Good grief, why is everyone making the OP about themselves?
This is a message board. Not everyone will have the same opinion or point of view. Get over it.
I said, there is more to the story, and I believe the story was sensationalized by the media and prosecutor. It's been almost 2 years since this happened!
Having a child run and/or carry wood generally does not equate to death. In THIS instance it did. There ARE underlying medical possibilities. There ARE NO WITNESS'S to the 3 hours of abuse. And if there was a witness, why didn't they stop it?
I'm NOT saying THIS CASE IS NOT ABUSE. Let the jury decide. We do not have ALL the facts.
__________________
I drink coffee so I don't kill you.
I quilt so I don't kill you.
Do you see a theme?
Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.
""Witnesses told deputies Savannah was told to run and not allowed to stop for three hours on Friday, an Etowah County Sheriff's Office spokeswoman said.""
Note the word "witnesses". And, yes if someone saw that they should have stopped it. But, grandma is still guilty of murder.
So just to clarify-calling people c0ckholsters is ok, but calling people freaks is just crossing the line. Ok then. I must be living on another planet.
Husker never called a poster a c0ckholster - he was speaking about the subject of a news article, and he certainly didn't call you one. You, however, called posters freaks. It's disappointing you can't see the difference.
Wild blue did NOT call posters freaks. Ms Rock did. (I'm disappointed you didn't see the difference)
-- Edited by PotteryChick on Thursday 20th of November 2014 10:36:11 AM
You are correct and I apologize. I let this topic get the best of me.
So just to clarify-calling people c0ckholsters is ok, but calling people freaks is just crossing the line. Ok then. I must be living on another planet.
Husker never called a poster a c0ckholster - he was speaking about the subject of a news article, and he certainly didn't call you one. You, however, called posters freaks. It's disappointing you can't see the difference.
Wild blue did NOT call posters freaks. Ms Rock did. (I'm disappointed you didn't see the difference)
-- Edited by PotteryChick on Thursday 20th of November 2014 10:36:11 AM
You are correct and I apologize. I let this topic get the best of me.
I think this topic got to a lot of us, msrock.
The trial is set for February, 2015. I'll be interested to see how this goes.
I don't think speculating will get us anywhere.
I, for one, am willing to wait to see what information comes out in the trial.
So just to clarify-calling people c0ckholsters is ok, but calling people freaks is just crossing the line. Ok then. I must be living on another planet.
Husker never called a poster a c0ckholster - he was speaking about the subject of a news article, and he certainly didn't call you one. You, however, called posters freaks. It's disappointing you can't see the difference.
Wild blue did NOT call posters freaks. Ms Rock did. (I'm disappointed you didn't see the difference)
-- Edited by PotteryChick on Thursday 20th of November 2014 10:36:11 AM
You are correct and I apologize. I let this topic get the best of me.
I think there are freaks here too depending on the topic! I wasn't calling you out as much as I was correcting LL for assigning blame to the wrong person.
__________________
Maybe she'll learn to keep her c0ck-holster closed. -- Edited by huskerbb on Sunday 9th of November 2014 01:32:19 PM
So just to clarify-calling people c0ckholsters is ok, but calling people freaks is just crossing the line. Ok then. I must be living on another planet.
Husker never called a poster a c0ckholster - he was speaking about the subject of a news article, and he certainly didn't call you one. You, however, called posters freaks. It's disappointing you can't see the difference.
Wild blue did NOT call posters freaks. Ms Rock did. (I'm disappointed you didn't see the difference)
-- Edited by PotteryChick on Thursday 20th of November 2014 10:36:11 AM
You are correct and I apologize. I let this topic get the best of me.
I think there are freaks here too depending on the topic! I wasn't calling you out as much as I was correcting LL for assigning blame to the wrong person.
Other than having the wrong person (which I already apologized for), the point stands.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
So just to clarify-calling people c0ckholsters is ok, but calling people freaks is just crossing the line. Ok then. I must be living on another planet.
You are living on another planet. Try paying attention. I never called another poster a c0ckholster. To be more precise, I never called ANYONE a c0ckholster. I referred to their loud mouth that should have remained shut as a c0ckholster. Again, someone who was NOT a member of this forum, or even known to anyone on this forum.
We call those who are NOT on this board vile names all the time--including several that were used against the subject of this article. About 3 posts down on the first page is a "sick SOB" used in reference to someone. Where is your indignance about that?
Nowhere since it seems your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Try reading the rules rather than making up your own.
-- Edited by huskerbb on Thursday 20th of November 2014 06:42:08 PM
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
So just to clarify-calling people c0ckholsters is ok, but calling people freaks is just crossing the line. Ok then. I must be living on another planet.
Husker never called a poster a c0ckholster - he was speaking about the subject of a news article, and he certainly didn't call you one. You, however, called posters freaks. It's disappointing you can't see the difference.
Wild blue did NOT call posters freaks. Ms Rock did. (I'm disappointed you didn't see the difference)
-- Edited by PotteryChick on Thursday 20th of November 2014 10:36:11 AM
You are correct and I apologize. I let this topic get the best of me.
Yes you did.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.