An edgy New York designer has created a truly revolutionary work. Allow me to introduce, the “pussy pouch,” designed to save women from “manspreading” – which is one the greatest threats to gender relations of the 21st century, according “fourth wave” feminists.
The bags (which retail for between $160.00 and $895.00) have been lapped up by the world’s feminist elite, with Beyoncé and members of Russian feminist protest band, Pussy Riot, posing on Instagram with the accessory.
Rachel Feinberg, the designer, explains on her website how the moment of genius came to her one Monday morning as she made her commuted on the New York City Metro:
“Weighed down by three bags and a winter coat, she quickly locates an empty seat, beelines to it and sits down with a sigh of relief. Without much thought, she crosses her legs, places her purse on her lap and takes out a book she was reading – Politics of Reality: Oppression by Marilyn Frye. Frye writes:
““Consider, by comparison, the discipline of women’s cramped physical postures and attenuated stride.”
“Rachel looked up from her book to survey the commuters around her – each women, herself included, sat with her purse on her lap with legs either crossed or tightly closed, while the majority of men sat with relaxed limbs extended in all directions.
“Unwinding her legs and moving her purse to the vacant seat next to her, Rachel consciously transformed herself from a self-policing inmate of Foucault’s Panopticon [one of the left-wing postmodernist’s theories] to a fashion designer intrigued by the spatial consciousness and tendencies of the subway’s occupants: the majority of females sit with their bags on their lap, while the majority of males allow their belongings to occupy the space next to them. ‘Why?’ She asked.”
“And with that question in mind, the Pussy Pouch was born.”
Inspiring stuff.
If you’re wondering, though, Manspreading is the deplorable act of men sitting comfortably on public transport, whereby they position their legs in such a way as to not restrict blood passing to their nether region, which feminists insist is “an expression of patriarchal authority.”
The “manspreading” campaign gained significant traction and celebrity backing at the beginning of this year. At first, many considered it a joke, but it escalated to a point where it was made an “offence” on the NYC subway, with a $50 fine attacked.
And then, at the beginning of June, reports emerged that two men had actually been arrested and charge for “manspreading.” Breitbart London’s Milo Yiannopoulos takes a slightly different view:
“The manspreading complaint is couched as a response to “rudeness” by men, but it is no such thing: it is pathetic feminist pipsqueakery, the last dying gasp of a movement with nothing to win and nothing to say, determined to abuse and antagonise the male sex at all costs and for whatever perceived or outright imaginary infraction it can conjure from the vicissitudes of everyday life. It is offensively trivial, and those associated with it ought to be ashamed,” he wrote earlier this year.
Have you seen the pics of what this is though? Men sit on public transportation and take up 1 -2 seats. Women sit and try to be as compact as possible. It's an issue if there are not enough seats and the men continue to sit spread out. I will try and find some pics.
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
In eac of those examples, the men would give the women around them more room to be more comfortable if they had enough courtesy to not hog the entire bench. In 2 of those cases, another person could probably sit down if they would just sit more compactly. It's rude.
Is it one of our most pressing issues? No of course not. But for people who ride public transportation I am sure it's annoying. And public transportation works better when everyone uses their manners and common courtesy - which seems to be sorely lacking in these examples.
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
Men use to be chivalrous. Women use to like being treated nice.
As for the purse, it's ugly. Wouldn't have one. Looks more like a coffee bean to me.
If you want to sit, say "excuse me" and sit down.
Women don't have to be so passive.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Personally, I'm more offended that a man won't give up his seat for a woman than his posture once seated. But that's a sign of the times I suppose.
Why should a man give up his seat to woman? Are women so delicate, that they're incapable of standing for 10 minutes?
Sure, they should give up their seat for pregnant women and the elderly, but a healthy woman? What for?
For the same reason that I, as a woman, would ensure that I was only taking up one seat - to ensure that others can sit down. I don't think a man has to give up his seat for a woman, but I appreciate men who only take up one seat so that others may sit down. Look at those pics I posted - that man sitting in between the two women is squeezing them into smaller spaces so he can spread out. The women are sitting compact and small and he is spread out all over his space and theirs.
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
I rode the subway for the last two weeks. I did not see one manspreader. I have to wonder...how much of a "problem" is this, really? Or is it another excuse for manly women to hate on men.
I rode the subway for the last two weeks. I did not see one manspreader. I have to wonder...how much of a "problem" is this, really? Or is it another excuse for manly women to hate on men.
Yep! Just the latest feminazi bitchfest...
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Personally, I'm more offended that a man won't give up his seat for a woman than his posture once seated. But that's a sign of the times I suppose.
Why should a man give up his seat to woman? Are women so delicate, that they're incapable of standing for 10 minutes?
Sure, they should give up their seat for pregnant women and the elderly, but a healthy woman? What for?
Chivalry. Look it up.
Seriously...I prefer to be treated like a woman. Yes, I am delicate. Real women are. The others are butch and are not attractive...
Lol! I'm butch? News to me. I guess I have to throw out all my crimson lipstick and high heels. Get a bunch of plaid shirts and cut my long hair off. I'll have to get my hair cut at Lesbian Haircuts and Bicycle Repair.
Personally, I'm more offended that a man won't give up his seat for a woman than his posture once seated. But that's a sign of the times I suppose.
Why should a man give up his seat to woman? Are women so delicate, that they're incapable of standing for 10 minutes?
Sure, they should give up their seat for pregnant women and the elderly, but a healthy woman? What for?
Chivalry. Look it up.
Seriously...I prefer to be treated like a woman. Yes, I am delicate. Real women are. The others are butch and are not attractive...
Lol! I'm butch? News to me. I guess I have to throw out all my crimson lipstick and high heels. Get a bunch of plaid shirts and cut my long hair off. I'll have to get my hair cut at Lesbian Haircuts and Bicycle Repair.
You could come here, My barber, Anna, would be happy to fix you up. Haircuts are $9.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
Well, I am a girl but that doesnt' mean I cant use power tools or do all sorts of "man work". You dont' have to "butch" to do that. I do what needs done.
-- Edited by Lady Gaga Snerd on Monday 20th of July 2015 06:57:48 AM
I agree with ed11563. I don't get how a purse with a stylized labia majora on it decreases "man spreading".
I do think that it's easier for women to cross their legs in that manner than it is for me to do so though. Men have things protruding from their bodies that could be affected by crossing their legs in that manner or keeping their legs "knees together" tight while sitting.
That second sentence was supposed to read: "I do think that it's easier for women to cross their legs in that manner than it is for men to do so though."
Feminazis always have to look for new ways to be offended by men. The "manspreading" is no different than a woman carrying a huge purse and plopping it on the seat beside her or any number of things that HUMANS do to act territorial and to take up space.
Feminazis always have to look for new ways to be offended by men. The "manspreading" is no different than a woman carrying a huge purse and plopping it on the seat beside her or any number of things that HUMANS do to act territorial and to take up space.
But the majority of women on the subway put their giant bags on their lap.
And WSIWIG - your penis doesn't prevent you from being polite and taking up less space. You don't need to put your knees directly together, but there are ways for men to sit more compactly than the examples I posted above. Your cash and prizes doesn't give you an excuse to take up extra space.
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
Feminazis always have to look for new ways to be offended by men. The "manspreading" is no different than a woman carrying a huge purse and plopping it on the seat beside her or any number of things that HUMANS do to act territorial and to take up space.
But the majority of women on the subway put their giant bags on their lap.
And WSIWIG - your penis doesn't prevent you from being polite and taking up less space. You don't need to put your knees directly together, but there are ways for men to sit more compactly than the examples I posted above. Your cash and prizes doesn't give you an excuse to take up extra space.
Just for the sake of clarity, men don't mind having their penis squeezed. The balls, on the other hand, are very sensitive and painful when squeezed.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
And WSIWIG - your penis doesn't prevent you from being polite and taking up less space. You don't need to put your knees directly together, but there are ways for men to sit more compactly than the examples I posted above. Your cash and prizes doesn't give you an excuse to take up extra space.
- Mellow Momma
________________________
Please don't misunderstand me, I wasn't defending or advocating spreading out and taking the space of three people. I was just mentioning that getting men's legs to occupy as small of a space as women's legs can occupy could be a tad unlikely, even possibly painful. Men should have their knees no more than "shoulder width" apart. That should allow plenty of space for their "cash and prizes" as you called them, and still keep them occupying one seat area.
Men are able to sit with their legs together and men are even able to cross their legs. I think all anyone is asking is to just show some respect and manners toward society. That applies to men and women.
And WSIWIG - your penis doesn't prevent you from being polite and taking up less space. You don't need to put your knees directly together, but there are ways for men to sit more compactly than the examples I posted above. Your cash and prizes doesn't give you an excuse to take up extra space. - Mellow Momma
________________________
Please don't misunderstand me, I wasn't defending or advocating spreading out and taking the space of three people. I was just mentioning that getting men's legs to occupy as small of a space as women's legs can occupy could be a tad unlikely, even possibly painful. Men should have their knees no more than "shoulder width" apart. That should allow plenty of space for their "cash and prizes" as you called them, and still keep them occupying one seat area.
Seriously? Men are perfectly capable as a woman as sitting with their legs closed, and yes, even--*gasp!*--crossing them.
Plenty of men sit politely, their junk is no excuse whatsoever for being rude and taking up so much space.
Where did I suggest that they should sit impolitely or take up extra space? Knees at shoulder width is not taking up extra space that a person is not entitled to.
I could say women can sit with their knees shoulder width apart as well, but to suggest that a woman should be sitting in such a manner could be construed as being ungentlemanly.