I can't believe this! Isn't graffiti really vandalism? So they're being rewarded for vandalism and the owner of the building is being punished because he wanted to tear down HIS OWN BUILDING? Surely this will be overturned!!!
"A judge awarded $6.7 million Monday to graffiti artists who sued after dozens of their works were destroyed on the walls of dilapidated warehouses torn down to make room for high-rise luxury residences. US District Judge Frederic Block in Brooklyn said 45 of the 49 paintings were recognized works of art "wrongfully and willfully destroyed" by an "unrepentant" landlord. Twenty-one artists had sued the owner of a Long Island City, Queens, site known as 5Pointz under the Visual Artists Rights Act, a 1990 federal law that protects artists' rights even if someone else owns the physical artwork. Their graffiti was painted over in 2013, and the buildings were torn down a year later, reports the AP. Before they vanished, the graffiti became a tourist attraction, drawing thousands daily and forming a backdrop to the 2013 movie Now You See Me, as well as a site for an Usher tour, the judge noted.
All the while, the crime-ridden neighborhood gradually improved, and it became the "world's largest collection of quality outdoor aerosol art," Block wrote. The ruling followed a November trial in which Block said the "respectful, articulate, and credible" artists testified about "striking technical and artistic mastery and vision worthy of display in prominent museums if not on the walls of 5Pointz." Owner Jerry Wolkoff conceded he allowed the artists to use the buildings as a canvas for decades but said they always knew they would be torn down. The artists had once hoped to buy the properties, before their value soared to over $200 million. "Wolkoff could care less. As he callously testified," the judge said. "The sloppy, half-hearted nature of the whitewashing left the works easily visible under thin layers of cheap, white paint, reminding the plaintiffs on a daily basis what had happened."
One "artist" said she felt raped when she saw that her work had been whitewashed...really? Raped???
And just my pet peeve...the judge should have said "Wolkoff could NOT care less."
I saw this article today. I do not get the ability to vandalize a privately owned building and be rewarded for it. but I think it was done when the buildings were in bankruptcy I Don't know!
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
Shouldn't matter if the buildings where in bankruptcy or not. It's still not there to vandalize.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
You know what? Vandalism is vandalism, no matter if the base matter is in bankruptcy or not. The "artist" went onto private property & marred the property with unasked for graffiti. Tough titties for the "artist". There is so much graffiti in NYC - you can't even go 20 feet before you see some "artist's" rendering of what she/he is espousing.
You know what, "artists"? Buy your own canvas! If I don't like what you have sprayed on my own building, I have every right to paint over it!
And BTW, I'm from NYC, and my DH had his
office in Long Island City.
-- Edited by Momala on Wednesday 14th of February 2018 10:09:25 AM