Published: 22:10 EST, 2 July 2015 | Updated: 05:33 EST, 3 July 2015
239shares
237
View comments
A pregnant woman has challenged pro life activists to pay her $1 million to keep her baby.
In an anonymous essay titled 'How much would you pay to stop an abortion?', the writer claims she is 26 years old, seven weeks pregnant, with every intention of aborting her fetus.
But if she receives $1 million in 72 hours she will allegedly have the baby, put it up for adoption, and put every cent into a trust fund for the child to access at 21.
Otherwise, every donation will be returned and she will go through with the abortion she has scheduled for July 10.
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+2
Challenge: This is the essay which challenges pro-lifers to pay $1 million to save an unborn baby from abortion
Donations will be accepted from midnight July 7.
Writing one-page website called prolifeantiwoman.com, the woman says the rallying cry is a protest against 'extremely restrictive abortion laws' recently passed in the state where she attends graduate school.
The laws, she writes, require women to wait 72 hours after a doctor consultation to have an abortion.
North Carolina became the fourth state to assume a law of that nature last month, following Missouri, South Dakota, and Utah.
She continues: The laws 'impose unnecessary waiting time to get an abortion and attempt to enforce rules that bypass the doctor/patient privacy privilege.
'I now feel more comfortable traveling to my home state to get an abortion than I do trying to get one here.'
The essay concludes: 'I hope to give the American public a concrete example that the conservative right in America doesn't actually care about the life of a child, they care about controlling the lives and choices of women. We have to acknowledge this and we have to stop it.'
The Mail could not immediately verify the validity of the site or the facts stated.
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+2
The writer says it is a protest against 'extremely restrictive abortion laws' recently passed in the state where she attends graduate school, requiring women to wait 72 hours after a doctor consultation to have an abortion
In the essay, the writer stipulates: 'I will do my best to remain anonymous in this process as what I aim to prove has nothing to do with me personally.'
Reaction online has been mixed.
Critics have questioned the validity of the anonymous writers point, and one Twitter user wrote: 'How much do you love your unborn child? Not very much considering you are holding it for ransom.'
Another, however, has tweeted: 'This is... brave and amazing.'
'Horrible', 'necessary': Women react to the word 'abortion'
Well, what a nice legacy to her own child, flesh and blood. If she keeps her child, she can tell him/her that she held her own child's life for ransom.
I'm sorry, she should be in jail. I know abortion is legal but she is extortion her own baby for money. This is wrong and I feel sorry for the innocent baby. This will come back and bite her if not now but in the future.
Yes, because I am totally going to believe an anonymous person on the internet will put the money in a trust and not touch a cent of it. Riiiiiiiight.
What a twisted person. If you want an abortion, by all means have one, but this is twisted and wrong.
This excuse for a human should be in protective custody and that baby should be taken at birth.
Trash. Total trash.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Why doesn't a grad student know how to use protection?
I have terrible thoughts about how to rid the planet of this vile human.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Why doesn't a grad student know how to use protection?
I have terrible thoughts about how to rid the planet of this vile human.
Why do you assume she doesn't know how or that she wasn't using it? You yourself said you took BC pills and got pregnant even though you took them exactly as directed. Why do you assume she didn't?
I think she is a horrid person and I don't agree with her at all. But I think it's awfully easy to dismiss her as being careless with her BC when the fact is, several of us here got pregnant using BC exactly as directed. The truth about how she got pregnant is probably much more nuanced than "she is an idiot grad student who didn't take responsibility for her body".
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
Why doesn't a grad student know how to use protection?
I have terrible thoughts about how to rid the planet of this vile human.
Why do you assume she doesn't know how or that she wasn't using it? You yourself said you took BC pills and got pregnant even though you took them exactly as directed. Why do you assume she didn't?
I think she is a horrid person and I don't agree with her at all. But I think it's awfully easy to dismiss her as being careless with her BC when the fact is, several of us here got pregnant using BC exactly as directed. The truth about how she got pregnant is probably much more nuanced than "she is an idiot grad student who didn't take responsibility for her body".
Because that would be the very rare circumstance. Birth control is over 98% effective when used properly. So, whenever you talk about the people it doesn't work for, you are talking about less than 2%. Therefore to assume she did not use it or at least not correctly is playing the odds very, VERY, very well.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Why doesn't a grad student know how to use protection?
I have terrible thoughts about how to rid the planet of this vile human.
Why do you assume she doesn't know how or that she wasn't using it? You yourself said you took BC pills and got pregnant even though you took them exactly as directed. Why do you assume she didn't?
I think she is a horrid person and I don't agree with her at all. But I think it's awfully easy to dismiss her as being careless with her BC when the fact is, several of us here got pregnant using BC exactly as directed. The truth about how she got pregnant is probably much more nuanced than "she is an idiot grad student who didn't take responsibility for her body".
No, it really isn't.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Why doesn't a grad student know how to use protection?
I have terrible thoughts about how to rid the planet of this vile human.
Why do you assume she doesn't know how or that she wasn't using it? You yourself said you took BC pills and got pregnant even though you took them exactly as directed. Why do you assume she didn't?
I think she is a horrid person and I don't agree with her at all. But I think it's awfully easy to dismiss her as being careless with her BC when the fact is, several of us here got pregnant using BC exactly as directed. The truth about how she got pregnant is probably much more nuanced than "she is an idiot grad student who didn't take responsibility for her body".
Because that would be the very rare circumstance. Birth control is over 98% effective when used properly. So, whenever you talk about the people it doesn't work for, you are talking about less than 2%. Therefore to assume she did not use it or at least not correctly is playing the odds very, VERY, very well.
9.7 million people use the pill alone. At a 2% fail rate that's 194,000 pregnancies a year. Not as small as you would think. And thats just for the pill alone at a conservative 2%.
-- Edited by Mellow Momma on Saturday 4th of July 2015 12:45:37 PM
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
Condoms fail at a 12% rate. Multiplied by the 5.8 million users that's over 600,000 pregnancies a year. Again, not as statistically insignificant as you would think.
It's possible she was one of the almost a million people a year who got pregnant using BC.
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
If one is adamant about not wanting to be pregnant, one should take all precautions necessary to avoid it. Combine birth control methods. If you truly never want bio-kids, get a hysterectomy and avoid the worry of tube-tying failing.
The bc pill is not the best option for everyone. It also isn't as sensitive to what time one takes it as you might believe. I was on it for over a decade before having my son. Sometimes I messed up and forgot a day. Never took it an exact time each day. Never got pregnant. In fact, due to the line of thinking re taking at the same time, I thought I might be infertile. Wasn't wanting bio-kids so never got tested. Was only off it 2 months before conceiving my son. I'm back on it now and still don't take it at an exact time each day and no pregnancy scares.
You're right SB, scum is scum and this chic is coming up aces with it.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.