TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Taylor Swift Wants To Trademark 'Swiftmas'


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Taylor Swift Wants To Trademark 'Swiftmas'
Permalink  
 


Taylor Swift Wants To Trademark 'Swiftmas'

Like anyone was using it anyway.

 12/13/2015 02:06 pm ET
Hugo Hu/LP5 via Getty Images
 

Taylor Swift is taking care of business. 

The pop star wants to trademark five phrases associated with her album "1989" to prevent others from cashing in on her success by merchandising clothes, printed materials, retail websites and concerts featuring her lyrics and famous phrases. 

Swift filed trademark applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Dec. 3 for "Blank Space," "And I'll Write Your Name," "A Girl Named Girl," "1989" and "Swiftmas," according toUSA Today

We understand wanting to trademark song lyrics and titles, but "Swiftmas?" Seriously? We're surprised "Squad" didn't make the list, considering how often she flaunted her ever-expanding group of girlfriends over the past year. 

This isn't the first time the 26-year-old has taken action to protect her brand. In January, she trademarked a slew of Swifty soundbites like "Party Like It's 1989," "This Sick Beat," "Cause We Never Go Out Of Style" and "Nice to Meet You. Where You Been?"

Our reaction to this can best be summed up by the photo Swift shared on her Instagram Sunday to celebrate her 26th birthday. 

But if you, too, were born in 1989, don't freak out yet. The trademark application for that year only applies to the numbers in this “stylized form,” according to BuzzFeed. 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/taylor-swift-trademark-1989_566d9f6ce4b0fccee16ee890
 
 


__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't know why someone gets to own language? "This sick beat"? Yeah, that was in one of her songs but that has been in other songs long before her. Not sure why she gets to buy Language? Seems pretty greedy and narcisssitic.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

She is becoming the Gwyneth or Kanye of her genre.

The best thing that ever happened to one of her songs was when it was used in a parody.

The parody is way better.

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

1989 is too general to be trademarked. It is the year I graduated and I'll be damned if I'm going to pay her a royalty every time I write "class of 1989" on my Facebook wall.

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Oh, FFS!

flan

__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



My dog name is Sasha, too!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6679
Date:
Permalink  
 

"Swiftmas" seems like the only one that should/could be trademarked. The others are just too general IMO.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 649
Date:
Permalink  
 

I have heard worse.

"Eat more... " comes to mind.


__________________

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nice to meet you. Where you been? Like she invented these phrases? Can I get a trademark on Hello, Goodbye, How are you? and so forth? Sheesh.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Nothing's Impossible

Status: Offline
Posts: 16913
Date:
Permalink  
 

She can have swiftmas. I don't think that word will ever come out of my mouth.

__________________

A person's a person no matter how small.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

It just did. You owe her $100,000.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Give Me Grand's!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13802
Date:
Permalink  
 

Oh for crying out loud.

She's an a$$.

__________________

I drink coffee so I don't kill you.

I quilt so I don't kill you.

Do you see a theme?

Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.



Nothing's Impossible

Status: Offline
Posts: 16913
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yeah, I just lost a lot of respect for her.

__________________

A person's a person no matter how small.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Oh she should trademark A$$.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Give Me Grand's!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13802
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Oh she should trademark A$$.


Hey, that's MY trademark. She can't have the money for my work.  



__________________

I drink coffee so I don't kill you.

I quilt so I don't kill you.

Do you see a theme?

Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.



Give Me Grand's!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13802
Date:
Permalink  
 

...err a$$.

__________________

I drink coffee so I don't kill you.

I quilt so I don't kill you.

Do you see a theme?

Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3029
Date:
Permalink  
 

I agree with others that have said that she can have "Swiftmas", I can't think of a single reason for anyone to ever use that "word" anyway.

__________________


Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

She seems like a real ditz.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

She seems like a real ditz.


 She's no ditz.  She's a cutthroat business woman.  She's very smart.  Her parents have ammassed weath and i think her parents are like investment bankers or something.  Anyway, she is in the know when it comes to money.  Seems she has a roving band of lawyers at her beck and call.



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Southern_Belle wrote:

Yeah, I just lost a lot of respect for her.


 I don't know that I ever had any to begin with...

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

She's actually a really nice girl. And I think she's a good role model.

I think this is something her law team pushed through.

__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ohfour wrote:

She's actually a really nice girl. And I think she's a good role model.

I think this is something her law team pushed through.


 She's immensely talented and very smart.  But, I don't know why she needs lawyers trolling for issues.  Maybe it keeps them on her payroll gravy train.



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Hooker

Status: Offline
Posts: 12666
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Ohfour wrote:

She's actually a really nice girl. And I think she's a good role model.

I think this is something her law team pushed through.


 She's immensely talented and very smart.  But, I don't know why she needs lawyers trolling for issues.  Maybe it keeps them on her payroll gravy train.


Entertainment lawyers are as bad as ambulance chasers. There is nothing they will not do...



__________________

America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...



Regular

Status: Offline
Posts: 332
Date:
Permalink  
 

Honestly, most of it is to protect herself. She is not going to sue people for posting 1989 on their Facebook walls. But she is going to go after anyone who uses 1989 in Reference to herself or her work, especially when done in an objectionable manner, without permission.

It makes it easier to get a cease and desist if you own the "rights".

And I honestly do not blame her. If I wrote the lyrics and melody to a song, I would not want it sampled by a hardcore rapper in a mysoginistic rap or by a car company trying to hawk this year's latest model (while I find Fight Song to be on the insipid side, using it to sell fords most definitely takes away from the message).

Its about ownership of your intellectual property and I just cannot fault or make fun of her for going to the extremes.

__________________
“One day, you will be old enough to start reading fairytales again.” C.S.Lewis


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ilumine wrote:

Honestly, most of it is to protect herself. She is not going to sue people for posting 1989 on their Facebook walls. But she is going to go after anyone who uses 1989 in Reference to herself or her work, especially when done in an objectionable manner, without permission.

It makes it easier to get a cease and desist if you own the "rights".

And I honestly do not blame her. If I wrote the lyrics and melody to a song, I would not want it sampled by a hardcore rapper in a mysoginistic rap or by a car company trying to hawk this year's latest model (while I find Fight Song to be on the insipid side, using it to sell fords most definitely takes away from the message).

Its about ownership of your intellectual property and I just cannot fault or make fun of her for going to the extremes.


 Really?  I don't see all these other stars doing this?



__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

None of this makes me look at her and go WOW. She still seems flighty to me. Swiftmas? How dumb. You can have it.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Regular

Status: Offline
Posts: 332
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:
Ilumine wrote:

Honestly, most of it is to protect herself. She is not going to sue people for posting 1989 on their Facebook walls. But she is going to go after anyone who uses 1989 in Reference to herself or her work, especially when done in an objectionable manner, without permission.

It makes it easier to get a cease and desist if you own the "rights".

And I honestly do not blame her. If I wrote the lyrics and melody to a song, I would not want it sampled by a hardcore rapper in a mysoginistic rap or by a car company trying to hawk this year's latest model (while I find Fight Song to be on the insipid side, using it to sell fords most definitely takes away from the message).

Its about ownership of your intellectual property and I just cannot fault or make fun of her for going to the extremes.


 Really?  I don't see all these other stars doing this?


 Really?  Because in 2012 TufAmerica lost it's lawsuit (on behalf of the band Trouble Funk) against the BeastiBoys NOT because the "samples" were too small/short or because the Boy's song transformed the sample enough, but because TufAmerica did not get the correct copyright; i.e. exclusive copyright vs the right to sue on behalf of the original musician's behalf. 

That means that the Beastie Boys get to make money using TufAmerica's creativity and work.  

Are you honestly telling me that if you wrote a song, painted a painting or created a new recipe, you would be perfectly OK with someone else using your hard work and ingenuity to make sales without your permission or providing you profit?  You seem to have issue with people on social services using your hard earned tax dollars without work.  

The same situation happened with the JayZ lawsuit.  The judge did not dismiss the case because JayZ and Timberland did NOT steal a sample for one of their biggest hits, but because the person suing did not have "standing" to sue (i.e. the nephew of the original artist), which is WHY JayZ and Timberland thought that it was perfectly OK to use someone else's work to make their work easier or better. 

And how many Stars have to take on Politicians for using their music as anthems?  Donald Trump using Neil Young's song?  Reagan using Born in the USA and Pink Houses? Sting getting pissed that both Dole and Bush tried to use "Brand New Day".  Sam Moore and Obama using "Hold on, Im Coming".  

If you write an amazing anthem type song, would you be happy if someone you do not support uses it to promote themselves and their political stance?  

I just find it really interesting that you don't seem to support this.  

 



__________________
“One day, you will be old enough to start reading fairytales again.” C.S.Lewis


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 649
Date:
Permalink  
 

The little reading I did pointed out there is a difference between copyright and trademark. You can trademark more general terms. The example given was Madonna trademarked Madonna and was able to shutdown Madonna.com, a porn site at the time.

__________________

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard