TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: How Jesus 'the Glutton and the Drunk' Embraced Life Beyond the Religiously Accepted Limit


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
How Jesus 'the Glutton and the Drunk' Embraced Life Beyond the Religiously Accepted Limit
Permalink  
 


How Jesus 'the Glutton and the Drunk' Embraced Life Beyond the Religiously Accepted Limit

Posted: 10/24/2014 12:21 pm EDT Updated: 10/24/2014 12:59 pm EDT

 

 

 

Jesus was a controversial figure in society, outrageously controversial, in fact. He lived in a time that was far more extreme regarding the religious culture, with far more extreme consequences for not towing the religious party line, yet who could live like him today?

It's interesting, upon reflection, to feel that on one side we like to talk about Jesus' controversial reputation, but at the same time we like to remain in the more conservative lifestyle that does not offend the religious structure and those who populate them.

We love the idea of the wildly-free Jesus, but, in our minds, we quietly hold onto the quiet, submissive Jesus. The wild Jesus, though fun to quote, makes us nervous. He doesn't just rock the boat of religion, it's more likely that he sets it on fire and then jumps into the water and swims to shore.

One of the greatest challenges any Christian faces is the risk of falling in love with the idea of being like Jesus (WWJD?) while failing to recognize what a life lived in his footsteps truly looks like.

pin_it_button.png2014-10-24-party.jpg

The life of Christ was not lived in a bubble of holy rollers, going through the same worship songs over and over, hiding away from society in their prayer meetings and revival events. Jesus was in the midst of the party of life. He was at the center of the celebration, with people, all kinds of people, from all kinds of walks of life, with all kinds of world views and lifestyles.

Jesus was in the midst of the brokenness of life. When a woman was set to be stoned for her immorality, Jesus was there to defend her from the angry religious crowd. The Samaritan woman by the well, whom no one would talk with, there was Jesus starting a conversation. The lepers that no one would get close to, there was Jesus willing to touch them.

pin_it_button.pngsupport

Jesus didn't get a reputation amongst the religious as a 'glutton and a drunk' because of what he taught, but because he lived what he taught.

Religion wants everything sanitized. More than anything, religion is obsessed with maintaining a squeaky clean reputation, the very thing Jesus didn't seem to care about at all. For example, it's acceptable in modern Christian culture to hand a prostitute a flower and tell her God loves her, so long as you are on an organized 'ministry' trip and wearing a ministry branded shirt so those passing by can clearly see that you are a church person on a godly 'mission.'

But that wasn't what Jesus would do, at least I don't get that impression about him. No, he would more likely stroll up and ask how much the prostitutes rates are. Then he would probably pay her, go into the brothel with her. Then he'd talk to her for the hour, actually chat and enjoy her company, and then tell her he'd be back the next day. And he'd probably do this knowing the 'ministry' team across the road handing out flowers was watching him in disgust.

What would we think of Jesus if we saw him pay a prostitute, go into the brothel with her and come out an hour later with a smile on his face? We'd probably think he wasn't really the Christ after all. Ah, yes, and this was exactly the problem of the Pharisees, wasn't it? Jesus failed to live up to their idea of the Christ, which was, coincidentally, the exact image of their own religiously sanitized ideology.

As much as we love Jesus, I think until we allow our own reputation to become as trampled and dirty in the eyes of the religious as he allowed his to become, we'll never quite understand him, nor his message. Until we break free from the prison of maintaining a religiously acceptable reputation, we will continue to read about the wild Jesus in Scripture, but we'll struggle to truly understand him, and the way of life he exemplified.

Jesus was a reckless lover of people, and he refused to bow down to the religious expectation of loving from a distance. He was up close, real, and embracing of all people, from all walks of life. He was hated by the religious not for this theology, but for his love, for his love was not made up by words he spoke, but by the life he lived.

It's a daring thought, a wild, revolutionary act, to consider your religious image in society 'rubbish' (to quote the Apostle Paul) in order to come to truly know Christ. But I believe it's worth it. You might end up with a reputation like Jesus: "Here is a glutton and a drunk, and worse, a friend of prostitutes and sinners." . . . but isn't it Jesus we hope to be like in any case?

You can connect with Mick on his facebook page and also view a list of his books on amazon.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mick-mooney/how-jesus-the-glutton-and_b_6040778.html?utm_hp_ref=religion

 



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't disagree with all of his points--BUT--it's interesting that NONE of these articles that purport to say what Jesus would or would not do (especially ones on Huffpost) quote even ONE Bible verse to back up their assertions.

If you are going to say what Jesus might or might not do--that is the ONLY credible source of information.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yeah, they make some good points, but when they try to decide what Jesus would do, ie enter a brothel, etc, they are out of their league. That is why I personally never wore or liked those WWJD bracelets. I don't always KNOW what Jesus would do. YOu cannot put God in a box. His ways are higher than our ways. So, noooo, I don't purport to KNOW what he would do in those instances so it is a bit ridiculous.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Yeah, they make some good points, but when they try to decide what Jesus would do, ie enter a brothel, etc, they are out of their league. That is why I personally never wore or liked those WWJD bracelets. I don't always KNOW what Jesus would do. YOu cannot put God in a box. His ways are higher than our ways. So, noooo, I don't purport to KNOW what he would do in those instances so it is a bit ridiculous.


It wouldn't bother me so much if they actually tried to, you know, use the ONLY book from which we know a lot about Jesus Christ in order to formulate their points.   



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think it was a pretty good article until they decided that they know how Jesus would have acted regarding the brothel. Yes, he was kind and loving. But, he also scourged and turned the money changers tables over. He called Peter "Satan". He said the Pharisees were bags of bones in whitewashed tombs. He told the rich man it was easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a rich man to go to Heaven. He told the Parable of the Ten Virgins in which the other virgins who were wasteful were scolded as foolish and locked out. He said "Depart from Me I never knew You" to some who claimed to do things in his name. Sorry, I don't KNOW what Jesus would do in that situation and neither do they.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard