This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to colleagues, clients or customers, use the Reprints tool at the top of any article or order a reprint of this article now.
Violence at wedding causes family turmoil
December 24, 2014 by AMY DICKINSON / askamy@tribune.com
DEAR AMY: About a year ago, my sister got married in a wonderful elaborate ceremony. Around this same time, it was known within my family that I was struggling through a deep depression. Because it was my sister's day, I gamely attempted to play "happy" and be supportive of her. However, at this wedding weekend, my sister (the bride), my mother and my sister's bridesmaids took it upon themselves to viciously and maliciously attack my (then) girlfriend. The abuse was both verbal and sadly also physical, as a bridesmaid, apparently, shoved my girlfriend off the dance floor. With so many people at the wedding I had not seen in years, it was impossible for me to "guard" her at what was supposed to be a party. This vicious behavior exhibited by my family, coupled with my lack of responsiveness at the time led to our breakup immediately after the wedding. I have tried to move on from this event and continue in therapy, but I am struggling to rebuild any real relationship with my sister or mother and have no real desire to see them. They have never apologized and know how hurt I was by their actions. Am I supposed to just "forgive" and pretend it never happened the way they seem to have?
DEAR SUFFERING: Your guest was bullied by family members. Clearly, this is unacceptable on every level.
Bullies never want to acknowledge their own actions. They want to move through life without reflection or apology.
I assume you are discussing this in therapy. This episode requires that you do whatever you need to do to restore your own sense of trust and serenity.
Your family will not offer an apology, but you should ask for one. You should write down your thoughts, including an "ask." Make it as calm and neutral as possible and include the phrase, "For the sake of our relationship, I would like you to acknowledge your actions on that day."
Be prepared that your family may find ways to transfer the responsibility to you.
Your next task should be to reflect on how you can best move forward. It might be best for you to continue to avoid your family members until you can fully accept the reality of their flawed behavior and release your own anger. This is for your sake, not theirs.
Some people will be nasty their whole lives and not see it. They are still family but LW doesn't need to put up with their crap. I'd just keep the bare minimum contact.
It sounds like the Bridesmaid did some of the behavior too. So, his family may not feel responsible for her behavior. I do think he should bring this up with his family and say "this really bothered me and still does" and have that conversation about their part as well.
But, why would they vicsciously attack his GF? Is there some backstory? Not saying their behavior is in anyway justified but it seems odd that they would just attack his GF out of the blue.
It seems VERY odd that a physical altercation occurred without some underlying cause. Not that violence is justified very often, but I think there is probably more to the story, maybe more that the LW doesn't even know.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Well, there are some people who are real Aholes so hard to tell. Maybe his family is. Or, maybe there is still an underlying issue but even so, they should have more class than that as well.
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
My sisters in laws were like this family. No one talked to anyone because they were all mad at each other for one reason or another. When my sister passed one of the brothers came to the funeral for her, not for his brother.
It seems VERY odd that a physical altercation occurred without some underlying cause. Not that violence is justified very often, but I think there is probably more to the story, maybe more that the LW doesn't even know.
Let me just guess that the LW is female, and showing up with her GF would be cause enough, especially when mixed with alcohol.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
It seems VERY odd that a physical altercation occurred without some underlying cause. Not that violence is justified very often, but I think there is probably more to the story, maybe more that the LW doesn't even know.
Let me just guess that the LW is female, and showing up with her GF would be cause enough, especially when mixed with alcohol.
Why are you assuming this a gay thing? It doesn't say that.
Although in this day and age....
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
It seems VERY odd that a physical altercation occurred without some underlying cause. Not that violence is justified very often, but I think there is probably more to the story, maybe more that the LW doesn't even know.
Let me just guess that the LW is female, and showing up with her GF would be cause enough, especially when mixed with alcohol.
Why are you assuming this a gay thing? It doesn't say that.
Although in this day and age....
It was just a guess, based on the lack of information. Also don't know whether the LW is male or female. The letter sounds to me like it was written by a woman.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
Um. The LW wasn't treated like trash. The LW is a baby. A year later is too long to worry about something that happened to someone else.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Pushing and shoving at a wedding? Yeah I would say that is being treated poorly. Why is the LW supposed to grow up but not the family who behaved that way? Seems like it should be a two way street?
Pushing and shoving at a wedding? Yeah I would say that is being treated poorly. Why is the LW supposed to grow up but not the family who behaved that way? Seems like it should be a two way street?
About 4 posts ago, you agreed with me.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
And one person's growing up has NOTHING to do with another's.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I do agree with you. He should put it behind him. But, I also agreed there was nothing wrong with approaching the family to discuss it too. And, they might shrug it off , in which case he can decide to let it go or whatever.
On some level it sounds like he/she blames them for losing his/her GF too.
Was this a one time incident or is this a pattern with the family? If it's one time the LW needs to cut them some slack. He claims to have been "deeply depressed" so that may have colored his perception. If the family treats him like this all the time then he needs to handle it in another way. You don't allow people to treat you poorly. Family or not.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
No. They were horrible, have not apologized, and can't be trusted around future girlfriends. Why does he have to get over it? Why do these people have to be in his life? You don't get to treat people like crap just b/c they are family and remain family. They should treat family BETTER b/c they are more important. This will only get worse if he lets them get away with it.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
You all assume get over it means allow it to happen again.
That is not what it means.
Don't go around them anymore. Keep them at a safe distance.
But get over it for yourself.
It isn't about them. It is about yourself.
A year ago and still stewing over it? I can guarantee they are not stewing about it. Why keep your blood pressure up over something they have forgotten all about?
Get over it. Move on. It's on them. Not you.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
You all assume get over it means allow it to happen again.
That is not what it means.
Don't go around them anymore. Keep them at a safe distance.
But get over it for yourself.
It isn't about them. It is about yourself.
A year ago and still stewing over it? I can guarantee they are not stewing about it. Why keep your blood pressure up over something they have forgotten all about?
Get over it. Move on. It's on them. Not you.
I agree they're not stewing about it. They're more likely to be laughing about it. Even a year later. That reminds them of the feelings of power they had at the time.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
You all assume get over it means allow it to happen again.
That is not what it means.
Don't go around them anymore. Keep them at a safe distance.
But get over it for yourself.
It isn't about them. It is about yourself.
A year ago and still stewing over it? I can guarantee they are not stewing about it. Why keep your blood pressure up over something they have forgotten all about?
Get over it. Move on. It's on them. Not you.
I agree they're not stewing about it. They're more likely to be laughing about it. Even a year later. That reminds them of the feelings of power they had at the time.
They STILL have the power. What they did is still influencing his actions.
Heck, he's not even dating that chick, anymore.
If he wants to have no further contact with them--fine, that's his decision and a justifiable one.
If he wants them to apologize before he will come to family get-togethers, it's not going to happen.
If he wants to swallow his pride and come back, my bet is that it would soon be water under the bridge.
Whatever he decides, though, he needs to quit being a weenie.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.