The prodigal son asked for and took his portion before the end of his father's life.
His father welcomed the him home because he was missed while out in the world.
The PS, after squandering away all he had, had lived in squalor.
His father was happy to have him home, safe and sound.
The message is, no matter how far you go, no matter how low you go, God will welcome you back with open arms. Will celebrate your return.
The older son, while working, was living in his father's presence. He never stopped receiving his gifts.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
And yet, you capitalize your words, which is internet-ese for yelling. Lead by example.
Guess what? I intended to yell.
flan
Guess what? Maybe Lily used a larger font to make a point just as you used capitals to indicate yelling. You chastised Lily for using larger text yet you did the same thing. Pot, meet kettle.
I C&P the scripture.
When I typed my thoughts, the font carried.
There was absolutely no malicious intent.
This is what I figured but I figured it was also plausible you were simply making a point
Flan, you are missing a big point. The older son did all the "right" things by the book. But, was unrepentant in his own way. Also, the prodigal son is US. We have all gone astray from God. That is how God welcomes us.
But your opinion is flawed. The point of the parable is that even when we ROYALLY fvck up, our Heavenly Father welcomes us back with joy and open arms. Is it fair to those that have made a daily effort to walk the walk? Not necessarily. But that's God. He is the God of a million chances.....
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
But your opinion is flawed. The point of the parable is that even when we ROYALLY fvck up, our Heavenly Father welcomes us back with joy and open arms. Is it fair to those that have made a daily effort to walk the walk? Not necessarily. But that's God. He is the God of a million chances.....
Exactly
__________________
I drink coffee so I don't kill you.
I quilt so I don't kill you.
Do you see a theme?
Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.
I understand that moral of the story of the Prodigal Son, I just don't like the celebration of his return. Welcome him back, by all means. Do so with forgiveness and open arms, by all means. But, I think the message gets messy when the return is celebrated more joyously than reasonable or sensible.
The reason I don't like the celebratory nature is that I feel it could lead to people leaving so they can get the celebration upon their return.
The prodigal son is about unconditional love. About forgiveness when it is not deserved. And about acceptance.
Yes.
Here's the thing - God will forgive your sins, no matter what you do, no matter how big the sin. So, you need to pass that forgiveness on to others. You need to love them no matter what.
All the "I don't like its" are human reactions. That's why the father is set as an example - because he rises above his human emotion and forgives as God would.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
The idea that the older son should've been rewarded too just because the younger son was rewarded smacks of the attitude in today's society that squashes success and achievement just because someone else might get their feelings hurt.
So LOYALTY is not important?
The younger son is rewarded for screwing up?!
flan
The younger son is welcomed home. So, if your son screws up and is gone for years and comes back, you are not going to be glad to see him?
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Remind me never to disagree with y'all...or even have my own opinion.
flan
There's the VICTIM! YAY! Seriously, you are so predicable.
Did you even read this thread?
flan
Yep. You are being melodramatic. People disagreed with you - big whoop. You disagree with people. Should I start playing victim whenever you disagree with me?
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
The idea that the older son should've been rewarded too just because the younger son was rewarded smacks of the attitude in today's society that squashes success and achievement just because someone else might get their feelings hurt.
So LOYALTY is not important?
The younger son is rewarded for screwing up?!
flan
The younger son is welcomed home. So, if your son screws up and is gone for years and comes back, you are not going to be glad to see him?
I was wondering when someone was going to bring that up.
Of course I would be glad to see my son, BUT I would make sure to talk to my OTHER son BEFORE I killed the fatted calf...
The idea that the older son should've been rewarded too just because the younger son was rewarded smacks of the attitude in today's society that squashes success and achievement just because someone else might get their feelings hurt.
So LOYALTY is not important?
The younger son is rewarded for screwing up?!
flan
The younger son is welcomed home. So, if your son screws up and is gone for years and comes back, you are not going to be glad to see him?
I was wondering when someone was going to bring that up.
Of course I would be glad to see my son, BUT I would make sure to talk to my OTHER son BEFORE I killed the fatted calf...
flan
Really? So, when you bail out one son, you discuss it with the other first?
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Quite frankly - had he waited to discuss it with his other son - that would have been BAD PARENTING. Parents are supposed to be the guide, and teach their children about love and forgiveness, not help them nurse grudges and teach them to play the victim over "unfairness".
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Quite frankly - had he waited to discuss it with his other son - that would have been BAD PARENTING. Parents are supposed to be the guide, and teach their children about love and forgiveness, not help them nurse grudges and teach them to play the victim over "unfairness".
This is NOT rocket science. TELL the loyal son BEFORE the big party. Tell him how happy you are that you have BOTH sons in your life now.
Quite frankly - had he waited to discuss it with his other son - that would have been BAD PARENTING. Parents are supposed to be the guide, and teach their children about love and forgiveness, not help them nurse grudges and teach them to play the victim over "unfairness".
This is NOT rocket science. TELL the loyal son BEFORE the big party. Tell him how happy you are that you have BOTH sons in your life now.
flan
Ok - let's get some perspective. His son leaves and is gone for years. He is worried all the time, having no idea if his son is dead or alive. He prays to God to bring his son back to him. There are no phones, no post office, no way of communicating. And then one day, he looks outside and he sees his lost son coming up the house, bedraggled, beaten down, humbled. And he is just so GLAD. So happy is son is alive and home. He runs to him, embraces him, doesn't even THINK of anything but how happy he is to see his child. He hollers out to the servants to prepare a feast, his lost son has returned!
Yeah -that's a horrible thing. He should definitely have held himself back and said, "Before I can welcome you, I need to wait for your brother to come back who is off working somewhere in the fields I gave him. "
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I understand that moral of the story of the Prodigal Son, I just don't like the celebration of his return. Welcome him back, by all means. Do so with forgiveness and open arms, by all means. But, I think the message gets messy when the return is celebrated more joyously than reasonable or sensible.
The reason I don't like the celebratory nature is that I feel it could lead to people leaving so they can get the celebration upon their return.
Others may feel differently.
But apply it to us. Everyone has strayed at some point in their lives. Maybe they haven't left the church, but they've doubted, not put their trust in God fully, sinned even when they knew what they were doing was wrong.
NONE of us are the older son. We are ALL the prodigal son in some way.
But it take it even further. Let's say all pious church-goers can be compared to the older son. would it not be a reason for great rejoicing when an un-churched person comes to faith--no matter what their past?
Most pastors will tell you that performing adult baptisms is one of the most rewarding parts of their job.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
I understand that moral of the story of the Prodigal Son, I just don't like the celebration of his return. Welcome him back, by all means. Do so with forgiveness and open arms, by all means. But, I think the message gets messy when the return is celebrated more joyously than reasonable or sensible.
The reason I don't like the celebratory nature is that I feel it could lead to people leaving so they can get the celebration upon their return.
Others may feel differently.
But apply it to us. Everyone has strayed at some point in their lives. Maybe they haven't left the church, but they've doubted, not put their trust in God fully, sinned even when they knew what they were doing was wrong.
NONE of us are the older son. We are ALL the prodigal son in some way.
But it take it even further. Let's say all pious church-goers can be compared to the older son. would it not be a reason for great rejoicing when an un-churched person comes to faith--no matter what their past?
Most pastors will tell you that performing adult baptisms is one of the most rewarding parts of their job.
It is understandable in human terms--but not in God's.
The point of the parable is that jealousy is actually a sin. We are not to covet what our brother has--whether we are talking earthly things or heavenly rewards.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
But apply it to us. Everyone has strayed at some point in their lives. Maybe they haven't left the church, but they've doubted, not put their trust in God fully, sinned even when they knew what they were doing was wrong.
NONE of us are the older son. We are ALL the prodigal son in some way.
But it take it even further. Let's say all pious church-goers can be compared to the older son. would it not be a reason for great rejoicing when an un-churched person comes to faith--no matter what their past?
Most pastors will tell you that performing adult baptisms is one of the most rewarding parts of their job.
- huskerbb
_________________________________
I actually was applying it to us. If people thought they could get a celebration upon their return, many in this modern day and age of "gimme, gimme, gimme" would leave and then maybe return, but they also might never return. Is it worth it to dangle that celebration in front of them?
But apply it to us. Everyone has strayed at some point in their lives. Maybe they haven't left the church, but they've doubted, not put their trust in God fully, sinned even when they knew what they were doing was wrong.
NONE of us are the older son. We are ALL the prodigal son in some way.
But it take it even further. Let's say all pious church-goers can be compared to the older son. would it not be a reason for great rejoicing when an un-churched person comes to faith--no matter what their past?
Most pastors will tell you that performing adult baptisms is one of the most rewarding parts of their job. - huskerbb
_________________________________
I actually was applying it to us. If people thought they could get a celebration upon their return, many in this modern day and age of "gimme, gimme, gimme" would leave and then maybe return, but they also might never return. Is it worth it to dangle that celebration in front of them?
If someone I knew strayed from their faith and some years later same back--I would celebrate that.
From Luke 15
3 Then Jesus told them this parable:4 “Suppose one of you has a hundred sheep and loses one of them. Doesn’t he leave the ninety-nine in the open country and go after the lost sheep until he finds it?5 And when he finds it, he joyfully puts it on his shoulders6 and goes home. Then he calls his friends and neighbors together and says, ‘Rejoice with me; I have found my lost sheep.’7 I tell you that in the same way there will be more rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who do not need to repent.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
While I agree that we do not understand God, we do have the ability to reason. A sheep does not. That's why this parable fails, in my opinion.
But this parable is not about the sheep.
It's about the Shepard loving his sheep so much He will leave the group to find the one.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
It's about the Shepard loving his sheep so much He will leave the group to find the one.
- lilyofcourse
________________________
I understand that it is not about the sheep. I just believe that sheep were a poor comparison to man. It would be like comparing the reasoning skills of huskerbb to the reasoning skills of a turnip. I would hope that the turnip would not be huskerbb's equal.
It's about the Shepard loving his sheep so much He will leave the group to find the one. - lilyofcourse
________________________
I understand that it is not about the sheep. I just believe that sheep were a poor comparison to man. It would be like comparing the reasoning skills of huskerbb to the reasoning skills of a turnip. I would hope that the turnip would not be huskerbb's equal.
That is the comparison CHRIST makes. If you are a Christian, I can't believe you are saying that Christ, himself, is wrong. If you aren't a Christian, I don't see why it matters.
However, compared to God, humans are turnips--or, rather, sheep.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
That is the comparison CHRIST makes. If you are a Christian, I can't believe you are saying that Christ, himself, is wrong. If you aren't a Christian, I don't see why it matters.
However, compared to God, humans are turnips--or, rather, sheep.
- huskerbb
____________________________
I'm not saying Christ is wrong. I'm saying he was misquoted or the parable was misattributed. On the "Do You Believe in the Devil?" thread, I posted the following, which may be able to explain how I come to this finding:
Unlike some people, I don't subscribe to the "The Bible is the perfect word of God" belief. I fall more in line with "The Bible is inspired by God but written by men with their biases and human failings and frailties influencing the outcome of the final work".