The bill, inspired by Brittany Maynard, passed in the state Senate Friday.
Mollie ReillyDeputy Politics Editor, The Huffington Post
Posted: 09/11/2015 06:56 PM EDT
The "death with dignity" movement marked a victory in California Friday when the state Senate passed a bill allowing terminally ill patients to end their own lives with the help of a physician.
The End of Life Option Act, which passed in the state Assembly Wednesday, would allow patients to seek aid-in-dying options so long as they are given six months or less to live by two doctors, submit a written request and two oral requests at least 15 days apart and possess the mental capacity to make their own health care decisions.
Gov. Jerry Brown (D), who attended a Jesuit seminary prior to his political career, has yet to indicate whether he will sign the bill into law.
The bill was inspired by Brittany Maynard, a 29-year-old San Francisco Bay Area resident who became the public face of the "death with dignity" movement after she was diagnosed with brain cancer last year. After discovering her diagnosis was terminal, Maynard moved to Oregon, where it's long been legal for doctors to help patients end their own lives. Maynard died Nov. 1, 2014.
"I am heartbroken that I had to leave behind my home, my community and my friends in California. But I am dying and I refuse to lose my dignity. I refuse to subject myself and my family to purposeless, prolonged pain and suffering at the hands of an incurable disease," Maynard said in a video message to lawmakers recorded a few weeks before her death. "No one should have to leave their home and community for peace of mind, to escape suffering and to plan for a gentle death."
Maynard also personally lobbied Brown during a telephone conversation the week before her death.
Credit: Rich Pedroncelli/Associated PressIn a Tuesday, Aug. 18, 2015, file photo, Debbie Ziegler holds a photo of her daughter, Brittany Maynard, during a news conference to announce the reintroduction of right to die legislation, in Sacramento, California.
A version of the bill was first introduced earlier this year and initially appeared to be on the path for passage. The California Medical Association dropped its opposition to the bill, marking a major breakthrough, and the bill passed in the state Senate in June. But before it could be brought to a vote in the Assembly, lawmakers abandoned the bill in committee amid opposition from the Catholic church as well as disability rights advocacy groups.
Last month, supporters of the bill reintroduced the legislation during a special legislative session on health care, adding a sunset provision so that the bill will expire in 10 years unless legislators vote to extend it. The bill passed in committee by a 10-2 vote before going on to the full legislative body for consideration.
The bill's fate now rests with Brown, who has until Oct. 11 to sign or veto the legislation. If signed into law, it will go into effect next year.
For more from The Huffington Post, download our app for iOS or Android.
I don't understand how dying is a 'right"? You can off yourself anytime you want.
It's a step closer to killing people who are not productive or beneficial.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I don't understand how dying is a 'right"? You can off yourself anytime you want.
It's a step closer to killing people who are not productive or beneficial.
Don't act like this is so insulting on this thread when you were fine with it on the other. If you're ok with prisoners being killed, and they apparently aren't productive or beneficial, then why are you all of a sudden an advocate for life on this thread? Your ability to reconcile and justify abhorrent behavior is downright amazing.
I don't understand how dying is a 'right"? You can off yourself anytime you want.
It's a step closer to killing people who are not productive or beneficial.
Don't act like this is so insulting on this thread when you were fine with it on the other. If you're ok with prisoners being killed, and they apparently aren't productive or beneficial, then why are you all of a sudden an advocate for life on this thread? Your ability to reconcile and justify abhorrent behavior is downright amazing.
You may just be my new board crush...(sorry, LGS!)
I don't understand how dying is a 'right"? You can off yourself anytime you want.
It's a step closer to killing people who are not productive or beneficial.
Don't act like this is so insulting on this thread when you were fine with it on the other. If you're ok with prisoners being killed, and they apparently aren't productive or beneficial, then why are you all of a sudden an advocate for life on this thread? Your ability to reconcile and justify abhorrent behavior is downright amazing.
You may just be my new board crush...(sorry, LGS!)
flan
Shush up!!! Joe is ALL mine!!!! Mine I tell you!!
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
I don't understand how dying is a 'right"? You can off yourself anytime you want.
This is for people who don't have the physical ability to do so. They are incapacitated because of illness and are asking for docs to be able to administer or at the very least provide the medications to end their suffering.
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
I don't understand how dying is a 'right"? You can off yourself anytime you want.
It's a step closer to killing people who are not productive or beneficial.
Don't act like this is so insulting on this thread when you were fine with it on the other. If you're ok with prisoners being killed, and they apparently aren't productive or beneficial, then why are you all of a sudden an advocate for life on this thread? Your ability to reconcile and justify abhorrent behavior is downright amazing.
You may just be my new board crush...(sorry, LGS!)
I don't understand how dying is a 'right"? You can off yourself anytime you want.
It's a step closer to killing people who are not productive or beneficial.
Don't act like this is so insulting on this thread when you were fine with it on the other. If you're ok with prisoners being killed, and they apparently aren't productive or beneficial, then why are you all of a sudden an advocate for life on this thread? Your ability to reconcile and justify abhorrent behavior is downright amazing.
You may just be my new board crush...(sorry, LGS!)
flan
Shush up!!! Joe is ALL mine!!!! Mine I tell you!!
Oooh, MM, you think you can take me???
flan
Step aside be-yotch! I am a fighter! 😈
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
I don't understand how dying is a 'right"? You can off yourself anytime you want.
It's a step closer to killing people who are not productive or beneficial.
Don't act like this is so insulting on this thread when you were fine with it on the other. If you're ok with prisoners being killed, and they apparently aren't productive or beneficial, then why are you all of a sudden an advocate for life on this thread? Your ability to reconcile and justify abhorrent behavior is downright amazing.
I know you. Your posting is familiar. Can't put my finger on it yet but I will.
And don't get it twisted. You show me a single post in which I said it was ok on the other thread.
I didnt.
Now. I know I am able to post on multiple threads and leave the argument on each thread.
Are you?
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Again, you want to judge a situation AFTER the fact.
I dont.
My compassion is just fine.
I feel for the police officers who had to deal with that woman and now have to live with her death.
She was a CRIMINAL IN JAIL.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
And this little nugget in the OP is the beginning of being able to kill mentally ill people just because the family doesn't want to deal with them.
You want to fight for a cause, be sure you understand what you are fighting for.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Next we'll be feeling sorry for the father who kills his whole family to save them from the shame he created...Oh wait you've all already done that (excluding LGS who I believe doesn't buy into killing innocent people) on so many other threads. The embracing of death I just don't understand.
__________________
“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.” ― Julia Child ―
Next we'll be feeling sorry for the father who kills his whole family to save them from the shame he created...Oh wait you've all already done that (excluding LGS who I believe doesn't buy into killing innocent people) on so many other threads. The embracing of death I just don't understand.
Nope - not me. He was a coward and a fool who murdered his family. He gets no sympathy from me.
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
I don't understand how dying is a 'right"? You can off yourself anytime you want.
It's a step closer to killing people who are not productive or beneficial.
Don't act like this is so insulting on this thread when you were fine with it on the other. If you're ok with prisoners being killed, and they apparently aren't productive or beneficial, then why are you all of a sudden an advocate for life on this thread? Your ability to reconcile and justify abhorrent behavior is downright amazing.
Well, I wasn't ok with that woman being killed, and I think this law is a very bad step in the wrong direction.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
I think a better step is to require people to have Advanced Directives. To have more honest and frank discussion about End of Life decisions. I think I would like to see a medical team have a sit down with the patient and family and be frank and honest about what they are suffering. Yes, there are many doctors who do this. But still a lot who don't. And, there is often a tipping point. The point where further aggressive medical treatment no longer prolongs one's life but simply prolongs one's death. There was a point when my mom was ill and deteriorating physically and mentally where she hit the point of no return. And, so then we said no more to medical interventions other than comfort measures.
And, I think hospice does a fantastic job. I have no problem with sedating someone heavily at the end of their life and keeping them comfortable to await the inevitable. I have no problem with refusing IV fluids or feeding tubes or dialysis or any other medical intervention when you are dying. In olden days, if great grandma had a stroke and couldn't eat or drink, she simply went home to be surrounded by family to die.
And, one other point. Dying is not simply about the person dying. It is a process for humanity. There is something sacrosanct about our own mortality. I feel that my mother's death was a valuable lesson in dying and living. I helped her transition. I sat by her bed and held her hand. I spent months being there for her. It is really far more than simply just dying and getting out of the way of the living. Dying isn't supposed to be easy. We aren't happy unless we can wrap things up into neat and tidy packages. Life ins't like that and neither is the process of dying.
Thank you. I do agree that the "do everything possible at all costs" is not necessarily the best approach either. And, yes, I don't want people to suffer at the end of their lives. When my mom was first admitted to the home, she was crying and hysterical and having issues of dementia. That was very painful! And, the doctor had ordered sedatives and antipyschotics but only PRN (as needed), so the nurses were not giving her those medications! I talked to the nursing supervisor and then contacted the Doctor and he changed the order so that it was given every 6 hours.
There is a big difference between withholding care and treatment and keeping people comfortable (which I help people do those advanced directives every day) and actively killing people. People should not play God.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Thank you. I do agree that the "do everything possible at all costs" is not necessarily the best approach either. And, yes, I don't want people to suffer at the end of their lives. When my mom was first admitted to the home, she was crying and hysterical and having issues of dementia. That was very painful! And, the doctor had ordered sedatives and antipyschotics but only PRN (as needed), so the nurses were not giving her those medications! I talked to the nursing supervisor and then contacted the Doctor and he changed the order so that it was given every 6 hours.
That was my mother's approach. I hope I will be strong enough to choose differently.
Thank you. I do agree that the "do everything possible at all costs" is not necessarily the best approach either. And, yes, I don't want people to suffer at the end of their lives. When my mom was first admitted to the home, she was crying and hysterical and having issues of dementia. That was very painful! And, the doctor had ordered sedatives and antipyschotics but only PRN (as needed), so the nurses were not giving her those medications! I talked to the nursing supervisor and then contacted the Doctor and he changed the order so that it was given every 6 hours.
That was my mother's approach. I hope I will be strong enough to choose differently.
flan
I am not sure you will be making that choice. I had to make those choices for my mom. She could not. And, there is a lot grey area. People think that it is a cut and dried thing. But, it really is complex. For instance, one night my mom deteriorated and they transferred her to the local hospital. They called me and I went to the ER. She was in respiratory distress and congestive heart failure. And, they wanted to Life Flight her to Pittsburgh. I said No. Just keep her here, give her some diuretics so that she is breathing comfortably again and send her back to the home. I had a good discussion with the Doctor and he understood that she was at the end stages of her life. So, no, Life flighting to Pittsburgh for a cardiac cath, blah, blah was not the course we wanted to proceed with. But, that doesn't mean we didnt' want ANY medical intervention. By giving her diuretics, that pulled some of the fluid off and she was breathing comfortably and went back to the home a day or two later.
Then she had an episode of renal failure. The Doctor talked about dialysis. I said no. Just keep her comfortable. I feel fortunate that I was there and to be able to help make those decisions and I feel that I did so in a way that she would have wanted.
On the other hand, DH's mom had end stage COPD. She was literally gasping for air at the end of her life. However , DH's sister could not accept that she had a terminal disease. And was constantly rushing her in from doctor to doctor. Other than steroids, oxygen and inhalers, there isn't a heck of a lot you can do for end stage COPD. And, when she deteriorated, she cardiac arrested. Well, DH's sister demand she be resuscitated and they put her on a ventilator. Then, DH's sister allowed them to Trach her. So, she wound up going to a nursing home on a ventilator with a Tracheotomy. To me, that was more than I would have done, but that was not my call.
When people are choosing their health care agent, they really need to take into consideration WHO should be the ones making the decision based upon their ability and personality and not simply that they are my "only" or "oldest" child, etc.
You need to choose someone that can accept reality, accept YOUR wishes, and not be haunted forever by having to follow through with what you want.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
For those of you hailing this--remember, it's only a VERY short step from you deciding this, to someone else doing so. Someone you may not like or agree with.
Do you want me making this decision for you?
Careful what you wish for.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
For those of you hailing this--remember, it's only a VERY short step from you deciding this, to someone else doing so. Someone you may not like or agree with.
Do you want me making this decision for you?
Careful what you wish for.
I'm still in favor of a person being allowed to decide for themselves.
For those of you hailing this--remember, it's only a VERY short step from you deciding this, to someone else doing so. Someone you may not like or agree with.
Do you want me making this decision for you?
Careful what you wish for.
I'm still in favor of a person being allowed to decide for themselves.
flan
If you think that is where it will stay, I have some beachfront property in Wyoming you might be interested in.
Other nations that have went down this path, especially ones with single-payer health care systems, didn't take long to extend it so that other people decide your fate.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
People have tunnel vision. They see the one thing but fail to see the ripple effect.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I think a better step is to require people to have Advanced Directives. To have more honest and frank discussion about End of Life decisions. I think I would like to see a medical team have a sit down with the patient and family and be frank and honest about what they are suffering.
That's what that dingbat, Sarah Palin, was calling a "Death Panel".