Homosexuals make up 1% of our population. There are literally tons of studies on this. The percentage is 1% if you just consider homosexuals. 1-3% if you add in all the bisexual, transsexual, transgender, and all the other things.
I can't count the number of posts that I have seen on my feed that have called for all Christians to be killed. And not just killed. I mean torture killed. These were all people that had the lovely rainbow symbols up.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
No, it doesn't. But so many people like to call things hate that are not hate. - Lawyerlady
_________________________________
Is this a reference to the Confederate Flag controversy? I only ask because many are calling that a symbol of hate, and anyone that knows it's true history knows that it's not.
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I cannot agree with you at all. In that same vein, all it takes is one rape to make all men evil rapists. One race motivated shooting to make all whites racists. You cannot make one case or even 10 cases the baseline by which you judge millions of people. Because then we are all depraved in some way. Out to fvck someone over because we are human. These examples I named get away with it every day too. Yet homosexuals are all suing. Every single one of them are out to close down religious businesses. Can you honesty say that? That is why people are gay, to fvck with your religious freedoms?
I cannot agree with you at all. In that same vein, all it takes is one rape to make all men evil rapists. One race motivated shooting to make all whites racists. You cannot make one case or even 10 cases the baseline by which you judge millions of people. Because then we are all depraved in some way. Out to fvck someone over because we are human. These examples I named get away with it every day too. Yet homosexuals are all suing. Every single one of them are out to close down religious businesses. Can you honesty say that? That is why people are gay, to fvck with your religious freedoms?
No one is saying that. But the problem is that the ones that are suing are WINNING because of this liberal cause of the moment. That is a problem.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
I cannot agree with you at all. In that same vein, all it takes is one rape to make all men evil rapists. One race motivated shooting to make all whites racists. You cannot make one case or even 10 cases the baseline by which you judge millions of people. Because then we are all depraved in some way. Out to fvck someone over because we are human. These examples I named get away with it every day too. Yet homosexuals are all suing. Every single one of them are out to close down religious businesses. Can you honesty say that? That is why people are gay, to fvck with your religious freedoms?
No one is saying that. But the problem is that the ones that are suing are WINNING because of this liberal cause of the moment. That is a problem.
We've had same sex marriages legal here for almost 10 yrs now and we still have a case come up every now and then. Our laws are a bit more clear in terms of business rights vs individual rights, but we are at a point where if a case comes up now, you know someone is being a serious d1ck. It could take a few years for all the loopholes and limits to be clarified. They are there, and a good laywer will find them and ab/use them.
I cannot agree with you at all. In that same vein, all it takes is one rape to make all men evil rapists. One race motivated shooting to make all whites racists. You cannot make one case or even 10 cases the baseline by which you judge millions of people. Because then we are all depraved in some way. Out to fvck someone over because we are human. These examples I named get away with it every day too. Yet homosexuals are all suing. Every single one of them are out to close down religious businesses. Can you honesty say that? That is why people are gay, to fvck with your religious freedoms?
It's the consequences that matter.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Tell that to the couple in New York who is getting fined over a hundred grand. I wouldn't be so against those sick fvckers marrying if they'd leave everyone else alone--but they don't. They preach "live and let live"--but they don't practice it.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
precisely--and what's coming ( soon ) is the point where ordinary people decide the hell with the law and deal with these people directly in a language these agitators may not understand ( or survive )
__________________
" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke
Tell that to the couple in New York who is getting fined over a hundred grand. I wouldn't be so against those sick fvckers marrying if they'd leave everyone else alone--but they don't. They preach "live and let live"--but they don't practice it. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
precisely--and what's coming ( soon ) is the point where ordinary people decide the hell with the law and deal with these people directly in a language these agitators may not understand ( or survive )
When is Texas seceding from the Union? Cuz I sure don't want that crap going on where I live...
Tell that to the couple in New York who is getting fined over a hundred grand. I wouldn't be so against those sick fvckers marrying if they'd leave everyone else alone--but they don't. They preach "live and let live"--but they don't practice it. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
precisely--and what's coming ( soon ) is the point where ordinary people decide the hell with the law and deal with these people directly in a language these agitators may not understand ( or survive )
When is Texas seceding from the Union? Cuz I sure don't want that crap going on where I live...
flan
I believe Texas will be the first to secede--followed by most of the south, the Great Plains except Colorado, and Arizona, for sure. Probably also pockets of California and the rust belt.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
I believe Texas will be the first to secede--followed by most of the south, the Great Plains except Colorado, and Arizona, for sure. Probably also pockets of California and the rust belt.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
that would be drastic indeed--before then I believe we will have a national referendum ( 2016 is a national election year ) with the issue on the ballot--I believe we will at least try to settle it peacefully, as is our duty--failing that, then I don't think your scenario is too far off the mark
the problem that the feds must confront immediately is that they can't imprison entire states' populations and that will be their inevitable choice--follow the will of the people or be defied ( and most probably removed from office )
__________________
" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke
I believe Texas will be the first to secede--followed by most of the south, the Great Plains except Colorado, and Arizona, for sure. Probably also pockets of California and the rust belt. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
that would be drastic indeed--before then I believe we will have a national referendum ( 2016 is a national election year ) with the issue on the ballot--I believe we will at least try to settle it peacefully, as is our duty--failing that, then I don't think your scenario is too far off the mark
the problem that the feds must confront immediately is that they can't imprison entire states' populations and that will be their inevitable choice--follow the will of the people or be defied ( and most probably removed from office )
Too many deadbeats have figured out they can just vote themselves money.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.