TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Dear Abby: Smoking Relatives


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
RE: Dear Abby: Smoking Relatives
Permalink  
 


Tinydancer wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

My right to breathe beats your right to smoke. What is so hard to understand about that? My breathing doesn't affect you whereas your smoking affects others. Easy peasy, smoke outside and you'll see your grandkids. Smoke inside "for the one day I'm there" and you are the one who made the choice. JMHO


 Someone smoking does not affect your breathing for one day.


 That is absolutely stupid.  It most certainly does for MANY people. 


 BS.  That really is your problem, anyway, not theirs.  


 My problem - my choice to stay home.  If they don't like that, well then, that is THEIR problem.


 Again, you'd be beyond pissed if your spouse skipped a family event--and moreover refused to let you take your kids to it.  The reasons are irrelevant.


 I love how you always know exactly how someone you've never met will react...lol


 People are predictable.  At their core, most are selfish and want what they want, no matter what anyone and everyone else might think.  That's the problem here.  The LW wants tomdomwhatbshe wants--to he!! With everyone else.


 She wants them to smoke outside for one day so she doesn't get sick. If that's too much to ask of your family then that's a pretty crappy family.


 No.  It's selfish of the one to ask the many to change.  Not the other way around.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

My right to breathe beats your right to smoke. What is so hard to understand about that? My breathing doesn't affect you whereas your smoking affects others. Easy peasy, smoke outside and you'll see your grandkids. Smoke inside "for the one day I'm there" and you are the one who made the choice. JMHO


 Someone smoking does not affect your breathing for one day.


 That is absolutely stupid.  It most certainly does for MANY people. 


 BS.  That really is your problem, anyway, not theirs.  


 My problem - my choice to stay home.  If they don't like that, well then, that is THEIR problem.


 Again, you'd be beyond pissed if your spouse skipped a family event--and moreover refused to let you take your kids to it.  The reasons are irrelevant.


 Oh, wow.  You so know nothing about me.  I would certainly not get upset with my spouse for skipping family events - in fact, he has done it and I didn't get mad.  And I've skipped some of his. 


Seriously...G doesn't always go with me to family events.  And I don't always go to his.   


 And does he also say that you are forbidden to take the kids even if you want to?



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Ohfour wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

My right to breathe beats your right to smoke. What is so hard to understand about that? My breathing doesn't affect you whereas your smoking affects others. Easy peasy, smoke outside and you'll see your grandkids. Smoke inside "for the one day I'm there" and you are the one who made the choice. JMHO


 Someone smoking does not affect your breathing for one day.


 That is absolutely stupid.  It most certainly does for MANY people. 


 BS.  That really is your problem, anyway, not theirs.  


 My problem - my choice to stay home.  If they don't like that, well then, that is THEIR problem.


 Again, you'd be beyond pissed if your spouse skipped a family event--and moreover refused to let you take your kids to it.  The reasons are irrelevant.


 Oh, wow.  You so know nothing about me.  I would certainly not get upset with my spouse for skipping family events - in fact, he has done it and I didn't get mad.  And I've skipped some of his. 


Seriously...G doesn't always go with me to family events.  And I don't always go to his.   


 And does he also say that you are forbidden to take the kids even if you want to?


If he felt that strongly about it, then no, I would not take the kids.  But he is the final decision maker in my household, so he gets the say. 



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Vette's SS!!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2297
Date:
Permalink  
 

I am sensitive to smoke. It burns my throat and makes my chest hurt and I feel sick for hours after. No way would I put myself or my hypothetical kids through that for a party of any kind.

__________________


On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

My right to breathe beats your right to smoke. What is so hard to understand about that? My breathing doesn't affect you whereas your smoking affects others. Easy peasy, smoke outside and you'll see your grandkids. Smoke inside "for the one day I'm there" and you are the one who made the choice. JMHO


 Someone smoking does not affect your breathing for one day.


 That is absolutely stupid.  It most certainly does for MANY people. 


 BS.  That really is your problem, anyway, not theirs.  


 My problem - my choice to stay home.  If they don't like that, well then, that is THEIR problem.


 Again, you'd be beyond pissed if your spouse skipped a family event--and moreover refused to let you take your kids to it.  The reasons are irrelevant.


 I love how you always know exactly how someone you've never met will react...lol


 People are predictable.  At their core, most are selfish and want what they want, no matter what anyone and everyone else might think.  That's the problem here.  The LW wants tomdomwhatbshe wants--to he!! With everyone else.


 She wants them to smoke outside for one day so she doesn't get sick. If that's too much to ask of your family then that's a pretty crappy family.


 No.  It's selfish of the one to ask the many to change.  Not the other way around.


 The many did change.  They changed the venue so they could smoke. 



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Dona Worry Be Happy wrote:

I am sensitive to smoke. It burns my throat and makes my chest hurt and I feel sick for hours after. No way would I put myself or my hypothetical kids through that for a party of any kind.


 Not possible.  Must be all in your head.  You selfish, ridiculous tyrant.  evileye



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
Dona Worry Be Happy wrote:

I am sensitive to smoke. It burns my throat and makes my chest hurt and I feel sick for hours after. No way would I put myself or my hypothetical kids through that for a party of any kind.


 Not possible.  Must be all in your head.  You selfish, ridiculous tyrant.  evileye


 I know, right?

I bet she doesn't even have a boyfriend...

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

My right to breathe beats your right to smoke. What is so hard to understand about that? My breathing doesn't affect you whereas your smoking affects others. Easy peasy, smoke outside and you'll see your grandkids. Smoke inside "for the one day I'm there" and you are the one who made the choice. JMHO


 Someone smoking does not affect your breathing for one day.


 That is absolutely stupid.  It most certainly does for MANY people. 


 BS.  That really is your problem, anyway, not theirs.  


 My problem - my choice to stay home.  If they don't like that, well then, that is THEIR problem.


 Again, you'd be beyond pissed if your spouse skipped a family event--and moreover refused to let you take your kids to it.  The reasons are irrelevant.


 I love how you always know exactly how someone you've never met will react...lol


 People are predictable.  At their core, most are selfish and want what they want, no matter what anyone and everyone else might think.  That's the problem here.  The LW wants tomdomwhatbshe wants--to he!! With everyone else.


 She wants them to smoke outside for one day so she doesn't get sick. If that's too much to ask of your family then that's a pretty crappy family.


 No.  It's selfish of the one to ask the many to change.  Not the other way around.


 The many did change.  They changed the venue so they could smoke. 


 They changed the venue--but you don't know that is the reason.  However, even so, the point still stands.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Husker, when the whims of the many AFFECT others - they don't get to control what others choose to do to avoid it.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

Husker, when the whims of the many AFFECT others - they don't get to control what others choose to do to avoid it.


 It's the one who has the whim here, not the many.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

Husker, when the whims of the many AFFECT others - they don't get to control what others choose to do to avoid it.


 It's the one who has the whim here, not the many.


 Choosing not to breathe in toxic carcinogens and nicotine that make her physically ill is a whim?  Uh - ok. hmm



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

husker,

Do you smoke?

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:

husker,

Do you smoke?

flan


 Nope, never have.  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

Husker, when the whims of the many AFFECT others - they don't get to control what others choose to do to avoid it.


 It's the one who has the whim here, not the many.


 Your "because I said so" arguments get pretty old husker. Second hand smoke has been proven to be harmful. People (especially children) with asthma, older folks with COPD, people who are allergic (again it's been PROVEN that some people are), and just normal people who don't want to smell like an ashtray should be able to avoid it. I think any relative who would not smoke outside for one day of the year is certainly not worried about my feelings so I guess that would be up to me.



__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tinydancer wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Lawyerlady wrote:

Husker, when the whims of the many AFFECT others - they don't get to control what others choose to do to avoid it.


 It's the one who has the whim here, not the many.


 Your "because I said so" arguments get pretty old husker. Second hand smoke has been proven to be harmful. People (especially children) with asthma, older folks with COPD, people who are allergic (again it's been PROVEN that some people are), and just normal people who don't want to smell like an ashtray should be able to avoid it. I think any relative who would not smoke outside for one day of the year is certainly not worried about my feelings so I guess that would be up to me.


 Your ridiculous arguments get old.  The LW doesn't even saynthat any of those are issues.  The health concern is NOT for most people if you are only talking one day.  the health effects demonstrated from second vp hand smoke were caused by YEARS of continuous exposure.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

She says she gets sick from the smoke but again you think you know better than the LW how she feels. You do realize that's not even a real argument after a while?

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tinydancer wrote:

She says she gets sick from the smoke but again you think you know better than the LW how she feels. You do realize that's not even a real argument after a while?


 That has nothing to do with him taking the kids even if it is true.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

She says she gets sick from the smoke but again you think you know better than the LW how she feels. You do realize that's not even a real argument after a while?


 That has nothing to do with him taking the kids even if it is true.


 You really do think you know better than everyone how they feel. It's like arguing with a wall.



__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

If you don't like it, then don't do it.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

Maybe I enjoy arguing with walls. Oh wait. Why don't you just tell me how I feel.

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Then if you enjoy it why are you complaining about it?

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

Comparing your arguing style to like talking to a wall isn't complaining. It's stating an opinion. I know how you hate it when someone has a different one than yours...lol

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Personally, I don't understand smoking. Seems pretty dumb and useless to me.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Personally, I don't understand smoking. Seems pretty dumb and useless to me.


Nicotine stimulates pleasure centers in the brain. 

And it's more addictive than heroin.

 

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

She says she gets sick from the smoke but again you think you know better than the LW how she feels. You do realize that's not even a real argument after a while?


 That has nothing to do with him taking the kids even if it is true.


Sure it does. It's a very bad idea to deliberately expose your children to an environment that you KNOW makes you sick, and could lead them to develop asthma and nicotine addiction. 

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Sniff...sniff, sniff. Yay! A Bum!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7536
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:

She says she gets sick from the smoke but again you think you know better than the LW how she feels. You do realize that's not even a real argument after a while?


 That has nothing to do with him taking the kids even if it is true.


 Well doctors and scientists agree that there is no safe amount of second hand smoke exposure. They were pressed to come up with an amount of smoke that would be "acceptable" to be exposed to and they could agree that there is ZERO amount of safe second hand smoke. None. Not one breath of it is safe. 



__________________

Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite ! 



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

There is a whole generation that grew up with smoking households.

Generally, they turned out alright.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:

There is a whole generation that grew up with smoking households.

Generally, they turned out alright.


That would include ME. 

Define "generally" and "alright" please.

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:

There is a whole generation that grew up with smoking households.

Generally, they turned out alright.


 Neither of my parents smoked.

And MANY of those whose parents DID developed respiratory problems.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

ed11563 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

There is a whole generation that grew up with smoking households.

Generally, they turned out alright.


That would include ME. 

Define "generally" and "alright" please.

 


 In general they are alright.

 



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:
ed11563 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

There is a whole generation that grew up with smoking households.

Generally, they turned out alright.


That would include ME. 

Define "generally" and "alright" please.

 


 In general they are alright.

 


You didn't even try to answer the question. 

Is Asthma alright?

Heart disease?

Breast cancer?

 

We've survived long enough to make and raise smoke-free children. Is that what you mean?

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

An OPINION is NOT a FACT.

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

ed11563 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:
ed11563 wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

There is a whole generation that grew up with smoking households.

Generally, they turned out alright.


That would include ME. 

Define "generally" and "alright" please.

 


 In general they are alright.

 


You didn't even try to answer the question. 

Is Asthma alright?

Heart disease?

Breast cancer?

 

We've survived long enough to make and raise smoke-free children. Is that what you mean?

 


 Yes. All that happens.

 

In those who did and did not grow up in smoking homes.

 



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

But it happens MORE OFTEN in smoking homes...

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Sniff...sniff, sniff. Yay! A Bum!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7536
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well there are kids who are neglected and abused who grow up to be happy and healthy and raise happy and healthy children. That doesn't mean we should all neglect and abuse our kids. The logic doesn't stand up.

__________________

Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite ! 



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'm not defending smoking. I quit cause it was so bad for me and my kids.

All I am saying is being in a house for a couple hours with a smoker isn't going to kill anyone.


__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Sniff...sniff, sniff. Yay! A Bum!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7536
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:

I'm not defending smoking. I quit cause it was so bad for me and my kids.

All I am saying is being in a house for a couple hours with a smoker isn't going to kill anyone.


 It might not kill them on the spot, but it does make the OP sick. She feels the effects for a full week after. Why should she have to deal with that?! 



__________________

Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite ! 



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

She doesnt. No one does.

But every action has an equal but opposite reaction.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

LMAO

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1324
Date:
Permalink  
 

I smoke and I have enough respect for my family to smoke outside. I am the only smoker in my house. I would not dream of subjecting my daughter, my SO, his kids, my kids or my Kiddie to my smoke. It's not a big deal to step outside. I do get p!ssed when non smokers try to take away my outside. I can respect closed spaces, but not open air.

__________________


Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:

I'm not defending smoking. I quit cause it was so bad for me and my kids.

All I am saying is being in a house for a couple hours with a smoker isn't going to kill anyone.


 It wouldn't kill my kids to hang out with people who spew profanities for a few hours either, but I still don't want to expose them to that. 

 

Plus, it's not one smoker. It's a party where a lot of people will be indoors smoking. In a house where people smoke indoors full time. 

 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

msrock wrote:

I smoke and I have enough respect for my family to smoke outside. I am the only smoker in my house. I would not dream of subjecting my daughter, my SO, his kids, my kids or my Kiddie to my smoke. It's not a big deal to step outside. I do get p!ssed when non smokers try to take away my outside. I can respect closed spaces, but not open air.


 THIS!!!!! If you have respect for others then you have my respect. If your cigarette is more important then enjoy your lonely old self!



__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

NAOW wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

I'm not defending smoking. I quit cause it was so bad for me and my kids.

All I am saying is being in a house for a couple hours with a smoker isn't going to kill anyone.


 It wouldn't kill my kids to hang out with people who spew profanities for a few hours either, but I still don't want to expose them to that. 

 

Plus, it's not one smoker. It's a party where a lot of people will be indoors smoking. In a house where people smoke indoors full time. 

 


 I wouldn't stay away because they smoke in their own home I would only decline if they decided to smoke in the house for the one day I'm there while knowing it makes me sick. I'm not sure why that's so hard to believe.



__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

I can imagine expecting someone not to smoke in their own home when I am there.

I don't understand that line of thinking.

I do understand not going to their because they smoke.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

And I give it about 5 years and we will start hearing about laws that make it illegal to smoke in your own home.

There are laws being pushed now to make it illegal to smoke in your own car.



__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:

There is a whole generation that grew up with smoking households.

Generally, they turned out alright.


 This is the stupidest thing you've posted in a long time.  Cancer rates are at an all time high.  I don't call that "alright".

 

And for someone on disability before age 45 - you are not "alright".  One of the environmental factors that can trigger and worsen RA is smoking. 



-- Edited by Lawyerlady on Sunday 18th of October 2015 07:27:24 AM



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

lilyofcourse wrote:

And I give it about 5 years and we will start hearing about laws that make it illegal to smoke in your own home.

There are laws being pushed now to make it illegal to smoke in your own car.


 If people would be considerate enough not to smoke around others, it wouldn't be such an issue.  Laws get made because it's a problem. 

People have the right to smoke so long as it is only affecting them.  When their smoke affects me - that right ends.

As for their own home, they can choose to smoke.  And I can choose not to go there.  The fact that you don't understand this concept is flat out ridiculous.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:
lilyofcourse wrote:

There is a whole generation that grew up with smoking households.

Generally, they turned out alright.


 This is the stupidest thing you've posted in a long time.  Cancer rates are at an all time high.  I don't call that "alright".

 

And for someone on disability before age 45 - you are not "alright".  One of the environmental factors that can trigger and worsen RA is smoking. 



-- Edited by Lawyerlady on Sunday 18th of October 2015 07:27:24 AM


 You...stop with the LOGIC...evileye

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Nothing's Impossible

Status: Offline
Posts: 16913
Date:
Permalink  
 

My sister died from lung cancer at 43. She never smoked but her husband did. Their oldest son had chronic respiratory issues when he was a baby. Probably caused by all that second hand smoke.

__________________

A person's a person no matter how small.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Southern_Belle wrote:

My sister died from lung cancer at 43. She never smoked but her husband did. Their oldest son had chronic respiratory issues when he was a baby. Probably caused by all that second hand smoke.


 That's so very sad, SB.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.

«First  <  1 2 3 4 5  >  Last»  | Page of 5  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard