totallygeeked -> totallygeeked general -> Student isgiven an 'inappropriate dress' warning by her teacher for wearing this sleeveless shirt under a zip-up jacket
Post Info
TOPIC: Student isgiven an 'inappropriate dress' warning by her teacher for wearing this sleeveless shirt under a zip-up jacket
Father's fury as his high school student daughter, 17, is given an 'inappropriate dress' warning by her teacher for wearing this sleeveless shirt under a zip-up jacket
Tessa Wisloh wore the jacket over her blouse at her high school in Florida
Student was held back after class by a teacher for breaking uniform policy
The warning was put on file but school board rules do not mention jackets
Her father branded the decision 'absolutely ridiculous' and 'preposterous'
Published: 21:28 EST, 9 September 2015 | Updated: 01:00 EST, 10 September 2015
59shares
86
View comments
A high school student was given a 'preposterous' verbal warning by her teacher for wearing a sleeveless shirt under a zip-up jacket.
Tessa Wisloh, 17, was held back after class on September 3 by a teacher who asked her to remove the jacket to see if she was violating the school's dress code.
Despite the county school board's rules not mentioning any ban on wearing jackets, Miss Wisloh will now have an record of her breaching the policy put on her official file.
Scroll down for video
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+5
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+5
In the wrong? Tessa Wisloh, 17, was given an official warning by a teacher for wearing a zip-up jacket over a sleeveless shirt
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+5
'Preposterous': Miss Wisloh's father Frank slammed the school's decision, branding it 'absolutely ridiculous'
The student at Frank W. Springstead High School, north of Tampa, Florida, said she initially refused to remove her cardigan when a teacher asked her to prove she was not showing skin underneath.
Speaking to ABC Action News, she said: 'I don't really see the problem in it. I thought maybe my book-bag strap had brought my jacket down. But no skin was showing. It was just like this. Nothing had moved.'
Miss Wisloh's father Frank slammed the verbal warning, branding it 'preposterous'.
He said: 'I feel bad when she has a bad day, when she is singled out for something that's just absolutely ridiculous.
'It's a little upsetting as a parent to think that my daughter is now getting harassed at school and asked to remove an article of clothing for something that just seems preposterous. We live in Florida. It's 90 some odd degrees and it's hot.'
Tessa Wisloh shows sleeveless shirt that got her in trouble
Text Edge StyleNoneRaisedDepressedUniformDropshadow
Font FamilyDefaultMonospace SerifProportional SerifMonospace Sans-SerifProportional Sans-SerifCasualScriptSmall Caps
DefaultsDone
MinimizeExpandClose
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+5
Miss Wisloh was held back after class on September 3 by a teacher who asked her to remove the jacket to see if she was violating the school's dress code
SHARE PICTURE
Copy link to paste in your message
+5
The student's father said the decision by a teacher at Frank W. Springstead High School (pictured) was 'preposterous' and 'absolutely ridiculous'
HERNANDO COUNTY UNIFORM RULES ON SHOWING SKIN
Hernando County School Board's uniform policy on shorts and blouses says:
'Shirts and Blouses – Must be long enough to remain tucked in at all times with no skin visible.
'Blouses with a neckline that dip below the line formed between the right and left armpit are prohibited.
'Spaghetti straps, tank tops, muscle shirts, and shirts with cut off sleeves are also prohibited.'
The policy makes no reference to whether wearing jackets is allowed or prohibited.
Hernando County School District's uniform policy makes no direct reference to jackets or cardigans, simply saying that shirts and blouses 'must be long enough to remain tucked in at all times with no skin visible'.
However Cathy Dofka, a director at Hernando County Schools, said she saw no problem with the 17-year-old's choice of clothing so long as she did not take off the jacket during class.
It also states that dresses must not have a plunging neckline and that spaghetti straps, tank tops, muscle shirts, and shirts with cut off sleeves are all banned.
The school board told ABC Action News that pupils were not allowed to wear clothing that hides breaches of the uniform rules - which in this case was Miss Wisloh wearing a sleeveless blouse that showed skin, albeit covered up.
School bosses are now reconsidering the written warning but are yet to make a decision
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
She had a jacket over it. What the heck diff does it make what she has underneath if she has the jacket on? And, that shirt is fine. That school is ridiculous. Making a fuss over nothing is far more distracting to the educational process than what she was wearing. Wow.
I think the top is fine too. I think the jacket is fine.
But.
The school has a dress code.
Parents sign a form saying they will abide by the policy and rules of the school.
So follow through.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I cannot agree in this instance that the school is right. Otherwise, is wearing a camisole under a sweater wrong because it has spaghetti straps? Kids are not allowed to layer? The jacket was part of the outfit, which meant that she was fully covered. Blazers, jackets, sweaters, etc. that cover ARE long-sleeved.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
how was she not? The ban on sleeveless shirts is to prevent bare shoulders from showing--and they werent.
this would be like a teacher telling a student to take off their long sleeve sweatshirt and then busting them for violating the dress code because they now only have a bra on.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
I think the top is fine too. I think the jacket is fine.
But.
The school has a dress code.
Parents sign a form saying they will abide by the policy and rules of the school.
So follow through.
They did. The policy does not say that every layer must meet the code. It's the combination. If they are forced to take clothes off, then everyone is in violation because at some point--you'd be naked.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Personally, I think a teacher telling a student to remove clothing should be reprimanded.
Yeah. Pretty skeevy.
I wouldn't have done it. Creepy!
We had a dress code at my Catholic HS. The skirt was this gross polyester thing. I brought it to a seamstress and asked her to copy it. Had a beauty of a skirt. Never got busted. Then we needed a collared shirt. I had Nana knit up a tiny collar that I could tie on. Many a laugh from it! I'd tie it on.
how was she not? The ban on sleeveless shirts is to prevent bare shoulders from showing--and they werent.
this would be like a teacher telling a student to take off their long sleeve sweatshirt and then busting them for violating the dress code because they now only have a bra on.
Exactly!
Or take the bra off...and now her boobs are showing...
Personally, I think a teacher telling a student to remove clothing should be reprimanded.
I agree. I think a school authority (including a classroom teacher) should need to have a search warrant, signed by a judge, to demand that a student remove clothing for any kind of "inspection".
Could this be considered child abuse? Possibly a sex crime?
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
Personally, I think a teacher telling a student to remove clothing should be reprimanded.
I agree. I think a school authority (including a classroom teacher) should need to have a search warrant, signed by a judge, to demand that a student remove clothing for any kind of "inspection".
Could this be considered child abuse? Possibly a sex crime?
The BEST course for every school is to just have uniforms.
It would solve all these dress code problems.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
And now these pictures will be on the internet forever and the whole world will know that this girl has shoulders!!!
Seriously, if she had to remove clothing to violate the dress code I don't think she was violating the dress code to start with. Also, the dress code is stupid.
And now these pictures will be on the internet forever and the whole world will know that this girl has shoulders!!!
Seriously, if she had to remove clothing to violate the dress code I don't think she was violating the dress code to start with. Also, the dress code is stupid.
Personally, I think a teacher telling a student to remove clothing should be reprimanded.
I agree. I think a school authority (including a classroom teacher) should need to have a search warrant, signed by a judge, to demand that a student remove clothing for any kind of "inspection".
Could this be considered child abuse? Possibly a sex crime?
No.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Well, then neither should boys be showing their shoulders. Does the basketball team have jerseys showing their shoulders? If so, they are violating their own dress code.
Personally, I think a teacher telling a student to remove clothing should be reprimanded.
I agree. I think a school authority (including a classroom teacher) should need to have a search warrant, signed by a judge, to demand that a student remove clothing for any kind of "inspection".
Could this be considered child abuse? Possibly a sex crime?
No.
They seem to get laser focused on young girls. Why aren't we hearing about boys' dress code violations? And, some girls are busty. It seems they focus on the busty girls for dances and so forth when a slighter girl can wear things with no problem. Well, guess what? God put the boobies right out front there, just like hood ornaments.
Personally, I think a teacher telling a student to remove clothing should be reprimanded.
I agree. I think a school authority (including a classroom teacher) should need to have a search warrant, signed by a judge, to demand that a student remove clothing for any kind of "inspection".
Could this be considered child abuse? Possibly a sex crime?
No.
They seem to get laser focused on young girls. Why aren't we hearing about boys' dress code violations? And, some girls are busty. It seems they focus on the busty girls for dances and so forth when a slighter girl can wear things with no problem. Well, guess what? God put the boobies right out front there, just like hood ornaments.
Yes, pants hanging down below their underwear. yuck.
And you know - she's not even really wearing a "jacket". That's a hoodie. Basically, a casual sweatshirt cardigan. Kids wear them all the time as thier normal clothes.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
I have noticed the cross country track team gathering in the afternoon on our way out.
They all have the running shorts and team tank tops.
But I have noticed that a few of the boys are shirtless.
I don't understand how they get away with that.
And it looks like they would want the shirt on. Running through the trails.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I am not going to buy my daughter a new wardrobe every time the rules change. Thankfully I live in NH and our rules are fairly tame. That situation is so ridiculous.
__________________
Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.
The fact that she was asked to remove clothing to determine if she was "breaking" dress code shows that she was not.
- Lawyerlady
_______________________________
This is my thought as well. The jacket made the outfit conform to the dress code.
What's next? Long Johns for underwear because boy's tighty-whiteys or girl's panties don't come down the leg far enough?
__________________
Page 1 of 1 sorted by
totallygeeked -> totallygeeked general -> Student isgiven an 'inappropriate dress' warning by her teacher for wearing this sleeveless shirt under a zip-up jacket