Published: 14:43 EST, 23 May 2015 | Updated: 15:41 EST, 23 May 2015
52shares
22
View comments
Parents and community members shouted 'shame on you' to an Ohio school board president during a meeting in which the topic at hand was the district's handling of a seventh grade student's suicide.
About three dozen students and parents were at the packed Fairfield City School District board meeting on Thursday to support 13-year-old Emilie Olsen, who shot herself in her home last December.
Her parents, Marc and Cindy Olsen, claimed in December that bullying at Fairfield Middle School played a role in her December 11 death, but the district seemed to disagree.
Scroll down for video
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+7
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+7
Emilie Olsen, 13, shot herself in her home after school on December 11, 2014. Her parents, Marc and Cindy Olsen, claimed that bullying at Fairfield Middle School played a role in her death, but the district said they had 'no credible evidence' of such claims
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+7
Parents, including father-of-two Ray Schmitz, shouted at the Fairfield City School District board members at a meeting on Thursday, claiming the school wasn't handling Olsen's death properly
Eight days after her death, Fairfield City School Superintendent Paul Otten released a statement saying that there was 'no credible evidence that bullying was a factor,' according to WCPO.
But WCPO found emails, school reports and a fake Instagram account mocking Olsen, which all pointed toward bullying as an issue Olsen faced.
Board members did not comment Olsen's case during Thursday's meeting, despite the numerous people who stood up asking for answers.
Joan Parrett, a mother of two, stood up and stressed that the school board needs to improve the way bullying cases are handled.
She said she had a gay son in the district a decade ago who faced much of the same bullying as Olsen, and she now has a daughter entering fifth grade.
'I'm here because that could have been my son that decided to take his life,' she told school board. 'I'm here to stick up for all of our kids.'
Parent lashes out at Fairfield City School board members
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+7
Schmitz said he 'can't believe you guys would bury your head in the sand like that' and said that the kids 'deserved more' from their district
She was cut short by board president Jerome Kearns, who told her she had exceeded her time and needed to 'wrap it up'.
Ray Schmitz, a father of two Fairfield students, said that Parrett should get more time to speak.
'This is important. This is the only important thing we've talked about tonight. Quit hiding from it,' he said.
Schmitz said his daughter got into fights at school defending Olsen, who faced 'relentless' bullying.
'I can't believe you guys would bury your head in the sand like that. Shame on you guys,' he said at the board meeting.
When he was asked by Board President Jerome Kearns to leave the meeting, Schmitz had one last thing to say: 'I want you to leave. You. Leave our district. Our kids deserve more than that.'
The outraged crowd shouted at the board members, one yelling 'Shame on you' before storming out with several parents and students.
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+7
Marc Olsen, pictured with his wife Cindy, had raised concern with the school about bullying, but according to children of other parents, Olsen faced 'relentless' bullying
Students and friends of Emilie attended the meeting to show their support.
Carley Kraus, show said she'd known Olsen 'her whole life', said that the suicide is 'not something that Fairfield can ignore'.
'I want to know why Fairfield doesn't care. If it was any of their children, they would do something about it. Does it have to get to the point where they have to go through it for them to do something about it?' she said.
The mother of Olsen's seventh grade boyfriend also attended Thursday's meeting. Wendy Scalf said she was disappointed with how the death was handled.
'I wanted to hear that they were going to implement a new bullying program, that they were going to do something to combat this...and to try to have some kind of accountability,' she told WCPO.
Parrett had said earlier that her son was bullied so badly that he was removed from school, and she too wanted to know more about new bullying programs. She even offered to start a bullying awareness program for the district.
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+7
Dozens of people showed up to the school board meeting on Thursday in hopes of discussing a anti-bullying initiative that would prevent more suicides in the future
'(School officials) basically told me maybe (the district) wasn't the place for my son because the problem had gotten so big,' she said. 'It was bigger than anything they could handle.'
School spokeswoman Gina Gentry-Fletcher handed out a statement before the meeting, but nothing was said thereafter about the death.
The statement read: This is a very tragic and sad situation for the family, the school district and the city and township communities.
'Our thoughts continue to be with everyone impacted by this loss of young life. Unfortunately, because of privacy laws regarding the release of student records, we are unable to share personally identifiable information without parental consent.
'As the parent of four children in the Fairfield City School District, it is my highest priority to ensure that each child in our schools is learning in a safe and positive environment.'
Prior to his daughter's death, Olsen's father, Marc Olsen, wrote more than one email to the district raising concern that his daughter was becoming the subject of bullying. In one email he cited the Instagram account that mocked his daughter.
Olsen's parents were not immediately available for comment.
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+7
Reports from Fairfield Middle School (pictured), as well as emails and a fake Instagram account mocking Olsen pointed toward potential bullying. But Board members did not comment Olsen's case during Thursday's meeting, despite the numerous people who stood up asking for answers
I think there is a lot of misunderstanding on how School Boards operate and what their role is. The role of the School Board is to make and vote on policy. The School Board is not involved in daily affairs, managing the school and day to day operation. The School Board is not involved in discipline issues at ALL unless or until it comes to the Board as an expulsion hearing. We are not privy to discipline issues that are going on because the Board is supposed to be an impartial jury to decide on expulsion hearings, so we are not given information on those goings on unless it rises to that level. Every school has bullying policies. We have bullying policies, social media use policies and on and on.
I think there is a lot of misunderstanding on how School Boards operate and what their role is. The role of the School Board is to make and vote on policy. The School Board is not involved in daily affairs, managing the school and day to day operation. The School Board is not involved in discipline issues at ALL unless or until it comes to the Board as an expulsion hearing. We are not privy to discipline issues that are going on because the Board is supposed to be an impartial jury to decide on expulsion hearings, so we are not given information on those goings on unless it rises to that level. Every school has bullying policies. We have bullying policies, social media use policies and on and on.
Well, THIS school board handled that meeting very poorly. I hope they are all prepared to lose their seats the next time they come up for election.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
"Every school has bullying policies. We have bullying policies, social media use policies and on and on."
I've never seen anything in writing about any local school's anti-bullying policies or programs.
These should be published, sent out to the community along with the school district newsletters,
transparent, emphasized and enforced.
One policy that SHOULD be in place and followed is, every incident of physical bullying should be reported to the police, so students can be charged with assault when appropriate.
I'm sick and tired of school hiding this activity and constantly letting the perpetrators get away with it.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
Bullying is a very difficult thing to police. People can bully without a word. They can give an askance look, etc. And, how do you expect the School Board to police Facebook and Instagram and Snapchat and Yik Yak and a thousand other social media sites?
And, the School Board is not the parent either. If you think your child is having mental health issues, then as a parent you need to get your child help as well.
We have bullying programs in place. Our Admin team really works hard to try to make school a welcoming place. But, even still, kids are going to have some negative interactions with other kids. If someone has an answer that nobody else has to completely stop it, I would love to hear it.
Bullying is a very difficult thing to police. People can bully without a word. They can give an askance look, etc. And, how do you expect the School Board to police Facebook and Instagram and Snapchat and Yik Yak and a thousand other social media sites? And, the School Board is not the parent either. If you think your child is having mental health issues, then as a parent you need to get your child help as well. We have bullying programs in place. Our Admin team really works hard to try to make school a welcoming place. But, even still, kids are going to have some negative interactions with other kids. If someone has an answer that nobody else has to completely stop it, I would love to hear it.
But WCPO found emails, school reports and a fake Instagram account mocking Olsen, which all pointed toward bullying as an issue Olsen faced.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
The parents have a lot bigger role in their child's life than anyone at school.
Apparently this girl needed help. Counseling or something.
The schools are there to educate. Not parent.
Sorry. It isn't the schools fault this girl killed herself.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Bullying is a very difficult thing to police. People can bully without a word. They can give an askance look, etc. And, how do you expect the School Board to police Facebook and Instagram and Snapchat and Yik Yak and a thousand other social media sites? And, the School Board is not the parent either. If you think your child is having mental health issues, then as a parent you need to get your child help as well. We have bullying programs in place. Our Admin team really works hard to try to make school a welcoming place. But, even still, kids are going to have some negative interactions with other kids. If someone has an answer that nobody else has to completely stop it, I would love to hear it.
But WCPO found emails, school reports and a fake Instagram account mocking Olsen, which all pointed toward bullying as an issue Olsen faced.
I read that. And, of course, they should have been doing whatever they could do in regards to that. Yes, don't hide it. But, they you cannot publically speak about the disciplinary actions of other students. If they ignored this stuff, they should all be ousted on their ears. But, they may have disciplined those involved but they cannot talk about it publically.
People just want someone to blame. Was she bullied? Probably. Was it a factor in her suicide? Probably.
The article does not give, however, the specifics of the bullying or what the school did do about it.
People seem to have the notion that the school is responsible for every damn thing kids do. NOT THE CASE. They can't be everywhere--especially on social media, email, or texts--where we all know damn well that much, if not most, bullying occurs.
Really, if parents truly think they need to find someone to blame for a child's suicide--they might want to look in the mirror.
Is that uncomfortable? He!! yes it is--but parents spend more time with their kids than the school does, especially before high school sport take over. There's a reason they aren't a bigger influence on their kids' lives than the school--or some bullies.
I'm not trying to "pile on" grieving parents--but if they really think they need to blame someone, it makes more sense than going after the school.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
And, I think the bigger issue, which I have said OVER AND OVER, isn't to pretend we can eliminate bullying from the planet because we can't. Instead we should be teaching kids how to be RESILIANT. On the playground, when we were called names, we would just shout back with the "Sticks and stones" mantra. And, we were taught that the words of some bully should not matter more to you than the words of people who love you.
And, I think the bigger issue, which I have said OVER AND OVER, isn't to pretend we can eliminate bullying from the planet because we can't. Instead we should be teaching kids how to be RESILIANT. On the playground, when we were called names, we would just shout back with the "Sticks and stones" mantra. And, we were taught that the words of some bully should not matter more to you than the words of people who love you.
There will always be bullies. All these "anti-bullying" programs are well and good, but they won't stop all bullies.
In fact, bullying probably is worse now than 20 or 30 years ago due to technology. At least back then you could go home, or hang out with your little group of friends and get away from the bullies for part of the day.
Now, kids have some perverse need to live online where the bullies have unlimited access to them at almost any time of the day or night.
Sorry, but parents need to police that.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
"Every school has bullying policies. We have bullying policies, social media use policies and on and on."
I've never seen anything in writing about any local school's anti-bullying policies or programs.
These should be published, sent out to the community along with the school district newsletters,
transparent, emphasized and enforced.
One policy that SHOULD be in place and followed is, every incident of physical bullying should be reported to the police, so students can be charged with assault when appropriate.
I'm sick and tired of school hiding this activity and constantly letting the perpetrators get away with it.
Check the school district's website. Policy documents are typically on line.
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
And, I think the bigger issue, which I have said OVER AND OVER, isn't to pretend we can eliminate bullying from the planet because we can't. Instead we should be teaching kids how to be RESILIANT. On the playground, when we were called names, we would just shout back with the "Sticks and stones" mantra. And, we were taught that the words of some bully should not matter more to you than the words of people who love you.
There will always be bullies. All these "anti-bullying" programs are well and good, but they won't stop all bullies.
In fact, bullying probably is worse now than 20 or 30 years ago due to technology. At least back then you could go home, or hang out with your little group of friends and get away from the bullies for part of the day.
Now, kids have some perverse need to live online where the bullies have unlimited access to them at almost any time of the day or night.
Peer pressure has always been powerful flan. This isn't something new. But, I agree, the kids seem to be getting crueler and they have many more opportunities to bully someone 24/7.
Bullying is more invasive now because there is no escaping it by leaving school. Husker is right. And so is Gaga - you have to teach your kids to be resilient and how to turn off and ignore technology when it is being used to harass you.
But, that doesn't mean the schools get to ignore it on their end, either. They still have the obligation to make school a good, safe environment for learning, and turning a blind eye to bullying is not the way to do it.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Bullying is more invasive now because there is no escaping it by leaving school. Husker is right. And so is Gaga - you have to teach your kids to be resilient and how to turn off and ignore technology when it is being used to harass you.
But, that doesn't mean the schools get to ignore it on their end, either. They still have the obligation to make school a good, safe environment for learning, and turning a blind eye to bullying is not the way to do it.
Of course. Everyone needs to stand up to it. But, I think we are living in a fantasy world to believe it can be stopped. A simple glance, a tone of voice and there are a million ways to express your displeasure to someone without being able to label it as bullying. That is what is so difficult about it. And, no, everyone doesn't have to like you. You can't make kids all like one another.
It's not the school's job to stand up for the students (I realize how stupid that sounds). It is the parents job. Where were these parents BEFORE their daughter died?
One of the things I tried really hard to teach my girls was "not everyone will like you". Not every teacher, not every classmate, not every adult...some people just won't like you. And other than just being yourself, there is not a darn thing you can do about it. So don't give it any thought and move on. It hurts, but you can't dwell on it or worry about it. There are people YOU don't like who are sitting at home right now upset that you don't like them, no matter what they say and do at school, but that won't change your mind. So you won't change their mind. Move on.
Teaching kids that rainbows shoot out their backside and everyone gets a trophy and we are all special...well that doesn't help them in the real world does it? Because there are professors in college whose job it is to weed out the weak in the field. Their class is mandatory and they are the only prof who teaches it. It's because it's their job to get rid of the kids who won't make it so only the strong advance to the upper levels of the program.
And bosses...there will be some fricking terrible bosses in your life. Do you want to be the employee the boss chews up and spits out or do you want to be the one who survives ? Teach your kids accordingly.
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
We have to teach our kids that the opinions of those who love you are FAR more important. And, yes, there are people who won't like you. So, heck with those who don't!
Really, if parents truly think they need to find someone to blame for a child's suicide--they might want to look in the mirror.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
This--ultimately, a child is a PARENT'S responsibility
__________________
" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke
It's not the school's job to stand up for the students (I realize how stupid that sounds). It is the parents job. Where were these parents BEFORE their daughter died?
It is and isn't. It's absolutely the school's job--when the child is IN SCHOOL or at an official school activity. The school absolutely has a duty to provide a safe environment for all its students.
Beyond school hours and off school property, though, they cannot be expected to police social media, monitor texts, and everything else
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Bullying is more invasive now because there is no escaping it by leaving school. Husker is right. And so is Gaga - you have to teach your kids to be resilient and how to turn off and ignore technology when it is being used to harass you.
But, that doesn't mean the schools get to ignore it on their end, either. They still have the obligation to make school a good, safe environment for learning, and turning a blind eye to bullying is not the way to do it.
Yes, DURING school and on school property.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
My dil,works at the grade school as a aide and sometimes substitute teacher. One kid was calling a girl all kinds of names and my dil, looked at her and asked why would you say that? The kid stuttered and said cause no one likes her and she said "again why would you say that"? The school may not be able to control bullying off of campus but they can control it at school.
It's not the school's job to stand up for the students (I realize how stupid that sounds). It is the parents job. Where were these parents BEFORE their daughter died?
It is and isn't. It's absolutely the school's job--when the child is IN SCHOOL or at an official school activity. The school absolutely has a duty to provide a safe environment for all its students.
Beyond school hours and off school property, though, they cannot be expected to police social media, monitor texts, and everything else
One teacher and 30 students. the school is relatively powerless. It is up to the parents to foster a trusting relationship with their child and follow up. Advocacy is the parent's job.
I don't even get what you mean by your first two statements. Are you saying the teacher should do nothing when they see bullying? The school has no role in preventing and punishing bullying within its walls? That's just looney. They absolutely have a duty to do so.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
I don't even get what you mean by your first two statements. Are you saying the teacher should do nothing when they see bullying? The school has no role in preventing and punishing bullying within its walls? That's just looney. They absolutely have a duty to do so.
You're right. You don't get it.
I'm saying that it is a losing battle and the teacher is unlikely to see everything. Kinda thought common sense would kick in on that one.
My dil,works at the grade school as a aide and sometimes substitute teacher. One kid was calling a girl all kinds of names and my dil, looked at her and asked why would you say that? The kid stuttered and said cause no one likes her and she said "again why would you say that"? The school may not be able to control bullying off of campus but they can control it at school.
Yes, but if you will recall, a teacher did just that and she was fired at another school district.
Bullying is more invasive now because there is no escaping it by leaving school. Husker is right. And so is Gaga - you have to teach your kids to be resilient and how to turn off and ignore technology when it is being used to harass you.
But, that doesn't mean the schools get to ignore it on their end, either. They still have the obligation to make school a good, safe environment for learning, and turning a blind eye to bullying is not the way to do it.
Yes, DURING school and on school property.
Yes. I don't see how people can expect the School to police the Internet and all the social media.
Well, it seems there have been times when schools do police the internet. There was one I remember that suspended a kid because of something said on FB.
I don't expect anyone to police a child's activities but the parents.
If something happens at school, then yes, the school gets involved.
If not, the school should stay out of it.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
My dil,works at the grade school as a aide and sometimes substitute teacher. One kid was calling a girl all kinds of names and my dil, looked at her and asked why would you say that? The kid stuttered and said cause no one likes her and she said "again why would you say that"? The school may not be able to control bullying off of campus but they can control it at school.
Yes, but if you will recall, a teacher did just that and she was fired at another school district.
Oh I remember but I don't think they have a problem with teachers trying to stop it here.
Bullying is more invasive now because there is no escaping it by leaving school. Husker is right. And so is Gaga - you have to teach your kids to be resilient and how to turn off and ignore technology when it is being used to harass you.
But, that doesn't mean the schools get to ignore it on their end, either. They still have the obligation to make school a good, safe environment for learning, and turning a blind eye to bullying is not the way to do it.
Yes, DURING school and on school property.
Yes. I don't see how people can expect the School to police the Internet and all the social media.
It is the parents' job to monitor what their kids are doing online when they are not in school.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
This is a horrible thing. And kids killing themselves over this type of thing is terrible. ALL of Society should feel a responsibility toward the welfare of children. And, of course the school should absolutely police bullying. However, I don't think policing bullying is enough. Simply attempting to squash it doesn't provide the inclusion that kids seek. Instead find other ways to give kids inclusion and acceptance.
But, even among friends, kids are in one minute and out the next. There is constant drama going on at school in DD's 7th grade class. One minute they are best friends, the next minute the girls are all fighting. There is a mom who is always trying to jump in when the fighting happens and that makes it worse.
I don't even get what you mean by your first two statements. Are you saying the teacher should do nothing when they see bullying? The school has no role in preventing and punishing bullying within its walls? That's just looney. They absolutely have a duty to do so.
You're right. You don't get it.
I'm saying that it is a losing battle and the teacher is unlikely to see everything. Kinda thought common sense would kick in on that one.
That's bull. The school absolutely had a duty to confront bullying when it happens during school. THAT is common sense.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
I don't even get what you mean by your first two statements. Are you saying the teacher should do nothing when they see bullying? The school has no role in preventing and punishing bullying within its walls? That's just looney. They absolutely have a duty to do so.
You're right. You don't get it.
I'm saying that it is a losing battle and the teacher is unlikely to see everything. Kinda thought common sense would kick in on that one.
That's bull. The school absolutely had a duty to confront bullying when it happens during school. THAT is common sense.
Not if they don't see it. Again - 30 kids and 1 teacher. You think kids are dumb enough to misbehave while teacher is looking?
I don't even get what you mean by your first two statements. Are you saying the teacher should do nothing when they see bullying? The school has no role in preventing and punishing bullying within its walls? That's just looney. They absolutely have a duty to do so.
You're right. You don't get it.
I'm saying that it is a losing battle and the teacher is unlikely to see everything. Kinda thought common sense would kick in on that one.
That's bull. The school absolutely had a duty to confront bullying when it happens during school. THAT is common sense.
Not if they don't see it. Again - 30 kids and 1 teacher. You think kids are dumb enough to misbehave while teacher is looking?
They need to see it. I taught school. Bullying is something you can't miss. If you do--you aren't doing your job.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Teachers are 100% responsible for what goes on in their classroom. If they don't "see it"--that is irrelevant. They are still responsible for it and can and will be held accountable for it by the administration--if the administration is doing their job.
It's not an excuse to say "well, I didn't see it.".
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
I don't even get what you mean by your first two statements. Are you saying the teacher should do nothing when they see bullying? The school has no role in preventing and punishing bullying within its walls? That's just looney. They absolutely have a duty to do so.
You're right. You don't get it.
I'm saying that it is a losing battle and the teacher is unlikely to see everything. Kinda thought common sense would kick in on that one.
That's bull. The school absolutely had a duty to confront bullying when it happens during school. THAT is common sense.
Not if they don't see it. Again - 30 kids and 1 teacher. You think kids are dumb enough to misbehave while teacher is looking?
They need to see it. I taught school. Bullying is something you can't miss. If you do--you aren't doing your job.
Either you still don't get it or you are looking for an excuse to be obtuse. Are teachers patrolling the halls before and after classes? the change rooms? the bathrooms? You're fighting a losing battle if you think a teacher - who is a human being - would be there to see and prevent every instance of bullying.
Yes. As I have said like 1000x there are a million and one subtle ways to bully someone. An askance glance, whatever. If you expect teachers to see all of that, they won't be spending much time teaching.
We seem to put ridiculous expectations on to teachers. Well, if you are fat, out of shape and don't take your medicine, is that your doctor's fault? Why not? We seem to expect teachers to perform miracles that even doctors can't do. Yes, it is the job of the teacher to set the tone of the classroom and to monitor and police the students. Of course. Absolutely. But, no they are not going to see every incident. Or, even if they do see one, they may have not see the 10 other incidents preceding it. Or, the kids have different classes or it happened at the cafeteria or while waiting for the bus or whatever.
Teachers should absolutely be paying attention and doing what they can to control bullying. No, they will not see every instance of it - but they cannot bury their heads in the sand about it, either. And YES, patrolling the halls between classes is something that teachers or school officials should be doing. The school has custody of our children for 7-8 hours a day - they don't just get to pretend bullying doesn't happen.
And bullying is NOT always as subtle as you think. The kids see it - the teachers can see it if they pay attention, EVEN IF it is not all actionable. That laughter and those glances tells someone that SOMETHING is going on, which should lead the teachers to pay CLOSER attention or ask questions, not just shrug it off even though they might not be able to do anything about it right then.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Teachers are 100% responsible for what goes on in their classroom. If they don't "see it"--that is irrelevant. They are still responsible for it and can and will be held accountable for it by the administration--if the administration is doing their job.
It's not an excuse to say "well, I didn't see it.".
Talking out of both sides of your mouth or did you have stroke and forget what you said before?
People just want someone to blame. Was she bullied? Probably. Was it a factor in her suicide? Probably.
The article does not give, however, the specifics of the bullying or what the school did do about it.
People seem to have the notion that the school is responsible for every damn thing kids do. NOT THE CASE. They can't be everywhere--especially on social media, email, or texts--where we all know damn well that much, if not most, bullying occurs.
Really, if parents truly think they need to find someone to blame for a child's suicide--they might want to look in the mirror.
Is that uncomfortable? He!! yes it is--but parents spend more time with their kids than the school does, especially before high school sport take over. There's a reason they aren't a bigger influence on their kids' lives than the school--or some bullies.
I'm not trying to "pile on" grieving parents--but if they really think they need to blame someone, it makes more sense than going after the school.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I don't even get what you mean by your first two statements. Are you saying the teacher should do nothing when they see bullying? The school has no role in preventing and punishing bullying within its walls? That's just looney. They absolutely have a duty to do so.
You're right. You don't get it.
I'm saying that it is a losing battle and the teacher is unlikely to see everything. Kinda thought common sense would kick in on that one.
That's bull. The school absolutely had a duty to confront bullying when it happens during school. THAT is common sense.
Not if they don't see it. Again - 30 kids and 1 teacher. You think kids are dumb enough to misbehave while teacher is looking?
They need to see it. I taught school. Bullying is something you can't miss. If you do--you aren't doing your job.
Either you still don't get it or you are looking for an excuse to be obtuse. Are teachers patrolling the halls before and after classes? the change rooms? the bathrooms? You're fighting a losing battle if you think a teacher - who is a human being - would be there to see and prevent every instance of bullying.
Yes. Yes. Yes. It's not an excuse to say "I didn't see it" if it happens on your watch. Youd get fired for that.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Teachers are 100% responsible for what goes on in their classroom. If they don't "see it"--that is irrelevant. They are still responsible for it and can and will be held accountable for it by the administration--if the administration is doing their job.
It's not an excuse to say "well, I didn't see it.".
Talking out of both sides of your mouth or did you have stroke and forget what you said before?
People just want someone to blame. Was she bullied? Probably. Was it a factor in her suicide? Probably.
The article does not give, however, the specifics of the bullying or what the school did do about it.
People seem to have the notion that the school is responsible for every damn thing kids do. NOT THE CASE. They can't be everywhere--especially on social media, email, or texts--where we all know damn well that much, if not most, bullying occurs.
Really, if parents truly think they need to find someone to blame for a child's suicide--they might want to look in the mirror.
Is that uncomfortable? He!! yes it is--but parents spend more time with their kids than the school does, especially before high school sport take over. There's a reason they aren't a bigger influence on their kids' lives than the school--or some bullies.
I'm not trying to "pile on" grieving parents--but if they really think they need to blame someone, it makes more sense than going after the school.
WTF are you babbling about? I said the school can't be responsible foe what happens OUTSIDE of school, especially on social media. I NEVER said they weren't responsible for what goes on during school.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.