TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Could you vs should you?
Was this kid right or wrong? [7 vote(s)]

Completely within his rights.
14.3%
Just being an ass.
42.9%
Completely within his right but still being an ass.
42.9%


Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Could you vs should you?
Permalink  
 


DH and I were talking about a video we saw on the news last night.  It ended up turning into a heated debate.  First, last time DH came home he told me he got frisked by a TSA agent.  He told the TSA agent that if he touched his balls he was going to sue the pants off him.  I asked him why he would say that and he said TSA agents are overpaid under worked stupid uneducated people who are unnecessary to this world.  I was pretty shocked by that attitude.  My DH is always the one the tips the waiters and waitresses extra because he knows how hard they work.  I have never seen him look down on anyone before.

So the clip on the news was a 16 year old kid and he was using his phone to video record a TSA agent.  The TSA agent wasn't doing anything wrong.  He was patting down the kids father.  The TSA agent asked the kid several times to turn off the camera.  The kid replies with, "I read all the rules for the TSA before I came.  I know what's okay and what's  not.  The rules say I can video tape you at any time without your permission.  Why don't you know the rules."  The TSA guy just tries to handle it.  He asks him nicely to turn off the video.  The kid continually, IMO, "taunts" him telling him he has the right to video tape him and he wants to know why the agent doesn't know he has the right to tape him.  The father never says anything during the whole time.  All he ever says is "Hey, that's my son."  The agent ends up getting cop to come over because the kid is holding up the line.

I said it sounds to me like the kid was just wanting to be an ass.  Like he had studied ahead of time all the rules for the TSA just to see how far he could go without getting into trouble.  Yes, he had every right to video tape the agent.  But why?  The agent wasn't doing anything wrong.  Even the kid says he's not doing anything wrong but that he wants to tape him just to tape him.  My opinion is sure you CAN tape him but why?  Unless there's a good reason it's stirring up trouble.  DH says the kid had every right to tape the guy and he was proud of him for acting like that and "putting the agent in his place".  He said it was just another example of an uneducated and unnecessary agent. 

Honestly, after hearing some of the things people try to pull on the agents I'm to the point where I'm starting to feel for them.  I'm sure they're just trying to do their job and go home.  And yes, I'm sure there's a few bad apples.  But that doesn't mean the majority of them are trying to cop a feel or do something wrong.  So what do you think. 



__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Sniff...sniff, sniff. Yay! A Bum!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7536
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't think the TSA agents do anything wrong, but I don't think they are doing anything right either. They miss WAY too much. Whenever DH and his teams travel as a group, they don't even check their liquids. They bring way more than is allowed. And all those studies that came out showing how many dangerous items they allowed people to carry onto a plane?! Terrifying. There are always a few of them standing around doing nothing and talking. I am sure they are good decent people. But they happen to suck at their jobs. That isn't always their fault though.

About the OP, the boy was allowed to film so I don't have a problem with that. I have more of a problem with the agent getting so upset about the boy doing something that he was allowed to do that he potentially could have missed something else happening. I also don't like when people in authority don't know the rules. Like police who speed (they are not allowed to go faster than the speed limit, even with lights and sirens on). I think if you take a job like that you need to know the rules.

__________________

Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite ! 



Nothing's Impossible

Status: Offline
Posts: 16913
Date:
Permalink  
 

Kid was just being a jerk. It isn't like the agent was doing anything wrong or was being a jerk.

__________________

A person's a person no matter how small.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well, here's the thing. If he wasn't video taping and the guy did something wrong, he'd probably miss it. By video-taping the agent and making it known, he pretty much was trying to assure nothing went wrong. The agent shouldn't have just shrugged it off and gone about his job since videoing him was within the rules.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think your husband is right and TSA agents are mostly useless tools.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Mellow Momma wrote:

I don't think the TSA agents do anything wrong, but I don't think they are doing anything right either. They miss WAY too much. Whenever DH and his teams travel as a group, they don't even check their liquids. They bring way more than is allowed. And all those studies that came out showing how many dangerous items they allowed people to carry onto a plane?! Terrifying. There are always a few of them standing around doing nothing and talking. I am sure they are good decent people. But they happen to suck at their jobs. That isn't always their fault though.

About the OP, the boy was allowed to film so I don't have a problem with that. I have more of a problem with the agent getting so upset about the boy doing something that he was allowed to do that he potentially could have missed something else happening. I also don't like when people in authority don't know the rules. Like police who speed (they are not allowed to go faster than the speed limit, even with lights and sirens on). I think if you take a job like that you need to know the rules.


 Untrue.   If they do NOT have lights and sirens on they aren't supposed to exceed the speed limit. 

 

What the law says is that if they are going to exceed the speed limit, then they must have their lights and sirens on.

 

 

ETA:  Actually, I did a little more research, and it's up to the officer whether or not to break traffic laws in order to get to the scene faster--whether the lights and siren are on, or not.  The standard is that they are allowed to go as fast as they "safely" can--but it's up to individual discretion how fast that is. 



-- Edited by huskerbb on Friday 24th of July 2015 10:41:23 PM

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6644
Date:
Permalink  
 

I have to wonder if the father told the kid to videotape the encounter in case the agent did something wrong.

__________________

~At Gnome in the Kitchen~



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

chef wrote:

I have to wonder if the father told the kid to videotape the encounter in case the agent did something wrong.


 The father acted so nonchalant.  He didn't say anything other than, "Hey man, that's my son."  That was the only thing he said.  He didn't tell his son to stop.  He didn't defend his son's right to video either.  He was just so passive about it all.  That part really stuck out for me.



__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Sniff...sniff, sniff. Yay! A Bum!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7536
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Mellow Momma wrote:

I don't think the TSA agents do anything wrong, but I don't think they are doing anything right either. They miss WAY too much. Whenever DH and his teams travel as a group, they don't even check their liquids. They bring way more than is allowed. And all those studies that came out showing how many dangerous items they allowed people to carry onto a plane?! Terrifying. There are always a few of them standing around doing nothing and talking. I am sure they are good decent people. But they happen to suck at their jobs. That isn't always their fault though.

About the OP, the boy was allowed to film so I don't have a problem with that. I have more of a problem with the agent getting so upset about the boy doing something that he was allowed to do that he potentially could have missed something else happening. I also don't like when people in authority don't know the rules. Like police who speed (they are not allowed to go faster than the speed limit, even with lights and sirens on). I think if you take a job like that you need to know the rules.


 Untrue.   If they do NOT have lights and sirens on they aren't supposed to exceed the speed limit. 

 

What the law says is that if they are going to exceed the speed limit, then they must have their lights and sirens on.

 

 

ETA:  Actually, I did a little more research, and it's up to the officer whether or not to break traffic laws in order to get to the scene faster--whether the lights and siren are on, or not.  The standard is that they are allowed to go as fast as they "safely" can--but it's up to individual discretion how fast that is. 



-- Edited by huskerbb on Friday 24th of July 2015 10:41:23 PM


 In our state it is against the law no matter what. My best friend's father was killed by a police officer who was going 90, hot and killed him and the officer was charged and eventually found guilty of manslaughter specifically because the police cannot speed no matter what. 



__________________

Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite ! 



Sniff...sniff, sniff. Yay! A Bum!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7536
Date:
Permalink  
 

Oh, the officer had his lights and siren on but was not in pursuit, nor was he en route to a call. He just wanted to go faster.

__________________

Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite ! 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1849
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:

I think your husband is right and TSA agents are mostly useless tools.


 I agree with both of them. TSA is nothing but a power play by the government and seems to be incapable of refraining from hiring thieves and drug smugglers, not to mention all the unnecessary groping and harassment. 



__________________
FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

The kid was a jerk. TSA should have shrugged it off. Or posed. Or did something funny for the video, like make a duck face or whatever.

TSA agents, and law enforcement in general, have a difficult job. Because of jerks like that kid and anyone else who gives them a hard time just to give them a hard time.

When I worked for DOJ, TSA gave me an inside tour of Dulles airport. It was very interesting, to say the least.

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

FNW wrote:

The kid was a jerk. TSA should have shrugged it off. Or posed. Or did something funny for the video, like make a duck face or whatever.

TSA agents, and law enforcement in general, have a difficult job. Because of jerks like that kid and anyone else who gives them a hard time just to give them a hard time.

When I worked for DOJ, TSA gave me an inside tour of Dulles airport. It was very interesting, to say the least.


 



__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1586
Date:
Permalink  
 


expect tsa to conduct themselves professionally--if I'm going to consent to a search, they need to conduct the same professionally and with respect--as long as they treat me professionally I'll reciprocate--otherwise, we're going to have a problem

__________________

" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Mellow Momma wrote:

Oh, the officer had his lights and siren on but was not in pursuit, nor was he en route to a call. He just wanted to go faster.


Then that may have made the difference.  I would like to see the statute that says they can't speed "no matter what".  I highly doubt that is true.   



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard