TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Dear Prudie - tapped out


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Dear Prudie - tapped out
Permalink  
 


Dear Prudence,
I have been married to a wonderful woman for 36 years. Two years ago, at age 58, I left a very secure well-paying job for a business opportunity that didn’t work out. Now at 60, I am rekindling my former career in sales. The problem is that after 30 years I know my tank is empty, and I will never make the type of money I once did. My wife is incredibly selfless, has never spent on herself, but adores our antique house and pictures us living there for the rest of our lives. After eight years of college tuitions, our daughter’s wedding, and some other large outflows, our bank account is tapped, and my earnings outlook dim. Downsizing would make total financial sense, but I know my wife will be crushed if we have to sell. We have some retirement money, but not enough if we start taking it now. I am racked with guilt for putting us in this situation. Besides our family, this house is her life.

—Sick with worry

Dear Sick,
Let’s say your wife had a stroke and she could no longer negotiate the stairs or keep up an old house. Let’s say you got Alzheimer’s and to get you the care you needed, it was necessary to sell your place. In either case, events would force you to move. Fortunately, you two can make a rational, considered decision about your finances without the pressure of life-altering illness. Your house is a thing—yes, a thing imbued with memory and meaning, but it shouldn’t hold hostage your ability to retire comfortably. You’re right that restarting a sales career at 60 is perilous. You should be counting down toward retirement; instead like so many people you are facing the prospect of outliving your money. So you two need to make hard-headed decisions about how to avoid disaster. Perhaps your home could help pay for itself and you could rent out your basement. If not, selling your home and moving someplace more affordable could give you a financial and psychological cushion. You say for your wife her family and her home are her life, so I get the impression she doesn’t work. In a way your letter is a kind of bookend to the first letter. Not that your wife is a bum, but your situation does illustrate that it’s in everyone’s interest to be able to contribute economically because you never know what might happen. If she’s fit enough maybe she could walk dogs, babysit, care for an elderly person, or get a retail job. If she were able to earn even $15,000 to $20,000 a year, it would help ease your final years. Although it will be tempting to take Social Security early, the longer you put off collecting it, the bigger the payout will be when you need it the most. And let your tale be a warning to people who tap into their savings to pay for their children’s storybook weddings. Unless you can blithely afford the catering bill, the story takes a dark turn when the champagne toasts result in Mom and Dad being tapped out. Stop trying to protect your wife from reality. If she is the wonderful partner you claim she is, she should know where you two stand, and she should share the burden you’re now carrying alone.

—Prudie



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

How can the communication in a 36 year marriage be so poor?

My guess is that the wife isn't as clueless about their financial situation as he seems to think.

Also, ruining your future to put kids through college and giving them lavish weddings are not good decisions. Water under the bridge, now (unless there is another daughter to marry off) I realize, but man how can people be so short-sighted.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

Something about this letter sounds fishy.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

How so?

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

Something about the response suggests the original letter had more information in it.

__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Mod & Permanent Board Sweetheart

Status: Offline
Posts: 3348
Date:
Permalink  
 

He never asked a direct question - usually the letters have a direct question, thus the responding answer.



__________________

Coffee understands.



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think the response is bad advice.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well, with the info given I think he needs to be having this discussion with his wife. Maybe it's worth it to her to stay in the house at all costs (and because she has been so selfless, it would be nice if he would try) or maybe she is good with financial decisions and would rather sell it to be more secure. He really shouldn't make the decision by himself.

And I agree with Husker. Don't go broke paying for kid's tuition and weddings.

__________________


Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't like the bum remark. She says, "Not that your wife is a bum..." which kind of implies that she hasn't exactly pulled her share. But if that was their joint decision for her to stay home and be a home maker then she most definitely HAS pulled her share. She stayed home and raised the kids and kept the house and made memories. And now, essentially, what is her pride and joy, her career, is being taken from her? I can see where that might be a huge deal. They need to see a financial counselor and see what their options are.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well most people don't have unlimited finances. They choose together to spend big on tuition , weddings and who knows what. Their financial picture has changed. Now face reality and make smart financial decisions.


__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Sniff...sniff, sniff. Yay! A Bum!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7536
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think they made the tuition and wedding payments when they were more financially secure and anticipated being able to replenish their savings. Plus, if they were doing well all their children's lives, I can see how the tuition situation came about. The university calculates your parents savings etc into your financial aid package. The children probably didn't qualify for any based on the parents worth, and so the parents felt obligated to contribute. Not saying they should have paid for it all (if they did).

I do agree that they should have had the financial talk with their children and not handed them a blank check. Giving them a blank check for university or a wedding isn't smart. Telling them how much you are able to contribute towards it would have been smarter.

__________________

Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite ! 



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

Mellow Momma wrote:

I think they made the tuition and wedding payments when they were more financially secure and anticipated being able to replenish their savings. Plus, if they were doing well all their children's lives, I can see how the tuition situation came about. The university calculates your parents savings etc into your financial aid package. The children probably didn't qualify for any based on the parents worth, and so the parents felt obligated to contribute. Not saying they should have paid for it all (if they did).

I do agree that they should have had the financial talk with their children and not handed them a blank check. Giving them a blank check for university or a wedding isn't smart. Telling them how much you are able to contribute towards it would have been smarter.


 I think this is part of it.  Just because you CAN afford it doesn't mean you necessarily should.  Things change.  Your kids don't have to go to the most expensive college or have the fanciest wedding.  Of course, if that's what they want they can always contribute to it.



__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard