after what I had just gone through.

'You have treated me very poorly. I have treated you with great respect as much as humanly possible. I have not made a dime off your case and I have devoted a great deal of time. It doesn’t matter. I could have done so much for you. 

'But you can’t stick to your word even when you swear you will.' 

The press conference she referred to was one which was abruptly canceled on November 2. Bloom had touted it to the media and reporters had gathered to attend it when the unnamed woman backed out with minutes to spare. 

'She is living in fear. She has decided that she is too afraid to show her face,' Bloom told reporters at the time.  

A day after those texts, Bloom met the woman at a hotel in Virginia and offered her a final sum of $750,000 - to be put up by an unnamed donor - to pay for protection and relocation if she went public. 

She refused it and they went their separate ways. 

The woman never participated in any media interviews but signed a contract Bloom sent her which stated that a 33 per cent cut of any media fees she collected by speaking out would be taken for The Bloom Firm. 

She highlighted certain shows which she knew paid for stories and highlighted those that did not, namely CBS which the two accusers had been approached by to share their allegations. 

In text messages, Bloom told the woman: 'Outlets with which I have good relationships that may pay for your first on camera interview, revealing your name and face: Inside Edition, Dr. Phil, LawNewz.com. 

'My best estimate of what I could get for you would be $10-15,000 (less our 1/3 attorney fee).

'If you are interested I would recommend Inside Edition or Dr. Phil as they are much bigger. Dr. Phil is doing a show on Trump accusers next Tuesday in LA and would fly you here and put you up in a nice hotel, and pay for your meals as well, with your daughter if you like. 

'Media moves very quickly so you need to decide and then once confirmed, you need to stick to it.' 

Producers for both Dr. Phil and Inside Edition said they did not pay any Trump accusers for appearances. 

Bloom hit back at The Hill's article on Friday. In a lengthy statement, she labeled it a 'smear story' and said that any fee her clients would have received from media appearances was insignificant compared to Trump's billions. 

She defended her firm's policy of taking a 33 percent cut of the fees, claiming it ensured her staff were paid. 

'In pro bono cases (where we work for free or at sharply reduced fees), we add a line in our client agreements that if the client gets paid for media interviews our law firm gets one-third. This seems fair to us and our clients.