Evolution teaches that COMPLEX life forms evolved from simple life forms. There is no natural law to explain this. Mutations tend to destroy genetic information. From where did all this complex genetic information come from? Insects don't evolve into more complex Non-insects because they don't have the genes to do that. You cannot evolve into a higher life form and some how gain a massive amount of genetic information. It's NONSENSICAL.
We are trying to debate. It is Welts who is chiming in with the slams on religion, the "if you believe in creation you are stupid" type comments and so forth. A debate is a back and forth discussion flan. That seems to bother you that people just don't automatically agree.
-- Edited by Lady Gaga Snerd on Monday 28th of December 2015 04:58:31 PM
It's completely pointless to debate anything when you have the most nonsensical arguments like fossils being 10 years old and garbage evolving into Swiss watches and corgis.
That's why I refuse to do it any more. It's like arguing with the moronic Ray Comfort or Bill "The earth is the only planet with a moon and nobody can explain the tides" O'Reilly.
Why don't you address Ed's post about life created from non-life in a lab? I see everyone avoided it like the plague.
It's completely pointless to debate anything when you have the most nonsensical arguments like fossils being 10 years old and garbage evolving into Swiss watches and corgis.
That's why I refuse to do it any more. It's like arguing with the moronic Ray Comfort or Bill "The earth is the only planet with a moon and nobody can explain the tides" O'Reilly.
Why don't you address Ed's post about life created from non-life in a lab? I see everyone avoided it like the plague.
The point about the swiss watches was valid. That random processes do NOT produce complex and well put together instruments. In fact it would be far MORE plausible for a swiss watch to spontaneously occur which isn't even a living thing versus what you are saying.
I said I'm done arguing with moronic statements made by people who have no clue what they're talking about and I meant it.
There is nothing "moronic" about the points i have made. You simply cannot have a debate without resorting to your name calling or running away. LOL!!!!
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
If you want to make fun of someone for believing in creation.
You don't use evolution.
Evolution can not be proven.
It is conjecture and supposition.
There is no fact in may, could, possibly or might.
It's a guess.
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Who are they? And where did all those chemicals, heat, pressure and otherconditions come from?
__________________
A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.
Fossils do not prove evolution. All fossils prove is that there was once a living being that died and became ensconced in a preservation material in conditions conducive to causing the fossilization process to take place. Also, fossils are, at best, a snapshot of previously alive beings since they only show what that being looked like at death. Of course, one must take into account that conditions (weather, soil, whatever) most likely affected the fossil in some way.
I've studied evolution extensively and there is nothing that explains HOW life came to be. Evolution explains changes in organisms over time. It does not explain how those organisms came to be. Evolution, by definition, requires something from which to evolve. Something cannot evolve out of nothing. There had to have been a creation event (or even a series of creation events) in order for evolution to even happen. I believe God is the Creator.
YOU are stating evolution as a truth. Prove it. Orove that Nothing created something. Lets go.
No problem. Fossils.
Fossils prove that life arose from nonlife? That nothing existed and then something came into existence? And, fossils prove evolution? Funny, but i always thought a fossil was simply a dead animal skeleton encased in a rock.