Show me ANY part of the Constitution, or even any federal law that says that sermons are not and can not be protected speech--political, religious, or otherwise. You can't.
This is a rogue judge trying to make new law from the bench.
It isn't the judge - it's the city's lawyers. It hasn't reached the judge, yet.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Show me ANY part of the Constitution, or even any federal law that says that sermons are not and can not be protected speech--political, religious, or otherwise. You can't.
This is a rogue judge trying to make new law from the bench.
It isn't the judge - it's the city's lawyers. It hasn't reached the judge, yet.
No, it was appealed to one court and they upheld it. Not sure at what level. Might not even be federal.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Show me ANY part of the Constitution, or even any federal law that says that sermons are not and can not be protected speech--political, religious, or otherwise. You can't.
This is a rogue judge trying to make new law from the bench.
It isn't the judge - it's the city's lawyers. It hasn't reached the judge, yet.
No, it was appealed to one court and they upheld it. Not sure at what level. Might not even be federal.
Huh? Where was that?
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Show me ANY part of the Constitution, or even any federal law that says that sermons are not and can not be protected speech--political, religious, or otherwise. You can't.
This is a rogue judge trying to make new law from the bench.
It isn't the judge - it's the city's lawyers. It hasn't reached the judge, yet.
No, it was appealed to one court and they upheld it. Not sure at what level. Might not even be federal.
Huh? Where was that?
It was in the article I read on Yahoo News yesterday. I don't know if I can still find it, or not.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.