TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Baylor, Football and the Rape Case of Sam Ukwuachu


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Baylor, Football and the Rape Case of Sam Ukwuachu
Permalink  
 


 

Baylor, Football and the Rape Case of Sam Ukwuachu


On Aug. 21, a Baylor University football player named Sam Ukwuachu was sentenced to six months in the county jail and 10 years’ probation for sexually assaulting a freshman soccer player two years ago.

Although Ukwuachu pleaded not guilty to the charges, there wasn’t much doubt that “Jane Doe,” as she is referred to in court documents, had been raped. When she went to the hospital after the encounter, the examining nurse found “vaginal injuries, including redness, bleeding and friction injuries,” according to a powerful account in Texas Monthly. Jane Doe had been a virgin.

Her testimony during the short trial was nothing short of chilling. “He was using all of his strength to pull up my dress and do stuff to me,” she testified. “He had me on my stomach on the bed and he was on top of me.” Her head caught between the bed and a desk, she was “screaming ‘stop’ and ‘no’ ” as Ukwuachu raped her.

The day of Ukwuachu’s sentencing, Baylor’s president, Ken Starr — yes, the same Ken Starr who 17 years ago authored the lurid Starr Report about President Bill Clinton’s dalliance with Monica Lewinsky — issued a letter to the Baylor community denouncing “this unspeakable tragedy.” He insisted that Baylor works “tirelessly” to provide a safe environment and that perpetrators of sexual violence “will find no shelter on our campus.”

And then on Friday, Starr issued another statement, in which he announced the university would hire outside counsel to conduct an investigation. He also said Baylor would hire a full-time official to oversee “all student-athlete behavior.”

I will address the absurdity of the latter role shortly. But first, it’s worth taking a closer look at the case, which says a lot about the relationship between Baylor and its football team, very little of it good.

Is football big at Baylor? You bet it is. Its beautiful new McLane Stadium, opened last year, cost $266 million. The town of Waco, Tex., where Baylor is located, pretty much stops during a Baylor football game. Baylor’s top spokeswoman, Lori Fogleman, ends her voice mail message with an enthusiastic, “Sic ‘em Bears!”

The importance of having a good football team — and many prognosticators believe Baylor will be very good indeed this season — may help explain why it was willing to accept Ukwuachu in the first place. A talented defensive end, he had been dismissed from the Boise State team for undisclosed reasons, and conflicting accounts over the past two weeks have failed to clarify what Baylor knew about Ukwuachu at the time of his transfer.

During the trial, Ukwuachu’s former girlfriend at Boise State testified that he had been violently abusive with her, and records recently obtained by ESPN show Boise State officials were alarmed by Ukwuachu’s erratic and even suicidal behavior. According to the records, three days after he was given a diagnosis of a major depressive disorder, Ukwuachu was dismissed from the team. (Boise State insists it had no knowledge of the domestic abuse allegations at the time of Ukwuachu’s move to Baylor.).


In October 2013, while sitting out a year as a transfer, as required per N.C.A.A. rules, Ukwuachu raped Jane Doe. To be blunt, Baylor seemed mainly interested in protecting its football player. According to Texas Monthly, after conducting a few cursory interviews, and not even asking to look at the hospital rape kit, the school “cleared” Ukwuachu, as his lawyer later put it.

Not that anybody knew this, because Baylor said nothing publicly, not even after Ukwuachu’s indictment. In fact, when he failed to suit up for the 2014 season — and reporters began asking why — Baylor said only that he had “some issues.” Even with the indictment hanging over him, Ukwuachu was allowed to do conditioning work with the team.

As recently as this June, just two months before the trial, Baylor’s defensive coordinator said he expected the defensive end to play during the 2015 season. It was only as the trial was about to begin that The Waco Tribune-Herald reported Ukwuachu’s “issues” included a rape accusation.

Ken Starr was as complicit in the two-year-long silence as anybody in the Baylor athletic department, which makes his current “anguish” seem like little more than P.R. posturing. If you Google Starr, you’ll find plenty of pictures of him on the Baylor football field, cheering on the team.

But it’s at moments of crises like this one when people discover how a university, and its president, prioritizes athletics. Baylor, a Baptist school that professes to adhere to Christian principles, appears to have “sheltered” a “perpetrator,” to use Starr’s own words, because this particular perp might be able to help the team win a few games. It happens way too often.

As for the idea that someone has to be hired to monitor the behavior of the school’s 500 athletes — how, exactly, does Baylor propose to do that, send chaperones on their dates? — shouldn’t the real issue be who the school admits in the first place, and how forthrightly it acts when problems emerge? By this standard, Baylor’s response has been abysmal.

Indeed, judging by the Ukwuachu case, it’s not so much the athletes who need to have their behavior monitored. It’s Ken Starr’s administration.

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

This goes to show how absurd our justice system is. This guy gets 6 MONTHS for a violent, forcible rape--while a high school student (or one just graduated) gets 11 YEARS for a statutory charge in which a girl just a few years younger actively participated.

Now, he'll probably violate his probation and spend more time in jail, but why wasn't the other kid, who I'm going to bet would be far less likely to violate such terms, not get that chance?

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:

This goes to show how absurd our justice system is. This guy gets 6 MONTHS for a violent, forcible rape--while a high school student (or one just graduated) gets 11 YEARS for a statutory charge in which a girl just a few years younger actively participated.

Now, he'll probably violate his probation and spend more time in jail, but why wasn't the other kid, who I'm going to bet would be far less likely to violate such terms, not get that chance?


 I agree that those are ridiculous in comparison.  That forcible rape should have gotten him 20 years.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

I live twenty minutes from Baylor. This article paints Baylor in a light that is so untrue.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

I live twenty minutes from Baylor. This article paints Baylor in a light that is so untrue.


 It sounds like the article wants to villify Ken Starr as the head of Baylor.  Who even knows how much he knew? 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

Here's what I'll tell you about Baylor. I've been on the campus many times. SS's mom feeds the football players. Football is not everything here. It is EVERYTHING. You can't walk into a store, restaurant, or fast food place that doesn't have Sic' em Bears up. It is a bizarre mentality here. If a business chooses NOT to have the Baylor insignia up they are shunned. And here's the thing. If you are a Baylor student or the parent of a Baylor student and you go into those businesses you get a discount. Baylor students are special. I'm not saying that because I resent them. I'm saying that because it creates an air of being untouchable. When they step foot on Baylor campus the indoctrination starts. And the businesses hate to deal with those kids because they have an air of "I'm entitled". In September Brad Paisley, a hugely famous country singer, is playing a free concert to the Baylor kids. Baylor is also one of the biggest suppliers of drugs to the neighboring towns. A couple of years ago the police busted a HUGE drug lab that was being produced in the basement of a dorm. RGIII made Baylor famous. After he made pros and put us on the map They built McLane Stadium. It is huge. It is something the town lives, dies, and thrives on. Drugs and rape are perfectly okay at Baylor. They will turn the other cheek. What is not okay is being unwed and pregnant or gay. You will find yourself tossed out of school for that in a heart beat. When they were building McClane stadium there were three illegal workers helping on the bridge. McClane stadium sits on the river and Waco's eight year plan is to turn the river into a riverfront type thing like in San Antonio. There is already one restaurant there on the river. They want to build up the riverfront and have shops all up and down it. Right now Mclane stadium is not accessible through the riverwalk. That is their ultimate goal. Anyway, three illegals were working on the riverfront without the proper equipment and were drowned. Never made the papers. It quickly got swept under the carpet.

This story doesn't surprise me one bit. It's pretty typical fare for Baylor who is a strict Christian school. In fact, I'm surprised this even made the news. There is so many other things that go on at Baylor it's incredible. SS's mom works there. She says the kids are spoiled rotten brats with the I'm entitled mentality. Yeah, not surprised by this at all.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

This is someone who is barely into Baylor sports. This isn't even a true fan...

11914242_10153603828566926_6112727475501925692_n.jpg?oh=bfda0f578fa469045b58fd24e51876e4&oe=56682B80



__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3029
Date:
Permalink  
 

This goes to show how absurd our justice system is. This guy gets 6 MONTHS for a violent, forcible rape--while a high school student (or one just graduated) gets 11 YEARS for a statutory charge in which a girl just a few years younger actively participated.

Now, he'll probably violate his probation and spend more time in jail, but why wasn't the other kid, who I'm going to bet would be far less likely to violate such terms, not get that chance?
- huskerbb

___________________________

I agree. This sentence was a farce of justice.

Not just because of the differences in sentencing of a violent rape versus a statutory case, but 6 months for a rape? That's it? They should have put this guy in jail and thrown away the key.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

WYSIWYG wrote:

This goes to show how absurd our justice system is. This guy gets 6 MONTHS for a violent, forcible rape--while a high school student (or one just graduated) gets 11 YEARS for a statutory charge in which a girl just a few years younger actively participated.

Now, he'll probably violate his probation and spend more time in jail, but why wasn't the other kid, who I'm going to bet would be far less likely to violate such terms, not get that chance?
- huskerbb

___________________________

I agree. This sentence was a farce of justice.

Not just because of the differences in sentencing of a violent rape versus a statutory case, but 6 months for a rape? That's it? They should have put this guy in jail and thrown away the key.


 I think there should be more of a difference, especially given how close they were in age in the statutory case, and how close she was to the age of consent.  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard