TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: New York aunt sues nephew, 12, who broke her wrist at his eighth birthday party - because she can no longer hold a plate


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
New York aunt sues nephew, 12, who broke her wrist at his eighth birthday party - because she can no longer hold a plate
Permalink  
 


A New York woman is suing her 12-year-old nephew who accidentally broke her wrist while greeting her at his eighth birthday party.

Jennifer Connell is seeking $127,000 from Sean Tarala of Westport, Connecticut, after the youngster jumped into her arms whens she arrived at his party on March 18, 2011.

Connell - a 54-year-old human resources manager - described her nephew in court as 'very loving' and 'sensitive' towards her, but told Judge Edward Stodolink that the youngster should be held accountable for his behavior.


According to the Connecticut Post, Sean looked 'confused' as he sat in the Superior Court in Bridgeport alongside his father Michael.

The boy's mother, Lisa, died last year.

The court heard that Sean had just received a red bicycle for his birthday and was riding it when Connell arrived at the home in Westport.

According to her testimony, Connell claimed that Sean got excited when he saw her and shouted: '"Auntie Jen, Auntie Jen". All of a sudden he was there in the air, I had to catch him and we tumbled on to the ground, I remember him shouting, "Auntie Jen I love you," and there he was flying at me.

Connell told the court that she realized she had been injured but did not want to raise the matter at the time because she did not want to ruin his birthday celebration.

However, she said the injury had had a massive impact on her life.

She said: 'I live in Manhattan in a third-floor walk-up so it has been very difficult. And we all know how crowded it is in Manhattan. I was at a party recently, and it was difficult to hold my hors d’oeuvre plate.'

According to court documents: 'The injuries, losses and harms to the plaintiff were caused by the negligence and carelessness of the minor defendant in that a reasonable eight year old under those circumstances would know or should have known that a forceful greeting such as the one delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff could cause the harms and losses suffered by the plaintiff.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3270400/I-love-owe-127-000-New-York-aunt-sues-nephew-12-broke-wrist-greeting-eighth-birthday-party.html#ixzz3oT6gP9o0
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6644
Date:
RE: New York aunt sues nephew, 12, who broke her wrist at his eighth birthday party - because she can no longer hold a p
Permalink  
 


Well, excuse him for loving his aunt! Sheesh!

__________________

~At Gnome in the Kitchen~



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

And, the boy's mother died last year as well. Wow.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6644
Date:
Permalink  
 

I can't imagine suing a CHILD because they got overzealous and caused me harm.

It happened at his 8th birthday party. He's 12 now. If her wrist is still that weak after 4 years, she needs to go to a doctor, not court.

__________________

~At Gnome in the Kitchen~



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

heavy.com/news/2015/10/jennifer-connell-aunt-suing-nephew-sean-tarala-birthday-party-injuries-lawsuit-westport-connecticut-manhattan-photos-facebook-damages/

Another link.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10458
Date:
Permalink  
 

Home insurance will pay out. Liability coverage on the home. What a turd.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

Wow she just lost more then her sister by this low lawsuit. She lost any relationship she could have had with her nephew. She waited 4 years to sue the child? His mother died a year earlier, I wonder if the aunt is after the life insurance policy the young man may have inherited on his mothers death. She is scum. I hope the judge and jury can see this is a money grabber who thinks she is entitled.

__________________


Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lindley wrote:

Wow she just lost more then her sister by this low lawsuit. She lost any relationship she could have had with her nephew. She waited 4 years to sue the child? His mother died a year earlier, I wonder if the aunt is after the life insurance policy the young man may have inherited on his mothers death. She is scum. I hope the judge and jury can see this is a money grabber who thinks she is entitled.


 Seriously?!

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

He was eight years old when this happened, the boy is now 12. At least in the article it happened at his eight birthday party.

__________________


Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lindley wrote:

He was eight years old when this happened, the boy is now 12. At least in the article it happened at his eight birthday party.


 Yeah, that's what makes this story CRAZY.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'm thinking either she's going after the homeowner's insurance and it's a "friendly" lawsuit, or he inherited money when mom died and aunt is a money-grubbing ho.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

I'm thinking either she's going after the homeowner's insurance and it's a "friendly" lawsuit, or he inherited money when mom died and aunt is a money-grubbing ho.


 You may be on to something!

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Regular

Status: Offline
Posts: 288
Date:
Permalink  
 

She lost the lawsuit. I saw that earlier today. Either way, I think she is an awful person.

__________________

Well, that's just toady!



My dog name is, Sasha!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5883
Date:
Permalink  
 

Oughttabeworking wrote:

She lost the lawsuit. I saw that earlier today. Either way, I think she is an awful person.


 I hope she had to pay legal fees too.



__________________

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not today, Satan.  Not today.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

Jury: Boy not liable for exuberant hello that injured aunt


 

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. (AP) — A Connecticut jury on Tuesday rejected a woman's bid to sue her 12-year-old nephew for injuries she says she suffered from his exuberant greeting at his birthday party four years ago.

 

New York City resident Jennifer Connell claimed the Westport boy acted unreasonably when he jumped into her arms at his 8th-birthday party, causing her to fall and break her wrist. She sued in Bridgeport Superior Court for $127,000.

The Connecticut Post reports (http://bit.ly/1PrB8eR ) that the six-member jury found that the boy was not liable. The newspaper reported that she ignored shouted requests for comment as she passed reporters outside the courthouse.

Connell, a 54-year-old human resources manager, had testified that she loves her nephew but thinks he should be held accountable. She said when the child jumped she tumbled to the ground as she tried to catch him.

"I remember him shouting, 'Auntie Jen I love you,' and there he was flying at me," she testified.

Connell argued that her injuries severely disrupted her life in Manhattan. She told jurors last week that she was at a party recently, and "it was difficult to hold my hors d'oeuvre plate," the Post reported.

Her lawsuit said: "The injuries, losses and harms to the plaintiff were caused by the negligence and carelessness of the minor defendant in that a reasonable 8-year-old under those circumstances would know or should have known that a forceful greeting such as the one delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff could cause the harms and losses suffered by the plaintiff."

The boy, the only defendant, appeared in court with his father, Michael Tarala. A listed phone number couldn't be found for Tarala. The boy's mother died last year.

___

Information from: Connecticut Post, http://www.connpost.com



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Nothing's Impossible

Status: Offline
Posts: 16913
Date:
Permalink  
 

Why did she wait 4 years to sue?

__________________

A person's a person no matter how small.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

ed11563 wrote:

Jury: Boy not liable for exuberant hello that injured aunt


 

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. (AP) — A Connecticut jury on Tuesday rejected a woman's bid to sue her 12-year-old nephew for injuries she says she suffered from his exuberant greeting at his birthday party four years ago.

 

New York City resident Jennifer Connell claimed the Westport boy acted unreasonably when he jumped into her arms at his 8th-birthday party, causing her to fall and break her wrist. She sued in Bridgeport Superior Court for $127,000.

The Connecticut Post reports (http://bit.ly/1PrB8eR ) that the six-member jury found that the boy was not liable. The newspaper reported that she ignored shouted requests for comment as she passed reporters outside the courthouse.

Connell, a 54-year-old human resources manager, had testified that she loves her nephew but thinks he should be held accountable. She said when the child jumped she tumbled to the ground as she tried to catch him.

"I remember him shouting, 'Auntie Jen I love you,' and there he was flying at me," she testified.

Connell argued that her injuries severely disrupted her life in Manhattan. She told jurors last week that she was at a party recently, and "it was difficult to hold my hors d'oeuvre plate," the Post reported.

Her lawsuit said: "The injuries, losses and harms to the plaintiff were caused by the negligence and carelessness of the minor defendant in that a reasonable 8-year-old under those circumstances would know or should have known that a forceful greeting such as the one delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff could cause the harms and losses suffered by the plaintiff."

The boy, the only defendant, appeared in court with his father, Michael Tarala. A listed phone number couldn't be found for Tarala. The boy's mother died last year.

___

Information from: Connecticut Post, http://www.connpost.com


 She might have been thinking that the damage and her disability from it would clear up. And it didn't. cry



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

So glad the jury voted against her.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6644
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'm glad she lost. What a jerk.

__________________

~At Gnome in the Kitchen~



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well if you became disabled due to whatever, you need money to live on. SSI doesn't pay the mortgage. It was probably a friendly law suit as LL suggested.

__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

TrudyML wrote:

Home insurance will pay out. Liability coverage on the home. What a turd.


 This.  Homeowners should pay for the injury and lost time.  And as someone said if her wrist is still bad after four years the doctors did a bad job.



__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

So she lost. Accomplished nothing and put a big hurt on her own family. Strong work.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

So she lost. Accomplished nothing and put a big hurt on her own family. Strong work.


 Well not if it was a friendly lawsuit,  you don't know the details.  Only what the media prints,  I don't trust the media.



__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

Just as some of us suspected: www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/national/northeast/2015/10/attorneys_law_forced_woman_to_sue_nephew_over_medical_bills

Attorneys: Law forced woman to sue nephew over medical bills
Wednesday, October 14, 2015 PrintEmail0 Comments
By:
Associated Press


HARTFORD, Conn. — A woman who sued her 12-year-old nephew for $127,000 over injuries she received when he exuberantly greeted her at his birthday party four years ago was forced to go to court over her medical bills, her lawyers said Wednesday as backlash against her on social media sites poured in.

A jury on Tuesday rejected Jennifer Connell's lawsuit, finding the boy was not liable for her injuries. She had said she broke her wrist when the Westport boy jumped into her arms at his 8th-birthday party, causing her to fall.

Jainchill & Beckert, Connell's law firm, said her nephew's parents' insurance company offered her $1 over the fall, which occurred at their home. She had no choice but to sue to pay medical bills, they said, adding that she has had two surgeries and could face a third, her lawyers said.

"From the start, this was a case ... about one thing: Getting medical bills paid by homeowner's insurance," the law firm said Wednesday in an emailed statement. "Our client was never looking for money from her nephew or his family."

Peter Kochenburger, an insurance law specialist at the University of Connecticut School of Law, said state law typically requires those claiming injury to sue the individual responsible.

"In Connecticut and most states, if you have a claim against someone for negligence, you sue that individual, not the insurance company," he said.

Connell's lawsuit said her "injuries, losses and harms" were caused by the negligence and carelessness of the youngster, who should have known his "forceful greeting" would have injured her. A six-member Superior Court jury found that the boy was not liable.

Jainchill & Beckert said Connell, a 54-year-old human resources manager from New York City, is being attacked on social media and has "been through enough."

On Twitter, she has been vilified as a terrible aunt, the most hated woman in America and an awful human being.

Many took aim in particular at her statement to jurors, reported by the Connecticut Post, that because of her injury she could not easily hold an hors d'oeuvre plate at a recent party.

___

Follow Stephen Singer on Twitter at twitter.com/SteveSinger10

Author(s):
Associated Press

__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yes, that does happen where are told to sue. And, not sure why she owes so much money? She is an employed HR person. I would think she has insurance. But, maybe she has Obamacare.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Regular

Status: Offline
Posts: 332
Date:
Permalink  
 

The salacious Press at its best.

Per Connecticut State law and the lovely Insurance Company, the Aunt had to sue the person who actually caused the injury. It was not HER idea, but the way the systems are set up.

The Press knows this. The Press choose to write this story in a way that created this knee-jerk, tugging the heart strings, demonizing the poor Aunt because it makes for a great story.

As for the dollar amount, the Aunt has had two surgeries already (not mentioned in 99% of the news stories) and will have to have another one. None of this will allow her to get disability, so any out of work time will be lost income.

And finally - Subrogation people.

__________________
“One day, you will be old enough to start reading fairytales again.” C.S.Lewis
FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

Just when I thought my in-laws were bad...

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Yes, that does happen where are told to sue. And, not sure why she owes so much money? She is an employed HR person. I would think she has insurance. But, maybe she has Obamacare.


More likely, her medical insurance company declined to pay because her injury was caused by someone else's action, and that person's insurance should pay. 

Catch-22

 

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Mod/Penguin lover/Princess!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13089
Date:
Permalink  
 

 

I saw the interview on the Today Show this morning. (The clip I found is only part of it.)

It was just like Illumine explained it.

She had no choice. It would be the only way to get the Homeowner's Insurance to pay.cry

Her nephew defended her. It sounds like they have a great relationship.smile



__________________

Ohioan by birth, Texan by choice!



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Thanks for the update, FWM.

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

Fort Worth Mom wrote:

 

I saw the interview on the Today Show this morning. (The clip I found is only part of it.)

It was just like Illumine explained it.

She had no choice. It would be the only way to get the Homeowner's Insurance to pay.cry

Her nephew defended her. It sounds like they have a great relationship.smile


 That is good  to know. I'm glad the family  came out to defend  her and put a stop to the bad press  she was receiving.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well, if the family is fine with it, then it's nobody else's business. Actually it is nobody else's business either way. But, there are times when you are put in a position to sue not because you want to but because you have to in order to force those to pay who were supposed to pay in the first place.

However, she should know that the "i can't hold a plate of hors douerves really makes for good copy and makes her sound like some elite snob.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Well, if the family is fine with it, then it's nobody else's business. Actually it is nobody else's business either way. But, there are times when you are put in a position to sue not because you want to but because you have to in order to force those to pay who were supposed to pay in the first place.

However, she should know that the "i can't hold a plate of hors douerves really makes for good copy and makes her sound like some elite snob.


I think she was trying to make it as ridiculous as she could.  It was a farce from the beginning... 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

Then how on earth did this get on the news?

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

FNW wrote:

Then how on earth did this get on the news?


 Because the media is full of *******s.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3029
Date:
Permalink  
 

She had no choice. It would be the only way to get the Homeowner's Insurance to pay.
- Fort Worth Mom

_____________________________

I saw a news segment where they asked a lawyer from that state about her need to sue a person, and according to him she could have sued her nephew or either parent as the homeowners since it was done to make the homeowner's insurance pay. She chose to not sue the father or the estate of the mother.

__________________
FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
New York aunt sues nephew, 12, who broke her wrist at his eighth birthday party - because she can no longer hold a plate
Permalink  
 


This makes me feel better about the lawsuit. But more angry at the media for blasting it.



-- Edited by FNW on Friday 16th of October 2015 10:25:02 AM

__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
RE: New York aunt sues nephew, 12, who broke her wrist at his eighth birthday party - because she can no longer hold a p
Permalink  
 


The kid is not old enough for a judgment to legally obligate him to anything.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

FNW wrote:

This makes me feel better about the lawsuit. But more angry at the media for blasting it.



-- Edited by FNW on Friday 16th of October 2015 10:25:02 AM


 My son worked for a news station as a camara man and sound tech.  He said the motto was if it bleeds it leads.   



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard