"Second - that was CENTURIES ago. To blame Christians TODAY for things that happened centuries ago and compare it to the murderous acts of Muslims TODAY makes no sense." - Lawyerlady
It makes perfect sense, if you look at it based solely on the age of the religions themselves. Christians were well into their atrocities in the name of religion faze at about the same age of the religion itself, as the Muslims currently are.
-- Edited by Tignanello on Thursday 20th of November 2014 10:37:48 PM
More ignorance and defense of the indefensible.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
"Pick ANY passage you want to. There are ZERO substantive differences between the various translations." - huskerbb
I believe this is within the rules to post - There's another board out there, "MM Invisapeeps", and specifically a member there "Viczaes" that knows more about the Bible than you and I put together. You should join that board and have a discussion with her. It might be enlightening to you.
Then again, considering your certainty in your rightness, you might just dismiss anything she has to say.
"Pick ANY passage you want to. There are ZERO substantive differences between the various translations." - huskerbb
I believe this is within the rules to post - There's another board out there, "MM Invisapeeps", and specifically a member there "Viczaes" that knows more about the Bible than you and I put together. You should join that board and have a discussion with her. It might be enlightening to you.
Then again, considering your certainty in your rightness, you might just dismiss anything she has to say.
More than you, undoubtedly. More than me--not a chance.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
"That board, in particular, has a group think mentality that doesn't brook any differing opinions." - I can't disagree with you there. That's why I suggested the one specific member.
"Pick ANY passage you want to. There are ZERO substantive differences between the various translations." - huskerbb
I believe this is within the rules to post - There's another board out there, "MM Invisapeeps", and specifically a member there "Viczaes" that knows more about the Bible than you and I put together. You should join that board and have a discussion with her. It might be enlightening to you.
Then again, considering your certainty in your rightness, you might just dismiss anything she has to say.
More than you, undoubtedly. More than me--not a chance.
wow - we have reached an entirely new level of hubris....
It's interesting that most of those who are clamoring about there being more than one--aren't Christians and really know nothing on the subject, anyway. Laughable.
"Pick ANY passage you want to. There are ZERO substantive differences between the various translations." - huskerbb
I believe this is within the rules to post - There's another board out there, "MM Invisapeeps", and specifically a member there "Viczaes" that knows more about the Bible than you and I put together. You should join that board and have a discussion with her. It might be enlightening to you.
Then again, considering your certainty in your rightness, you might just dismiss anything she has to say.
More than you, undoubtedly. More than me--not a chance.
wow - we have reached an entirely new level of hubris....
Especially since she's working on her Doctorate...
It's interesting that most of those who are clamoring about there being more than one--aren't Christians and really know nothing on the subject, anyway. Laughable.
husker, the two are NOT mutually exclusive.
flan
Reading this thread--they obviously are.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.