TOTALLY GEEKED!

Tinydancer · Guru

RE: This isn't a few "radicals", this is the goal for the entire religion....

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

flan327 wrote:
I'll get back to you in 5 years...

flan

How many more people will be dead due to terrorist attacks in "gun-free" zones in the meantime?

Bonny22Pye · Guru

I read a few articles about the statement in the OP, but I can't find one from a mainstream news source. Basically a reporter says he said that and he say's he never did.

Lexxy · My dog name is Sasha, too!

Bonny22Pye wrote:
I read a few articles about the statement in the OP, but I can't find one from a mainstream news source. Basically a reporter says he said that and he say's he never did.

Thank you!

huskerbb · Guru

Dona Worry Be Happy wrote:
Sooooo. If 1.6 BILLION people are all terrorists, why one earth are any of us still alive? If entire governments are secretly radicals and want all non muslims to be destroyed, why haven't they yet?

How do you guys even believe the nonsense you post?

????? They have been trying to do so for centuries. Mostly, the Western world has fought back--from Charles "the Hammer" Martel on to the present day.

Pretty much, the religion has been isolated to the Middle East as a majority of the population--and where it is a minority, it doesn't have the power to wipe everyone out--but they are trying. Haven't you been paying attention to the news, lately?

huskerbb · Guru

Bonny22Pye wrote:
I read a few articles about the statement in the OP, but I can't find one from a mainstream news source. Basically a reporter says he said that and he say's he never did.

Of course he's not going to admit it publicly. THAT'S THE POINT.

Ohfour · Hooker

Here's audio of an imam here saying the same thing...

www.jihadwatch.org/2013/06/tennessee-imam-jews-and-christians-filthy-their-lives-and-property-can-be-taken-in-jihad-by-the-musl

huskerbb · Guru

People are so ignorant of history.

In 1979, Iran was the most Westernized country in the Middle East. Women had unprecedented rights there compared to the rest of the Muslim World. In urban areas, few even wore their burkhas, hijabs, or whatever. Their economy was rapidly becoming capitalist. They had a growing, educated, middle class, especially in the urban areas.

Why was the Shah overthrown? Was it because he was a corrupt, wealthy dictator with his foot on the neck of his people? Absolutely not. While he might have been corrupt, his people had freedoms found nowhere else in that part of the world.

Who overthrew him? The poor, downtrodden lower class? Again, absolutely not. It was an urban, educated, "intelligentsia" class who wanted to return to the former, conservative ways--Sharia Law.

Since 1979, Iran has been a backwater economically. It's people are FAR poorer than in 1979. There are fewer educated people, especially women. Rights and freedoms have been severely curtailed--especially for women.

You think this is some "radical" movement? They overthrew an entire government--and have held sway there for the last 30+ years.

Anyone who doesn't think they want to do the same thing anywhere they have the power to do so is a flat out idiot.

Look ANYWHERE in the world. Wherever Muslims are a majority--or even a sizeable minority--the people in those nations have FAR fewer rights than in Western nations.

All you who have flapping jaws about how this is some radical movement or whatever, find me ONE majority Muslim nation where they have rights on par with the U.S., Canada, Britain, or any other Western nation.

YOU CAN'T.

-- Edited by huskerbb on Tuesday 8th of December 2015 04:27:07 PM

just Czech · Give Me Grand's!

Ohfour wrote:
Here's audio of an imam here saying the same thing...

www.jihadwatch.org/2013/06/tennessee-imam-jews-and-christians-filthy-their-lives-and-property-can-be-taken-in-jihad-by-the-musl

Oh now, O4, the truth simply can not be heard.

just Czech · Give Me Grand's!

huskerbb wrote:
People are so ignorant of history.

In 1979, Iran was the most Westernized country in the Middle East. Women had unprecedented rights there compared to the rest of the Muslim World. In urban areas, few even wore their burkhas, hijabs, or whatever. Their economy was rapidly becoming capitalist. They had a growing, educated, middle class, especially in the urban areas.

Why was the Shah overthrown? Was it because he was a corrupt, wealthy dictator with his foot on the neck of his people? Absolutely not. While he might have been corrupt, his people had freedoms found nowhere else in that part of the world.

Who overthrew him? The poor, downtrodden lower class? Again, absolutely not. It was an urban, educated, "intelligentsia" class who wanted to return to the former, conservative ways--Sharia Law.

Since 1979, Iran has been a backwater economically. It's people are FAR poorer than in 1979. There are fewer educated people, especially women. Rights and freedoms have been severely curtailed--especially for women.

You think this is some "radical" movement? They overthrew an entire government--and have held sway there for the last 30+ years.

Anyone who doesn't think they want to do the same thing anywhere they have the power to do so is a flat out idiot.

Most people are aware of this history. Some chose to ignore the truth.

huskerbb · Guru

just Czech wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
People are so ignorant of history.

In 1979, Iran was the most Westernized country in the Middle East. Women had unprecedented rights there compared to the rest of the Muslim World. In urban areas, few even wore their burkhas, hijabs, or whatever. Their economy was rapidly becoming capitalist. They had a growing, educated, middle class, especially in the urban areas.

Why was the Shah overthrown? Was it because he was a corrupt, wealthy dictator with his foot on the neck of his people? Absolutely not. While he might have been corrupt, his people had freedoms found nowhere else in that part of the world.

Who overthrew him? The poor, downtrodden lower class? Again, absolutely not. It was an urban, educated, "intelligentsia" class who wanted to return to the former, conservative ways--Sharia Law.

Since 1979, Iran has been a backwater economically. It's people are FAR poorer than in 1979. There are fewer educated people, especially women. Rights and freedoms have been severely curtailed--especially for women.

You think this is some "radical" movement? They overthrew an entire government--and have held sway there for the last 30+ years.

Anyone who doesn't think they want to do the same thing anywhere they have the power to do so is a flat out idiot.
Most people are aware of this history. Some chose to ignore the truth.

I truly doubt that. While some do choose to ignore the truth, many others have no clue what it is.

just Czech · Give Me Grand's!

huskerbb wrote:
just Czech wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
People are so ignorant of history.

In 1979, Iran was the most Westernized country in the Middle East. Women had unprecedented rights there compared to the rest of the Muslim World. In urban areas, few even wore their burkhas, hijabs, or whatever. Their economy was rapidly becoming capitalist. They had a growing, educated, middle class, especially in the urban areas.

Why was the Shah overthrown? Was it because he was a corrupt, wealthy dictator with his foot on the neck of his people? Absolutely not. While he might have been corrupt, his people had freedoms found nowhere else in that part of the world.

Who overthrew him? The poor, downtrodden lower class? Again, absolutely not. It was an urban, educated, "intelligentsia" class who wanted to return to the former, conservative ways--Sharia Law.

Since 1979, Iran has been a backwater economically. It's people are FAR poorer than in 1979. There are fewer educated people, especially women. Rights and freedoms have been severely curtailed--especially for women.

You think this is some "radical" movement? They overthrew an entire government--and have held sway there for the last 30+ years.

Anyone who doesn't think they want to do the same thing anywhere they have the power to do so is a flat out idiot.
Most people are aware of this history. Some chose to ignore the truth.
I truly doubt that. While some do choose to ignore the truth, many others have no clue what it is.

I have a pretty strong memory of the aftermath of Komenie (sp).

Women were forced to hide, forced out of schools, jobs and of life in general. The World Women's Conferences of the 80's and 90's were filled with horror stories from inside Iran.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

I'm going to agree with Husker. I'm amazed at the general ignorance of history. What has happened to women in the Middle East is horrifying. It's one of the reasons I can't sympathize much with the uber feminists in this country. If women's rights were that important to them - they'd be fighting for the world b/c there are places where women are still nothing but property.

Ohfour · Hooker

Lawyerlady wrote:
I'm going to agree with Husker. I'm amazed at the general ignorance of history. What has happened to women in the Middle East is horrifying. It's one of the reasons I can't sympathize much with the uber feminists in this country. If women's rights were that important to them - they'd be fighting for the world b/c there are places where women are still nothing but property.

Absolutely.

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

Yet, there is not a peep from uber feminists about the treatment of women by Muslim cultures.

Ohfour · Hooker

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Yet, there is not a peep from uber feminists about the treatment of women by Muslim cultures.

Or gays...

FNW · Guru

Why do you suppose that is?

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

FNW wrote:
Why do you suppose that is?

Because HERE, in this beautiful country they are so fixated on changing, they can protest, speak, demand, and fight without impunity because of the freedoms and rights we have. Anywhere else, they would be in danger. They stand behind the protections of America while trying to corrupt it and change it from the inside. They better hope they don't win, or they will be very sorry they got what they wished for.

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

12311136_10205663876218607_8622304807906391577_n.jpg?oh=1ecc9991453f1178d08fcfed205979f2&oe=56E99C62

huskerbb · Guru

just Czech wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
just Czech wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
People are so ignorant of history.

In 1979, Iran was the most Westernized country in the Middle East. Women had unprecedented rights there compared to the rest of the Muslim World. In urban areas, few even wore their burkhas, hijabs, or whatever. Their economy was rapidly becoming capitalist. They had a growing, educated, middle class, especially in the urban areas.

Why was the Shah overthrown? Was it because he was a corrupt, wealthy dictator with his foot on the neck of his people? Absolutely not. While he might have been corrupt, his people had freedoms found nowhere else in that part of the world.

Who overthrew him? The poor, downtrodden lower class? Again, absolutely not. It was an urban, educated, "intelligentsia" class who wanted to return to the former, conservative ways--Sharia Law.

Since 1979, Iran has been a backwater economically. It's people are FAR poorer than in 1979. There are fewer educated people, especially women. Rights and freedoms have been severely curtailed--especially for women.

You think this is some "radical" movement? They overthrew an entire government--and have held sway there for the last 30+ years.

Anyone who doesn't think they want to do the same thing anywhere they have the power to do so is a flat out idiot.
Most people are aware of this history. Some chose to ignore the truth.
I truly doubt that. While some do choose to ignore the truth, many others have no clue what it is.
I have a pretty strong memory of the aftermath of Komenie (sp).
Women were forced to hide, forced out of schools, jobs and of life in general. The World Women's Conferences of the 80's and 90's were filled with horror stories from inside Iran.

That's you. You aren't most people. I doubt the average person on the street has any idea who you are talking about when you say "Shah of Iran." They have no idea who he is, where he ruled, when he ruled, what happened when he quit ruling.

Another of Carter's disasters.

I've talked history with you, before, and on most topics, you know your stuff. Half the people in the U.S. can't even tell you the year, let alone the day, when Abraham Lincoln was killed--they have no clue about the history of any other nation.

-- Edited by huskerbb on Tuesday 8th of December 2015 05:02:23 PM

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

huskerbb wrote:
just Czech wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
just Czech wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
People are so ignorant of history.

In 1979, Iran was the most Westernized country in the Middle East. Women had unprecedented rights there compared to the rest of the Muslim World. In urban areas, few even wore their burkhas, hijabs, or whatever. Their economy was rapidly becoming capitalist. They had a growing, educated, middle class, especially in the urban areas.

Why was the Shah overthrown? Was it because he was a corrupt, wealthy dictator with his foot on the neck of his people? Absolutely not. While he might have been corrupt, his people had freedoms found nowhere else in that part of the world.

Who overthrew him? The poor, downtrodden lower class? Again, absolutely not. It was an urban, educated, "intelligentsia" class who wanted to return to the former, conservative ways--Sharia Law.

Since 1979, Iran has been a backwater economically. It's people are FAR poorer than in 1979. There are fewer educated people, especially women. Rights and freedoms have been severely curtailed--especially for women.

You think this is some "radical" movement? They overthrew an entire government--and have held sway there for the last 30+ years.

Anyone who doesn't think they want to do the same thing anywhere they have the power to do so is a flat out idiot.
Most people are aware of this history. Some chose to ignore the truth.
I truly doubt that. While some do choose to ignore the truth, many others have no clue what it is.
I have a pretty strong memory of the aftermath of Komenie (sp).
Women were forced to hide, forced out of schools, jobs and of life in general. The World Women's Conferences of the 80's and 90's were filled with horror stories from inside Iran.
That's you. You aren't most people. I doubt the average person on the street has any idea who you are talking about when you say "Shah of Iran." They have no idea who he is, where he ruled, when he ruled, what happened when he quit ruling.
Another of Carter's disasters.

I've talked history with you, before, and on most topics, you know your stuff. Half the people in the U.S. can't even tell you the year, let alone the day, when Abraham Lincoln was killed--they have no clue about the history of any other nation.

-- Edited by huskerbb on Tuesday 8th of December 2015 05:02:23 PM

Which was the intended end result of Liberals taking over our schools and education. To create the current dumbed down Sheeple.

huskerbb · Guru

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
just Czech wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
just Czech wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
People are so ignorant of history.

In 1979, Iran was the most Westernized country in the Middle East. Women had unprecedented rights there compared to the rest of the Muslim World. In urban areas, few even wore their burkhas, hijabs, or whatever. Their economy was rapidly becoming capitalist. They had a growing, educated, middle class, especially in the urban areas.

Why was the Shah overthrown? Was it because he was a corrupt, wealthy dictator with his foot on the neck of his people? Absolutely not. While he might have been corrupt, his people had freedoms found nowhere else in that part of the world.

Who overthrew him? The poor, downtrodden lower class? Again, absolutely not. It was an urban, educated, "intelligentsia" class who wanted to return to the former, conservative ways--Sharia Law.

Since 1979, Iran has been a backwater economically. It's people are FAR poorer than in 1979. There are fewer educated people, especially women. Rights and freedoms have been severely curtailed--especially for women.

You think this is some "radical" movement? They overthrew an entire government--and have held sway there for the last 30+ years.

Anyone who doesn't think they want to do the same thing anywhere they have the power to do so is a flat out idiot.
Most people are aware of this history. Some chose to ignore the truth.
I truly doubt that. While some do choose to ignore the truth, many others have no clue what it is.
I have a pretty strong memory of the aftermath of Komenie (sp).
Women were forced to hide, forced out of schools, jobs and of life in general. The World Women's Conferences of the 80's and 90's were filled with horror stories from inside Iran.
That's you. You aren't most people. I doubt the average person on the street has any idea who you are talking about when you say "Shah of Iran." They have no idea who he is, where he ruled, when he ruled, what happened when he quit ruling.
Another of Carter's disasters.

I've talked history with you, before, and on most topics, you know your stuff. Half the people in the U.S. can't even tell you the year, let alone the day, when Abraham Lincoln was killed--they have no clue about the history of any other nation.

-- Edited by huskerbb on Tuesday 8th of December 2015 05:02:23 PM
Which was the intended end result of Liberals taking over our schools and education. To create the current dumbed down Sheeple.

But stuff like that wasn't taught in school, anyway. It isn't just that.

I can remember watching the fall of the Shah on TV--and I was like 10 years old. How many kids today watch the news? Oh sure, a shooting happens in California they might tune in for a bit--but even with all that's happened in the Crimea in the last few years, how many kids today could find it on a map?

FNW · Guru

I remember the fall of the Shah, too. I was a little older.

I really have no sympathy at all for the Muslim women. Particularly after San Bernardino.

Lindley · Guru

huskerbb wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
just Czech wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
just Czech wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
People are so ignorant of history.

In 1979, Iran was the most Westernized country in the Middle East. Women had unprecedented rights there compared to the rest of the Muslim World. In urban areas, few even wore their burkhas, hijabs, or whatever. Their economy was rapidly becoming capitalist. They had a growing, educated, middle class, especially in the urban areas.

Why was the Shah overthrown? Was it because he was a corrupt, wealthy dictator with his foot on the neck of his people? Absolutely not. While he might have been corrupt, his people had freedoms found nowhere else in that part of the world.

Who overthrew him? The poor, downtrodden lower class? Again, absolutely not. It was an urban, educated, "intelligentsia" class who wanted to return to the former, conservative ways--Sharia Law.

Since 1979, Iran has been a backwater economically. It's people are FAR poorer than in 1979. There are fewer educated people, especially women. Rights and freedoms have been severely curtailed--especially for women.

You think this is some "radical" movement? They overthrew an entire government--and have held sway there for the last 30+ years.

Anyone who doesn't think they want to do the same thing anywhere they have the power to do so is a flat out idiot.
Most people are aware of this history. Some chose to ignore the truth.
I truly doubt that. While some do choose to ignore the truth, many others have no clue what it is.
I have a pretty strong memory of the aftermath of Komenie (sp).
Women were forced to hide, forced out of schools, jobs and of life in general. The World Women's Conferences of the 80's and 90's were filled with horror stories from inside Iran.
That's you. You aren't most people. I doubt the average person on the street has any idea who you are talking about when you say "Shah of Iran." They have no idea who he is, where he ruled, when he ruled, what happened when he quit ruling.
Another of Carter's disasters.

I've talked history with you, before, and on most topics, you know your stuff. Half the people in the U.S. can't even tell you the year, let alone the day, when Abraham Lincoln was killed--they have no clue about the history of any other nation.

-- Edited by huskerbb on Tuesday 8th of December 2015 05:02:23 PM
Which was the intended end result of Liberals taking over our schools and education. To create the current dumbed down Sheeple.
But stuff like that wasn't taught in school, anyway. It isn't just that.

I can remember watching the fall of the Shah on TV--and I was like 10 years old. How many kids today watch the news? Oh sure, a shooting happens in California they might tune in for a bit--but even with all that's happened in the Crimea in the last few years, how many kids today could find it on a map?

Have you ever watched a segment of waters world on bill o'reily? He goes around and ask people questions like who won the civil war and other basic history questions. You would be surprised how little of history people don't know. A lot of them were college students.

Bonny22Pye · Guru

FNW wrote:
I remember the fall of the Shah, too. I was a little older.

I really have no sympathy at all for the Muslim women. Particularly after San Bernardino.

Thats sad. Most of these women are being brutalized by men, given little to no education and are trapped. They have no way of getting out of their situation.

just Czech · Give Me Grand's!

Bonny22Pye wrote:
FNW wrote:
I remember the fall of the Shah, too. I was a little older.

I really have no sympathy at all for the Muslim women. Particularly after San Bernardino.
Thats sad. Most of these women are being brutalized by men, given little to no education and are trapped. They have no way of getting out of their situation.

...and they live in the "religion of peace".

It's unbelievable that so many PC Americans fail to see that fact.

lilyofcourse · My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

just Czech wrote:
Bonny22Pye wrote:
FNW wrote:
I remember the fall of the Shah, too. I was a little older.

I really have no sympathy at all for the Muslim women. Particularly after San Bernardino.
Thats sad. Most of these women are being brutalized by men, given little to no education and are trapped. They have no way of getting out of their situation.
...and they live in the "religion of peace".
It's unbelievable that so many PC Americans fail to see that fact.

And they are the same ones who can't wrap their heads around the fact that if this "peaceful religion" continues, it will become the norm here.

FNW · Guru

Bonny22Pye wrote:
FNW wrote:
I remember the fall of the Shah, too. I was a little older.

I really have no sympathy at all for the Muslim women. Particularly after San Bernardino.
Thats sad. Most of these women are being brutalized by men, given little to no education and are trapped. They have no way of getting out of their situation.

Not to mention going on killing sprees...or are you saying this broad was justified because of her "suppression"?

Bonny22Pye · Guru

FNW wrote:
Bonny22Pye wrote:
FNW wrote:
I remember the fall of the Shah, too. I was a little older.

I really have no sympathy at all for the Muslim women. Particularly after San Bernardino.
Thats sad. Most of these women are being brutalized by men, given little to no education and are trapped. They have no way of getting out of their situation.
Not to mention going on killing sprees...or are you saying this broad was justified because of her "suppression"?

That's not what I said at all. I think its sad that you don't have sympathy for any of the Muslim women. The terrorist from S.B. should have been killed on site, but that doesn't mean their aren't lots and lots of women who want out of crazy Sharia law.

lilyofcourse · My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Wasn't the wife a willing participant?

FNW · Guru

Yes. And it was a woman who tried to lure police into a building to blow him up in Paris.

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

FNW wrote:
Bonny22Pye wrote:
FNW wrote:
I remember the fall of the Shah, too. I was a little older.

I really have no sympathy at all for the Muslim women. Particularly after San Bernardino.
Thats sad. Most of these women are being brutalized by men, given little to no education and are trapped. They have no way of getting out of their situation.
Not to mention going on killing sprees...or are you saying this broad was justified because of her "suppression"?

She lived in America. She could have walked away if she wanted too.

ed11563 · Guru

Lawyerlady wrote:
flan327 wrote:
I'll get back to you in 5 years...

flan
How many more people will be dead due to terrorist attacks in "gun-free" zones in the meantime?

How many people did the IRA kill in Ireland and England?

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Bonny22Pye wrote:
FNW wrote:
I remember the fall of the Shah, too. I was a little older.

I really have no sympathy at all for the Muslim women. Particularly after San Bernardino.
Thats sad. Most of these women are being brutalized by men, given little to no education and are trapped. They have no way of getting out of their situation.

EXACTLY.

flan

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Unfortunately, these shootings have taken on a life of their own. It's a snowball effect, period.

flan

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

And a meme is hardly a reliable source...

flan

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

flan327 wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Unfortunately, these shootings have taken on a life of their own. It's a snowball effect, period.
flan

In other words, of course Obama bears NO responsibility for any of it! confuse

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

flan327 wrote:
And a meme is hardly a reliable source...

flan

Is it wrong? Then post some link that is "accurate" according to you.

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

flan327 wrote:
Bonny22Pye wrote:
FNW wrote:
I remember the fall of the Shah, too. I was a little older.

I really have no sympathy at all for the Muslim women. Particularly after San Bernardino.
Thats sad. Most of these women are being brutalized by men, given little to no education and are trapped. They have no way of getting out of their situation.
EXACTLY.
flan

Uh huh. So, where are all the so called great champions of women flan? W struck down the Taliban who were brutalizing women. Where are the liberal champions FOR Muslim women and children across the globe? There aren't any. Why flan?

huskerbb · Guru

flan327 wrote:
Bonny22Pye wrote:
FNW wrote:
I remember the fall of the Shah, too. I was a little older.

I really have no sympathy at all for the Muslim women. Particularly after San Bernardino.
Thats sad. Most of these women are being brutalized by men, given little to no education and are trapped. They have no way of getting out of their situation.
EXACTLY.
flan

Exactly what? You seem to support the very system that does that.

huskerbb · Guru

huskerbb wrote:
People are so ignorant of history.

In 1979, Iran was the most Westernized country in the Middle East. Women had unprecedented rights there compared to the rest of the Muslim World. In urban areas, few even wore their burkhas, hijabs, or whatever. Their economy was rapidly becoming capitalist. They had a growing, educated, middle class, especially in the urban areas.

Why was the Shah overthrown? Was it because he was a corrupt, wealthy dictator with his foot on the neck of his people? Absolutely not. While he might have been corrupt, his people had freedoms found nowhere else in that part of the world.

Who overthrew him? The poor, downtrodden lower class? Again, absolutely not. It was an urban, educated, "intelligentsia" class who wanted to return to the former, conservative ways--Sharia Law.

Since 1979, Iran has been a backwater economically. It's people are FAR poorer than in 1979. There are fewer educated people, especially women. Rights and freedoms have been severely curtailed--especially for women.

You think this is some "radical" movement? They overthrew an entire government--and have held sway there for the last 30+ years.

Anyone who doesn't think they want to do the same thing anywhere they have the power to do so is a flat out idiot.

Look ANYWHERE in the world. Wherever Muslims are a majority--or even a sizeable minority--the people in those nations have FAR fewer rights than in Western nations.
All you who have flapping jaws about how this is some radical movement or whatever, find me ONE majority Muslim nation where they have rights on par with the U.S., Canada, Britain, or any other Western nation.

YOU CAN'T.

-- Edited by huskerbb on Tuesday 8th of December 2015 04:27:07 PM

<crickets chirping>

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

Yup. Christianized nations are where women have freedom.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Yup. Christianized nations are where women have freedom.

Is that supposed to surprise anyone?

flan

just Czech · Give Me Grand's!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry3NzkAOo3s

Can someone help me post this video from youtube, please. It is really worth watching.

Peaceful people are irrelevant.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msLNVMufJEg

I think this is the correct link.

-- Edited by just Czech on Wednesday 9th of December 2015 04:54:06 PM

huskerbb · Guru

flan327 wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Yup. Christianized nations are where women have freedom.
Is that supposed to surprise anyone?
flan

Yet you rail against Christianity at every turn and support Muslims every chance you get.

flan327 · Itty bitty's Grammy

huskerbb wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Yup. Christianized nations are where women have freedom.
Is that supposed to surprise anyone?
flan
Yet you rail against Christianity at every turn and support Muslims every chance you get.

I don't "rail." I just get so tired of the air of superiority that some posters exude.

I don't believe that every Muslim is a terrorist (or should that be TERRORIST!!!!!)

flan

huskerbb · Guru

It doesn't matter if they are a "terrorist", or not. The goal of the religion is the same whether it comes by way of terror, or simply becoming the majority in a certain state or area.

If you don't believe it--then find ONE example in history where Muslims have become the majority and that society has more rights after that than before.

Lawyerlady · On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

flan327 wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Yup. Christianized nations are where women have freedom.
Is that supposed to surprise anyone?
flan
Yet you rail against Christianity at every turn and support Muslims every chance you get.
I don't "rail." I just get so tired of the air of superiority that some posters exude.
I don't believe that every Muslim is a terrorist (or should that be TERRORIST!!!!!)
flan

Yes, you really do. You make digs at Christianity every chance you get, you argue against Christian beliefs. You are the second most anti-Christian on the board. If you can't see that in yourself, some self-reflection is in order.

Lady Gaga Snerd · Guru

flan327 wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
flan327 wrote:
Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Yup. Christianized nations are where women have freedom.
Is that supposed to surprise anyone?
flan
Yet you rail against Christianity at every turn and support Muslims every chance you get.
I don't "rail." I just get so tired of the air of superiority that some posters exude.
I don't believe that every Muslim is a terrorist (or should that be TERRORIST!!!!!)
flan

Do you even read what you write? Nobody said every Muslim is a terrorist. Not at all. I think i have said 100x that not every German was a Nazi. Not every Russian is a comunist, blah, blah. So, what? We are at war with ideology that is killing Americans. We can continue allowing the deaths of INNOCENT people here or we can really to target and fight and yes, sorry, but some of their Innocents are going to get to killed as is the nature of war. We arent' attacking them. They are attacking us. Wake up.

WYSIWYG · Guru

huskerbb does have a point. Never in history has society progressed towards equality anywhere the Muslims are or were in control. That's not to say that all Muslims are bad. But the religion itself is not one that's conducive to individual rights, especially the rights of women. The facts speak for themselves.