TOTALLY GEEKED!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Help! Should My Daughter’s Girlfriend Stay With Us if Her Parents Don’t Know She’s Gay?


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Help! Should My Daughter’s Girlfriend Stay With Us if Her Parents Don’t Know She’s Gay?
Permalink  
 


Help! Should My Daughter’s Girlfriend Stay With Us if Her Parents Don’t Know She’s Gay?

 

Q. Houseguest or no?: My 16-year-old daughter is gay. This past summer, she met a girl on our family vacation who was at first a close friend but whom she now considers to be her girlfriend. Because they live on opposite coasts, all of their contact is via text/Skype. While they were still just friends, I promised my daughter that the other girl could come and stay with us for the summer. Recently, I suggested that my daughter give the other girl’s parents my number so that we could discuss details. That is when my daughter disclosed that her friend’s parents have no idea that she is involved with another girl and would “kill her” if they found out. She is begging me for secrecy. I don’t want to kill my daughter’s romance, and I certainly don’t want to out someone against her will, but I also don’t feel comfortable lying to another parent about the nature of a visit. To me, a “girlfriend” visit and a “friend” visit are different, and a parent of a 16-year-old has the right to determine if it is appropriate or not. Advice?

A: I’m not sure if “they would kill her” is standard teenage hyperbole or if your daughter’s girlfriend is at actual risk of physical violence from her homophobic family. LGBT youth face a much higher risk of violence and homelessness after being rejected by their family of origin. You’re absolutely right not to want to out her, in any case. Talk with your daughter about her girlfriend’s living situation. Is she in immediate danger? Does she have a place to stay if her family discovers her orientation and throw her out? While it’s understandable that you don’t want to host your daughter’s girlfriend in the same way you would have happily hosted a platonic friend, it’s possible that you and your family can be a resource for this poor girl.

You may not feel comfortable hosting her under the guise of “just friendship,” but perhaps you could arrange for her to stay with a family friend so the two of them could see one another without temporarily moving in together. If that still doesn’t sit well with you, I think it’s fine to tell your daughter you have separate sleepover rules for friends and girlfriends, and now that they’re dating, you can’t host this girl in your home, but I hope that you can continue to offer support and acceptance to her. It sounds like she’s going to need it.

Q. Re: Houseguest or no?: Let your daughter’s girlfriend visit. I remember being young, scared, and queer at age 16 (10 years ago now). Having my girlfriend’s parents welcome me into their home was an incredible relief, since my own parents were very homophobic. Have them sleep in separate bedrooms, and lay down whatever rules you want, but don’t cancel the visit. If your daughter’s girlfriend is closeted, traveling across the country to a place where she can actually be herself for a little while will be so incredibly freeing. It’s probably something she desperately needs.

 

A: I’m inclined to agree.

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

No.


__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Rib-it! Rrrib-it!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24026
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't know why we're supposed to have MORE compassion and leniency for them because they're gay. If the answer is no sex in the house and no mates/dates spend the night then that is the rule no matter who you sleep with.

__________________


“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I'll rise!”
Maya Angelou



Frozen Sucks!

Status: Offline
Posts: 24384
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

I don't know why we're supposed to have MORE compassion and leniency for them because they're gay. If the answer is no sex in the house and no mates/dates spend the night then that is the rule no matter who you sleep with.


 



-- Edited by I know what to do_sometimes on Monday 4th of January 2016 08:27:47 PM

__________________

Sometimes you're the windshield, and sometimes you're the bug.

Frozen is the bestest movie ever, NOT!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Huh? She's 16 and mom is gonna move in her lover? Wth!

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Are there any parents that want to be parents.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Mod/Penguin lover/Princess!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13089
Date:
Permalink  
 

I know what to do_sometimes wrote:
Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

I don't know why we're supposed to have MORE compassion and leniency for them because they're gay. If the answer is no sex in the house and no mates/dates spend the night then that is the rule no matter who you sleep with.


 



-- Edited by I know what to do_sometimes on Monday 4th of January 2016 08:27:47 PM


Times 100!

What the heck? 



__________________

Ohioan by birth, Texan by choice!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Prudie's response here was HORRIBLE.

She basically ignored the issue of them being more than friends and set up a double standard since it was a female.

She NEVER would have given that advice if we were talking a 16 year old boy wanting to stay with his girlfriend and not wanting said girlfriend's parent to tell his parents about it.

__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Mod/Penguin lover/Princess!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13089
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:

Prudie's response here was HORRIBLE.

She basically ignored the issue of them being more than friends and set up a double standard since it was a female.

She NEVER would have given that advice if we were talking a 16 year old boy wanting to stay with his girlfriend and not wanting said girlfriend's parent to tell his parents about it.


The "New Prudie" is off to a rough start.

She's only 29.

She doesn't have enough life experience to be giving advice to the parents of teenagers.

JMHO.

 



__________________

Ohioan by birth, Texan by choice!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Fort Worth Mom wrote:
huskerbb wrote:

Prudie's response here was HORRIBLE.

She basically ignored the issue of them being more than friends and set up a double standard since it was a female.

She NEVER would have given that advice if we were talking a 16 year old boy wanting to stay with his girlfriend and not wanting said girlfriend's parent to tell his parents about it.


The "New Prudie" is off to a rough start.

She's only 29.

She doesn't have enough life experience to be giving advice to the parents of teenagers.

JMHO.

 


I don't think that overall she's so bad--but she did really miss the boat here, and I think her age and inexperience is a factor in that.  

 

I understand, to a degree, her concern for the kid--BUT--that does not trump parental rights.  Plus, there is really ZERO evidence that her parents would harm her in any way.

 

Parents say they'll "kill" their teenagers over lots of things--but it's an expression, not a literal threat.  "I'm going to kill that kid.".  

 

If there is truly a concern, then the LW doesn't have to "out" the kid--but neither does she have to go behind the other parents' back and allow this.  Just say no.  It's possible.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

I don't know why we're supposed to have MORE compassion and leniency for them because they're gay. If the answer is no sex in the house and no mates/dates spend the night then that is the rule no matter who you sleep with.


 I agree 100%



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

IMHO, parents who think they can keep their 16 y.o. kids from continuing to have sex are mistaken.

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

What an idiot parent.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Give Me Grand's!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13802
Date:
Permalink  
 

Good gosh, talk about double standards.

Just say NO. Simple really.

__________________

I drink coffee so I don't kill you.

I quilt so I don't kill you.

Do you see a theme?

Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

ed11563 wrote:

IMHO, parents who think they can keep their 16 y.o. kids from continuing to have sex are mistaken.

 


  Parents may not be able to stop them but doesn't mean they have to make it easier.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Exactly.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Mod/Penguin lover/Princess!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13089
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Fort Worth Mom wrote:
huskerbb wrote:

Prudie's response here was HORRIBLE.

She basically ignored the issue of them being more than friends and set up a double standard since it was a female.

She NEVER would have given that advice if we were talking a 16 year old boy wanting to stay with his girlfriend and not wanting said girlfriend's parent to tell his parents about it.


The "New Prudie" is off to a rough start.

She's only 29.

She doesn't have enough life experience to be giving advice to the parents of teenagers.

JMHO.

 


I don't think that overall she's so bad--but she did really miss the boat here, and I think her age and inexperience is a factor in that.  

 

I understand, to a degree, her concern for the kid--BUT--that does not trump parental rights.  Plus, there is really ZERO evidence that her parents would harm her in any way.

 

Parents say they'll "kill" their teenagers over lots of things--but it's an expression, not a literal threat.  "I'm going to kill that kid.".  

 

If there is truly a concern, then the LW doesn't have to "out" the kid--but neither does she have to go behind the other parents' back and allow this.  Just say no.  It's possible.


I don't think overall that she's so bad, husker.

I'm sure she means well. And wants to do a good job as the new Prudie.

But, here is where she's coming from.

She's young. Only 29.

She's gay. (So, I think that is going to have some effect on her answers, to questions like these.)

She's not a parent. Not even of a toddler. Let alone, a teenager.

I'm sorry. I can't take her advice very seriously.

Not on these sorts of questions.

Again, JMHO.



__________________

Ohioan by birth, Texan by choice!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

When I was 19, my 17 y.o. gf and her 16 y.o. sister went on the Pill at the same time. Their mother knew her daughters, and wasn't ready to be a grandparent. 

 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Give Me Grand's!

Status: Offline
Posts: 13802
Date:
Permalink  
 

ed11563 wrote:

When I was 19, my 17 y.o. gf and her 16 y.o. sister went on the Pill at the same time. Their mother knew her daughters, and wasn't ready to be a grandparent. 

 


 This has nothing to do with two female lesbians. I doubt they will need the pill.



__________________

I drink coffee so I don't kill you.

I quilt so I don't kill you.

Do you see a theme?

Faith isn't something that keeps bad things from happening. Faith is what helps us get through bad things when they do happen.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4882
Date:
Permalink  
 

I like her answer. What's wrong with letting this young lady stay with a family friend for the duration of the visit?
Outing her is absolutely the wrong thing to do.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

For the summer? No i wouldnt take some neighbor's 16 yr old in for the summer.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Fort Worth Mom wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Fort Worth Mom wrote:
huskerbb wrote:

Prudie's response here was HORRIBLE.

