TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Obama Silent on Kate Steinle’s Death, But Spoke about Michael Brown within 3 Days


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Obama Silent on Kate Steinle’s Death, But Spoke about Michael Brown within 3 Days
Permalink  
 


Obama Silent on Kate Steinle’s Death, But Spoke about Michael Brown within 3 Days

 

 

Roughly 15 days ago Kathryn Steinle was shot and killed, allegedly by illegal immigrant Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez. He chose to stay in San Francisco specifically because it was a sanctuary city – protecting him as an illegal immigrant from federal Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.

Under the liberal policies of sanctuary cities, city officials do not have to turn over illegal immigrants to ICE. This was the case with Lopez-Sanchez, because ICE officials had requested that San Francisco police let ICE know when Lopez-Sanchez would be released so that ICE would be able to take him into federal custody, but San Francisco refused to notify the federal officials.

President Obama has said nothing about Steinle’s death – even after her parents have proposed Kate’s law and appeared on national television to discuss the death of their daughter and the legislation.

The Washington Post’s Mark Thiessen noted Obama may not be rushing to comment on Steinle’s death because it “would require him to confront the fact that his administration has been releasing tens of thousands of dangerous undocumented immigrants with criminal convictions into our communities — including many who have gone on to commit murder.”

For example, Thiessen pointed out that in 2013, the Obama administration released roughly 36,007 illegal immigrants who all had criminal convictions — 1,000 of those individuals were then convicted of different crimes following their release.

In 2014, the Obama administration released roughly 30,558 illegal immigrants.

“According to the House Judiciary Committee, only 8 percent of those were due to the Supreme Court’s decision in Zadvydas v. Davis, which requires that undocumented immigrants be released after 180 days if their home countries won’t take them back. The other 92 percent were released because of Obama’s policies,” Thiessen stated.

However, Obama has been quick to react to the shooting deaths of African American men.

For example, the recent death of Freddie Gray in Baltimore, Maryland – which sparked violent riots against police – occurred on April 12, 2015. It was 17 days later that Obama publicly addressed the young man’s death.

On August 9, 2014, Michael Brown was shot and killed in Ferguson, Missouri, sparking violent riots – but just three days later, Obama spoke about Brown’s death:

The death of Michael Brown is heartbreaking, and Michelle and I send our deepest condolences to his family and his community at this very difficult time.  As Attorney General Holder has indicated, the Department of Justice is investigating the situation along with local officials, and they will continue to direct resources to the case as needed.  I know the events of the past few days have prompted strong passions, but as details unfold, I urge everyone in Ferguson, Missouri, and across the country, to remember this young man through reflection and understanding.  We should comfort each other and talk with one another in a way that heals, not in a way that wounds.  Along with our prayers, that’s what Michael and his family, and our broader American community, deserve.

Obama also sent Administration officials to Brown’s funeral.

A grand jury later found Brown was the aggressor toward a police officer who shot Brown in self-defense.

Regarding the death of Trayvon Martin on February 26, 2012, Obama said he believed the shooting of Martin by George Zimmerman should be investigated. He made his remarks 25 days after the death on March 23, 2012 when Obama told reporters, “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”

Thiessen argues what is different between Steinle’s death in comparison to the deaths of Martin, Gray and Brown is that Obama has no political policy talking points.

“After Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and Freddie Gray were killed, Obama had liberal public policy points he wanted to make — about gun control, “stand your ground” laws, racial profiling and police bias. In the Steinle case, there are no issues Obama wants to highlight — because his administration supports the policies that led to her death,” Thiessen argues.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/15/obama-silent-on-kate-steinles-death-but-spoke-about-michael-brown-within-3-days/

 



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Owl drink to that!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4799
Date:
Permalink  
 

Doesn't surprise me one bit

__________________

Was it a bad day?

Or was it a bad five minutes that you milked all day?



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

He's a jerk.

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1586
Date:
Permalink  
 


he's a racist and a hypocrite--plain and simple--pretty transparent, huh ?--what's great ( and also sad because it's true ) about this article is it's from the washington post a source that's traditionally been a mouthpiece for the democrat / liberal agenda for a long time

perhaps some of the libs are finally beginning to see the light ( or the dark as the case may be )



-- Edited by burns07 on Wednesday 15th of July 2015 08:43:33 PM

__________________

" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

A. He doesn't care.

B. It doesn't fit with his political agenda when a white person is killed by an illegal.



When a black person is killed (and more than NINETY PERCENT of them are killed by another black person and NOT the Dylann Roof's of the world)--it matters.

When a white person is killed--it doesn't.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:

A. He doesn't care.

B. It doesn't fit with his political agenda when a white person is killed by an illegal.



When a black person is killed (and more than NINETY PERCENT of them are killed by another black person and NOT the Dylann Roof's of the world)--it matters.

When a white person is killed--it doesn't.


 The only time a black life matters if he is a thug and killed  by the police. A innocent  black life doesn't  matter   either.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lindley wrote:
huskerbb wrote:

A. He doesn't care.

B. It doesn't fit with his political agenda when a white person is killed by an illegal.



When a black person is killed (and more than NINETY PERCENT of them are killed by another black person and NOT the Dylann Roof's of the world)--it matters.

When a white person is killed--it doesn't.


 The only time a black life matters if he is a thug and killed  by the police. A innocent  black life doesn't  matter   either.


And, all the murders in Chicago, not a peep! 



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lindley wrote:
huskerbb wrote:

A. He doesn't care.

B. It doesn't fit with his political agenda when a white person is killed by an illegal.



When a black person is killed (and more than NINETY PERCENT of them are killed by another black person and NOT the Dylann Roof's of the world)--it matters.

When a white person is killed--it doesn't.


 The only time a black life matters if he is a thug and killed  by the police. A innocent  black life doesn't  matter   either.


 True--and only when it's a white officer.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard