Hi, Carolyn: Our daughter “Annie” has moved back home at age 33 to save some money while doing postdoc work and teaching college courses. She works hard and studies for grueling hours, and she contributes to household expenses. Our daughter “Bonnie” has moved back home at 29 after a sudden breakup, bringing our 15-month-old grandchild with her. Bonnie works but does not earn much money, and we are encouraging her to save it instead of giving it to us because we know she wants to live independently with her child as soon as possible.
When Bonnie is not working, she is mostly tied up with her baby.
Neither daughter really contributes to the housework, but they are good housemates and we are really happy to have them both home.
Annie is resentful that Bonnie does not pay “rent,” and feels she has been given a pass simply because she has a child. Bonnie feels judged and looked down on by her sister. My husband and I are often caught in the middle, and the tension sometimes leads us to regret opening our home to both kids.
STORY FROM HILTON
Need Help Planning the Perfect Weekend Getaway?
See more →
One or both will probably move out within the next year. Until then, how do we cope? Do we intervene or stay out of it?
- Boomeranged
Two things.
(1) Annie is being shortsighted. Good families don’t take care of everything equally; instead they commit equally to taking care of needs. That means if Annie needs X she gets X, and if Bonnie need Y she gets Y, because what exactly is accomplished by handing Bonnie X just because that’s what Annie got? I use the term “shortsighted” because neither you nor Annie nor Bonnie knows what is in store for everyone, so for all you know Annie is five years out from needing XYZ all at once – and the pricklier she gets with Bonnie now, the more Annie opens herself to Bonnie’s resentful payback, plus interest. Which I hope she won’t do because that’s petty, but still.
Read more:
Mother and son worry about disclosing sexuality
Parents want to avoid gender stereotypes
(2) Annie is paying her way, but she doesn’t hold voting shares in your household. You decide how your resources are allocated, you decide which kid needs what, you decide what’s fair. If Annie isn’t happy to be mooching on less favorable terms than her sister is, then she needs to either take that up with you or move out. Resenting Bonnie for it is misplaced and unfair.
So, time to sit down with Annie. State your policy clearly: Different kids, different needs, same commitment to meeting needs, with the understanding that life is long and bean-counting serves nobody. If she’s not willing to trust that your home is a supportive one and that your judgment is good and that things will even out in the end, then she can take her complaints to you, and even propose other solutions, or forever hold her peace – because you will not stand for tension or hostility between the siblings.
If there’s old baggage here and either Annie or Bonnie tries to hand it back to you by way of explanation for the current rift, then decline to accept it. Say you will think carefully about your role in creating this dynamic – toward moving forward, however. Not back.
Have Bonnie pay rent but put a portion of it in savings for her. It would probably take much longer to save for her own place if left to do it on her own. Both daughters need a share of the household chores.
Well, it isn't Anne's business one way or the other what her parents choose to do. So, if she doesnt' like it, move out. On the other why are they making Anne pay and giving Bonnie a free ride? So, cut Anne some slack and give her a free ride too.
I agree with the advise. Parents do treat their kids differently depending on specific needs. However, the household chore thing bothers me. Both girls should be doing cleaning/helping regardless of their schedules.
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
I would charge them both rent and like SB said, put it in savings for Bonnie. Actually, if rent wasn't needed to support the household, I would return Annie's when she moved out as well. But I would tell neither of my intent. And they need to step up and do some chores.
I think I would resent a sibling that was living scott free if I were required to pay. It would be hard not to become resentful. I would feel I was being punished for being more successful, and that my sibling was being favored for being a screw up.
I think I would resent a sibling that was living scott free if I were required to pay. It would be hard not to become resentful. I would feel I was being punished for being more successful, and that my sibling was being favored for being a screw up.
This except I did not resent the sibling, I resented the parents for doing that. DB cannot rub 2 nickels together and come out with a penny. My parents, and now Mom, have bailed out DB so many times over the years and continue to do so. While DH and I are responsible, pay our bills on time, put $$ into savings (albeit not as much as we should). The last time we borrowed any money was after we moved in and needed to have the driveway replaced. We had used up most of our reserves with getting the house ready for us to move in. We paid it back within a few years.
I've bailed out each of late DH's six kids,
in one way or another, and none of them
have made any effort to repay the "loan".
I never help any of them with money that
I can't afford to say good-bye to, because
I know they'll just forget about repaying
me.
Giving Bonnie a free ride does not teach her the ability to live independently. There is no place else that is going to let her live for free. She should be contributing as well. They should make the contribution a percentage of each person's pay - therefore, it is an equal contribution if not an equal amount.
If they want to gift it back later -that's up to them.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