She basically ignored the issue of them being more than friends and set up a double standard since it was a female.

She NEVER would have given that advice if we were talking a 16 year old boy wanting to stay with his girlfriend and not wanting said girlfriend's parent to tell his parents about it.


The "New Prudie" is off to a rough start.

She's only 29.

She doesn't have enough life experience to be giving advice to the parents of teenagers.

JMHO.

 


I don't think that overall she's so bad--but she did really miss the boat here, and I think her age and inexperience is a factor in that.  

 

I understand, to a degree, her concern for the kid--BUT--that does not trump parental rights.  Plus, there is really ZERO evidence that her parents would harm her in any way.

 

Parents say they'll "kill" their teenagers over lots of things--but it's an expression, not a literal threat.  "I'm going to kill that kid.".  

 

If there is truly a concern, then the LW doesn't have to "out" the kid--but neither does she have to go behind the other parents' back and allow this.  Just say no.  It's possible.


I don't think overall that she's so bad, husker.

I'm sure she means well. And wants to do a good job as the new Prudie.

But, here is where she's coming from.

She's young. Only 29.

She's gay. (So, I think that is going to have some effect on her answers, to questions like these.)

She's not a parent. Not even of a toddler. Let alone, a teenager.

I'm sorry. I can't take her advice very seriously.

Not on these sorts of questions.

Again, JMHO.


I agree here.  She really missed the boat on this one. 



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

weltschmerz wrote:

I like her answer. What's wrong with letting this young lady stay with a family friend for the duration of the visit?
Outing her is absolutely the wrong thing to do.


Absurd.  It's NOT a "family friend".  It's their teenage child's lover.

 

If this was a boy and they were boyfriend/girlfriend that advice would be absolutely stupid.  Because it's a girl, it's still stupid--but some people have stupid double standards.  



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

ed11563 wrote:

When I was 19, my 17 y.o. gf and her 16 y.o. sister went on the Pill at the same time. Their mother knew her daughters, and wasn't ready to be a grandparent. 

 


So fvcking what?  That is IRRELEVANT. 

 

You can decide that crap for YOUR children--you don't get to do so for someone else's.

 

Plus, if you hadn't noticed, these are both FEMALE, so they don't need the damn pill.   



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9186
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
ed11563 wrote:

When I was 19, my 17 y.o. gf and her 16 y.o. sister went on the Pill at the same time. Their mother knew her daughters, and wasn't ready to be a grandparent. 

 


So fvcking what?  That is IRRELEVANT. 

 

You can decide that crap for YOUR children--you don't get to do so for someone else's.

 

Plus, if you hadn't noticed, these are both FEMALE, so they don't need the damn pill.   


I reckon that I am more liberal than you are. 



__________________

The Principle of Least Interest: He who cares least about a relationship, controls it.

Always misinterpret when you can.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1586
Date:
Permalink  
 


perhaps a better question might be whether the new prudie should consider a career change

__________________

" the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. "--edmund burke

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3029
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't know why we're supposed to have MORE compassion and leniency for them because they're gay. If the answer is no sex in the house and no mates/dates spend the night then that is the rule no matter who you sleep with.
- Nobody Just Nobody

_______________________________

This is where I'm at also.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3029
Date:
Permalink  
 

I agree here. She really missed the boat on this one.
- huskerbb

_____________________________

Missed the boat? Prudie didn't even make it to the harbor.

__________________


Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:

I like her answer. What's wrong with letting this young lady stay with a family friend for the duration of the visit?
Outing her is absolutely the wrong thing to do.


Absurd.  It's NOT a "family friend".  It's their teenage child's lover.

 

If this was a boy and they were boyfriend/girlfriend that advice would be absolutely stupid.  Because it's a girl, it's still stupid--but some people have stupid double standards.  


 The GF would be staying with a family friend. It's called a compromise.

And who knows if they're actually lovers, or just toying with the idea? How long was the family vacation where they met? A week? Two weeks?

Too many questions...

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Vette's SS!!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2297
Date:
Permalink  
 

They were friends when they parted, and they have only been gfs over the internet. There is zero chance of pregnancy, and both parents already agreed to the summer long visit, canceling now leads to a lot of awkward questions and hurt feeling all around, and as long as rules are in place and they are sleeping in separate rooms, I see very little downside to this arrangement.
I guess it wouldn't faze me at all.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Oh balonely! Being sexually active isn't only about getting pregnant. You need to time to develop your maturity and character and not have a lot of confusing situations and feelings. So, as a parent, you job is to protect your child's purity at a tender age . You don't go out of your way to set up situations to make this easy for them. Nope. I don't give a rip if this is 'awkward" to cancel now. You call the parents and say "I am sorry, we have had a change of plans and will not be able to accomodate and entertain your daughter for the summer". Period. You don't have to explain why.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

BTW, teens actually WANT boundaries. So, mom didn't know she was involved with her and thought they were friends. So, the daughter told her upfront. Good for her daughter for doing so but it is also highly possible that this is far too intense for her as well and maybe she wants mom to be the ADULT in the room. Not that it matters either way, cuz my answer would be NO. It would be no different if my sons said 'We are going to move our gf's in for the summer". Umm...no.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

BTW, it's January, i think they have ample to time to find other summer plans for their daughter. Sheesh.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

I find it interesting that was think gay sex is somehow different. When Mayor McGreevy was Boohooing over cheating on his wife with his male lover, everyone was soooo sympathetic. WTH! Adultery is adultery whether you are sleeping with a man or a woman you are cheating on your marital vows.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

Allowing my teenage daughter or son to have their boyfriend or girlfriend move in is not parenting. I can't believe people think this is ok. Making it easy for your children to have sex makes zero sense unless promiscuity is what you want to teach.

__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

ed11563 wrote:

When I was 19, my 17 y.o. gf and her 16 y.o. sister went on the Pill at the same time. Their mother knew her daughters, and wasn't ready to be a grandparent. 

 


 ed - the reason for teenagers NOT to have sex is more than just pregnancy. 

 

And PARENTS, real parents, should not be ENDORSING teenage sex in their home.



__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



On the bright side...... Christmas is coming! (Mod)

Status: Offline
Posts: 27192
Date:
Permalink  
 

Is this Prudie even a parent, yet?

__________________

LawyerLady

 

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. 



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lawyerlady wrote:

Is this Prudie even a parent, yet?


 I thought someone upthread said that she wasn't.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



My spirit animal is a pink flamingo.

Status: Offline
Posts: 38325
Date:
Permalink  
 

I wouldn't want anyone to stay the whole Summer.

That'd get on my last nerve.

__________________

A flock of flirting flamingos is pure, passionate, pink pandemonium-a frenetic flamingle-mangle-a discordant discotheque of delirious dancing, flamboyant feathers, and flamingo lingo.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 25897
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yeah. First of all , I am not going to accept responsibility for someone else's kid for an entire summer.

__________________

https://politicsandstuff.proboards.com/



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lady Gaga Snerd wrote:

Yeah. First of all , I am not going to accept responsibility for someone else's kid for an entire summer.


 I'd have to know the girl better before I agreed.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

ed11563 wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
ed11563 wrote:

When I was 19, my 17 y.o. gf and her 16 y.o. sister went on the Pill at the same time. Their mother knew her daughters, and wasn't ready to be a grandparent. 

 


So fvcking what?  That is IRRELEVANT. 

 

You can decide that crap for YOUR children--you don't get to do so for someone else's.

 

Plus, if you hadn't noticed, these are both FEMALE, so they don't need the damn pill.   


I reckon that I am more liberal than you are. 


 You are, but that is also irrelevant.  You can make whatever decisions you want to for YOUR child.  If you want to invite over your daughters 16 Year old boyfriend and throw them a box of condoms, then fine--AS LONG AS his parents are ok with it.  You don't get to unilaterally decide that is ok for their child, as well.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
weltschmerz wrote:

I like her answer. What's wrong with letting this young lady stay with a family friend for the duration of the visit?
Outing her is absolutely the wrong thing to do.


Absurd.  It's NOT a "family friend".  It's their teenage child's lover.

 

If this was a boy and they were boyfriend/girlfriend that advice would be absolutely stupid.  Because it's a girl, it's still stupid--but some people have stupid double standards.  


 The GF would be staying with a family friend. It's called a compromise.

And who knows if they're actually lovers, or just toying with the idea? How long was the family vacation where they met? A week? Two weeks?

Too many questions...

flan


 No, there isn't.  The LW's daughter wants her mom to be deliberately deceptive to another teens parents.  That is not cool in any way.

if LW mom is fine with this arrangement, then be honest with the other parent and see if they feel the same.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

Dona Worry Be Happy wrote:

They were friends when they parted, and they have only been gfs over the internet. There is zero chance of pregnancy, and both parents already agreed to the summer long visit, canceling now leads to a lot of awkward questions and hurt feeling all around, and as long as rules are in place and they are sleeping in separate rooms, I see very little downside to this arrangement.
I guess it wouldn't faze me at all.


 So you would be fine with other parents lying to you?  That's what you would be doing to them.

 

hey mom, I'm going to stay at cindis house--while cindis mom leaves out the part where she and her daughter snort coke together and want your daughter to join them.  

 

That wouldnt "faze" you?  Really?



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.



Itty bitty's Grammy

Status: Offline
Posts: 28124
Date:
Permalink  
 

huskerbb wrote:
Dona Worry Be Happy wrote:

They were friends when they parted, and they have only been gfs over the internet. There is zero chance of pregnancy, and both parents already agreed to the summer long visit, canceling now leads to a lot of awkward questions and hurt feeling all around, and as long as rules are in place and they are sleeping in separate rooms, I see very little downside to this arrangement.
I guess it wouldn't faze me at all.


 So you would be fine with other parents lying to you?  That's what you would be doing to them.

 

hey mom, I'm going to stay at cindis house--while cindis mom leaves out the part where she and her daughter snort coke together and want your daughter to join them.  

 

That wouldnt "faze" you?  Really?


 Snorting coke is a universe away from being a lesbian.

flan



__________________

You are my sun, my moon, and all of my stars.



Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

I wouldn't lie to another parent. I mean there is already a great deal of trust they are putting in you to send their child to you for months, don't take advantage of that. Either the parents know the whole truth or it doesn't happen, although in my house this example wouldn't be happening at all. Bf/gf don't spend the night.

__________________


Vette's SS

Status: Offline
Posts: 5001
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Dona Worry Be Happy wrote:

They were friends when they parted, and they have only been gfs over the internet. There is zero chance of pregnancy, and both parents already agreed to the summer long visit, canceling now leads to a lot of awkward questions and hurt feeling all around, and as long as rules are in place and they are sleeping in separate rooms, I see very little downside to this arrangement.
I guess it wouldn't faze me at all.


 So you would be fine with other parents lying to you?  That's what you would be doing to them.

 

hey mom, I'm going to stay at cindis house--while cindis mom leaves out the part where she and her daughter snort coke together and want your daughter to join them.  

 

That wouldnt "faze" you?  Really?


 Snorting coke is a universe away from being a lesbian.

flan


 It's the principle that the girls parents have a right to know the nature of the visit.  Staying the summer at a friend's house vs staying the summer at a lovers house. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6573
Date:
Permalink  
 

NAOW wrote:

I wouldn't lie to another parent. I mean there is already a great deal of trust they are putting in you to send their child to you for months, don't take advantage of that. Either the parents know the whole truth or it doesn't happen, although in my house this example wouldn't be happening at all. Bf/gf don't spend the night.


 thumbsup.gif



__________________

“Until I discovered cooking, I was never really interested in anything.”
― Julia Child ―


 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 10215
Date:
Permalink  
 

flan327 wrote:
huskerbb wrote:
Dona Worry Be Happy wrote:

They were friends when they parted, and they have only been gfs over the internet. There is zero chance of pregnancy, and both parents already agreed to the summer long visit, canceling now leads to a lot of awkward questions and hurt feeling all around, and as long as rules are in place and they are sleeping in separate rooms, I see very little downside to this arrangement.
I guess it wouldn't faze me at all.


 So you would be fine with other parents lying to you?  That's what you would be doing to them.

 

hey mom, I'm going to stay at cindis house--while cindis mom leaves out the part where she and her daughter snort coke together and want your daughter to join them.  

 

That wouldnt "faze" you?  Really?


 Snorting coke is a universe away from being a lesbian.

flan


 Good God is that a dumb post.   this has NOTHING to do with being a lesbian.  

It primarily has to do with lying to another parent--do you want other parents lying to you about your child? 

 

Secondarily ly it has to do with two teenagers who want to be sexually active in one parent's home.  even IF you are ok with that, and even IF you don't like the comparison to drugs--what gives you the fvcking right to make decisions about sexual activity for SOMEONE ELSE'S child? 

Who died and made you God?  That is the height of arrogance.



__________________

I'm not arguing, I'm just explaining why I'm right.

 

Well, I could agree with you--but then we'd both be wrong.

FNW


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 18703
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nobody Just Nobody wrote:

I don't know why we're supposed to have MORE compassion and leniency for them because they're gay. If the answer is no sex in the house and no mates/dates spend the night then that is the rule no matter who you sleep with.


 This.



__________________

#it's5o'clocksomewhere

1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard