I'm asking questions. Looking for, waiting for, one of you to provide the proof. The reasoning.
Can you answer my question?
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
And you still can not answer why two cells in a pond can't create a beating heart at some point in the last 2000 years.
Nor can she explain how eyes, ears or anything else. Except to say "millions and millions of years" Well, the human body would not survive over millions and millions. All of those things have to occur simultaneously. Oh, and just IGNORE the FACT that it takes LIFE to beget LIFE. Pretend otherwise. Uh huh.
And you still can not answer why two cells in a pond can't create a beating heart at some point in the last 2000 years.
Nor can she explain how eyes, ears or anything else. Except to say "millions and millions of years" Well, the human body would not survive over millions and millions. All of those things have to occur simultaneously. Oh, and just IGNORE the FACT that it takes LIFE to beget LIFE. Pretend otherwise. Uh huh.
And you still can not answer why two cells in a pond can't create a beating heart at some point in the last 2000 years.
BECAUSE IT'S ONLY 2000 YEARS!!
So in 2000 years, there has been no proof that evolution actually happened.
It's all conjecture and supposition.
"Could have", "might have", "possibility".
But you want to mock and kill the actual creation of a child in utero. A progression of two cells actually forming a whole, working and functioning being.
Creation always bests evolution.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
I'm asking questions. Looking for, waiting for, one of you to provide the proof. The reasoning.
Can you answer my question?
Do you believe that Dinosaurs walked on Earth before humans?
How do you think the fossils came to be?
Yes. There were dinosaurs. What an odd question.
And what do fossils have to do with anything?
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
And you still can not answer why two cells in a pond can't create a beating heart at some point in the last 2000 years.
Nor can she explain how eyes, ears or anything else. Except to say "millions and millions of years" Well, the human body would not survive over millions and millions. All of those things have to occur simultaneously. Oh, and just IGNORE the FACT that it takes LIFE to beget LIFE. Pretend otherwise. Uh huh.
-- Edited by weltschmerz on Sunday 27th of December 2015 08:15:00 PM
The eye is developed in utero. Stem cells.
However. An eye will not evolve out of nothing.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
And you still can not answer why two cells in a pond can't create a beating heart at some point in the last 2000 years.
BECAUSE IT'S ONLY 2000 YEARS!!
So in 2000 years, there has been no proof that evolution actually happened.
It's all conjecture and supposition.
"Could have", "might have", "possibility".
But you want to mock and kill the actual creation of a child in utero. A progression of two cells actually forming a whole, working and functioning being.
Creation always bests evolution.
Agian, I have no idea what you`re babbling about. Evidently, you don`t have a handle on this evolution thing.
Maybe you should read something besides the bible.
And you still can not answer why two cells in a pond can't create a beating heart at some point in the last 2000 years.
BECAUSE IT'S ONLY 2000 YEARS!!
So in 2000 years, there has been no proof that evolution actually happened.
It's all conjecture and supposition.
"Could have", "might have", "possibility".
But you want to mock and kill the actual creation of a child in utero. A progression of two cells actually forming a whole, working and functioning being.
Creation always bests evolution.
Agian, I have no idea what you`re babbling about. Evidently, you don`t have a handle on this evolution thing.
Maybe you should read something besides the bible.
You keep posting articles that say may, and possibly, and probably, and yet take them as proof and expect us to also. We're smarter than that...
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
And you still can not answer why two cells in a pond can't create a beating heart at some point in the last 2000 years.
BECAUSE IT'S ONLY 2000 YEARS!!
So in 2000 years, there has been no proof that evolution actually happened.
It's all conjecture and supposition.
"Could have", "might have", "possibility".
But you want to mock and kill the actual creation of a child in utero. A progression of two cells actually forming a whole, working and functioning being.
Creation always bests evolution.
Agian, I have no idea what you`re babbling about. Evidently, you don`t have a handle on this evolution thing.
Maybe you should read something besides the bible.
That's funny. I haven't brought up the bible. You did.
And you say I am rambling when I use scientific facts to make my argument.
So if that is babbling.
What are you doing?
You haven't offered anything.
Articles full of possibilities and maybe but nothing solid.
I'm waiting for a good reason why your evolution can not produce a single beating heart in the last 2000 years.
But I will widen the net.
Since the creation of man.
Why has there not been another heart suddenly start beating in any part of the world?
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
And you still can not answer why two cells in a pond can't create a beating heart at some point in the last 2000 years.
BECAUSE IT'S ONLY 2000 YEARS!!
So in 2000 years, there has been no proof that evolution actually happened.
It's all conjecture and supposition.
"Could have", "might have", "possibility".
But you want to mock and kill the actual creation of a child in utero. A progression of two cells actually forming a whole, working and functioning being.
Creation always bests evolution.
Agian, I have no idea what you`re babbling about. Evidently, you don`t have a handle on this evolution thing.
Maybe you should read something besides the bible.
You keep posting articles that say may, and possibly, and probably, and yet take them as proof and expect us to also. We're smarter than that...
Where is your proof of creation? You take an old book of myths written by ancient goat-herders in the Bronze Age as proof and expect me to believe it also. I'm smarter than that.
Fossils are proof of what? Dead animals? There have been spark plugs that have been found to be fossilized. I presume those aren't MILLIONS of years old.
If you could read, I've never said there is proof. Its a belief. Youre the one saying there is proof. So I ask you to supply that...
Fossils. Fossils are proof, not a belief.
Lol! Fossils can be 10 years old. A fossil cannot be dated exactly. Even carbon dating has been proven wrong several times. Theres no proof of evolution anyway. There is proof that something existed. Show me how that proves evolution.
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
And you still can not answer why two cells in a pond can't create a beating heart at some point in the last 2000 years.
BECAUSE IT'S ONLY 2000 YEARS!!
So in 2000 years, there has been no proof that evolution actually happened.
It's all conjecture and supposition.
"Could have", "might have", "possibility".
But you want to mock and kill the actual creation of a child in utero. A progression of two cells actually forming a whole, working and functioning being.
The Bible says Adam and Eve were told to REPLENISH the earth.
What and who was outside the garden? Where did Cain get his wife?
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
OMG, you can't possibly be serious! You really are gullible, aren't you? Those weren't found in ancient geodes.
And neither has proof of evolution.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
If you could read, I've never said there is proof. Its a belief. Youre the one saying there is proof. So I ask you to supply that...
Fossils. Fossils are proof, not a belief.
Lol! Fossils can be 10 years old. A fossil cannot be dated exactly. Even carbon dating has been proven wrong several times. Theres no proof of evolution anyway. There is proof that something existed. Show me how that proves evolution.
Lol! No, it can't. A fossil is a remnant, trace or impression from a former geological age.
10 years ago is not a former geological age.
Jesus Christ! It's like having a debate with a porcini mushroom. I give up.
If you could read, I've never said there is proof. Its a belief. Youre the one saying there is proof. So I ask you to supply that...
Fossils. Fossils are proof, not a belief.
Lol! Fossils can be 10 years old. A fossil cannot be dated exactly. Even carbon dating has been proven wrong several times. Theres no proof of evolution anyway. There is proof that something existed. Show me how that proves evolution.
Lol! No, it can't. A fossil is a remnant, trace or impression from a former geological age.
10 years ago is not a former geological age.
Jesus Christ! It's like having a debate with a porcini mushroom. I give up.
At least you could saute the mushroom in butter & garlic...
Some people obviously don't know what the word proof means or faith for that matter. I belive in the Creation because I have faith. You believe in evolution because you have proof. Oh wait, you have maybe, could be, or might be. None of which means proof just in case you didn't understand.
__________________
“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.” ― Julia Child ―
The Bible says Adam and Eve were told to REPLENISH the earth.
What and who was outside the garden? Where did Cain get his wife?
WTF does any of that have to do with evolution?
Because your book says God zapped Adam and Eve in toto and in situ, then evolution can't possibly be true?
You have no idea what you're talking about. Take an elementary biology class. Please.
Uh... I was responding to Ed.
And in my biology classes, life can never come from nothing.
In my environmental classes, life can never come from nothing.
In advanced microbiology, life can never come from nothing.
There is always a driving force. Life begets life.
Period. Plan and simple.
And again, I did not bring the bible into this.
YOU are the one who began mocking it and God.
I've asked you for proof of evolution. You mocked my Bible and my God.
I asked you to explain how creation can do in a relatively short amount of time that your evolution can not do in a millenia. You claim you can't understand the question and again insult.
So my conclusion is, you have no proof.
And that means there is no longer a need to give your argument an ounce of consideration.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
There will never be a way to prove that God exists, yet you believe.
flan
My proof is personal. I have EXPERIENCED God. I have felt Him. I have heard Him. Have you experienced evolution?
Again, I'm not claiming proof of creation. I claim belief, yet you and people like Welts claim proof of evolution without a shred of evidence. Hey, if you like to think your ancestors were swamp goo, who am I to argue? Mine certainty weren't.
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...
The Bible says Adam and Eve were told to REPLENISH the earth.
What and who was outside the garden? Where did Cain get his wife?
WTF does any of that have to do with evolution?
Because your book says God zapped Adam and Eve in toto and in situ, then evolution can't possibly be true?
You have no idea what you're talking about. Take an elementary biology class. Please.
Uh... I was responding to Ed.
And in my biology classes, life can never come from nothing.
In my environmental classes, life can never come from nothing.
In advanced microbiology, life can never come from nothing.
There is always a driving force. Life begets life.
Period. Plan and simple.
And again, I did not bring the bible into this.
YOU are the one who began mocking it and God.
I've asked you for proof of evolution. You mocked my Bible and my God.
I asked you to explain how creation can do in a relatively short amount of time that your evolution can not do in a millenia. You claim you can't understand the question and again insult.
So my conclusion is, you have no proof.
And that means there is no longer a need to give your argument an ounce of consideration.
Of course she has no proof. Its called posturing, and people who claim proof of evolution are very well versed in that...
__________________
America guarantees equal opportunity, not equal outcome...