TOTALLY GEEKED!

Hmmm...ever hear of this happening in places with permissive gun laws? No, they target the helpless...

flan327 wrote:

---

I refuse to have guns in my house. I don't understand the mindset.

flan

---

Well, you said your neighborhood was becoming more and more unsafe.  If someone breaks into your house, what are you going to do? 

You didn't answer my question. What are you going to do when someone breaks into your house in the middle of the night?

flan327 wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

You didn't answer my question. What are you going to do when someone breaks into your house in the middle of the night?

---

 What do you think?

flan

---

Die?   

These people were terrorists. Masterminds of a terrorist cell The amount of munitions they had in their house leads people experienced in such stuff the conclusion that they were planning many attacks. Something went wrong for them yesterday. Probably they were too confident that the gunless society in CA would help them get away. They were wrong. I applaud the response from all the police and swat teams. So quick and so relentless. They probably save 100's if not 1,000's of lives.

flan327 wrote:

---

Fort Worth Mom wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

flan327 wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

You didn't answer my question. What are you going to do when someone breaks into your house in the middle of the night?

---

 What do you think?

flan

---

Die?   

---

flan, since you don't own a gun.

If someone breaks into your house in the middle of the night, and you can't get out.

Pretend to be asleep.

That would be my advice. 

---

 Thanks, FWM.

The dogs would let us know if anyone came near a door or window.

flan

---

 Barking dogs deter a lot of break ins, flan.

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

Oh weltz dear, you didn't answer the real question.

How does strict gun control keep guns out of terrorists' hands?

---

Well, lilly dear, you didn't ask me that question.

It's very hard to get guns here, except for hunting shotguns. The ones that criminals get are coming in from the US.

We need more controls at the border.

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

Yes. I did ask that question.

And no. More gun control is not what is needed.

Gun requirement is what is needed.

---

 Amen!!!!

weltschmerz wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

Yes. I did ask that question.

And no. More gun control is not what is needed.

Gun requirement is what is needed.

---

Lol! yes, of course. The solution to gun violence is more guns.

Just like the solution to the meth problem is more meth. 

---

 The scary thing is that they BELIEVE that crap.

flan

weltschmerz wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

Yes. I did ask that question.

And no. More gun control is not what is needed.

Gun requirement is what is needed.

---

Lol! yes, of course. The solution to gun violence is more guns.

Just like the solution to the meth problem is more meth. 

---

 The places with the least restrictive carry laws are the safest places in the US. 

And the first person you're going to be glad to see in the middle of a mass shooting is a good guy with a gun.

I know my gun hating neighbors will run to my house at the first sign of being attacked. When it becomes personal, really personal, the light dawns on Marblehead.

Man, talk about Big Government! Forcing people to own guns.

flan327 wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

flan327 wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

Yes. I did ask that question.

And no. More gun control is not what is needed.

Gun requirement is what is needed.

---

Lol! yes, of course. The solution to gun violence is more guns.

Just like the solution to the meth problem is more meth. 

---

 The scary thing is that they BELIEVE that crap.

flan

---

 Wtf? You admitted in this very thread that my city was safe because everyone owns guns! So sure cant keep your stories straight can you? 

---

 You have stated that before. I was merely telling welts what your explanation would be.

You CANNOT force people to own guns.

flan

---

 Sure you can.  Just tax them if they don't and it's all good. 

Ohfour wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Man, talk about Big Government! Forcing people to own guns.

---

 Not forcing anyone. But those that are too pussified to protect themselves dont get the benefit of my preparedness. 

---

And your preparedness would have helped the disabled people in San Bernadino how, exactly? 

She'd have shot the bastards along with all the other carriers. Do you not understand?

flan327 wrote:

---

Ohfour wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Man, talk about Big Government! Forcing people to own guns.

---

 Not forcing anyone. But those that are too pussified to protect themselves dont get the benefit of my preparedness. 

---

 You really need to stop calling names when someone disagrees with you.

flan

---

No one is calling names. Pussified, is an adjective. (If I'm not mistaken.) 

No one should be forced to own a gun, in my opinion.

And, no one, who has a license to carry, and has gone through the training, should be forced to leave their gun at home.

Being able to defend yourself, and your family, should be your right. 

If more people had their guns with them, crazies would think twice, before they attacked innocent people.

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Fort Worth Mom wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

Yes. I did ask that question.

And no. More gun control is not what is needed.

Gun requirement is what is needed.

---

Lol! yes, of course. The solution to gun violence is more guns.

Just like the solution to the meth problem is more meth. 

---

 It's not the same thing, welts.

Having gun free zones, like schools, stadiums, movie theaters, etc. Makes the general population, a sitting duck, for a madman with a gun.

If all the people, who have a license to carry, actually carried their guns, they could take out a crazy person, in a school. Or a stadium. Or a movie theater.

JMHO

---

I can just see myself dragging my hunting rifle around when I go to the movies or go shopping. 

---

 So don't, but why stop your neighbor from keeping his family safe. Just because it's not important for you to protect your family doesn't mean I won't do what I have to to keep mine safe.

Tinydancer wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Fort Worth Mom wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

Yes. I did ask that question.

And no. More gun control is not what is needed.

Gun requirement is what is needed.

---

Lol! yes, of course. The solution to gun violence is more guns.

Just like the solution to the meth problem is more meth. 

---

 It's not the same thing, welts.

Having gun free zones, like schools, stadiums, movie theaters, etc. Makes the general population, a sitting duck, for a madman with a gun.

If all the people, who have a license to carry, actually carried their guns, they could take out a crazy person, in a school. Or a stadium. Or a movie theater.

JMHO

---

I can just see myself dragging my hunting rifle around when I go to the movies or go shopping. 

---

 So don't, but why stop your neighbor from keeping his family safe. Just because it's not important for you to protect your family doesn't mean I won't do what I have to to keep mine safe.

---

There's absolutely nothing stopping my neighbour from getting a rifle or shotgun to keep his family safe.

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Tinydancer wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Fort Worth Mom wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

Yes. I did ask that question.

And no. More gun control is not what is needed.

Gun requirement is what is needed.

---

Lol! yes, of course. The solution to gun violence is more guns.

Just like the solution to the meth problem is more meth. 

---

 It's not the same thing, welts.

Having gun free zones, like schools, stadiums, movie theaters, etc. Makes the general population, a sitting duck, for a madman with a gun.

If all the people, who have a license to carry, actually carried their guns, they could take out a crazy person, in a school. Or a stadium. Or a movie theater.

JMHO

---

I can just see myself dragging my hunting rifle around when I go to the movies or go shopping. 

---

 So don't, but why stop your neighbor from keeping his family safe. Just because it's not important for you to protect your family doesn't mean I won't do what I have to to keep mine safe.

---

There's absolutely nothing stopping my neighbour from getting a rifle or shotgun to keep his family safe.

---

 Exactly. Are you really not able to see? Well when they're killing your family I'll stand aside so as not to hurt your sensibilities.

I know what to do_sometimes wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

Fort Worth Mom wrote:

---

weltschmerz wrote:

---

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

Yes. I did ask that question.

And no. More gun control is not what is needed.

Gun requirement is what is needed.

---

Lol! yes, of course. The solution to gun violence is more guns.

Just like the solution to the meth problem is more meth. 

---

 It's not the same thing, welts.

Having gun free zones, like schools, stadiums, movie theaters, etc. Makes the general population, a sitting duck, for a madman with a gun.

If all the people, who have a license to carry, actually carried their guns, they could take out a crazy person, in a school. Or a stadium. Or a movie theater.

JMHO

---

I can just see myself dragging my hunting rifle around when I go to the movies or go shopping. 

---

 This probably qualifies as the most ignorant statement of the day.  No one who carries to protect themselves would carry a "hunting rifle". I suggest you do research and learn about guns before posting anti-gun crap.

---

 In Canada they only have hunting rifles don't cha know...

Nope. Just wait for those who have the balls to protect you.

The pipe bombs found at the shooters home were made out of normal, everyday things you find at Home Depot.

Guess we need to lock up the pvc pipes, fertilizer, nails and whatever else they use.

Oh and RC cars. Cause they had on of those ready to bomb the event too.

lilyofcourse wrote:

---

How do you keep guns out of the hands of criminals?

---

 Oh, FFS, Lily...if any person knew the answer to that, the problem would be solved.

flan