Oh, I disagree that "few parents" would allow them to share a bedroom. I find that there are plenty of parents with very liberal views on that. But, I already said that the Ex should step out of the picture for a few days and allow him to have time with his parents. And, likewise, they can entertain her and tell him, sorry, Ex is coming over for dinner tonight and you are free to join us or not.
See - that's reasonable. The OP is not. In the OP, the son is demanding they cut her out of their lives completely.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Oh, I disagree that "few parents" would allow them to share a bedroom. I find that there are plenty of parents with very liberal views on that. But, I already said that the Ex should step out of the picture for a few days and allow him to have time with his parents. And, likewise, they can entertain her and tell him, sorry, Ex is coming over for dinner tonight and you are free to join us or not.
See - that's reasonable. The OP is not. In the OP, the son is demanding they cut her out of their lives completely.
That's why the advice given was spot on--which you and others seemed to disagree with.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Oh, I disagree that "few parents" would allow them to share a bedroom. I find that there are plenty of parents with very liberal views on that. But, I already said that the Ex should step out of the picture for a few days and allow him to have time with his parents. And, likewise, they can entertain her and tell him, sorry, Ex is coming over for dinner tonight and you are free to join us or not.
See - that's reasonable. The OP is not. In the OP, the son is demanding they cut her out of their lives completely.
That's why the advice given was spot on--which you and others seemed to disagree with.
No, the advice basically said to give in to her unreasonable son.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Oh, I disagree that "few parents" would allow them to share a bedroom. I find that there are plenty of parents with very liberal views on that. But, I already said that the Ex should step out of the picture for a few days and allow him to have time with his parents. And, likewise, they can entertain her and tell him, sorry, Ex is coming over for dinner tonight and you are free to join us or not.
See - that's reasonable. The OP is not. In the OP, the son is demanding they cut her out of their lives completely.
That's why the advice given was spot on--which you and others seemed to disagree with.
No, the advice basically said to give in to her unreasonable son.
It was NOT that at all. I don't even know how you could come up with that nonsense. There is NOTHING in the advice given that remotely suggests that.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Oh, I disagree that "few parents" would allow them to share a bedroom. I find that there are plenty of parents with very liberal views on that. But, I already said that the Ex should step out of the picture for a few days and allow him to have time with his parents. And, likewise, they can entertain her and tell him, sorry, Ex is coming over for dinner tonight and you are free to join us or not.
See - that's reasonable. The OP is not. In the OP, the son is demanding they cut her out of their lives completely.
That's why the advice given was spot on--which you and others seemed to disagree with.
No, the advice basically said to give in to her unreasonable son.
It was NOT that at all. I don't even know how you could come up with that nonsense. There is NOTHING in the advice given that remotely suggests that.
A: What a tragic situation, and how kind of you to step up and fill the breach in this hurting young person’s life. If only Jane had been your son’s dear friend, and not his girlfriend, this would be so much easier. It was essentially destined that this high school romance wouldn’t last, and now it hasn’t. You have obligations to two young people. First, to your son. Yes, you can be sad he and Jane broke up, but that’s normal, that happens, and you cannot put the weight of the world on him for wanting to move on from his high school girlfriend. You also can’t tell your son that when he comes home during the holidays his former girlfriend will be there. However, you can’t abandon her. So this is a very tricky needle to thread. First, try to establish some nondevastated communication with your son. Tell him that you understand that high school romances end and you are excited to meet his new girlfriend. Then explain all of you are in a difficult position because you, as adults, feel a moral and financial obligation to Jane. Explain you and his mother are going to do your best to discharge that without ever making him feel as if he’s done something wrong by breaking up. Say that you will not do anything behind his back, but you and his mother also want to help Jane move forward. She is alone in the world, and you two want to help her be less so. Then you and your wife need to have some talks with Jane. Surely, a girl who’s been through what she has needs counseling—not just to get over your son, but to get on with her life. She needs a larger network than the two of you. Maybe she can spend holidays with a roommate or a friend—while also visiting you two during, say, a short school break when your son is not planning to come home. You can tell her what you plan to do as far as financial support is concerned, but you two also need some counseling on how best to help her. Maybe, with Jane’s permission, you can talk to the dean of students on her behalf and explain her situation and that she needs attention and aid. But first, re-establish good relations with your son and some ground rules that honor his needs, while helping him see that his parents can help Jane without him feeling emotionally burdened.
The red is flippin' ridiculous - it's honor thy parents, not honor thy children's demands.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Not his "demands"--his needs. Their son comes before some random live-in stranger.
Needs, my ass.
That's what it says.
Besides, a young kid should be able to come home for the holidays.
You are such a hypocrite.
I'm betting you would never say "well, honey, we'd love to meet your new boyfriend, but this Thanksgiving we are having your ex-boyfriend over for turkey dinner, so your current one can't come."
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
For goodness sake. No where in the letter did it say he was going to sleep with new GF in the house.
If I were the Ex I would automatically make other arrangements. I think she should do that...even as a matter of pride. She can still have a relationship with his parents. But they are not together anymore.
She needs to remove herself from the holiday equation so the parents don't have to do it.
It is not a need. It is him not wanting to face his ex-girlfriend. But the OP's letter clearing said son wanted them to cut her out of their life completely. That is him being an ass - that is not about his needs.
And no, if I wanted to have someone to MY house on Thanksgiving, I would do it and my son would live with it.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Part of being an adult is learning to be civil to people you don't want to be around for the sake of work, kids, or other reasons. Sometimes in life we don't always get our way and sometimes we still have to deal with people and relationships we don't want to.
Whoever is at fault, whoever is right, whoever is wrong, doesn't really matter. It's the parents house. They get to choose. The other "grown ups" need to grow up and deal with it.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
Seriously - WTF? I will never understand people who think they have to give into emotional blackmail. And if I ever raised a child that attempted that **** on me, they would see the wrath of mom so fast, their head would spin.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
It is not a need. It is him not wanting to face his ex-girlfriend. But the OP's letter clearing said son wanted them to cut her out of their life completely. That is him being an ass - that is not about his needs.
And no, if I wanted to have someone to MY house on Thanksgiving, I would do it and my son would live with it.
Do you regularly have holiday dinners with your ex's? Didn't think so.
That is NOT some unreasonable request.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Part of being an adult is learning to be civil to people you don't want to be around for the sake of work, kids, or other reasons. Sometimes in life we don't always get our way and sometimes we still have to deal with people and relationships we don't want to.
Whoever is at fault, whoever is right, whoever is wrong, doesn't really matter. It's the parents house. They get to choose. The other "grown ups" need to grow up and deal with it.
They need to choose their son.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
It is not a need. It is him not wanting to face his ex-girlfriend. But the OP's letter clearing said son wanted them to cut her out of their life completely. That is him being an ass - that is not about his needs.
And no, if I wanted to have someone to MY house on Thanksgiving, I would do it and my son would live with it.
Do you regularly have holiday dinners with your ex's? Didn't think so.
That is NOT some unreasonable request.
Not every holiday or occasion but yes. My DH's extended family invites exes/parents of the children to their house.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
This is complicated by the fact that she's not JUST his ex.
These parents basically raised her, provided a safe-haven and parenting for her since she was in early elementary school.
The only justification I could see would be if he knows she's a drug addict who steals. And in the letter there's no indication of anything wrong with her.
__________________
The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.
Part of being an adult is learning to be civil to people you don't want to be around for the sake of work, kids, or other reasons. Sometimes in life we don't always get our way and sometimes we still have to deal with people and relationships we don't want to.
Whoever is at fault, whoever is right, whoever is wrong, doesn't really matter. It's the parents house. They get to choose. The other "grown ups" need to grow up and deal with it.
They need to choose their son.
They need to choose to do what is right. What THEY feel is right. And no, they do not need to choose to give in to unreasonable demands of their child.
This is NOT a normal situation.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
The first mistake was made when the girl moved in all those years ago and was not legally adopted.
If you are going to make someone your child, make them your child.
When the relationship started between the boy and girl, I'd like to know how that was handled.
Seems to me all of them need to grow up in their thinking.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I can understand why they didn't legally adopt her. If her dad is an alcoholic then they have to get his permission to adopt her. Also, for financial purposes for college she's much better off financially if they don't adopt her.
Now the dating should never have happened. That's where they went wrong. My guess is that he was already sweet on this girl when he asked his parents if she could move in. I would bet my bottom dollar that they had no idea about that. And that he used it as his opportunity to get her close to him. And now we have the fallout of it all.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
Part of being an adult is learning to be civil to people you don't want to be around for the sake of work, kids, or other reasons. Sometimes in life we don't always get our way and sometimes we still have to deal with people and relationships we don't want to.
Whoever is at fault, whoever is right, whoever is wrong, doesn't really matter. It's the parents house. They get to choose. The other "grown ups" need to grow up and deal with it.
They need to choose their son.
They need to choose to do what is right. What THEY feel is right. And no, they do not need to choose to give in to unreasonable demands of their child.
This is NOT a normal situation.
What is right is to tell the ex to go stay with someone else for the holidays so their son can come home.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
Part of being an adult is learning to be civil to people you don't want to be around for the sake of work, kids, or other reasons. Sometimes in life we don't always get our way and sometimes we still have to deal with people and relationships we don't want to.
Whoever is at fault, whoever is right, whoever is wrong, doesn't really matter. It's the parents house. They get to choose. The other "grown ups" need to grow up and deal with it.
They need to choose their son.
They need to choose to do what is right. What THEY feel is right. And no, they do not need to choose to give in to unreasonable demands of their child.
This is NOT a normal situation.
What is right is to tell the ex to go stay with someone else for the holidays so their son can come home.
You are deliberately ignoring the part where he is demanding they cut her out of their lives completely. This can be the solution sometimes - but not always, and not at his DEMAND.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Part of being an adult is learning to be civil to people you don't want to be around for the sake of work, kids, or other reasons. Sometimes in life we don't always get our way and sometimes we still have to deal with people and relationships we don't want to.
Whoever is at fault, whoever is right, whoever is wrong, doesn't really matter. It's the parents house. They get to choose. The other "grown ups" need to grow up and deal with it.
They need to choose their son.
They need to choose to do what is right. What THEY feel is right. And no, they do not need to choose to give in to unreasonable demands of their child.
This is NOT a normal situation.
What is right is to tell the ex to go stay with someone else for the holidays so their son can come home.
You are deliberately ignoring the part where he is demanding they cut her out of their lives completely. This can be the solution sometimes - but not always, and not at his DEMAND.
No, I'm not. I have said several times they can still honor financial obligations to her and that she can come visit at times the son is not there. That is exactly what the advice given says.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
The problem is that this girl might not always have someplace else to go - and going to the dean to stay on campus alone is a crappy alternative. If she has no where else to go, then she needs to be able to go home, and the guy can suck it up and act like an adult and deal with it.
And in her situation, the emotional support is probably more important than the financial.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
The problem is that this girl might not always have someplace else to go - and going to the dean to stay on campus alone is a crappy alternative. If she has no where else to go, then she needs to be able to go home, and the guy can suck it up and act like an adult and deal with it.
And in her situation, the emotional support is probably more important than the financial.
That's bs. I doubt she wants to be around the guy who broke her heart any more than he wants to be around her. So it's a choice. If she goes there for the holidays, he can't and will have the same options she currently does.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
The problem is that this girl might not always have someplace else to go - and going to the dean to stay on campus alone is a crappy alternative. If she has no where else to go, then she needs to be able to go home, and the guy can suck it up and act like an adult and deal with it.
And in her situation, the emotional support is probably more important than the financial.
That's bs. I doubt she wants to be around the guy who broke her heart any more than he wants to be around her. So it's a choice. If she goes there for the holidays, he can't and will have the same options she currently does.
This is where we fundamentally disagree. I do not believe they cannot be in the same house together. That's asinine and immature.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
The problem is that this girl might not always have someplace else to go - and going to the dean to stay on campus alone is a crappy alternative. If she has no where else to go, then she needs to be able to go home, and the guy can suck it up and act like an adult and deal with it.
And in her situation, the emotional support is probably more important than the financial.
That's bs. I doubt she wants to be around the guy who broke her heart any more than he wants to be around her. So it's a choice. If she goes there for the holidays, he can't and will have the same options she currently does.
This is where we fundamentally disagree. I do not believe they cannot be in the same house together. That's asinine and immature.
Oh come on. Are you going to invite your kids ex's over for thanksgiving?
Sure, its possible to be in the same house, but you know damn well,it would be beyond awkward and uncomfortable for everyone. Except in a few rare cases where exs get together for holidays due to shared children, it's just not done because NO ONE wants that.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
The problem is that this girl might not always have someplace else to go - and going to the dean to stay on campus alone is a crappy alternative. If she has no where else to go, then she needs to be able to go home, and the guy can suck it up and act like an adult and deal with it.
And in her situation, the emotional support is probably more important than the financial.
That's bs. I doubt she wants to be around the guy who broke her heart any more than he wants to be around her. So it's a choice. If she goes there for the holidays, he can't and will have the same options she currently does.
This is where we fundamentally disagree. I do not believe they cannot be in the same house together. That's asinine and immature.
Oh come on. Are you going to invite your kids ex's over for thanksgiving?
Sure, its possible to be in the same house, but you know damn well,it would be beyond awkward and uncomfortable for everyone. Except in a few rare cases where exs get together for holidays due to shared children, it's just not done because NO ONE wants that.
Again, this is not a normal situation. And these exes basically have shared family now, and are going to have to deal with it.
__________________
LawyerLady
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
The problem is that this girl might not always have someplace else to go - and going to the dean to stay on campus alone is a crappy alternative. If she has no where else to go, then she needs to be able to go home, and the guy can suck it up and act like an adult and deal with it.
And in her situation, the emotional support is probably more important than the financial.
That's bs. I doubt she wants to be around the guy who broke her heart any more than he wants to be around her. So it's a choice. If she goes there for the holidays, he can't and will have the same options she currently does.
This is where we fundamentally disagree. I do not believe they cannot be in the same house together. That's asinine and immature.
Oh come on. Are you going to invite your kids ex's over for thanksgiving?
Sure, its possible to be in the same house, but you know damn well,it would be beyond awkward and uncomfortable for everyone. Except in a few rare cases where exs get together for holidays due to shared children, it's just not done because NO ONE wants that.
Again, this is not a normal situation. And these exes basically have shared family now, and are going to have to deal with it.
Irrelevant. They are NOt family.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
It's stupid to say they can't be together. What happens when they both get older and get married and have kids? Is she still not allowed to come "home" for holidays because he will ALWAYS be reminded? Stupid. He needs to grow up.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
It's stupid to say they can't be together. What happens when they both get older and get married and have kids? Is she still not allowed to come "home" for holidays because he will ALWAYS be reminded? Stupid. He needs to grow up.
What happens? Well, first, that will be an entirely different situation than just after a recent break up. Maybe this will heal, but it's not now.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
You live with the consequences of your actions. This is one of them.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
You live with the consequences of your actions. This is one of them.
Doesn't have to be. Having to deal with an ex on holidays, especially when there are no kids involved, is almost never a consequence. That is the point. His parents are trying to force him to stay in the relationship.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
No one is trying to force him to stay in a RELATIONSHIP. You cannot read. Just because the parents were upset they broke up does not mean they expect them to date forever. A lot of parents are upset when their kid breaks up with someone they really liked or got along with. But they know it's their kids choice to break up. They are not trying to force him to date her. He wants to demand things from his parents. He doesn't have that right.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
No one is trying to force him to stay in a RELATIONSHIP. You cannot read. Just because the parents were upset they broke up does not mean they expect them to date forever. A lot of parents are upset when their kid breaks up with someone they really liked or got along with. But they know it's their kids choice to break up. They are not trying to force him to date her. He wants to demand things from his parents. He doesn't have that right.
Yeah, but none of those upset parents invite the ex over for thanksgiving. It's just not done.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
I have stated several times that I had two ex b/f's at my wedding. My husband's ex g/f catered my wedding. My in laws routinely invite my SIL's ex over to things. So yes, it IS done. Maybe not in your sheltered world but there are many people who break up and then act like adults and move on. This guy is not one of them.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
I have stated several times that I had two ex b/f's at my wedding. My husband's ex g/f catered my wedding. My in laws routinely invite my SIL's ex over to things. So yes, it IS done. Maybe not in your sheltered world but there are many people who break up and then act like adults and move on. This guy is not one of them.
He's in college, not 50 years old. It was a high school relationship. There are no kids and no reason for them to do so.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
And for my SS I have gone to all kinds of things with the ex and her family. I am currently babysitting my DH's ex wife's grand daughter.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
I have stated several times that I had two ex b/f's at my wedding. My husband's ex g/f catered my wedding. My in laws routinely invite my SIL's ex over to things. So yes, it IS done. Maybe not in your sheltered world but there are many people who break up and then act like adults and move on. This guy is not one of them.
He's in college, not 50 years old. It was a high school relationship. There are no kids and no reason for them to do so.
That's just an excuse. He needs to grow up. Anyway, it doesn't matter. It's the parents house and they can do whatever the hell they please.
__________________
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!” ― Maya Angelou
I have stated several times that I had two ex b/f's at my wedding. My husband's ex g/f catered my wedding. My in laws routinely invite my SIL's ex over to things. So yes, it IS done. Maybe not in your sheltered world but there are many people who break up and then act like adults and move on. This guy is not one of them.
He's in college, not 50 years old. It was a high school relationship. There are no kids and no reason for them to do so.
That's just an excuse. He needs to grow up. Anyway, it doesn't matter. It's the parents house and they can do whatever the hell they please.
And risk ruining their relationship with their son and potentially future DIL's. Stupid. There is zero reason to even consider this.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.
The problem is that this girl might not always have someplace else to go - and going to the dean to stay on campus alone is a crappy alternative. If she has no where else to go, then she needs to be able to go home, and the guy can suck it up and act like an adult and deal with it.
And in her situation, the emotional support is probably more important than the financial.
That's bs. I doubt she wants to be around the guy who broke her heart any more than he wants to be around her. So it's a choice. If she goes there for the holidays, he can't and will have the same options she currently does.
This is where we fundamentally disagree. I do not believe they cannot be in the same house together. That's asinine and immature.
Oh come on. Are you going to invite your kids ex's over for thanksgiving?
Sure, its possible to be in the same house, but you know damn well,it would be beyond awkward and uncomfortable for everyone. Except in a few rare cases where exs get together for holidays due to shared children, it's just not done because NO ONE wants that.
Again, this is not a normal situation. And these exes basically have shared family now, and are going to have to deal with it.
Irrelevant. They are NOt family.
This is where I disagree. They all most certainly ARE family. Family is more than biology. This girl is part of their family. When they started dating, there should have been a conversation about what happens when you break up and this is how we will all move on in that situation. Yes. It will be uncomfortable. Most dealings with family ARE uncomfortable to some extent - everyone has that relative they don't like and have learned to smile and be polite around for the sake of family harmony. This is no different.
__________________
Out of all the lies I have told, "just kidding" is my favorite !
The problem is that this girl might not always have someplace else to go - and going to the dean to stay on campus alone is a crappy alternative. If she has no where else to go, then she needs to be able to go home, and the guy can suck it up and act like an adult and deal with it.
And in her situation, the emotional support is probably more important than the financial.
That's bs. I doubt she wants to be around the guy who broke her heart any more than he wants to be around her. So it's a choice. If she goes there for the holidays, he can't and will have the same options she currently does.
This is where we fundamentally disagree. I do not believe they cannot be in the same house together. That's asinine and immature.
Oh come on. Are you going to invite your kids ex's over for thanksgiving?
Sure, its possible to be in the same house, but you know damn well,it would be beyond awkward and uncomfortable for everyone. Except in a few rare cases where exs get together for holidays due to shared children, it's just not done because NO ONE wants that.
Again, this is not a normal situation. And these exes basically have shared family now, and are going to have to deal with it.
Irrelevant. They are NOt family.
This is where I disagree. They all most certainly ARE family. Family is more than biology. This girl is part of their family. When they started dating, there should have been a conversation about what happens when you break up and this is how we will all move on in that situation. Yes. It will be uncomfortable. Most dealings with family ARE uncomfortable to some extent - everyone has that relative they don't like and have learned to smile and be polite around for the sake of family harmony. This is no different.
It's vastly different. No one dated weird aunt mable.
__________________
I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.