TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Marriott to pay $600G fine for jamming hotspots


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Marriott to pay $600G fine for jamming hotspots
Permalink  
 


Marriott to pay $600G fine for jamming hotspots

The Marriott logo is shown on a hotel

The Marriott logo is shown on a hotel in a 2013 photo.

Travel deals

Marriott International will pay the government a $600,000 fine for jamming conference attendees' own Wi-Fi networks at one of its hotels, forcing them instead to pay as much as $1,000 each to use the hotel's own connection.

Frequent travelers often carry personal Wi-Fi hotspots — tiny devices that can connect to the Internet via cell phone towers. For $50 a month, they can connect to the Internet on the move, often avoiding hefty fees charged by hotels, airports and conference facilities. Last year, a conference attendee at the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center in Nashville, Tennessee — which is managed by Marriott — found that the hotel was jamming their device in its ballrooms and complained to the Federal Communications Commission. In the complaint, the guest noted that it had happed previously at another Gaylord property.

The FCC said Marriott charged conference exhibitors $250 to $1,000, per device, to use the Gaylord's Wi-Fi connection. The FCC declined to release the initial guest complaint except if requested under the Freedom of Information Act, a process that can often take weeks.

While agreeing to the fine, Marriott on Friday defended the practice of jamming guests' own Wi-Fi networks. The company said this wasn't aimed at charging guests extra for Internet access but about protecting its network. It said the hotel's actions were legal and encouraged the FCC to change its rules "to eliminate the ongoing confusion" and "to assess the merits of its underlying policy."

"Marriott has a strong interest in ensuring that when our guests use our Wi-Fi service, they will be protected from rogue wireless hotspots that can cause degraded service, insidious cyber-attacks and identity theft," the company said in a statement, adding that hospitals and universities employee similar jamming practices.

Marriott operates or franchise more than 4,000 hotels around the world. A spokesman for the company wouldn't say how many other hotels employ block personal Wi-Fi connections.

The government said people who purchase cellular data plans should be able to use them without fear that their personal connection will be blocked.

"It is unacceptable for any hotel to intentionally disable personal hotspots while also charging consumers and small businesses high fees to use the hotel's own Wi-Fi network," Travis LeBlanc, chief of the FCC's enforcement bureau said in a statement. "This practice puts consumers in the untenable position of either paying twice for the same service or forgoing Internet access altogether."

 

Link:

http://www.newsday.com/business/marriott-international-to-pay-600-000-fine-for-jamming-conference-attendees-hotspots-1.9463852



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think they'd have a better chance of convincing people they were only protecting their network if they weren't gouging to use it.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4189
Date:
Permalink  
 

Wow, I've never had to pay that much to use a hotel's wireless. Actually, free wi-fi is something it look for when booking a place to stay. But once I was at a work conference where I didn't pick where we stayed, the wi-fi was $5-8/day I believe. $250 is ridiculous

__________________

Faith makes things possible, not easy



Nothing's Impossible

Status: Offline
Posts: 16913
Date:
Permalink  
 

They were jamming the people who paid for wifi hotspots from their provider so they could charge them for the service. That's criminal.

__________________

A person's a person no matter how small.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Damn! We always stay at Marriott when we travel.

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

I already have a Mi-Fi, so there should be no reason to use the hotel's public system.

Just because they're providing it, doesn't mean it's safe or secure. It's like the wi-fi in airports, they're hacker heaven.

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

If it can be done, it will be done if someone can find a way to make a buck off of it.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

ed11563 wrote:

I already have a Mi-Fi, so there should be no reason to use the hotel's public system.

Just because they're providing it, doesn't mean it's safe or secure. It's like the wi-fi in airports, they're hacker heaven.

 


What do they care as long as they get the Benjamins? 



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard