TOTALLY GEEKED!

just Czech · Give Me Grand's!

RE: 27% of Democrats Want Global Warming Doubters Prosecuted

weltschmerz · Guru

just Czech wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
I used to believe I had a soul, and now I don't.
It's all good.
Does this mean that if someone calls you "soulless", you won't be offended?

It's hardly complimentary.

soulless

(ˈsəʊllɪs)

adj

1. lacking any humanizing qualities or influences; dead; mechanical: soulless work.

2. (of a person) lacking in sensitivity or nobility

3. heartless; cruel

ˈsoullessly adv ˈsoullessness n

huskerbb · Guru

weltschmerz wrote:
just Czech wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
I used to believe I had a soul, and now I don't.
It's all good.
Does this mean that if someone calls you "soulless", you won't be offended?
It's hardly complimentary.

soulless
(ˈsəʊllɪs)
adj
1. lacking any humanizing qualities or influences; dead; mechanical: soulless work.
2. (of a person) lacking in sensitivity or nobility
3. heartless; cruel
ˈsoullessly adv ˈsoullessness n

What difference does the dictionary definition make? YOU are the one who says you don't have a soul.

It's like when atheists get all offended when Christians say they are going to he!!. It only means they aren't very confident in their own beliefs.

If they were confident in what they believe, then someone saying they are going to go to a place they don't even believe exists would not be offensive.

weltschmerz · Guru

huskerbb wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
just Czech wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
I used to believe I had a soul, and now I don't.
It's all good.
Does this mean that if someone calls you "soulless", you won't be offended?
It's hardly complimentary.

soulless
(ˈsəʊllɪs)
adj
1. lacking any humanizing qualities or influences; dead; mechanical: soulless work.
2. (of a person) lacking in sensitivity or nobility
3. heartless; cruel
ˈsoullessly adv ˈsoullessness n
What difference does the dictionary definition make? YOU are the one who says you don't have a soul.

It's like when atheists get all offended when Christians say they are going to he!!. It only means they aren't very confident in their own beliefs.

If they were confident in what they believe, then someone saying they are going to go to a place they don't even believe exists would not be offensive.

It makes all the difference. I don't believe I have a soul, but I do have a heart, and "soulless" is synonymou with "heartless."

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

A heart? You mean something that pumps blood and beats? Because a heart is ONLY a physical thing. No real evidence of feelings, love, etc. Can't really prove that that matters somehow.

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

I mean there is no real "love" or caring. It is just random chemical events.

just Czech · Give Me Grand's!

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
I mean there is no real "love" or caring. It is just random chemical events.

Conducted by a minute electrical charge.

Science says so.

Bzzzt

Ohfour · Hooker

Hahahaha!

huskerbb · Guru

weltschmerz wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
just Czech wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
I used to believe I had a soul, and now I don't.
It's all good.
Does this mean that if someone calls you "soulless", you won't be offended?
It's hardly complimentary.

soulless
(ˈsəʊllɪs)
adj
1. lacking any humanizing qualities or influences; dead; mechanical: soulless work.
2. (of a person) lacking in sensitivity or nobility
3. heartless; cruel
ˈsoullessly adv ˈsoullessness n
What difference does the dictionary definition make? YOU are the one who says you don't have a soul.

It's like when atheists get all offended when Christians say they are going to he!!. It only means they aren't very confident in their own beliefs.

If they were confident in what they believe, then someone saying they are going to go to a place they don't even believe exists would not be offensive.
It makes all the difference. I don't believe I have a soul, but I do have a heart, and "soulless" is synonymou with "heartless."

That's ridiculous. A heart is an organ that pumps blood. Do you need a lesson in basic anatomy and biology?

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

Yup. Science says that your heart is nerely a muscle pumping blood. So of course you cannot be heartless.

ed11563 · Guru

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Yup. Science says that your heart is merely a muscle pumping blood. So of course you cannot be heartless.

Am I the only one here who's actually SEEN a human heart, in use? And stopped, opened up for repairs, then restarted?

Hundreds of them?

It sure looks like a pump to me.

But I wouldn't use the word "merely".

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

Science reduces things to their elements. However because God awes me , His creation is awesome. Fearfully and wonderfully made.

lilyofcourse · My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

weltschmerz wrote:
I used to believe I had a soul, and now I don't.
It's all good.

Hebrews 4:12

For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart.

weltschmerz · Guru

flan327 wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
I used to believe I had a soul, and now I don't.
It's all good.
Can I ask why you changed your mind?
flan

Sure. When I was a believer, souls made sense. Now they don't.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

weltschmerz wrote:
flan327 wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
I used to believe I had a soul, and now I don't.
It's all good.
Can I ask why you changed your mind?
flan
Sure. When I was a believer, souls made sense. Now they don't.

Thanks.

And I'm sorry for the way the Christians treat you here.

flan

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

flan327 wrote:

weltschmerz wrote:
flan327 wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
I used to believe I had a soul, and now I don't.
It's all good.
Can I ask why you changed your mind?
flan
Sure. When I was a believer, souls made sense. Now they don't.
Thanks.
And I'm sorry for the way the Christians treat you here.
flan

Oh brother. Pour some victim syrup on. Wow. confuse

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

weltschmerz wrote:

flan327 wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
I used to believe I had a soul, and now I don't.
It's all good.
Can I ask why you changed your mind?
flan
Sure. When I was a believer, souls made sense. Now they don't.

Well, then you can't believe in "love" or "having a heart" either because those things don't exist.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

I am entitled to my opinion.

flan

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

flan327 wrote:

I am entitled to my opinion.

flan

Guess what? So am I! biggrin

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Yikes! I play the Victim Card in Marriage! Do you?

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Too many people play victims to crimes they created. Suck it up, own up to it, and move on. Life is not far and it's not meant to be far.:

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Buy this as a framed art print, greeting card, t-shirt, canvas, or mug.:

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
A heart? You mean something that pumps blood and beats? Because a heart is ONLY a physical thing. No real evidence of feelings, love, etc. Can't really prove that that matters somehow.

A "heart" means more than the physical organ.

If you tell someone to "have a heart," you're not handing them an organ...

flan

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Boy! You sure put me in my place.

flan

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

And the next time anyone whines about "Christian bashing," I'll be sure to copy those memes.

flan

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

flan327 wrote:
And the next time anyone whines about "Christian bashing," I'll be sure to copy those memes.

flan

That's how it started. Geez, you are unbelievable.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

When you treat someone...

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

flan327 wrote:

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
A heart? You mean something that pumps blood and beats? Because a heart is ONLY a physical thing. No real evidence of feelings, love, etc. Can't really prove that that matters somehow.
A "heart" means more than the physical organ.
If you tell someone to "have a heart," you're not handing them an organ...
flan

Why not? Science is the God of all that exists or can exist. Science can't explain love. Therefore, it does not exist.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Emotions don't exist? Gotcha!

flan

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

If you can't prove it scientifically, then it doesn't exist. It's just a random chemical reaction. Your notion that there is any meaning behind that whatsoever is pure nonsense.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.

1. I'm not an atheist.

2. Since when do you get to tell other people what they "cannot" feel? You are an intelligent women. Do you honestly believe the things you type?

flan

Tinydancer · Guru

flan327 wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.
1. I'm not an atheist.
2. Since when do you get to tell other people what they "cannot" feel? You are an intelligent women. Do you honestly believe the things you type?
flan

Bwahahahaha....Coming from you that is just pathetic.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.

I just remembered (I was in the shower...LOL) that a brain scan does show emotions.

flan

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

flan327 wrote:

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.
1. I'm not an atheist.
2. Since when do you get to tell other people what they "cannot" feel? You are an intelligent women. Do you honestly believe the things you type?
flan

You aren't making sense. Just taking the position of Science as God to the logical conclusion. Science cannot prove historical truths. Science cannot prove a lot of things that we know to be true. And, it is nonsense to even presume that science could prove God since God exists OUTSIDE the realm of science and creation. Duh.

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

flan327 wrote:

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.
I just remembered (I was in the shower...LOL) that a brain scan does show emotions.
flan

A chemical reaction or lighted area of the brain is simply that. YOU ascribe the emotion or feeling behind it. If all that exists is the material, your feeling is simple a false delusion or notion of love. It's just a nothingness of chemicals. Just like a fetus is a blob of cells of nothing in particular. Of course, denying fetal SCIENCE is very convenient.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.
I just remembered (I was in the shower...LOL) that a brain scan does show emotions.
flan

A chemical reaction or lighted area of the brain is simply that. YOU ascribe the emotion or feeling behind it. If all that exists is the material, your feeling is simple a false delusion or notion of love. It's just a nothingness of chemicals. Just like a fetus is a blob of cells of nothing in particular. Of course, denying fetal SCIENCE is very convenient.

So if everyone (Christian & Buddhist & agnostic, etc.) ascribes the same emotion?

flan

Tinydancer · Guru

Still can't be real because you have no proof.

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

flan327 wrote:

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.
I just remembered (I was in the shower...LOL) that a brain scan does show emotions.
flan

A chemical reaction or lighted area of the brain is simply that. YOU ascribe the emotion or feeling behind it. If all that exists is the material, your feeling is simple a false delusion or notion of love. It's just a nothingness of chemicals. Just like a fetus is a blob of cells of nothing in particular. Of course, denying fetal SCIENCE is very convenient.
So if everyone (Christian & Buddhist & agnostic, etc.) ascribes the same emotion?
flan

What are you talking about?

huskerbb · Guru

weltschmerz wrote:
flan327 wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
I used to believe I had a soul, and now I don't.
It's all good.
Can I ask why you changed your mind?
flan
Sure. When I was a believer, souls made sense. Now they don't.

So getting offended by someone saying you don't have something that you don't even believe exists is just stupid.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.
I just remembered (I was in the shower...LOL) that a brain scan does show emotions.
flan

A chemical reaction or lighted area of the brain is simply that. YOU ascribe the emotion or feeling behind it. If all that exists is the material, your feeling is simple a false delusion or notion of love. It's just a nothingness of chemicals. Just like a fetus is a blob of cells of nothing in particular. Of course, denying fetal SCIENCE is very convenient.
So if everyone (Christian & Buddhist & agnostic, etc.) ascribes the same emotion?
flan

What are you talking about?

You said that love wasn't real because there was no scientific proof. I provided scientific proof that emotions exist.

flan

weltschmerz · Guru

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.

Atjeists can't love? What on earth are you babbling about?

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

weltschmerz wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.
Atjeists can't love? What on earth are you babbling about?

Yeah, that's what I thought!!!

flan

Tinydancer · Guru

weltschmerz wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.
Atjeists can't love? What on earth are you babbling about?

Feelings can't be proved so they are not real. Isn't that YOUR logic?

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

An MRI of the brain IS proof.

flan

weltschmerz · Guru

Tinydancer wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.
Atjeists can't love? What on earth are you babbling about?
Feelings can't be proved so they are not real. Isn't that YOUR logic?

Feeling CAN be proven. look it up. Dopamine, serotonin, vasopressin, etc.....all contribute to feelings.

Tinydancer · Guru

flan327 wrote:
An MRI of the brain IS proof.

flan

Proof that it's working not what you're feeling. You two are so funny...lol

Ohfour · Hooker

weltschmerz wrote:
Tinydancer wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
flan327 wrote:

So you don't love your kids or your husband?

flan

I am not the one claiming that something doesn't exist if Science can't prove it. So, obviously I do love my DH and kids. But, atheists do not and cannot because their God of Science tells them so.
Atjeists can't love? What on earth are you babbling about?
Feelings can't be proved so they are not real. Isn't that YOUR logic?
Feeling CAN be proven. look it up. Dopamine, serotonin, vasopressin, etc.....all contribute to feelings.

HAHAHA! You're too funny today. Keep it up!