TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Who Gets Food Stamps? White People, Mostly


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Who Gets Food Stamps? White People, Mostly
Permalink  
 


Who Gets Food Stamps? White People, Mostly

Posted: 02/28/2015 7:30 am EST Updated: 18 minutes ago

pin_icon_onhover.pngFOOD STAMPS
Maggie Barcellano prepares dinner at her father's house in Austin, Texas, on Saturday, Jan. 25, 2014. Barcellano, who lives with her father, enrolled in the food stamps program to help save up for paramedic training while she works as a home health aide and raises her three-year-old daughter. (AP Photo/Tamir Kalifa) | ASSOCIATED PRESS
 
 
 

WASHINGTON -- Gene Alday, a Republican member of the Mississippi state legislature, apologized last week for telling a reporter that all the African-Americans in his hometown of Walls, Mississippi, are unemployed and on food stamps.

"I come from a town where all the blacks are getting food stamps and what I call 'welfare crazy checks,'" Alday said to a reporter for The Clarion-Ledger, a Mississippi newspaper, earlier this month. "They don't work."

Nationally, most of the people who receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program are white. According to 2013 data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the program, 40.2 percent of SNAP recipients are white, 25.7 percent are black, 10.3 percent are Hispanic, 2.1 percent are Asian and 1.2 percent are Native American.

pin_icon_onhover.pngSNAPCharts1_1.png

In the two congressional districts that overlap Alday's state legislature district, more African-Americans than whites receive food stamps, according to USDA data.

Twenty-three million households and 47 million Americans received benefits on an average month in 2013; enrollment declined slightly to 22 million households and 46 million individuals in 2014. Three-quarters of those households included a child, an elderly person or someone with a disability. The average monthly benefit per household was $274 in 2013 and $256 last year.

pin_icon_onhover.pngSNAPCharts2.png

Republicans are conducting a review of nutrition assistance with an eye toward figuring out how to nudge more people into the workforce. In recent years Republicans have lamented that a growing share of recipients are able-bodied adults without children -- a group that made up 10.2 percent of beneficiaries in 2011, up from 6.6 percent before the onset of the Great Recession in 2007. (The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates that 1 million people will be kicked off the rolls by next year as states reimpose time limits on childless, non-disabled adults.)

Nearly one-third of food stamp beneficiaries lived in a household where at least one member had some earned income in 2013. Different states have different eligibility rules for the program, but federal law puts the upper income limit at 200 percent of the poverty line, currently $20,090 for a family of three. Many SNAP recipients qualify based on their participation in another means-tested program, such as Medicaid or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.

pin_icon_onhover.pngSNAPCharts3_1.png



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think the data is influenced the most by the population. I would like to see the population of the US by race/ethnicity graphed side by side with the top. one.

__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 


just want to lay down some numbers.

And for the record, yes, more white people are on Food Stamps
image: images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/icon1.png
than Black people. That is a undeniable fact. So here is how it breaks down:

Population by race:

White: 224,000,000
Black: 39,000,000
Hispanic: 50,400,000

Number of people on Food Stamps by race.
White: 19,475,000
Black: 17,100,000
Hispanic: 8,550,000

Percent of population on Food Stamps by Race:
White: 8.6%
Black: 43.8%
Hispanic: 17%

www.fns.usda.gov/pd/34SNAPmonthly.htm

Read more at investmen****chblog.com/food-stamps-ebt-snap-numbers-by-race/



The HuffPo doesn't tend to break things down. They usually just post articles slanted toward their particular agenda and leave out any pesky facts that challenge their premise.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:


just want to lay down some numbers.

And for the record, yes, more white people are on Food Stamps
image: images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/icon1.png
than Black people. That is a undeniable fact. So here is how it breaks down:

Population by race:

White: 224,000,000
Black: 39,000,000
Hispanic: 50,400,000

Number of people on Food Stamps by race.
White: 19,475,000
Black: 17,100,000
Hispanic: 8,550,000

Percent of population on Food Stamps by Race:
White: 8.6%
Black: 43.8%
Hispanic: 17%

www.fns.usda.gov/pd/34SNAPmonthly.htm

Read more at investmen****chblog.com/food-stamps-ebt-snap-numbers-by-race/



The HuffPo doesn't tend to break things down. They usually just post articles slanted toward their particular agenda and leave out any pesky facts that challenge their premise.


 And that additional data makes the first set more logical.  I really dislike media outlets that report only some of the facts trying to get that slant.  



__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2672
Date:
Permalink  
 

:


 Percent of population on Food Stamps by Race:
White: 8.6%
Black: 43.8%
Hispanic: 17%

 


 Extremely slanted article. The bolded stats are the only ones you need to see that the headline is pretty much a lie.



__________________

No matter how educated, talented, rich or cool you believe you are,

how you treat people ultimately tells all.

Integrity is everything.



Nothing's Impossible

Status: Offline
Posts: 16913
Date:
Permalink  
 

Huffington Post is not a news source I would rely on.

__________________

A person's a person no matter how small.



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

Blankie wrote:
:


 Percent of population on Food Stamps by Race:
White: 8.6%
Black: 43.8%
Hispanic: 17%

 


 Extremely slanted article. The bolded stats are the only ones you need to see that the headline is pretty much a lie.


 Exactly.  If there are twenty times the number of white people than black people then of course the number of white people on them will be higher.  The percentages tell the true story.



__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1089
Date:
Permalink  
 

So, why is it important what color they are? I must be missing something.

__________________

I'm the Ginger Rogers of spelling...that means I'm smat.

Lesson learned in February:  I don't have to keep up, I just have to keep moving!

 



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

voiceofreason wrote:

So, why is it important what color they are? I must be missing something.


 We are just commenting on the slant of the headline, for me, out comments are not meant to be racist.



__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

voiceofreason wrote:

So, why is it important what color they are? I must be missing something.


 Because everyone wants to know which race gets the most food stamps?



__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1586
Date:
Permalink  
 


absolute BS--even a cursory examination of the numbers in the link reveals this: " 76% of households receiving SNAP are white and 40% of households NOT receiving SNAP are white " for a total of 116% ? lord, that's just one example of the glaring errors in this chart / this article--read it yourself

__________________

" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

voiceofreason wrote:

So, why is it important what color they are? I must be missing something.


Some white people want to label all people of color as lazy good-for-nothing parasites. 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Nothing's Impossible

Status: Offline
Posts: 16913
Date:
Permalink  
 

That's not the point people were trying to make Ed. Why the hostility?

__________________

A person's a person no matter how small.



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

ed11563 wrote:
voiceofreason wrote:

So, why is it important what color they are? I must be missing something.


Some white people want to label all people of color as lazy good-for-nothing parasites. 


 Ed the article headline is more white peeps are receiving food stamps than any other demographic.  Which is not proportional when you look at the data.  All ethnic groups have people that label others as good-for -nothings. So let's just clear the air on that.  Regardless if someone is yellow, pink, or purple, I for one don't care.  

I believe in giving a hand up to anyone willing to better themselves.  I also know that a lot of elderly need this help and cannot do more for themselves.  I am so tired of be lambasted because I am white and conservative.  I want people to be able to improve their situation and I will  help such people.



__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

I know what to do_sometimes wrote:
ed11563 wrote:
voiceofreason wrote:

So, why is it important what color they are? I must be missing something.


Some white people want to label all people of color as lazy good-for-nothing parasites. 


 Ed the article headline is more white peeps are receiving food stamps than any other demographic.  Which is not proportional when you look at the data.  All ethnic groups have people that label others as good-for -nothings. So let's just clear the air on that.  Regardless if someone is yellow, pink, or purple, I for one don't care.  

I believe in giving a hand up to anyone willing to better themselves.  I also know that a lot of elderly need this help and cannot do more for themselves.  I am so tired of be lambasted because I am white and conservative.  I want people to be able to improve their situation and I will  help such people.


As usual, I agree with you. 

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

Southern_Belle wrote:

That's not the point people were trying to make Ed. Why the hostility?


VoR asked a question, I gave the best answer I have. 

Why do people write slanted articles? Because they're inflammatory.
They want to piss people off.

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 649
Date:
Permalink  
 

burns07 wrote:


absolute BS--even a cursory examination of the numbers in the link reveals this: " 76% of households receiving SNAP are white and 40% of households NOT receiving SNAP are white " for a total of 116% ? lord, that's just one example of the glaring errors in this chart / this article--read it yourself


 

 

Do you mean this link?

http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/Mississippi.pdf

First you have that reversed: 76% of households receiving SNAP are white and 40% of households NOT receiving SNAP are white.

 

Not sure which row you are looking at but each row the larger is NOT receiving SAP.  The first table is:

46% of households receiving SNAP are white and 77% of households NOT receiving SNAP are white.

 

Also these are not additive.

Of the households in the district receiving SNAP.  46% are white, 50% black, .3% American Indian, .3% Asian  etc..

Of the households in the district not receiving SNAP  77% are white, 21% black, .2% American Indian, .5% Asian  etc..

 

As for the politicians quote the article does not say which districts he is from.  The districts 4 from the link all of black households  not having receiving SNAP.. It would be an anomaly if his district carves out a section where all blacks are receiving SNAP.

 



__________________

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1586
Date:
Permalink  
 


regardless of which way you state it, 46% + 77% = 123% ( believe it's referred to as the transitive property of addition )

similarly, various voter " polls " have shown 108%, 110% even 116% of the registered voters in a district / precinct voting for a particular candidate

after while, you begin to wonder about not only the veracity of the numbers themselves but the competence ( if any ) of the researchers / pollsters



__________________

" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke

 



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

ed11563 wrote:
I know what to do_sometimes wrote:
ed11563 wrote:
voiceofreason wrote:

So, why is it important what color they are? I must be missing something.


Some white people want to label all people of color as lazy good-for-nothing parasites. 


 Ed the article headline is more white peeps are receiving food stamps than any other demographic.  Which is not proportional when you look at the data.  All ethnic groups have people that label others as good-for -nothings. So let's just clear the air on that.  Regardless if someone is yellow, pink, or purple, I for one don't care.  

I believe in giving a hand up to anyone willing to better themselves.  I also know that a lot of elderly need this help and cannot do more for themselves.  I am so tired of be lambasted because I am white and conservative.  I want people to be able to improve their situation and I will  help such people.


As usual, I agree with you. 

 


 Ed, I misinterpreted your post.  So sorry.  I just get tired of people accusing others as being racist when in fact, their motivation in calling people out is about laziness, not real need.  I re read your post and see you are being "sarcastic" to my post in that you agree.  



__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't really care who gets food stamps. I don't care what color, race, or religion they are. I think food stamps are a good stop gap for some people. If you're temporarily unemployed, going to school to get an education, or in some kind of program where you can learn a skill. All of those will be temporary situations. Hopefully. My only two complaints about food stamps have nothing to do with race. They are that you should be limited to how long you can be on them. No one should be allowed to be on them forever. And if you are not a citizen of the US you shouldn't be getting them.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1089
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

I don't really care who gets food stamps. I don't care what color, race, or religion they are. I think food stamps are a good stop gap for some people. If you're temporarily unemployed, going to school to get an education, or in some kind of program where you can learn a skill. All of those will be temporary situations. Hopefully. My only two complaints about food stamps have nothing to do with race. They are that you should be limited to how long you can be on them. No one should be allowed to be on them forever. And if you are not a citizen of the US you shouldn't be getting them.


 I think elderly and vets should be allowed indefinite use.

Quite frankly, we give millions, perhaps billions, of food assistance to other countries.  Charity begins at home.  I'd rather our citizens get it than other countries.  

Of course, food assistance doesn't even register on my radar of pissiness. 



__________________

I'm the Ginger Rogers of spelling...that means I'm smat.

Lesson learned in February:  I don't have to keep up, I just have to keep moving!

 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 649
Date:
Permalink  
 

burns07 wrote:


regardless of which way you state it, 46% + 77% = 123% ( believe it's referred to as the transitive property of addition )

similarly, various voter " polls " have shown 108%, 110% even 116% of the registered voters in a district / precinct voting for a particular candidate

after while, you begin to wonder about not only the veracity of the numbers themselves but the competence ( if any ) of the researchers / pollsters


 regardless of which way you state it, 46% + 77% = 123% ( believe it's referred to as the transitive property of addition )

Group A (Receiving SNAP) is 46% white.

Group B (Not Receiving SNAP) is 77% white.

 I makes no sense to add them, they are separate groups.

Your seem to be treating that 46% of whites receive SNAP and 77% of whites do not receive SNAP.  That's not what the tables are. 



-- Edited by cadiver on Sunday 1st of March 2015 12:32:39 AM

__________________

 



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

I have no problem with the elderly or vets getting it if they meet the same income requirements that everyone else does. And I'd be willing to waive a time limit on them for the elderly and vets as long as they continue to meet the requirements.

Frankly, I don't think our government should be giving all that food assistance to other countries. There are plenty of organizations that do this. It should be voluntary.

I normally wouldn't care but our welfare roles are just swelling by the bucket load and if we don't rein things in somewhere we'll go broke. Oh wait, we already are.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

I agree NJN! Why are we sending so much DAMN money overseas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

How much money does the United States currently contribute to the United Nations and its various agencies? Surprisingly, no one knows for sure.

The State Department does report on its spending at the United Nations, but it is only one of several federal agencies that give money to the world body each year.

In its fiscal 2014 State and Foreign Operations budget proposal released in April, the Obama administration asked for $1.57 billion for contributions to international organizations, including $617.6 million for the U.N. operating budget — up from $568.8 million in fiscal 2012.

But other agencies giving to the U.N. include the Departments of Labor, Energy, Agriculture, Defense, and Health and Human Services, CNS News reported.
Fiscal 2007 legislation stipulated that the Office of Budget and Management (OMB) report all federal agencies' contributions, but the requirement expired in 2011.

Now Republican Sens. Mike Enzi of Wyoming and Mike Lee of Utah, and others, are submitting legislation that would reinstate the requirement.

"It's disturbing that no one, including our ambassador to the United Nations, knows exactly how much money we send the U.N. every year," Enzi said in a statement.
www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_33339.php



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard