So, a woman with short hair(forbidden in the bible) gets up, puts on a pair of pants (forbidden), gold earrings (forbidden), kisses her clean-shaven (forbidden) second husband (forbidden), and they go out for a nice lunch of shrimp (forbidden), then goes home and lies about how much she paid for her shoes (forbidden), checks her horoscope (forbidden), gossips with the neighbours (forbidden), is jealous of their new car (forbidden), watches a football game where they throw around a pigskin (forbidden), makes pork chops for supper (forbidden)...and then whines how immoral the gays are. Got it.
-- Edited by weltschmerz on Saturday 29th of August 2015 02:47:41 PM
-- Edited by weltschmerz on Saturday 29th of August 2015 03:01:37 PM
I think you do make some good points. I do agree that the Church seems to focus more on some sins than others. There is excessive focus on sexual sins versus other sins. On that, I agree with you.
if you want to go by the bible, churches shouldn't be allowed to marry a woman who isn't a virgin. The bible says she should be stoned. And not in the good way.
That statement shows a complete lack of understanding and ignorance of the Bible and Christian doctrine and teachings. It's laughable when non-Christians pretend like they actually know something on the subject.
Yeah, here's the thing. I used to be a Christian. I was one for a very long time. I went to bible study, the works.
Apparently you came away with zero understanding. Here's a passage you might want to try to grasp:
From John 8:
8 1 but Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.
2 At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them.3 The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group4 and said to Jesus, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery.5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women.Now what do you say?”6 They were using this question as a trap,in order to have a basis for accusing him.
But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger.7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stoneat her.”8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.
9 At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there.10 Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?”
11 “No one, sir,” she said.
“Then neither do I condemn you,”Jesus declared. “Go now and leave your life of sin.”
There are two essential parts of this passage. The first is that we are to forgive. CLEARLY Jesus forgave this woman--and the church is to do the same.
The second is that she is to leave her life of sin--quit sinning.
The church can marry people who are not virgins or who are divorced. That is the forgiveness part.
We are also to forgive the sin of homosexuality.
The difference here is that they don't recognize their sin or make any attempt to no longer do it.
If someone is having premarital sex--that is a sin--but the marriage stops that particular sin. A practicing homosexual is not stopping their sin.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
God made heterosexuals too. But, He doesn't give them carte blanche with their sex lives.
No, he didn't. God made mankind in his image--without sin. It was the fall of Adam in the garden that man brought sin into the world. ALL mankind are sinners. We must daily ask repentance for our sins.
The difference is that someone who asks a person of the same sex to marry them is clearly not sorry for that sin, and they are not only signifying that, but they are declaring their intention to keep sinning in that manner. They are unrepentant.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
if you want to go by the bible, churches shouldn't be allowed to marry a woman who isn't a virgin. The bible says she should be stoned. And not in the good way.
That statement shows a complete lack of understanding and ignorance of the Bible and Christian doctrine and teachings. It's laughable when non-Christians pretend like they actually know something on the subject.
Yeah, here's the thing. I used to be a Christian. I was one for a very long time. I went to bible study, the works.
Quite frankly, it sounds like you quit before you got to the New Testament.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
if you want to go by the bible, churches shouldn't be allowed to marry a woman who isn't a virgin. The bible says she should be stoned. And not in the good way.
That statement shows a complete lack of understanding and ignorance of the Bible and Christian doctrine and teachings. It's laughable when non-Christians pretend like they actually know something on the subject.
Yeah, here's the thing. I used to be a Christian. I was one for a very long time. I went to bible study, the works.
Apparently you came away with zero understanding. Here's a passage you might want to try to grasp:
From John 8:
8 1 but Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.
2 At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them.3 The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group4 and said to Jesus, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery.5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women.Now what do you say?”6 They were using this question as a trap,in order to have a basis for accusing him.
But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger.7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stoneat her.”8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.
9 At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there.10 Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?”
11 “No one, sir,” she said.
“Then neither do I condemn you,”Jesus declared. “Go now and leave your life of sin.”
There are two essential parts of this passage. The first is that we are to forgive. CLEARLY Jesus forgave this woman--and the church is to do the same.
The second is that she is to leave her life of sin--quit sinning.
The church can marry people who are not virgins or who are divorced. That is the forgiveness part.
We are also to forgive the sin of homosexuality.
The difference here is that they don't recognize their sin or make any attempt to no longer do it.
If someone is having premarital sex--that is a sin--but the marriage stops that particular sin. A practicing homosexual is not stopping their sin.
I guess that's why the Catholic church is so forgiving and willing to marry divorced people; because it's so forgiving. Oh, wait....!
The Catholic Church does not permit divorce for valid sacramental marriages. In fact a valid sacramental marriage is impossible to dissolve thereby making divorce not possible if the marriage was sacramental.
In marriage, the two become one flesh in a union joined by God, (Mark 10:8). Jesus speaks about divorce: “Therefore what God has joined together, no human being must separate,” (Mark 10:9). So for a marriage that meets the requirements of being a sacrament, divorce in the Catholic Church is not possible.
I love when we have these threads. One side uses Bible verses to back up what they have to say. The other side uses Bible verses to back up what they have to say. We all listen and come away with a deeper understanding of the others views and are much more tolerant and appreciative of our differences.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
I love when we have these threads. One side uses Bible verses to back up what they have to say. The other side uses Bible verses to back up what they have to say. We all listen and come away with a deeper understanding of the others views and are much more tolerant and appreciative of our differences.
I love when we have these threads. One side uses Bible verses to back up what they have to say. The other side uses Bible verses to back up what they have to say. We all listen and come away with a deeper understanding of the others views and are much more tolerant and appreciative of our differences.
I nearly spit my wine on my laptop screen!
Bad NJN!!!!!
flan
It was really all I had to add!
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
if you want to go by the bible, churches shouldn't be allowed to marry a woman who isn't a virgin. The bible says she should be stoned. And not in the good way.
That statement shows a complete lack of understanding and ignorance of the Bible and Christian doctrine and teachings. It's laughable when non-Christians pretend like they actually know something on the subject.
Yeah, here's the thing. I used to be a Christian. I was one for a very long time. I went to bible study, the works.
Apparently you came away with zero understanding. Here's a passage you might want to try to grasp:
From John 8:
8 1 but Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.
2 At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them.3 The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group4 and said to Jesus, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery.5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women.Now what do you say?”6 They were using this question as a trap,in order to have a basis for accusing him.
But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger.7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stoneat her.”8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.
9 At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there.10 Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?”
11 “No one, sir,” she said.
“Then neither do I condemn you,”Jesus declared. “Go now and leave your life of sin.”
There are two essential parts of this passage. The first is that we are to forgive. CLEARLY Jesus forgave this woman--and the church is to do the same.
The second is that she is to leave her life of sin--quit sinning.
The church can marry people who are not virgins or who are divorced. That is the forgiveness part.
We are also to forgive the sin of homosexuality.
The difference here is that they don't recognize their sin or make any attempt to no longer do it.
If someone is having premarital sex--that is a sin--but the marriage stops that particular sin. A practicing homosexual is not stopping their sin.
I guess that's why the Catholic church is so forgiving and willing to marry divorced people; because it's so forgiving. Oh, wait....!
The Catholic Church does not permit divorce for valid sacramental marriages. In fact a valid sacramental marriage is impossible to dissolve thereby making divorce not possible if the marriage was sacramental.
In marriage, the two become one flesh in a union joined by God, (Mark 10:8). Jesus speaks about divorce: “Therefore what God has joined together, no human being must separate,” (Mark 10:9). So for a marriage that meets the requirements of being a sacrament, divorce in the Catholic Church is not possible.
And people enter into that voluntarily. If they are serious enough about their Catholic faith to make their marriage a sacrament, then breaking that sacrament should be really damn difficult.
Louisiana actually has a secular version of this - their covenant marriages. If you choose to do one, you are going to have a very difficult time getting a divorce.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
if you want to go by the bible, churches shouldn't be allowed to marry a woman who isn't a virgin. The bible says she should be stoned. And not in the good way.
That statement shows a complete lack of understanding and ignorance of the Bible and Christian doctrine and teachings. It's laughable when non-Christians pretend like they actually know something on the subject.
Yeah, here's the thing. I used to be a Christian. I was one for a very long time. I went to bible study, the works.
Apparently you came away with zero understanding. Here's a passage you might want to try to grasp:
From John 8:
8 1 but Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.
2 At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them.3 The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group4 and said to Jesus, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery.5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women.Now what do you say?”6 They were using this question as a trap,in order to have a basis for accusing him.
But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger.7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stoneat her.”8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.
9 At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there.10 Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?”
11 “No one, sir,” she said.
“Then neither do I condemn you,”Jesus declared. “Go now and leave your life of sin.”
There are two essential parts of this passage. The first is that we are to forgive. CLEARLY Jesus forgave this woman--and the church is to do the same.
The second is that she is to leave her life of sin--quit sinning.
The church can marry people who are not virgins or who are divorced. That is the forgiveness part.
We are also to forgive the sin of homosexuality.
The difference here is that they don't recognize their sin or make any attempt to no longer do it.
If someone is having premarital sex--that is a sin--but the marriage stops that particular sin. A practicing homosexual is not stopping their sin.
I guess that's why the Catholic church is so forgiving and willing to marry divorced people; because it's so forgiving. Oh, wait....!
The Catholic Church does not permit divorce for valid sacramental marriages. In fact a valid sacramental marriage is impossible to dissolve thereby making divorce not possible if the marriage was sacramental.
In marriage, the two become one flesh in a union joined by God, (Mark 10:8). Jesus speaks about divorce: “Therefore what God has joined together, no human being must separate,” (Mark 10:9). So for a marriage that meets the requirements of being a sacrament, divorce in the Catholic Church is not possible.
Why would you think I give a rat's ass about what the Catholics teach and/or believe? I've already made it plain that I have little use for churches where they stray from Biblical teaching.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
I love when we have these threads. One side uses Bible verses to back up what they have to say. The other side uses Bible verses to back up what they have to say. We all listen and come away with a deeper understanding of the others views and are much more tolerant and appreciative of our differences.
It depends on who is using the Bible verses. If it is a non-Christian, then their use of them carries as much weight as me using the Quran when having a discussion on religion with a Muslim--none.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.