I watched this several times, to see whether any of the voter's other fingers came in contact with (or very close to) the touch screen at the same time.
One issue with touch screens is that if they are touched in two places at the same time, they home in on a point midway between the two points of contact.
I couldn't see whether that was happening here.
That possibility, tied in with the speed of the tap on the screen, makes me wonder whether the voter making the video was doing that on purpose,
to have a worthwhile You Tube video.
The only other thing I can think of is, a programming error. BUT if it was a programming problem, it would have been consistent, the voters would have reported it, and the machine would have been taken out of service. And there would be a big investigation.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
Think about it. Would it really be that hard for some smart hacker to hack voting machines? Not.
A couple of programmers I knew at the time, told me that's how Ronald Reagan won his landslide victory for his second term.
I figured it was his commanding personality.
I watched the video some more. There is a skip while the finger was getting to the screen at one time, and we do not see the right side of the touch screen.
I think the real touch could have been on the Democratic line on the right side. Clearly the video was edited.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
I've been talking about this kind of computer fraud rigging elections for decades.
If enough people watch this and believe it, maybe we could all go back to the old lever-type voting machines that literally created a paper trail.
But the problem remains that it's easiest to rig an election --- any election --- by rigging the computers that tabulate the votes when they're reported by the individual voting machines and individual districts.
Elections go to the ones who control the vote COUNTING, and these days that means the ones who have the best hackers.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
There was voter fraud in NH, not computer related but brought in people to vote. thing is voting records apparently are easy to obtain. they find the people less likely to show up to vote, go in and say they are such and such and vote.
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
There was voter fraud in NH, not computer related but brought in people to vote. thing is voting records apparently are easy to obtain. they find the people less likely to show up to vote, go in and say they are such and such and vote.
That is why every state should require photo I.D. to vote.
*yawn* a video almost exactly like this came out last election, and the one before. When is was the presidential election is was casting a vote for Romney when the person tried to vote for Obama. I don't remember the details of the one before that.
Probably a trick designed to rile people up. Otherwise, why make a video of yourself voting?
Proof to support your absurd claim that aliens from space hacked Reagan's election.
Aliens??? From SPACE ???
Are you okay?
If you said that to me face to face, I'd be evaluating you for slurred speech, movement problems, and looking for other signs of inebriation or stroke.
You usually make a lot more sense than this.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
Could have been out of calibration. Here is a demostration of one in WV that is out of calibration, selects below the actual touvh. Funny thing is once the tech recalibrates it it is still out of wack.
Proof to support your absurd claim that aliens from space hacked Reagan's election.
Aliens??? From SPACE ???
Are you okay?
If you said that to me face to face, I'd be evaluating you for slurred speech, movement problems, and looking for other signs of inebriation or stroke.
You usually make a lot more sense than this.
I am not the one claiming MASSIVE Nationwide voter fraud during the Reagan election.
Could have been out of calibration. Here is a demostration of one in WV that is out of calibration, selects below the actual touvh. Funny thing is once the tech recalibrates it it is still out of wack.
Proof to support your absurd claim that aliens from space hacked Reagan's election.
Aliens??? From SPACE ???
Are you okay?
If you said that to me face to face, I'd be evaluating you for slurred speech, movement problems, and looking for other signs of inebriation or stroke.
You usually make a lot more sense than this.
I am not the one claiming MASSIVE Nationwide voter fraud during the Reagan election.
Maybe you didn't actually read what I said. Isn't H***** the one who routinely misreads and twists things?
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
Could have been out of calibration. Here is a demostration of one in WV that is out of calibration, selects below the actual touvh. Funny thing is once the tech recalibrates it it is still out of wack.
Yeah, which is why I personally do not like computer voting. I think it's bunk.
well, that whole paper ballot thing didn't work out so well in Florida in 2000. just sayin'.
there's been voter fraud for years. one of the widest quotes of Joseph P. Kennedy was that he wasn't paying for a landslide, just a win for JFK in 1960.